Abstract
Over the last 100 years, philosophy of science has gone from empiricism to historicism to naturalism. Perhaps it is time to look at the horizon for alternatives and go beyond. Some science educators have suggested that historicism is dated. If we accept this advice, then we shall have to abandon the historical canon of chemistry (for that matter science in general) that integrates chemistry content with its historical development (Laudan, Beyond positivism and relativism: Theory, method and evidence. Boulder: Westview Press; 1996). It is this development that precisely shows how methodological pluralism (Gavroglu and Simões, Neither Physics nor Chemistry: A History of Quantum Chemistry. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press; 2012) facilitated different approaches for different problems in bond formation leading to the valence bond and molecular orbital theories. Pluralism itself is based on the possibility of a range of perspectives. Each of these perspectives may account for some but not all aspects of a problem. Pluralism of perspectives (Giere 2006a, b; Giere, Email to author dated March 19, 2014 after reading a preliminary version of Chapter 2, reproduced with permission; 2014) thus can provide one alternative to integrate historical reconstruction of a chemistry topic with alternative interpretations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bell, J. S. (1987). Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Binns, I. C., & Bell, R. L. (2015). Representation of scientific methodology in secondary science textbooks. Science & Education, 24, 913–936.
Bohm, D. (1952). A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of ‘hidden’ variables, I. Physical Review, 85, 166–179.
Brush, S. G. (1999). Dynamics of theory change in chemistry: Part 2. Benzene and molecular orbitals, 1945–1980. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 30, 263–302.
Bunge, M. (2003). Twenty-five centuries of quantum physics: From Pythagoras to us, and from subjectivism to realism. Science & Education, 12(5–6), 445–466.
Conant, J. B. (1947). On understanding science: A historical approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cooper, M. M., & Klymkowsky, M. (2013). Chemistry, life, the universe, and everything: A new approach to general chemistry, and a model for curriculum reform. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(9), 1116–1122.
Cooper, M. M., Grove, N., Underwood, S. M., & Klymkowsky, M. (2010). Lost in Lewis structures: An investigation of student difficulties in developing representational competence. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(8), 869–874.
Cushing, J. T. (1994). Quantum mechanics: historical contingency and the Copenhagen hegemony. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
Cushing, J. T. (1996). The causal quantum theory program. In J. T. Cushing, A. Fine, & S. Goldstein (Eds.), Bohmian mechanics and quantum theory: An appraisal (Boston studies in the philosophy of science, Vol. 184, pp. 1–19). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
De Berg, K. C. (2014b). The significance of the origin of physical chemistry for physical chemistry education: The case of electrolyte solution chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15, 266–275.
Duschl, R. A., & Grandy, R. (2013). Two views about explicitly teaching nature of science. Science & Education, 22(9), 2109–2139.
Earman, J. (2004). Laws, symmetry and symmetry breaking: Invariance, conservation principles and objectivity. Philosophy of Science, 71(5), 1227–1241.
Gavroglu, K., & Simões, A. (2012). Neither physics nor chemistry: A history of quantum chemistry. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
Giere, R. N. (1999). Science without laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Giere, R. N. (2006a). Scientific perspectivism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Giere, R. N. (2006b). Perspectival pluralism. In S. H. Kellert, H. E. Longino, & C. K. Waters (Eds.), Scientific pluralism (pp. 26–41). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Giere, R. N. (2010). Naturalism. In S. Psillos & M. Curd (Eds.), The Routledge companion to philosophy of science (pp. 213–223). London: Routledge.
Giere, R. N. (2014). Email to author dated March 19, 2014 after reading a preliminary version of Chapter 2, reproduced with permission.
Hoffmann, R., Shaik, S., & Hiberty, P. C. (2003). A conversation on VB vs MO theory: A never-ending rivalry? Accounts of Chemical Research, 36(10), 750–756.
Holton, G. (1952). Introduction to concepts and theories in physical science. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Holton, G. (1969). Einstein and the ‘crucial’ experiment. American Journal of Physics, 37, 968–982.
Holton, G., & Brush, S. G. (2001). Physics, the human adventure: From Copernicus to Einstein and beyond. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Hoyningen-Huene, P. (2013). Systematicity: The nature of science. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2011). A family resemblance approach to the nature of science for science education. Science & Education, 20(7–8), 591–607.
Kellert, S. H., Longino, H. E., & Waters, C. K. (2006). Introduction: The pluralist stance. In S. H. Kellert, H. E. Longino, & C. K. Waters (Eds.), Scientific pluralism (Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, Vol. XIX, pp. 7–29). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Kitcher, P. (2007). Living with Darwin: Evolution, design, and the future of faith. New York: Oxford University Press.
Klopfer, L. E. (1969). The teaching of science and the history of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 6, 87–95.
Laloë, F. (2001). Do we really understand quantum mechanics? Strange correlations, paradoxes, and theorems. American Journal of Physics, 69, 655–701.
Landau, L. D., & Lifshitz, E. M. (1958). Quantum mechanics: Non-relativistic theory. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Laudan, L. (1996). Beyond positivism and relativism: Theory, method and evidence. Boulder: Westview Press (Division of HarperCollins).
Lautesse, P., Valls, A. V., Ferlin, F., Héraud, J.-L., & Chabot, H. (2015). Teaching quantum physics in upper secondary school in France: ‘Quanton’ versus ‘wave-particle’ duality, two approaches of the problem of reference. Science & Education, 24, 937–955.
Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497–521.
Lenard, P. E. A. (1902). Über die LichtelektrischeWirkung. Annalen der Physik, 8, 149–198.
Lévy-Leblond, J. M. (1988). Neither waves, nor particles, but quantons. Nature, 334(6177), 19–20.
Matthews, M. R. (2015). Science teaching: The contribution of history and philosophy of science (20th Anniversary revised and expanded edition). New York: Routledge.
National Research Council, NRC. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). Washington, DC: National Academies Press. http://www.nextgenscience.org
Niaz, M. (2001c). A rational reconstruction of the origin of the covalent bond and its implications for general chemistry textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 23(6), 623–641.
Niaz, M. (2009). Critical appraisal of physical science as a human enterprise: Dynamics of scientific progress. Dordrecht: Springer.
Niaz, M. (2011). Innovating science teacher education: A history and philosophy of science perspective. New York: Routledge.
Niaz, M. (2012a). From ‘science in the making’ to understanding the nature of science: An overview for science educators. New York: Routledge.
Niaz, M. (2014a). Science textbooks: The role of history and philosophy of science. In M. R. Matthhews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 1411–1441). Dordrecht: Springer.
Niaz, M. (2014b). Evaluation of textbooks: Approaches and consequences. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science education (pp. 403–406). Dordrecht: Springer.
Niaz, M., & Luiggi, M. (2014). Facilitating conceptual change in students’ conceptual understanding of the periodic table. Dordrecht: Springer.
Niaz, M., & Rodríguez, M. A. (2001). Do we have to introduce history and philosophy of science or is it already ‘inside’ chemistry? Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 2, 159–164.
Niaz, M., Aguilera, D., Maza, A., & Liendo, G. (2002). Arguments, contradictions, resistances and conceptual change in students’ understanding of atomic structure. Science Education, 86, 505–525.
Oh, J.-Y. (2011). Using an enhanced conflict map in the classroom (photoelectric effect) based on Lakatosian heuristic principle strategies. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 1135–1166.
Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What ‘ideas-about-science’ should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692–720.
Phillips, D. C. (2014). Email to author, dated Feb. 6, 2014, reproduced with permission.
Polanyi, M. (1964). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. first published 1958.
Robinson, J. T. (1969). Philosophy of science: Implications for teacher education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 6, 99–104.
Shaik, S., & Hiberty, P. C. (2008). A chemist’s guide to valence bond theory. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
Sheldon, S. (2013). Bohmian mechanics. In E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2013 edition). http://plato.standford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/qm-bohm (consulted 3 May 2015).
Siegel, H. (2014). Email to author, dated Feb. 5, 2014, reproduced with permission.
Teo, T. W., Goh, M. T., & Yeo, L .W. (2014). Chemistry education research trends: 2004–1013. Chemistry Education Research and Practice (in press).
Wan, Z. H., Wong, S. L., & Zhan, Y. (2013). When nature of science meets Marxism: Aspects of nature of science taught by Chinese science teacher educators to prospective science teachers. Science & Education, 22(5), 1115–1140.
Windschitl, M. (2004). Folk theories of “inquiry:” How preservice teachers reproduce the discourse and practices of an atheoretical scientific method. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 481–512.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Niaz, M. (2016). Conclusions: From Empiricism to Historicism to Naturalism and Beyond. In: Chemistry Education and Contributions from History and Philosophy of Science. Science: Philosophy, History and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26248-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26248-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26246-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26248-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)