Skip to main content

The Politics of Higher Education Governance Reform in Western Europe

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Comparative Higher Education Politics

Part of the book series: Higher Education Dynamics ((HEDY,volume 60))

  • 552 Accesses

Abstract

There has been ample reform activity regarding the governance of higher education in Europe since the late 1980s. The initial impetus behind these reforms has been linked to the introduction of concepts stemming from New Public Management (NPM) leading to somewhat similar reform rationales throughout Western Europe. At the same time, European countries have approached the issue of governance reforms from very different starting points, and still today there is significant national diversity in higher education governance.

Overall, differing starting points, a converging reform rhetoric, but also diverging interests of the involved actors characterize governance reforms in higher education in Europe. This makes for a complex political environment and it is the aim of this chapter to provide a detailed account of the state of the art of academic research on this issue and make an argument for the importance of key political actors, namely political parties, in contemporary discussions about higher education governance. To this end, we will in a first step present a structured overview of the literature on politics of higher education governance reforms in Western Europe, which is then followed by an empirical analysis focusing on one specific factor that influences reforms and national variation in higher education governance in Europe: the preferences of political parties. In this, we will analyze to what extent different party families (e.g. Social Democrats or Christian Democrats) have diverging preferences with regard to higher education governance and whether and how parties with a similar ideological background differ in their policy positions across national contexts. This is based on an analysis and comparison of party manifestos from parties from six countries to identify both inter-party and inter-country differences in policy preferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This includes for example socialist or communist parties.

  2. 2.

    This includes for example right-wing populist or nationalist parties.

  3. 3.

    The concept of the party family describes a group of political parties that are active in different countries but share common ideological roots.

  4. 4.

    The “Liste Peter Pilz” is not included in the study due to missing data.

  5. 5.

    See: https://www.university-autonomy.eu/

References

  • Akkerman, T., de Lange, S. L., & Rooduijn, M. (2016). Radical right-wing populist parties in Western Europe: Into the mainstream? Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P. G. (1998). Comparative perspectives on higher education for the twenty-first century. Higher Education Policy, 11, 347–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansell, B. W. (2010). From the ballot to the blackboard: The redistributive political economy of education. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, I., & Jones, G. A. (2016). Governance of higher education. Global perspectives, theories, and practices. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennetot Pruvot, E., & Estermann, T. (2017). University Autonomy in Europe III. The Scorecard 2017. Retrieved from Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdahl, R. (1990). Academic freedom, autonomy and accountability in British universities. Studies in Higher Education, 15(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079012331377491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, A. E., Jungblut, J., & Jupskås, A. R. (2023). We don’t need no education? Education policies of Western European populist radical right parties. West European Politics, online first, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2023.2177010

  • Bleiklie, I., & Michelsen, S. (2013). Comparing HE policies in Europe. Higher Education, 65(1), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9584-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I., & Michelsen, S. (2018). Political-administrative structures and university policies. In I. Bleiklie, J. Enders, & B. Lepori (Eds.), Managing universities: Political and organizational change from a Western European comparative perspective (pp. 217–250). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boix, C. (1997). Political parties and the supply side of the economy: The provision of physical and human capital in advanced economies, 1960–90. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 814–845. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boix, C. (1998). Political parties, growth and equality: Conservative and social democratic economic strategies in the world economy. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, D. (2001). Regulierungsmodelle und Machtstrukturen an Universitäten. In U. Schimank & E. Stölting (Eds.), Die Krise der Universitäten (pp. 295–325). Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, D., & Merrien, F.-X. (1999). Towards a new model of governance for universities?: A comparative view. Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broucker, B., De Wit, K., Verhoeven, J. C., & Leisyte, L. (Eds.). (2019). Higher education system reform: An international comparison after twenty years of Bologna. Brill Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busemeyer, M. R. (2007). Determinants of public education spending in 21 OECD democracies, 1980–2001. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(4), 582–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760701314417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busemeyer, M. R. (2009). Social democrats and the new partisan politics of public investment in education. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(1), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760802453171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busemeyer, M. R. (2015). Skills and inequality. Partisan politics and the political economy of education reforms in Western Welfare States. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busemeyer, M. R., Garritzmann, J. L., & Neimanns, E. (2020). A loud but noisy signal? Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Capano, G. (2008). Looking for serendipity: The problematical reform of government within Italy’s Universities. Higher Education, 55(4), 481–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9069-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castles, F. G., & Obinger, H. (2007). Social expenditure and the politics of redistribution. Journal of European Social Policy, 17(3), 206–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928707078364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, M.-H., Jungblut, J., Ravinet, P., & Vukasovic, M. (2017). Higher education governance and policy: An introduction to multi-issue, multi-level and multi-actor dynamics. Policy and Society, 36(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1287999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T., Gornitzka, Å., & Maassen, P. (2014). Global pressures and national cultures. A Nordic University template? In P. Mattei (Ed.), University adaptation in difficult economic times (pp. 30–51). Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1983). The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities. Organizational pathways of transformation. Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culpepper, P. D. (2011). Quiet politics and business power. Corporate control in Europe and Japan. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, H., Enders, J., & Leisyte, L. (2007). Public sector reform in Dutch higher education: The organizational transformation of the university. Public Administration, 85(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00632.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D. (1997). Higher education markets and public policy. Higher Education Policy, 10(3–4), 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, M., & Knill, C. (2009). Higher education policies in Central and Eastern Europe: Convergence toward a common model? Governance, 22(3), 397–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01445.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, M., & Knill, C. (2014). Higher education governance and policy change in Western Europe: International challenges to historical institutions. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, M., Knill, C., & Vögtle, E. M. (2011). An analytical framework for the cross-country comparison of higher education governance. Higher Education, 62(5), 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9412-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donina, D., Meoli, M., & Paleari, S. (2015). Higher education reform in Italy: Tightening regulation instead of steering at a distance. Higher Education Policy, 28(2), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2014.6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, J., & Fulton, O. (2002). Higher education in a globalising world: International trends and mutual observations a Festschrift in Honour of Ulrich Teichler. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ferlie, E., Musselin, C., & Andresani, G. (2008). The steering of higher education systems: A public management perspective. Higher Education, 56(3), 325–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9125-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, P. E. (2019). Organizational change in higher education ministries in light of Agencification: Comparing Austria and Norway. Higher Education Policy, Online First, 34, 664–684. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-019-00157-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, O. (2002). Higher education governance in the UK: Change and continuity. In A. Amaral, G. A. Jones, & B. Karseth (Eds.), Governing higher education: National perspectives on institutional governance (pp. 187–211). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Garritzmann, J. L. (2016). The political economy of higher education finance: The politics of tuition fees and subsidies in OECD countries, 1945–2015. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research. Principles and practices. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gingrich, J. R. (2011). Making markets in the welfare state: The politics of varying market reforms. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gingrich, J. R. (2015). Varying costs to change? Institutional change in the public sector. Governance, 28(1), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goedegebuure, L., Kaiser, F., Maassen, P., Meek, V. L., van Vught, F., & De Weert, E. (1993). Higher education policy. An international comparative perspective. Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, Å., & Maassen, P. (2000). Hybrid steering approaches with respect to European higher education. Higher Education Policy, 13(3), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-8733(00)00012-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, Å., & Maassen, P. (2014). Dynamics of convergence and divergence. Exploring accounts of higher education policy change. In P. Mattei (Ed.), University adaptation in difficult economic times (pp. 13–29). Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, Å., Maassen, P., & de Boer, H. (2017). Change in university governance structures in continental Europe. Higher Education Quarterly, 71(3), 274–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312450709336664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazelkorn, E., Coates, H., & McCormick, A. C. (Eds.). (2018). Research handbook on quality, performance and accountability in higher education. Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Héritier, A. (2001). Differential Europe. The European Union impact on national policymaking. In A. Héritier, D. Kerwer, C. Knill, A.-C. Douillet, D. Lehmkuhl, & M. Teutsch (Eds.), Differential Europe. The European Union impact on national policymaking (pp. 1–21). Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, D. A. J. (1977). Political parties and macroeconomic policy. American Political Science Review, 71(4), 1467–1487. https://doi.org/10.2307/1961490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoareau, C. (2009). Does deliberation matter? The impact of the Bologna process on attitudes and policies in European higher education. PhD thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science, London. Retrieved from http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/307/

  • Holzinger, K., & Knill, C. (2005). Causes and conditions of cross-national policy convergence. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 775–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500161357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, J., & Van der Wende, M. (2004). The EU and Bologna: Are supra- and international initiatives threatening domestic agendas? European Journal of Education, 39(3), 349–357. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1503860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hüther, O., & Krücken, G. (2018). Higher education in Germany. Recent developments in an international perspective. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jungblut, J. (2015). Bringing political parties into the picture – A two-dimensional analytical framework for higher education policy. Higher Education, 69(5), 867–882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9810-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungblut, J. (2016). Re-distribution and public governance – The politics of higher education in Western Europe. European Politics and Society, 17(3), 331–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2016.1140395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungblut, J. (2017). From preferences to policies in coalition governments—Unpacking policy making in European higher education. Public Policy and Administration, 32(4), 323–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076716679223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jupskås, A. R. (2016). The taming of the shrew: How the progress party (almost) became part of the mainstream. In T. Akkerman, S. L. De Lange, & M. Rooduijn (Eds.), Radical right-wing populist parties in Western Europe. Into to the mainstream? (pp. 169–192). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalyvas, S. N., & van Kersbergen, K. (2010). Christian democracy. Annual Review of Political Science, 13(1), 183–209. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.021406.172506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauko, J. (2013). Dynamics in higher education politics: A theoretical model. Higher Education, 65(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9538-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner, E. J. (1988). Liberal parties in Western Europe. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klemenčič, M. (2014). Student power in a global perspective and contemporary trends in student organising. Studies in Higher Education, 39(3), 396–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.896177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klingemann, H.-D., Hofferbert, R. I., & Budge, I. (1994). Parties, policies, and democracy. Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knill, C., & Lehmkuhl, D. (2002). The national impact of European Union regulatory policy: Three Europeanization mechanisms. European Journal of Political Research, 41(2), 255–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, W., Cummings, W. K., & Fisher, D. (Eds.). (2011). Changing governance and management in higher education: The perspectives of the academy. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, P., & Mudde, C. (1998). The party family and its study. Annual Review of Political Science, 1(1), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.1.1.211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martens, K., Rusconi, A., & Leuze, K. (2007). New arenas of education governance: The impact of international organizations and markets on educational policy making. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martens, K., Nagel, A.-K., Windzio, M., & Weymann, A. (Eds.). (2010). Transformation of education policy. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLendon, M. K., & Ness, E. C. (2003). The politics of state higher education governance reform. Peabody Journal of Education, 78(4), 66–88. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327930PJE7804_05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (1998). The evaluative state reconsidered. European Journal of Education, 33(3), 265–284. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1503583

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (2003). The Bologna declaration: Some of the historic dilemmas posed by the reconstruction of the Community in Europe’s Systems of Higher Education. Educational Policy, 17(1), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904802239290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J. P. (1988). Administrative reform and theories of organization. In C. Campbell & B. G. Peters (Eds.), Organizing governance, governing organizations (pp. 233–254). University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J. P. (2007). The institutional dynamics of the European university. In P. Maassen & J. P. Olsen (Eds.), University dynamics and European integration (Vol. 19, pp. 25–54). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paradeise, C., Reale, E., & Bleiklie, I. (2009). University governance. Western European comparative perspectives (Vol. 25). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C. (2001). Clarifying convergence. Striking similarities and durable differences in public management reform. Public Management Review, 3(4), 471–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616670110071847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauh, C., Kirchner, A., & Kappe, R. (2011). Political parties and higher education spending: Who favours redistribution? West European Politics, 34(6), 1185–1206. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.616659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravinet, P. (2008). From voluntary participation to monitored coordination: Why European countries feel increasingly bound by their commitment to the Bologna process. European Journal of Education, 43(3), 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2008.00359.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, M. J., & Amaral, A. (Eds.). (2014). Quality assurance in higher education. Contemporary debates. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. (1976). Parties and party systems. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, S., & Westerheijden, D. F. (2004). Accreditation and evaluation in the European Higher Education area (Vol. 5). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, M. (Ed.). (2014). International trends in university governance. Autonomy, self-government and the distribution of authority. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sporn, B. (1999). Adaptive university structures: An analysis of adaptation to socioeconomic environments of US and European universities (Vol. 54). J. Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapper, T. (2007). The governance of British Higher Education: The struggle for policy control. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, K. (1999). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), 369–404. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto players: How political institutions work. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vaira, M. (2004). Globalization and higher education organizational change: A framework for analysis. Higher Education, 48(4), 483–510. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HIGH.0000046711.31908.e5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkens, A., Bara, J., Budge, I., McDonald, M. D., & Klingemann, H.-D. (2014). Mapping policy preferences from texts: Statistical solutions for manifesto analysts. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vukasovic, M. (2018). Stakeholder organizations and multi-level governance of higher education. In B. Cantwell, H. Coates, & R. King (Eds.), Handbook on the politics of higher education (pp. 413–430). Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte, J. (2006). Change of degrees and degrees of change. Comparing adaptions of European Higher Education systems in the context of the Bologna process. CHEPS/Universiteit Twente.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jens Jungblut .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jungblut, J., Dobbins, M. (2023). The Politics of Higher Education Governance Reform in Western Europe. In: Jungblut, J., Maltais, M., Ness, E.C., Rexe, D. (eds) Comparative Higher Education Politics . Higher Education Dynamics, vol 60. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25867-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25867-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-25866-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-25867-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics