Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Postmortem Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Fetus

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fetal MRI

Part of the book series: Medical Radiology ((Med Radiol Diagn Imaging))

  • 2589 Accesses

Abstract

Postmortem fetal MR imaging is regarded as a valuable adjunct or alternative method to autopsy. The latter is frequently denied by the parents of the deceased. In addition, autopsy may be impaired by tissue autolysis. High quality anatomical information and a permanent record of the information may be obtained from postmortem MRI. Most experience exists with postmortem MRI of the brain. An examiner with experience and knowledge of both fetal development and common artefacts from postmortem MR images is essential to ensure the accurate interpretation of the information obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adamsbaum C, Gelot A, Andre C, Baron JM (2001) Atlas d’IRM du cerveau foetal. Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghayev E, Thali MJ et al (2007) Post-mortem tissue sampling using computed tomography guidance. Forensic Sci Int 166(2–3):199–203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alderliesten ME, Peringa J et al (2003) Perinatal mortality: clinical value of postmortem magnetic resonance imaging compared with autopsy in routine obstetric practice. BJOG 110(4):378–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bar W, Kratzer A et al (1988) Postmortem stability of DNA. Forensic Sci Int 39(1):59–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bendersky M, Musolino PL et al (2006) Normal anatomy of the developing fetal brain. Ex vivo anatomical-magnetic resonance imaging correlation. J Neurol Sci 250(1–2):20–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bisset R (1998) Magnetic resonance imaging may be alternative to necropsy. BMJ 317(7170):1450

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bisset RA, Thomas NB et al (2002) Postmortem examinations using magnetic resonance imaging: four year review of a working service. BMJ 324(7351):1423–1424

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Breeze AC, Cross JJ et al (2006) Use of a confidence scale in reporting postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28(7):918–924

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Breeze AC, Gallagher FA et al (2008a) Postmortem fetal organ volumetry using magnetic resonance imaging and comparison to organ weights at conventional autopsy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31(2):187–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Breeze AC, Jessop FA et al (2008b) Feasibility of percutaneous organ biopsy as part of a minimally invasive perinatal autopsy. Virchows Arch 452(2):201–207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brookes JS, Hall-Craggs MA (1997) Postmortem perinatal examination: the role of magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 9(3):145–147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burton JL (2001) Getting consent for necropsies. Perhaps we should seek consent to show necropsies to students. BMJ 323(7326):1426

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burton JL, Underwood J (2007) Clinical, educational, and epidemiological value of autopsy. Lancet 369(9571):1471–1480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burton JL, Underwood JC (2003) Necropsy practice after the “organ retention scandal”: requests, performance, and tissue retention. J Clin Pathol 56(7):537–541

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cartlidge PH, Dawson AT et al (1995) Value and quality of perinatal and infant postmortem examinations: cohort analysis of 400 consecutive deaths. BMJ 310(6973):155–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CEMACH (2008). CEMACH perinatal mortality 2006: England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi JG, Dooling EC et al (1977) Gyral development of the human brain. Ann Neurol 1(1):86–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen MC, Paley MN et al (2008) Less invasive autopsy: benefits and limitations of the use of magnetic resonance imaging in the perinatal postmortem. Pediatr Dev Pathol 11(1):1–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • D’Arceuil H, de Crespigny A (2007) The effects of brain tissue decomposition on diffusion tensor imaging and tractography. Neuroimage 36(1):64–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dean A, Whitby EH (2007) Contribution of antenatal magnetic resonance imaging to diagnostic neuropathology. Curr Diagn Pathol 13(3):171–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans C, Marton T, et al. (2008). Cranial vault defects: the description of 3 cases that illustrate a spectrum of anomalies. Pediatr Dev Pathol 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogliarini C, Chaumoitre K et al (2005a) Assessment of cortical maturation with prenatal MRI. Part I: Normal cortical maturation. Eur Radiol 15(8):1671–1685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fogliarini C, Chaumoitre K et al (2005b) Assessment of cortical maturation with prenatal MRI: part II: abnormalities of cortical maturation. Eur Radiol 15(9):1781–1789

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garel C (2004) MRI of the fetal Brain. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garel C, Chantrel E et al (2001) Fetal cerebral cortex: normal gestational landmarks identified using prenatal MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22(1):184–189

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garel C, Chantrel E et al (2003) Fetal MRI: normal gestational landmarks for cerebral biometry, gyration and myelination. Childs Nerv Syst 19(7–8):422–425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Girard N, Confort-Gouny S et al (2007) MR imaging of brain maturation. J Neuroradiol 34(5):290–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grabherr S, Djonov V et al (2006) Postmortem angiography after vascular perfusion with diesel oil and a lipophilic contrast agent. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187(5):W515–W523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grabherr S, Djonov V et al (2007) Postmortem angiography: review of former and current methods. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(3):832–838

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grabherr S, Gygax E et al (2008) Two-step postmortem angiography with a modified heart-lung machine: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190(2):345–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grandjean H, Larroque D et al (1999) The performance of routine ultrasonographic screening of pregnancies in the Eurofetus Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181(2):446–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths PD, Variend D et al (2003) Postmortem MR imaging of the fetal and stillborn central nervous system. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24(1):22–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hagmann CF, Robertson NJ, et al. (2006). Postmortem MRI as an adjunct to perinatal autopsy for renal tract abnormalities. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagmann CF, Robertson NJ et al (2007) Postmortem magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to perinatal autopsy for renal-tract abnormalities. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 92(3):F215–F218

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huisman TA, Wisser J et al (2002) MR autopsy in fetuses. Fetal Diagn Ther 17(1):58–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackowski C, Thali M et al (2006) Postmortem imaging of blood and its characteristics using MSCT and MRI. Int J Legal Med 120(4):233–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kostovic I, Judas M (2007) Transient patterns of cortical lamination during prenatal life: do they have implications for treatment? Neurosci Biobehav Rev 31(8):1157–1168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kostovic I, Judas M et al (2002) Laminar organization of the human fetal cerebrum revealed by histochemical markers and magnetic resonance imaging. Cereb Cortex 12(5):536–544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levine D, Barnes PD (1999) Cortical maturation in normal and abnormal fetuses as assessed with prenatal MR imaging. Radiology 210(3):751–758

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levy AD, Abbott RM et al (2006) Virtual autopsy: preliminary experience in high-velocity gunshot wound victims. Radiology 240(2):522–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maroun LL, Graem N (2005) Autopsy standards of body parameters and fresh organ weights in nonmacerated and macerated human fetuses. Pediatr Dev Pathol 8(2):204–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McArdle CB, Richardson CJ et al (1987) Developmental features of the neonatal brain: MR imaging. Part I. Gray-white matter differentiation and myelination. Radiology 162(1 Pt 1):223–229

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholl RM, Balasubramaniam VP et al (2007) Postmortem brain MRI with selective tissue biopsy as an adjunct to autopsy following neonatal encephalopathy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 11(3):167–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pathologists, Joint Working Party Royal College Obstetricians and Gynaecologist and Royal College of Pathologists. (1988). Report of fetal and Perinatal pathology. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picone O, Levaillant JM et al (2008) Correlation between referral ultrasound with suspected foetal anomalies and autopsy examination in two prenatal diagnosis centres. Impact of the routine use of 3D/4D scan. Prenat Diagn 28(3):191–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prayer D, Kasprian G et al (2006) MRI of normal fetal brain development. Eur J Radiol 57(2):199–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rados M, Judas M et al (2006) In vitro MRI of brain development. Eur J Radiol 57(2):187–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts IS, Benbow EW et al (2003) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in determining cause of sudden death in adults: comparison with conventional autopsy. Histopathology 42(5):424–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts ISD, Benbow EW (2007). The non-invasive or minimally invasive autopsy. Recent Advances in Histopathology 22. The Royal Society of Medicine Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts MD, Lange RC et al (1995) Fetal anatomy with magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 13(4):645–649

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ros PR, Li KC et al (1990) Preautopsy magnetic resonance imaging: initial experience. Magn Reson Imaging 8(3):303–308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sankar VH, Phadke SR (2006) Clinical utility of fetal autopsy and comparison with prenatal ultrasound findings. J Perinatol 26(4):224–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snowdon C, Elbourne DR et al (2004) Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: attitudes of neonatologists and pathologists. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 89(3):F204–F207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thali MJ, Yen K et al (2003) Virtopsy, a new imaging horizon in forensic pathology: virtual autopsy by postmortem multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–a feasibility study. J Forensic Sci 48(2):386–403

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thayyil S (2008) Magnetic resonance imaging of the post-mortem fetus – technical factors.( personal communication)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayyil S, Cleary JO, Price AC, et al (2008). Whole-body post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging at 9.4T: a rapid and less invasive autopsy for small fetuses. ISMRM, Toronto Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayyil S, Robertson NJ et al (2008b) Parental consent for research and sudden infant death. Lancet 372(9640):715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thayyil S, Schievano S, et al. (2008) A semi-automated method for non-invasive internal organ weight estimation by post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses, newborns and children. Eur J Radiol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasudevan PC, Cohen MC et al (2006) The OEIS complex: two case reports that illustrate the spectrum of abnormalities and a review of the literature. Prenat Diagn 26(3):267–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vujanic GM, Cartlidge PH et al (1998) Improving the quality of perinatal and infant necropsy examinations: a follow up study. J Clin Pathol 51(11):850–853

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward PJ, Sohaey R et al (1997) Postmortem fetal MR imaging: comparison with findings at autopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168(1):41–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Sheffield, Glossop Road, Sheffield, S10 2JF, UK

    Elspeth Whitby & Martyn Paley

  2. Sheffield Children’s Hospital, Western Bank, Sheffield, UK

    Marta Cohen

Authors
  1. Elspeth Whitby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martyn Paley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marta Cohen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elspeth Whitby .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Radiodiagnostik, Medizinische Universität Wien, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Wien, 1090, Austria

    Daniela Prayer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Whitby, E., Paley, M., Cohen, M. (2010). Postmortem Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Fetus. In: Prayer, D. (eds) Fetal MRI. Medical Radiology(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2010_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2010_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73270-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73271-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation