Skip to main content

Unternehmerische Gelegenheiten: Nutzung von narrativen Interviews zur Untersuchung von Wendepunkten im Leben von Nachhaltigkeitsunternehmerinnen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gelegenheitsfenster für nachhaltigen Konsum

Zusammenfassung

Nachhaltigkeitsorientiertes Unternehmer*innentum gewinnt – nicht zuletzt ob seiner steigenden Relevanz für die Lösung akuter sozialer und ökologischer Probleme – auch in der Forschung an Bedeutung. Frauen wird hier besonderes Potenzial zugeschrieben, das jedoch bislang noch nicht ausreichend gehoben wird. Enormer Forschungsbedarf liegt daher auf der Schnittstelle „Women-Sustainability-Entrepreneurship“. Da Grundlage jeden unternehmerischen Handelns die Identifikation und Ergreifung unternehmerischer Gelegenheiten ist, soll dies im Mittelpunkt unseres Artikels stehen. Wir führen Elemente der Entrepreneurship-, Nachhaltigkeits- und Gender-Forschung zusammen und stellen vor, wie die Entstehung nachhaltiger, von Frauen entwickelter Geschäftsideen untersucht werden kann. Eine Analyse von Lebensläufen mit besonderem Blick auf die Gründungsgeschichten und der Vergleich unterschiedlicher Orientierungsrahmen mithilfe von narrativen Interviews und der dokumentarischen Methode kann zeigen, wie Frauen nachhaltigkeitsorientierte unternehmerische Gelegenheitsfenster identifizieren und öffnen, um erfolgreiche Nachhaltigkeitsunternehmen zu gründen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    In der Literatur werden, oft synonym, die Begriffe Sustainable Entrepreneurship (z. B. Johnson & Schaltegger 2020) oder auch Sustainability-related Entrepreneurship (z. B. Konys, 2019) genutzt. Wir verwenden neben den deutschsprachigen Begriffen in unserem Artikel den Begriff Sustainability Entrepreneurship, um Verwechslungen mit dem Begriff Sustainable Entrepreneurship im Sinne langfristigen Erfolgs bzw. Bestehens am Markt zu vermeiden, beziehen uns aber durchaus auch auf Studien, die den Begriff Sustainable Entrepreneurship im Sinne einer (ganzheitlichen) Nachhaltigkeitsorientierung nutzen.

  2. 2.

    TEA steht für Total Entrepreneurial Activity.

Literatur

  • Alfalih, A. A. (2021). The Role of Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Corporate Social Performance on Social Innovation: The Case of the Private Industrial Sector in Saudi Arabia. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arasti, Z., Rezayee, S. O., Zarei, B., & Panahi, S. M. S. (2012). A qualitative study on environmental factors affecting Iranian women entrepreneurs’ growth orientation. Journal of Management and Strategy, 3(2), 39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argade, P., Salignac, F., & Barkemeyer, R. (2021). Opportunity identification for sustainable entrepreneurship: Exploring the interplay of individual and context level factors in India. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3528–3551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asantea, E. A., & Affum-Osei, E. (2019). Entrepreneurship as a career choice: The impact of locus of control on aspiring entrepreneurs’ opportunity recognition. Journal of Business Research, 98, 227–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azmi, K. M., Latif, A. S. A., & Wahab, S. A. (2020). Entrepreneurship ecosystems and sustainable entrepreneurship ecosystems. Conference Paper, Putra Businss School Research and Innovation Colloquium, 3, 25 November 2020, Serdang, UPM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacq, S., & Janssen, F. (2011). The multiple faces of social entrepreneurship: A review of definitional issues based on geographical and thematic criteria. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 23(56), 373–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belz, F. M., & Binder, J. K. (2017). Sustainable entrepreneurship: A convergent process model. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berge, E., & Kuckertz, A. (2016). Female entrepreneurship in startup ecosystems worldwide. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5163–5168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, J. K., & Belz, F. M. (2015). Sustainable entrepreneurship: what it is. In Handbook of entrepreneurship and sustainable development research. Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blok, V., Gremmen, B., & Wesselink, R. (2016). Dealing with the wicked problem of sustainability: The role of individual virtuous competence. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 34(3), 297–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohnsack, R. (1999). Dokumentarische Methode. Rekonstruktive Sozialforschung. VS Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bohnsack, R. (2003). Dokumentarische Methode und sozialwissenschaftliche Hermeneutik. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 6, 550–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohnsack, R. (2007). Rekonstruktive Sozialforschung: Einführung in qualitative Methoden (6. Aufl.). Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohnsack, R., Hoffmann, N. F., & Nentwig-Gesemann, I. (2019). Typenbildung und Dokumentarische Methode. In Amling, S., Geimer, A., Schondelmayer, A.-C., Stützel, K., & Thomsen, S. (Hrsg.), Jahrbuch Dokumentarische Methode (S. 17–50). Centrum für qualitative evaluations- und Sozialforschung e.V. (ces) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brixiová, Z., & Kangoye, T. (2016). Gender and constraints to entrepreneurship in Africa: New evidence from Swaziland. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 5, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, J., et al. (2019). Role models and women entrepreneurs: entrepreneurial superwoman has her say. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(1), 154–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacciotti, G., & Hayton, J. (2014). Fear of failure and entrepreneurship: A review and direction for future research. Enterprise Research Center, Research Paper, 24(1), 1–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caliyurt, K. (2016). Women and sustainability in Business: A global perspective. Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardella, G. M., Hernández-Sánchez, B. R., & Sánchez-García, J. C. (2020). Women entrepreneurship: A systematic review to outline the boundaries of scientific literature. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 1557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choongo, P., et al. (2016). Factors influencing the identification of sustainable opportunities by SMEs: Empirical evidence from Zambia. Sustainability, 8(1), 81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, A., & Dixon, S. E. (2006). Green-works: A model for combining social and ecological entrepreneurship. In Social entrepreneurship (S. 214–234). Palgrave Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B., & Winn, M. (2007). Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P. (2015). Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualization. Journal Business Venturing, 30, 674–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P. (2017). A future of entrepreneurship research: Domain, data, theory, and impact. The Wiley handbook of entrepreneurship, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew, E., & Humbert, A. L. (2012). ,Men have careers, women have babies‘: Unequal parental care among Irish entrepreneurs. Community, Work & Family, 15(1), 49–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R., Liere, K. V., Mertig, A., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of social issues, 56(3), 425–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H., Gregersen, H. B., & Christensen, C. (2008). Entrepreneur behaviors, opportunity recognition, and the origins of innovative ventures. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(4), 317–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elam, A. B., Brush, C. G., Greene, P. G., Baumer, B., Dean, M., & Heavlow, R. (2019). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2018/2019 women’s entrepreneurship report. Babson College, Smith College, and the Global Entrepreneurship Research Association (GERA). July 21, 2020: https://www.gemconsortium.org/report/gem-20182019-womens-entrepreneurship-report.

  • Eller, F. J., Gielnik, M. M., Wimmer, H., Thölke, C., Holzapfel, S., Tegtmeier, S., & Halberstadt, J. (2020). Identifying business opportunities for sustainable development: Longitudinal and experimental evidence contributing to the field of sustainable entrepreneurship. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1387–1403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelen, A., & von Gagen, C. (2017). Opportunity Recognition. 15 Ansätze für mehr Unternehmenswachstum. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engler, S. (2001). „In Einsamkeit und Freiheit“? Zur Konstruktion der wissenschaftlichen Persönlichkeit auf dem Weg zur Professur. UVK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T., & Stephan, U. (2014). Educated) women and men differ: Social and commercial entrepreneurship compared (summary. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 34(15), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farny, S., & Binder, J. K. (2021). Sustainable Entrepreneurship. World Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship, 605–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Rosenthal, W., & Rosenthal, G. (1997). Narrationsanalyse biographischer Selbstpräsentation. Sozialwissenschaftliche Hermeneutik (S. 133–164). VS Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, H., & Mitterer, G. (2009). Opportunity recognition–state of the art und Forschungsperspektiven. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 79(3), 367–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs-Heinritz, W. (2005). Biographische Kommunikation im Alltag. In Biographische Forschung (S. 13–84). VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadar, K., & Yunus, N. K. Y. (2009). The Influence of Personality and Socio-Economic Factors on Female Entrepreneurship Motivations in Malaysia. International Review of Business Research Papers, 5(1), 149–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galera, G., & Borzaga, C. (2009). Social Enterprise: An international overview of it’s conceptual evolution and legal implementation. Social Enterprise Journal, 5(3), 210–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, M.-C., & Welter, F. (2013). Gender identities and practices: Interpreting women entrepreneurs’ narratives. International Small Business Journal, 31(4), 384–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gast, J., Gundolf, K., & Cesinger, B. (2017). Doing business in a green way: A systematic review of the ecological sustainability entrepreneurship literature and future research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 147, 44–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, G., Kotha, R., Parikh, P., Alnuaimi, T., & Bahaj, A. S. (2016). Social structure, reasonable gain, and entrepreneurship in Africa. Strategic Management Journal, 37(6), 1118–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2010). Grounded theory: Strategien qualitativer Forschung. Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glinka, H. J. (2008). Das narrative Interview in seinen zentralen Analyseschritten. 66. Dgvt.

    Google Scholar 

  • González, F., Marshall, G., & Naidu, S. (2017). Start-up Nation? Slave wealth and entrepreneurship in Civil War in Maryland. The Journal of Economic History, 77(2), 373–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregoire, D. A., Shepherd, D. A., & Schurer Lambert, L. (2010). Measuring opportunity-recognition beliefs: Illustrating and validating an experimental approach. Organizational Research Methods, 13(1), 114–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guclu, A., Dees, J. G., & Anderson, B. B. (2002). The process of social entrepreneurship: Creating opportunities worthy of serious pursuit. Center for the advancement of social entrepreneurship, 1, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halabisky, D. (2018). Policy brief on women’s entrepreneurship. OECD/European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halberstadt, J., & Hölzner, H. (2018). Social Entrepreneurship. In A. Grundwald & A. Langer (Hrsg.), Sozialwirtschaft (S. 592–605). Nomos.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Halberstadt, J., & Hölzner, H. (2020). Perspectives on scaling social impact. International Journal Entrepreneurial Venturing, 12(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halberstadt, J., & Spiegler, A. B. (2018). SHEstainability: How relationship networks influence the idea generation in opportunity recognition process by female social entrepreneurs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 10(2), 202–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallward-Driemeier, M. (2013). Enterprising women: Expanding economic opportunities in Africa. World Banks Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanohov, R., & Baldacchino, L. (2017). Opportunity recognition in sustainable entrepreneurship: An exploratory study. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 24(2), 333–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hisrich, R. D., & Peters, M. P. (1995). Entrepreneurship (3 Aufl.). Irwin/McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofsta, N. (2007). Sustainable entrepreneurship in dialogue. Progress in Industrial Ecology, an International Journal, 4(6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, X., Marlow, S., Zimmermann, A., Martin, L., & Frank, R. (2020). Understanding opportunities in social entrepreneurship: A critical realist abstraction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(5), 1032–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, K. D. (2006). Exploring Motivation and Success among Canadian women entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 19(2), 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humbert, A. L. (2012). Women as social entrepreneurs. Third sector research center (TSRC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huysentruyt, M. (2014). Women’s social entrepreneurship and innovation. OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, J. E., & Brush, C. G. (2013). Research on women entrepreneurs: Challenges to (and from) the broader entrepreneurship literature? Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 663–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, I.-M. (2020). Turning Points. In L. Lane & M. Wallengren-Lynch (Hrsg.), Narratives of social work practice and education in Sweden (S. 47–58). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P., & Schaltegger, S. (2020). Entrepreneurship for sustainable development: A review and multilevel causal mechanism framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(6), 1141–1173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kariv, D. (2013). Female entrepreneurship and the new venture creation: An international overview. Taylor & Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, D. et al. (2011). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: Global Report 2010. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, D. et al. (2013). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: Global Report 2012. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, D. et al. (2015). GEM special report: Women’s entrepreneurship. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, D. et al. (2017): Women’s entrepreneurship 2016/2017 Report. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koe, W. L., Omar, R., & Sa’ari, J. R. (2015). Factors influencing propensity to sustainable entrepreneurship of SMEs in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 570–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konys, A. (2019). Towards sustainable entrepreneurship holistic construct. Sustainability, 11(23), 6749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, S., Burtscher, J., Vallaster, C., & Angerer, M. (2018). Sustainable entrepreneurship orientation: A reflection on status-quo research on factors facilitating responsible managerial practices. Sustainability, 10(2), 444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Küsters, I. (2009). Das narrative Interview im Forschungsprozess. Narrative Interviews: Grundlagen und Anwendungen. In Abels, H., Fuchs-Heinritz, W., Jäger, W., & Schimank, U. (Hrsg.), Hagener Studientexte zur Soziologie (S. 39–176). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langowitz, N., & Minniti, M. (2007). The entrepreneurial propensity of women. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(3), 341–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehner, O. M., & Kansikas, J. (2012). Opportunity recognition in social entrepreneurship: A thematic meta analysis. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 21(1), 25–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, S., Ahmed, H., & Apostolopoulos, D. (2021). Facilitators for coping with the COVID-19 pandemic: Online qualitative interviews comparing youth with and without disabilities. Disability and Health Journal, 14(4), 101–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littlewood, D., & Hold, D. (2015). Social entrepreneurship in South Africa: Exploring the influence of environment. Business & Society, 57(3), 525–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMullen, J. S., & Shepherd, D. A. (2006). Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 132–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, L. (2011). Overcoming the gender gap: Women entrepreneurs as economic drivers. SSRN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi, N. & Heshmati, S. (2021). Entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: A bibliometric overview and clustering analysis. In World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moya-Clemente, I., Ribes-Giner, G., & Pantoja-Díaz, O. (2020). Configurations of sustainable development goals that promote sustainable entrepreneurship over time. Sustainable Development, 28(4), 572–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, P., & Dimov, D. (2017). The call of the whole in understanding the development of sustainable ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(4), 632–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musona, J., Puumalainen, K., Sjögrén, H., & Vuorio, A. (2021). Sustainable entrepreneurship at the bottom of the pyramid: An identity-based perspective. Sustainability, 13(2), 812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nohl, A.-M. (2017). Interview und Dokumentarische Methode. Anleitungen für die Forschungspraxis (5. Aufl.). Springer Fachmedien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohl, A.-M. (2009). Interview und Dokumentarische Methode. Anleitung für die Forschungspraxis (3. Aufl.). VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oevermann, U. (1972). Sprache und soziale Herkunft: Ein Beitrag zur Analyse schichtspezifischer Sozialisationsprozesse und ihrer Bedeutung für den Schulerfolg. Suhrkamp

    Google Scholar 

  • Olenga Tete, P., Wunsch, M., & Menke, C. (2018). Deutscher social entrepreneurship monitor 2018. Social Entrepreneurship Netzwerk Deutschland e.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea, G., Farny, S., & Hakala, H. (2021). The buzz before business: A design science study of a sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small Business Economics, 56, 1097–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ost-Westdeutsche Grenze ist kein Zitat, sondern nur ein Beispiel in Klammern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Outsios, G., & Farooqi, S. A. (2017). Gender in sustainable entrepreneurship: Evidence from the UK. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 32(3), 183–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrish, B., & Foxon, T. (2009). Sustainability entrepreneurship and equitable transitions to a low-carbon economy. Greener Management International, 55, 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pansera, M.; Angel F. A. & Felix J. P. (2011). Eco-entrepreneurship in developing countries: The case of renewable energy sector in Bolivia. ICSB World Conference Proceedings, Washington. International Council of Small Business (ICSB), S. 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patzelt, H., & Shepherd, D. A. (2011). Recognizing opportunities for sustainable development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(4), 631–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ploum, L., Blok, V., Lans, T., & Omta, O. (2017). Toward a validated competence framework for sustainable entrepreneurship. Organization & environment, 31(2), 113–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ploum, L., Blok, V., Lans, T., & Omta, O. (2018). Exploring the relation between individual moral antecedents and entrepreneurial opportunity recognition for sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 1582–1591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. N., & Eddleston, K. A. (2013). Linking Family-to-business enrichment and support to entrepreneurial success: Do female and male entrepreneurs experience different outcomes? Journal of Business Venturing, 28(2), 261–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raheem, S. (2012). Sustainability Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Development. International Journal of Research and Sustainable Development, 4(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reicherts, J. (1986). Probleme qualitativer Sozialforschung: Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Objektiven Hermeneutik. Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizk, R., Rashed, A., & Rizk, R. (2019). Trends and Patterns of Women’s Entrepreneurship in Egypt. In Economic Research Forum (ERF).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, G. (1993). Reconstruction of life stories: Principles of selection in generating stories for narrative biographical interviews. The narrative study of lives, 1(1), 59–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmons, J. (2009). Online interviews in real time. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmons, J. (2014). Qualitative online interviews: Strategies, design, and skills. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarango-Lalangui, P., Santos, J. L. S., & Hormiga, E. (2018). The development of sustainable entrepreneurship research field. Sustainability, 10(6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarfaraz, L., Faghih, N., & Majd, A. A. (2014). The relationship between women entrepreneurship and gender equality. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 4(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S. (2011). Sustainability as a driver for corporate economic success: Consequences for the development of sustainability management control. Society and Economic, 33(1), 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Innovation: Categories and Interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20, 222–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpe, K., & Wunsch, M. (2020). Deutscher Social Entrepreneurship Monitor 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlange, L. E. (2009). Stakeholder Identification in Sustainability Entrepreneurship. The Role of Managerial and Organisational Cognition. Greener Management International, 55, 13–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schondelmayer, A.-C., Dörner, O., Loos, P., & Schäffer, B. (Hrsg.). (2019). Dokumentarische Methode: Triangulation und blinde Flecken. Verlag Barbara Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütze, F. (1976). Zur Hervorlockung und Analyse von Erzählungen thematisch relevanter Geschichten im Rahmen soziologischer Feldforschung: Dargestellt an einem Projekt zur Erforschung von kommunalen Machtstrukturen (S. 159–260), Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütze, F. (1987). Das narrative Interview in Interaktionsfeldstudien. Fernuniversität Hagen., Gesamthochschule. Hochschulschrift. Fachbereich Erziehungs-, Sozial- u. Geisteswissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects of the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11, 448–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, D. A., & Patzelt, H. (2011). New field of sustainable entrepreneurship: Studying entrepreneurial action linking, “What is to be sustained“ with ”What is to be developed“.Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 137–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, D. A., & Patzelt, H. (2017). Trailblazing in Entrepreneurship. Creating new paths for understanding the field. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, D. A., Patzelt, H., & Baron, R. A. (2013). “I care about nature, but…”: Disengaging values in assessing opportunities that cause harm. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1251–1273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Hunter, A. E., & Boyd, R. L. (2004). Applying theories of entrepreneurship to a comparative analysis of white and minority women business owners. Women in Management Review, 19(1), 18–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel, P. (2011). Social Business-Perspektive der innovativen Versöhnung von Ökonomie und sozialen Anliegen. In P. Jähnke, G. B. Christmann, & K. Balgar (Hrsg.), Social Entrepreneurship (S. 55–74). VS Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegler, A. B., & Halberstadt, J. (2018). SHEstainability: How relationship networks influence the idea generation in opportunity recognition process by female social entrepreneurs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 10(2), 202–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swart, R. J., Raskin, P., & Robinson, J. (2004). The problem of the future: Sustainability science and scenario analysis. Global Environmental Change, 14(2), 137–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale, S., et al. (2011). Exploring gender and social entrepreneurship: Women’s leadership, employment and participation in the third sector and social enterprises. Voluntary Sector Review, 2(1), 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terjesen, S., & Lloyd, A. (2015). The 2015 Female Entrepreneurship Index. Analyzing the conditions that foster high potential female entrepreneurship in 77 countries. GEDI. The Global Entrepreneurship and Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thébaud, S. (2015). Business as a plan B: Institutional foundations of gender inequality in entrepreneurship across 24 industrialized countries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60(4), 671–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, F., & Young, W. (2006). Sustainability Entrepreneurs: Could they be the true wealth generators of the future? Greener Management International. Sustainability Entrepreneurship Research, 55, 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Heuvel, G., Soeters, J., & Gössling, T. (2014). Global business, global responsibilities: Corporate social responsibility orientations within a multinational bank. Business & Society, 53(3), 378–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, M. S. (2017). Continued misgivings: A response to Davidsson on dismantling the opportunity construct. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 7c, 77–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yordanova, D. I., & Alexandrova‐Boshnakova, M. I. (2011). Gender effects on risk‐taking of entrepreneurs: Evidence from Bulgaria. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 17(3), 272–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelezny, L. C., Chua, P. P., & Aldrich, C. (2000). Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 443–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne-Kathrin Schwab .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Halberstadt, J., Schwab, AK. (2022). Unternehmerische Gelegenheiten: Nutzung von narrativen Interviews zur Untersuchung von Wendepunkten im Leben von Nachhaltigkeitsunternehmerinnen. In: Onnen, C. (eds) Gelegenheitsfenster für nachhaltigen Konsum. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37543-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37543-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-37542-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-37543-0

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics