Abstract
SMEs are increasingly forced to shift to more sustainable manufacturing. Industry 4.0 can support the transformation and foster innovation. But, SMEs need solutions with a low barrier to entry in terms of investment, IT knowledge and capacities. A framework based on value and material flow analysis, low investments and user-oriented IT skills is proposed. As an example, it is implemented in the furniture industry and shows a digital twin in terms of monitoring the energy and material flows. In addition, a product-specific allocation of energy consumption, energy peak shaving and other applications are possible.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download conference paper PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
For decades, growing economic, environmental and social challenges have reinforced the need for a “green transformation” in production. The increasing demand for resources by industry leads to environmental problems. As small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are responsible for 60–70% of industrial pollution in Europe, they need solutions to address sustainability [1, 2]. Combined with resource scarcity which entails supply risks and price volatilities, this poses major challenges, but also offers opportunities in terms of reduced environmental impact and lower supply risks. All companies, including SMEs, must develop their business models into sustainable ones.
Sustainable manufacturing (SM) can be seen a part of sustainable development (SD): Based on the UN Brundtland Commission, which has defined sustainability as "meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs", the approach is applied to the concept of SM [3]. In addition, the UN agreed on the 17 SD Goals (SDGs) in 2015. Three of them relate to SM and cover different aspects, namely SDG 7, 9 and 12. While SDG 7 and 12 consider energy intensity or material consumption, that can be achieved with SM approaches and technologies, SDG 9 emphasizes building resilient infrastructure, promoting inclusive and sustainable industrialization and fostering innovation. Target 9.4 explicitly calls for upgrading infrastructure and retrofitting industries to make them sustainable, with increased resource-use efficiency and greater adoption of clean and environmentally sound technologies and industrial processes [4].
2 Sustainable Manufacturing in the Context of Industry 4.0
2.1 Sustainable Manufacturing and Industry 4.0
There has been no uniform definition of SM among scientists for years, and even today different approaches are associated with SM [5, 6]. A general definition is given by Chen and Zhang, who describe SM as “the science and technology of manufacturing based on the idea of SD” [7]. Loglisci et al. go further, seeing SM as a key component of SD [8]. Following Moldavska and Welo, most definitions agree that SM is the creation of a product or service taking into account the environmental, economic and social dimensions. However, the literature distinguishes between whether it is a strategy or concept on the one hand, or a paradigm or system on the other. Further, while it can be assumed that the entire life cycle is considered, only a few deal with the end-of-life in the context of SM. Almost all definitions reflect the goal of reducing impacts or improving the relevant factors of production [5].
For this paper, SM is defined as “the integration of systems and processes capable to produce high-quality products and services by utilizing less and more sustainable resources such as energy and material, being safer for societies, employees, consumers, stakeholders and being able to mitigate social and environmental impacts throughout its whole life cycle” [9]. Bonvoisin et al. present four overlapping and complementary layers that considers the objects addressed and disciplines concerned to achieve SM [10]: According to these layers, the framework looks at the first layer, manufacturing technologies, which addresses the two factors of value creation process and equipment. The aim is to increase energy, resource and economic efficiency and reduce environmental impact through a digital twin by applying I4.0 technologies.
2.2 Industry 4.0 Enabling Technologies for Sustainable Manufacturing
I4.0 describes the transformation of the industry through Internet of Things (IoT), data and services. The term integrates different perspectives, sectors, industries, corporate functions, technologies and subject areas [11]. Its technologies have a huge scope of application and cover a broad spectrum. Suleiman et al. 2022 list 24 concepts that also include concepts beyond production: With regard to sustainability, the concepts of circular economy, remanufacturing, sustainability and Recycling 4.0 are mentioned. Accordingly, the sustainability concept of I4.0 “enables and supports sustainability by deploying digital technologies and business models with a focus on energy efficiency, pollution control, and value chain optimization” [12].
Ching et al. identify eight I4.0 technologies that are relevant for the economic, ecological and social dimension of SM [13]: Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain, Big Data Analytics, Cyber-Physical (Production) Systems (CP(P)S), Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), Digital Twins (DT), mixed reality and robotics. Others mention fog and cloud computing, actuators and sensors, 3 D print (additive manufacturing), cognitive computing, simulation and modelling related to sustainable or energy efficient manufacturing, to name but a few technologies [14,15,16,17].
For the purpose of this framework, technologies such as CPPS, IIoT, DT and sensors as well as methods such as data analytics and machine learning are relevant (Table 1). The technologies collect, transfer, store and process real time data via the infrastructure of the network (IIoT), while data analytics and machine learning methods analyse them for decision-making. These technologies and methods drive the digital transformation of production systems, which offer a variety of opportunities to use real-time data to increase sustainability in manufacturing [17,18,19,20]. Based on this, metrics are often used for SM assessment that prepare the real-time data for further use, e.g. key performance indicators, process maps, forecasts. Several metrics are available taking into account the three dimensions of sustainability [21,22,23,24].
Therefore, I4.0 technologies are recognised as a key facilitator in SM [6, 30]. Kumar et al. take a different perspective, noting that SMEs are under enormous pressure to produce more sustainable. Stakeholders ask SMEs to implement sustainability and request, for example, information on resource, material and energy consumption or their carbon footprint. The application of I4.0 may support SME in these efforts [31]. However, due to their economic footprint, SMEs are one of the most important pillars for the sustainable growth of national economies [30].
2.3 Industry 4.0 Challenges for SME and Small Volume Production
Large manufacturers are often taking a leading role in the adoption of technologies as they have greater opportunities to embrace and transform them, while many SMEs are reluctant to adopt [32]. The main barriers for adopting I4.0 are a lack of expertise and a short-term strategy mindset [33, 34]. In addition, limited IT skills, capacities and investment costs are a common concern [35]. SMEs’ production is often characterised by heterogeneous machines of different ages, from different manufacturers and with a variety of protocols and sometimes missing processing information (brownfield) [36]. Or it is a production that not infrequently also has a batch size of up to 1.
Studies tend to focus on global companies. Consequently, SMEs are often treated similarly in their transformation towards SM and I4.0, although they have different requirements. Thus, research is needed to support SMEs that help smaller players to continue or implement I4.0 innovations. Due to limited capacities, technologies need to prove their benefits quickly in order to be pursued further in SMEs. I4.0 applications for SMEs therefore require solutions that have low barriers to entry [35].
3 Framework for a Digital Twin for Sustainable Manufacturing
3.1 Method of Value and Material Flow Analysis in the Context of I4.0
Increasing sustainability in manufacturing is related to inputs and outputs, internal and external process parameters and characteristics, machining time, quality and the condition of machines and tools. Therefore, a combined value and material flow analysis was developed as a methodological basis in the context of I4.0 [37]. Depending on the aim of SM, the availability of (digital) data from different sources, ranging from ERP and MES systems to product data and machine and sensor data, is analysed and missing data must be collected with the help of I4.0 technologies (Fig. 1).
Thus, I4.0 technologies offer a real-time, consistent and continuous collection of relevant data from the machines, sensors and operational information systems to implement a digital twin for the value and material flow of a process chain. In combination with data analytic methods and user-related process knowledge, the data-based value and material flow model can be used for various issues of SM.
3.2 Framework for a Digital Twin in the Context of Sustainable Manufacturing
The framework links the methodology of value and material flow analysis with the architecture of I4.0 real-time based information, communication and data processing technologies. The stored data are then used to provide real-time data for operations profitability, energy and resource efficiency towards digital twins. The framework is developed for a brownfield approach that allows SMEs to retrofit their existing machines with I4.0 technologies regardless of heterogenous machine types, age, data format. Aim is to provide an I4.0 based solution for SM with a low entry threshold (Fig. 2).
Data from ERP, MES and PDM systems as well as machine data are collected with an OPC-UA server that converts them. While the machine data is real-time data from operations, the others are static data for process or product-specific analyses. Sensor data is collected by IoT connectors located at the machine site and transmitted using the messaging protocol MQTT (Message Queuing Telemetry Transport). In a next step, the data is processed with the object-based programming Node-RED and written to a database. Since the data is collected in small time steps, a time series database is recommended to process the flood of data appropriately in terms of time and storage capacity. The processed data serves as a digital backbone for visualization and analytics. Simple applications such as the monitoring of value and material flows as well as the utilization of machines are already possible with open source graphics programs. For data analytics, MatLab is recommended as a common tool for engineers. Descriptive analytics such as process maps for improved start-up of a process at the beginning of a shift to prescriptive analytics dealing with the energy peak shaving based on production planning and process data in order to reduce energy demand from the power grid.
3.3 Application of the Conceptional Framework for SM
The framework is applied in a small volume production in the furniture industry. It reflects typical processes from the panel sawing, edge banding and drilling and milling (Fig. 3). At shop floor level, the machines are equipped with IoT connectors, sensor technology for power, compressed air, exhaust air and waste, with data being collected every 250 ms. In the periphery system, the compressor and exhaust air system are equipped with sensors (power). In addition, data is extracted from the CAD product configurator, ERP and MES systems. This data characterises the material, density and size of the material and the parts to be produced, machining data per process step, e.g. type of edge band, number of sides to be edged, number of drillings per part. The data collected by the IoT connectors is transmitted via the MQTT protocol and processed with Node-RED. The material and product data are provided via an OPC UA server. All data is written to a DBflux database; all data analytics are carried out with MatLab.
The digital backbone of real-time data, enriched with product and process data, enables diverse applications in terms of SM. In the field, a real time monitoring of energy and material consumption for a small volume production with a parameterized process model was developed based on real-time data (Fig. 4). This allocates the consumption and power demand to specific components. Further applications develops a parameterized process (chain) model for forecasting energy and material consumption or machine occupancy, assessment of the total power demand to shave energy peaks, and direct offsetting of energy and processing costs at component and product level; or calculation of cumulative energy demand or CO2 footprint of a product.
Depending on the impacts and potentials of the manufacturing processes, SMEs need to derive strategies on how I4.0 can support sustainability efforts.
4 Conclusions
Based on a combined value and material flow analysis, the conceptional framework presents an approach that can be applied to implement SM applications in the context of I4.0. The methodology of material flow analysis is mainly known among environmentally oriented economists and engineers, but qualifies as a suitable approach for SMEs by combining it with the well-known method of value flow analysis. To address the SME situation, the framework avoids proprietary solutions to create a digital twin. Furthermore, it focuses on a brownfield environment with machines from different manufacturers and different levels of digitalisation, as is often the case in SMEs. The I4.0 hardware and software have a low barrier to entry in terms of costs and required skills. SMEs can apply it to a single process and then gradually extend it to others. Successes in real-time process monitoring and process maps encourage SMEs to take further steps. Various application as direct cost calculation or accounting of environmental impacts of products in small batch production are possible. However, there is a need for further research into solutions for a horizontal process integration.
References
Constantinos, C., et al.: SMEs and the environment in the EU, European Commission, DG Enterprise and Industry, Brussels (2010)
EaPGreen: Environmental Policy Toolkit for Green SMEs in the EU Eastern partnership countries, Brussels (2015)
World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED): Our Common Future, Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford and N.Y. (1987)
UN: Sustainable Development: The 17 goals. https://sdgs.un.org/goals. Accessed 30 Apr 22
Moldavska, A., Welo, T.: The concept of sustainable manufacturing and its definitions: a content-analysis based literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 166, 744–755 (2017)
Sartal, A., Bellas, R., Mejías, A.M., García-Collado, A.: The sustainable manufacturing concept, evolution and opportunities within Industry 4.0: a literature review. Adv. Mech. Eng. 12(5), 1–17 (2020)
Chen, M., Zhang, F.: End-of-life vehicle recovery in China: consideration and innovation following the EU ELV directive. JOM 61(3), 45–52 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-009-0040-8
Loglisci, G., Priarone, P.C., Settineri, L.: Cutting tool manufacturing: a sustainability perspective. In: Proceedings of the 11th GCSM, Berlin, pp. 252–257 (2013)
Malek, J., Desai, T.N.: Prioritization of sustainable manufacturing barriers using best worst method. J. Clean. Prod. 226, 589–600 (2019)
Bonvoisin, J., Stark, R., Seliger, G.: Field of research in sustainable manufacturing. In: Stark, R., Seliger, G., Bonvoisin, J. (eds.) Sustainable Manufacturing. SPLCEM, pp. 3–20. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48514-0_1
Kagermann, H., Anderl, R., Gausemeier, J., Schuh, G., Wahlster, W.: Industrie 4.0 im globalen Kontext, Berlin (2016)
Suleiman, Z., Shaikholla, S., Dikhanbayeva, D., Shehab, E., Turkyilmaz, A.: Industry 4.0: clustering of concepts and characteristics. Cogent Eng. 9, 1 (2022)
Ching, N.T., Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Maroufkhani, P., Asadi, S.: Industry 4.0 applications for sustainable manufacturing: a systematic literature review and a roadmap to sustainable development. J. Clean. Prod. 334, 130133 (2022)
Bonilla, S.H., Silva, H.R., da Silva, M.T., Goncalves, R.F., Sacomanto, J.: Industry 4.0 and sustainability implications: a scenario-based analysis of the impacts and challenges. Sustainability 10, 3740 (2018)
Jena, M.C., Mishra, S.K., Moharana, H.S.: Application of Industry 4.0 to enhance sustainable manufacturing. Environ. Progr. Sustain. Energy 39, e13360 (2020)
Mohamed, N., Al-Jaroodi, J., Lazarova-Molnar, S.: Leveraging the capabilities of Industry 4.0 for improving energy efficiency in smart factories. IEEE Access 7, 18008–18020 (2019)
Oláh, J., Aburumman, N., Popp, J., Khan, M.A., Haddad, H., Kitukutha, N.: Impact of Industry 4.0 on environmental sustainability. Sustainability 12, 4674 (2020)
Beier, G., Ulrich, A., Niehoff, S., Reißig, M., Habich, M.: Industry 4.0: how it is defined from a sociotechnical perspective and how much sustainability it includes – a literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 259, 120856 (2020)
Beltrami, M., Orzes, G., Sarkis, J., Sartor, M.: Industry 4.0 and sustainability: towards conceptualization and theory. J. Clean. Prod. 312, 127733 (2021)
Stock, T., Seliger, G.: Opportunities of sustainable manufacturing in Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP 40, 536–541 (2011). Proceedings of the 13th GCSM, Berlin
OECD: Sustainable manufacturing toolkit – 7 steps to environmental excellence (2011)
Joung, C.B., Carrell, J., Sarkar, P., Feng, S.C.: Categorization of indicators for sustainable manufacturing. Ecol. Ind. 24, 148–157 (2012)
Bhanot, N., Qaiser, F.H., Alkahtani, M., Rehman, A.U.: An integrated decision-making approach of cause-and-effect analysis for sustainable manufacturing indicators. Sustainability 12(4), 1517 (2020)
Swarnakar, V., Singh, A.R., Jayaraman, R., Tiwari, A.K., Rathi, R., Cudney, E.: Prioritzizing indicators for sustainability assessment in manufacturing process: an integrated approach. Sustainability 14, 3264 (2022)
Boyes, H.: A security framework for cyber-physical systems, WMG CSC Working Paper, Coventry, University of Warwick (2017)
Stark, R., Damerau, T.: Digital Twin. In: Chatti, S., Tolio, T. (eds.) CIRP Encyclopedia of Production Engineering, pp. 1–8. Springer, Heidelberg (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35950-7_16870-1
Bischoff, J., Taphorn, C., Wolter, D., Braun, N., et al.: Erschließen der Potenziale der Anwendung von Industrie 4.0 im Mittelstand, Studie (2015)
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R.P., Rab, S., Suman, R.: Significance of sensors for Industry 4.0: roles, capabilities, and applications. Sens. Int. 2, 100110 (2021)
Duan, L., Xu, L.D.: Data analytics in Industry 4.0: a survey. Inf. Syst. Front. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10190-0
Suciu, A.-D., Tudor, A.I.M., Chitu, I.B., Dovleac, L., Bratucu, G.: IoT Technologies as instruments for SMEs’ innovation and sustainable growth. Sustainability 13, 6357 (2021)
Kumar, R., Singh, R.K., Dwivedi, Y.K.: Application of Industry 40 technologies in SMEs for ethical and sustainable operations: analysis of challenges. J. Clean. Prod. 275, 124063 (2020)
Rauch, E., Dallasega, P., Unterhofer, M.: Requirements and barriers for introducing smart manufacturing in small and medium-sized enterprises. IEEE Eng. Manage. Rev. 47(3), 87–94 (2019)
Moeuf, A., Lamouri, S., Pellerin, R., Tamayo-Giraldo, S., Tobon-Valencia, E., Eburdy, R.: Identification of critical success factors, risks and opportunities of Industry 4.0 in SMEs. Int. J. Prod. Res. 58, 1384–1400 (2020)
Rauch, E., Unterhofer, M., Roja, R.A., Gualtieri, L., Woschank, M., Matt, D.T.: A maturity level-based assessment too to enhance the implementation of Industry 4.0 in small and medium-sized enterprises. Sustainability 12, 3559 (2020)
Chavez, Z., Hauge, J.B., Bellgran, M.: Industry 4.0, transition or addition in SMEs? A systematic literature review on digitalization for deviation management. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 119, 57–76 (2022)
Ingaldi, M., Ulewicz, R.: Problems with the implementation of Industry 4.0 in enterprises from the SME sector. Sustainability 12, 217 (2020)
Krommes, S., Tomaschko, F.: Chance für mehr Ressourceneffizienz. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb 116, 58–63 (2021)
Acknowledgement
The paper presents results of the ReFer project, which was funded by the Bavarian State Ministry of Education and Cultural Affairs, Science and the Arts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s)
About this paper
Cite this paper
Krommes, S., Tomaschko, F. (2023). Conceptual Framework of a Digital Twin Fostering Sustainable Manufacturing in a Brownfield Approach of Small Volume Production for SMEs. In: Kohl, H., Seliger, G., Dietrich, F. (eds) Manufacturing Driving Circular Economy. GCSM 2022. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28839-5_58
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28839-5_58
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-28838-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-28839-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)