Advertisement

Structure and Function of Skin Glands

  • W. B. Quay

Abstract

It is fitting that in this symposium on “Chemical Signals in Vertebrates” we concern ourselves first with the tissue and glandular sources of chemical signals. The particular chemical signals selected for consideration here are the pheromones. These have been defined as chemical signals secreted to the outside of the body by one individual, and received by a second individual of the same species, in which, as a result, a specific reaction occurs. This reaction can be manifested as a definite and characteristic behavior or behavior pattern, or the modification of a particular physiological or developmental process (Karlson and Lüscher, 1959; Butler, 1970). Although the definition of pheromones and appreciation of their biological significance derived primarily from chemical signals in insects, work of both earlier and recent date demonstrates the importance of pheromones for vertebrate animals of different groups from fish to “higher” mammals.

Keywords

Hair Follicle Chemical Signal Sebaceous Gland Mucous Cell Venom Gland 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ADELMAN, S., TAYLOR, C. R., and HEGLUND, N. C. 1975. Sweating on paws and palms: what is its function? Am. J. Physiol. 229: 1400–1402.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. BARDACH, J. E., and TODD, J. H. 1970. Chemical communication in fish. Adv. in Chemoreception 1:205–240.Google Scholar
  3. BAXTER, C. H., and PICKENS, P. E. 1964. Control of luminescence in hemichordates and some properties of a nerve net system. J. Exp. BioZ. 41: 1–14.Google Scholar
  4. BERGEOT, P., and WINTREBERT, P. 1926. Le déterminisme de l’éclosion chez l’Alyte (Alytes obstetricans, Laur.). CR Soc. BioZ. 95: 1326–30.Google Scholar
  5. BLAYLOCK, L. A., RUIBAL, R., and PLATT-ALOIA, K. 1976. Skin structure and wiping behavior of phyllomedusine frogs. Copeia 2: 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. BOURDIN, J. 1926. Le mecanisme de l’éclosion chez les teleosteans. III. Morphologie et repartition des glandes sereuses du tegument. Compt. rend. Soc. Biol. 95: 1239–1240.Google Scholar
  7. BRINLEY, F. J., and EULBERG, L. Embryological head glands of the cichlid fish Aequidens portalegrensis. Copeia 1953: 24–26.Google Scholar
  8. BURGHARDT, G. M. 1970. Chemical perception in reptiles. Adv. in Chemoreception 1:241–308.Google Scholar
  9. BUTLER, C. G. 1970. Chemical communication in insects: behavior-al and ecologic aspects. Adv. in Chemoreception 1: 35–78.Google Scholar
  10. COLE, C. J. 1966. Femoral glands of the lizard, Crotaphytus col-Zaris. J. Morph. 118: 119–136.Google Scholar
  11. DANIEL, J. F. 1934. The Elasmobranch Fishes, pp. 26–30. University of California Press, Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. EGGERT, B. 1931. Die Geschlechtsorgane der Gobiiformes und Blenniformes. Z. Wiss. Zool. 193: 249–558.Google Scholar
  13. ELDER, W. H. 1954. The oil gland of birds. Wilson Bull. 66: 6–31.Google Scholar
  14. Frisch, K. V. 1938. Zur Psychologie des Fisch-Schwarmes. Naturwissenschaften 26: 601–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. FRISCH, K. V. 1942. Über einen Schreckstoff der Fischhaut und seine biologische Bedeutung. Zeit. vergl. Physiol. 29: 46–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. GEORGES, D. 1964. Evolution morphologique et histologique des organes adhésifs du brochet (Esox lucius L.). Tray. Lab. Hy-drobiol. Grenoble 56: 7–16.Google Scholar
  17. GRUBB, T. C., JR. 1972. Smell and foraging in shearwaters and petrels. Nature 237: 404–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. HAWES, M. L. 1976. Odor as a possible isolating mechanism in sympatric species of shrews (Sorex vagrans and Sorex obscurus). J. Mammal. 57: 404–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. HILDEMANN, W. H. 1959. A cichlid fish, Symphosodon discus, with unique nurture habits. Am. Naturalist 93: 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. HOPPE, P. C. 1975. Genetic and endocrine studies of the pregnan-cy-blocking pheromone of mice. J. Reprod. Fert. 45: 109–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. HRBAČEk, J. 1950. On the flight reaction of tadpoles of the com-mon toad caused by chemical substances. Experientia 6: 100–102.Google Scholar
  22. ILG, L. 1952. über larvale Haftorgane bei Teleostiern.Zool. Jahrb. (Anat.) 72: 577–600.Google Scholar
  23. JONES, R. B., and NOWELL, N. W. 1973. The coagulating glands as a source of aversive and agression-inhibiting pheromone(s) in the male albino mouse. Physiol. and Behavior 11: 455–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. KARLSON, P., and LüSCHER, M. 1959. “Pheromones”: a new term for a class of biologically active substances. Nature 183: 55–56.Google Scholar
  25. KENNEDY, R. J. 1971. Preen gland weights. Ibis 113: 369–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. KITZAN, S. M., and SWEENY, P. R. 1968. A light and electron mi-croscope study of the structure of Protopterus annectens epi- dermis. I. Mucus production. Can. J. ZooZ. 46: 767–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. KROLL, J. C., and RENO, H. W. 1971. A re-examination of the clo-acal sacs and gland of the blind snake, Leptotyphlops dulcis,(Reptilia: Leptotyphlopidae). J. Morph. 133: 273–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. KULZER, E. 1954. Untersuchungen fiber die Schreckreaktion der Erd- krotenkaulquappen (Bufo bufo L.). Zeit. vergl. Physiol, 36: 443–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. LEINER, M. 1930. Fortsetzung der ökologischen Studienan Gaster- osteus aculeatus. Z. Morphol. Okol. Tiere 16: 499–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. LEON, M. 1975. Dietary control of maternal pheromone in the lac- tating rat. Physiol. and Behavior 14: 311–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. LIAPPIS, N., and JäKEL, A. 1975. Über die Ausscheidung der freien Aminosäuren im menschlichen ekkrinen Schweiss. Arch. Dermatological Res. 254: 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. LINTON, J. R., and SOLOFF, B. L. 1964. The physiology of the brood pouch of the male sea horse Hippocampus. BUZZ. Marine Sci, of the Gulf and Caribbean 14: 45–61.Google Scholar
  33. Lucas, A. M., and Stettenheim, P. R. 1972. Avian Anatomy. Integument. Part I I. U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
  34. MADERSON, P. F. A. 1970. Lizard glands and lizard hands: models for evolutionary study. Forma et Functio 3: 179–204.Google Scholar
  35. MADERSON, P. F. A. 1972. The structure and evolution of holocrine epidermal glands in sphaerodactyline and eublepharine gekkonid lizards. Copeia 1972: 559–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. MADERSON, P. F. A., and CHID, K. W. 1970. Epidermal glands in gekkonid lizards: evolution and phylogeny. Herpeto Zogica 26: 233–238.Google Scholar
  37. MICHAEL, R. P., BONSALL, R. W., and WARNER, P. 1974. Human vaginal secretions: volatile fatty acid content. Science 186: 1217–1219.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. MICHAEL, R. P., KEVERNE, E. B., and BONSALL, R. W. 1971. Pheromones: isolation of male sex attractants from a female primate. Science 172: 964–166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. MULLER, G. 1961. Die Moschusdrüsen von Clemmys caspica Gmelin 1774. Zool. Anz. 167: 151–158.Google Scholar
  40. MYKYTOWYCZ, R. 1970. The role of skin glands in mammalian communication. Adv. in Chemoreception 1:327–360.Google Scholar
  41. NELSON, K. 1964. Behavior and morphology in the Glandulocaudine fishes (Ostariophysi, Characidae). Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 75: 59–152.Google Scholar
  42. OLDAK, P. D. 1976. Comparison of the scent gland secretion lipids of twenty-five snakes: implications for biochemical systematics. Copeia 1976: 320–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. OLSSON, R. 1961. The skin of Amphioxus. Z. Zellforsch. 54: 90–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. PETERS, H. M. 1964. Über larvale Haftorgane bei Tilapia (Cich- lidae, Teleostei) und ihre Rückbildung in der Evolution. Zool. Jahrb. 71: 287–300.Google Scholar
  45. PFEIFFER, W. 1960. ÜBer die Schreckreaktion bei Fischen und die Herkunft des Schreckstoffes. Z. vergl. Physiol. 43: 578–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. PFEIFFER, W. 1963. Vergleichende Untersuchungen über die Schreck- reaktion und den Schreckstoff der Ostariophysen. Zeit. f. vergl. Physiol. 47: 111–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. PFEIFFER, W. 1967. Schreckreaktion und Schreckstoffzellen bei Ostariophysi und Gonorhynchiformes. Z. vergl. Physiol. 56: 380–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. PFEIFFER, W., and LEMKE, J. 1973. Untersuchungen zur Isolierung und Identifizierung des Schreckstoffes aus der Haut der Elritze, Phoxinus phoxinus (L.) (Cyprinidae, Ostariophysi, Pisces). J. Comp. Physiol. 82: 407–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. PFEIFFER, W., SASSE, D., and ARNOLD, M. 1971. Die Schreckstoff- zellen von Phoxinus phoxinus und Morulius chrysophakedion (Cyprinidae, Ostariophysi, Pisces). Z. Zellforsch. 118: 203–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. QUAY, W. B. 1959. Microscopic structure and variation in the cutaneous glands of the deer, Odocoileus virginianus. J. Mammal. 40: 114–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. QUAY, W. B. 1955. Histology and cytochemistry of skin gland areas in the caribou, Rangifer. J. Mammal. 36: 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. QUAY, W. B. 1967. Comparative survey of the anal glands of birds. Auk 84: 379–389.Google Scholar
  53. QUAY, W. B. 1968. The specialized posterolateral sebaceous glan- dular regions in microtine rodents. J. Mammal. 49: 427–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. QUAY, W. B. 1972. Integument and the environment: glandular composition, function and evolution. Am. Zool. 12: 95–108.Google Scholar
  55. QUAY, W. B., and MüLLER-SCHWARZE, D. 1971. Relations of age and sex to integumentary glandular regions in Rocky Mountain mule deer (Odocoileus hemíonus hemionus). J. Mammal. 52: 670–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. REESE, A. M. 1921. The structure and development of the integu- mental glands of the Crocodilia. J. Morph. 35: 581–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. ROSE, F. L. 1970. Tortoise chin gland fatty acid composition: behavioral significance. Comp. Biochem. and Physiol. 32: 577–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. ROSE, F. L., DROTMAN, R., and WEAVER, W. G. 1969. Electrophoresis of chin gland extracts of Gopherus (tortoises). Comp. Biochem. and Physiol. 29: 847–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. ROSEN, M. W., and CORNFORD, N. E. 1971. Fluid friction of fish slimes. Nature 234: 49–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. SCHAFFER, J. 1940. Die Hautdrüsenorgane der Säugetiere mit besonderer Berücksichtigung ihres histologischen Aufbaues und Bemerkungen über die Proktodäaldrüsen. Urban and Schwarzenberg, Berlin and Wien.Google Scholar
  61. SINGER, A. G., AGOSTA, W. C., O’CONNELL, R. J., PFAFFMANN, C., BOWEN, D. V., and F. H. FIELD. 1976. Dimethyl disulfide: an attractant pheromone in hamster vaginal secretion. Science 191: 948–950.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. SLOPES, T. D., and WILSON, W. O. 1975. The cloacal gland-an external indicator of testicular development in coturnix. Poultry Sci. 54: 1225–1229.Google Scholar
  63. SMITH, G. M., and COATES, C. W. 1936. On the histology of the skin of the lungfish Protopterus annectens after experimentally induced aestivation. Quart. J. Microscop. Sci. 79: 487–491.Google Scholar
  64. STOKLOSOWA, S. 1966. Sexual dimorphism in the skin of sea-trout, Salmo trutta. Copeia 1966: 613–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. TODD, J. H., ATEMA, J., and BARDACH, J. E. 1967. Chemical communication in the social behavior of a fish, the yellow bullhead, Ictalurus natalis. Science 158: 672–673.Google Scholar
  66. VANDENBERGH, J. G. 1975. Pheromonal stimulation of puberty in female mice. J. Endocrinology 64:38pGoogle Scholar
  67. VANDENBERGH, J. G., WHITSETT, J. M., and LOMBARDI, J. R. 1975. Partial isolation of a pheromone accelerating puberty in female mice. J. Reprod. Fert. 43: 515–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. WARD, J. A., and BARLOW, G. W. 1967. The maturation and regula- tion of glancing off the parents by young orange chromides (Etrophus maculatus: Pisces-Cichlidae). Behavior 29: 1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. WEITZEL, G., and LENNERT, K. 1951. Untersuchungen über die Bürzeldrüse der Vögel. I. Mitteilung. Die Fettstoffe der Bürzeldrüsen von Enten. II. Mitteilung. Morphologie und Histochemie der Bürzeldrüsen von Enten. Hoppe-Seyl. Zeit. 288: 4–6; 251–272.Google Scholar
  70. WINN, H. E. 1955. Formation of a mucous envelope by parrot fishes. Zoologica 40: 145–148.Google Scholar
  71. Winokur, R. M., and Legler, J. M. 1975. Chelonian mental glands. J. Morph. 147: 275–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. B. Quay
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Zoology, and Endocrinology-Reproductive Physiology ProgramUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations