Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Food and Agricultural Biotechnology: A Summary and Analysis of Ethical Concerns

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Food Biotechnology

Part of the book series: Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology ((ABE,volume 111))

Abstract

The range of social and ethical concerns that have been raised in connection with food and agricultural biotechnology is exceedingly broad. Many of these deal with risks and possible outcomes that are not unique to crops or animals developed using recombinant DNA. Food safety, animal welfare, socio-economic and environmental impacts, as well as shifts in power relations or access to technology raise concerns that might be generalized to many technologies. These aspects of the controversy over biotechnology are analyzed below as elements of general technological ethics, and key norms or values pertinent to each of these categories are specified in some detail. However, a number of special concerns unique to the use of rDNA in manipulating plant and animal genomes have been raised, and these are reviewed as well. The chapter concludes by reviewing two broad policy strategies for responding to the issues, one involving labels and consumer consent, the other applying the precautionary principle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander M (1985) Ecological Consequences: Reducing the Uncertainties. Issues Sci Technol 13:57–68

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andow D, Daniell H, Gepts P, Lamkey K, Nafzinger E, Strayer D (2004) A Growing Concern: Protecting the Food Supply in an Era of Pharmaceutical and Industrial Crops. Union of Concerned Scientists, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baier A (1994) Moral Prejudices: Essays on Ethics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beck U (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Mark Ritter. Sage Publications, Tr. Newbury Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bentham J (1948) The Principles of Morals and Legislation. Hafner Publishing Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bernstein A (1999) Precaution and Respect. In: Raffensperger C, Tickner JA (eds) Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 148–158

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brill WJ (1985) Safety Concerns and Genetic Engineering in Agriculture. Science 227:381–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bockmühl J (2001) A Goethean View of Plants: Unconventional Approaches. In: Heaf D, Wirz J (eds) Intrinsic Value and Integrity of Plants in the Context of Genetic Engineering. International Forum for Genetic Engineering, Llanystumdwy, UK, pp 26–31

    Google Scholar 

  9. Borlaug N (2001) Ending World Hunger. The Promise of Biotechnology and the Threat of Antiscience Zealotry. Plant Physiol 124:487–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Boulter D (1997) Scientific and Public Perception of Plant Genetic Manipulation – A Critical Overview. Crit Rev Plant Sci 16:231–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bowring F (2003) Science, Seeds and Cyborgs: Biotechnology and the Appropriation of Life. Verso Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brody BA (1989) An Evaluation of the Ethical Arguments Commonly Raised against the Patenting of Transgenic Animals. In: Lesser W (ed) Animal Patents: The Legal, Economic and Social Issues. Stockton Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brom FWA (2000) Food, Consumer Choices and Trust: Food Ethics for a Globalizing Market. J Agric Environ Ethics 12:127–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bruce D (2003) Contamination, Crop Trails and Compatibility. J Agric Environ Ethics 16:595–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bruce D, Bruce A (1998) Engineering Genesis: The Ethics of Genetic Engineering in Non-Human Species. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brunk C, Haworth L, Lee B (1991) Value Assumptions in Risk Assessment. Wilfrid University Press, Waterloo

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brunk C, Coward H (2008) Acceptable Genes? Religious Perspectives on Genetic Engineering and Food. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY

    Google Scholar 

  18. Burrows B (2001) Patents, Ethics and Spin. In: Tokar B (ed) Designing Life? The Worldwide Challenge to Genetic Engineering. Zed Books, London, pp 238–251

    Google Scholar 

  19. Busch L, Lacy WB, Burkhardt J, Lacy LR (1991) Plants, Power and Profit: Social, Economic, and Ethical Consequences of the New Biotechnologies. Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, MA, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  20. Busch L, Allison R, Harris C, Rudy A, Shaw BT, Ten Eyck T, Coppin D, Konefal J, Oliver C, Fairweather J (2004) External Review of the Collaborative Research Agreement between Novartis Agricultural Discovery Institute, Inc. and The Regents of the University of California. Institute for Food and Agricultural Standards, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI

    Google Scholar 

  21. Buttel FH (1995) The Global Impacts of Agricultural Biotechnology: A Post-Green Revolution Perspective. In: Mepham TB, Tucker GA, Wiseman J (eds) Issues Agric Bioethics. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham

    Google Scholar 

  22. Buttel FH, Barker R (1985) Emerging Agricultural Technologies, public policy and Implications for Third World Agriculture. Am J Agric Econ 67:1170–1175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Callicott JB, Nelson M (eds) (1998) The Great New Wilderness Debate. U Georgia Press, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  24. Carr S, Levidow L (2000) Exploring the Links Between Science, Risk, Uncertainty, and Ethics in Regulatory Controversies about Genetically Modified Crops. J Agric Environ Ethics 12:29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Caruso D (2002) Risk: The Art and Science of Choice. The Hybrid Vigor Institute, San Franciso, CA

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chadwick R (2000) Novel, natural, nutritious: Towards a philosophy of food. Proc Aristot Soc 100:193–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chrispeels MJ (2000) Biotechnology and the Poor. Plant Physiol 124:3–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Clark A (2006) Environmental risks of genetic engineering. Euphytica 148:47–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Comstock G (1998) Is it unnatural to genetically engineer plants? Weed Sci 46:647–651

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Comstock G (2000) Vexing Nature? On the Ethical Case against Agricultural Biotechnology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  31. Comstock G (2002) Ethics and Genetically Modified Foods. In: Ruse M, Castle D (eds) Genetically Modified Foods: Debating Biotechnology. Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY, pp 88–107

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cranor CF (1999) Asymmetric Information, the Precautionary Principle and Burdens of Proof. In: Raffensperger C, Tickner JA (eds) Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 74–99

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cranor CF (2003) How Should Society Approach the Real and Potential Risks Posed by New Technologies? Plant Physiol 133:3–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Dahlberg KA (1979) Beyond the Green Revolution: The Ecology and Politics of Global Agricultural Development. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  35. Doyle J (1985) Altered Harvest: Agriculture, Genetics and the Future of the World's Food Supply. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  36. Durant J, Bauer MW, Gaskell G (1998) Biotechnology in the Public Sphere. The Science Museum, London

    Google Scholar 

  37. Edelman M (2001) Social Movements: Changing Paradigms and Forms of Politics. Ann Rev Anthropol 30:285–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Einsiedel E, Edna F (2000) Cloning and Its Discontents: A Canadian Perspective. Nature Biotechnol 18:943–944

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Einseidel E, Allansdottir A, Allum N, Bauer MW, Berthomier A, Chatjouli A, De Cheveigné S, Downey R, Gutterling JM, Kohring M, Leonarz M, Manzoli F, Olofsson A, Przestalski A, Rusanen T, Seifert F, Stathopoulou A, Wagner W (2002) Brave New Sheep – The Clone Named Dolly. In: Bauer MW, Gaskell G (eds) Biotechnology: The Making of a Global Controversy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 313–347

    Google Scholar 

  40. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (Undated) Food and Nutrition Website, Risk Assessment http://www.fao.org/es/esn/food/risk_biotech_se_en.stm ; accessed: March 30, 2005

  41. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (1996) Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Biotechnology and Food Safety. Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  42. FDA (Food and Drug Administration) (2008) FDA Issues Documents on the Safety of Food from Animal Clones. Press Release. Available online: http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2008/NEW01776.html . Accessed: January 21, 2008

  43. Fowler C, Mooney P (1990) Shattering: Food, Politics, and the Loss of Genetic Diversity. University of Arizona Press, Tucson

    Google Scholar 

  44. Fox MW (1990) Transgenic Animals: Ethical and Animal Welfare Concerns. In: Wheale P, McNally R (eds) The Bio-Revolution: Cornucopia or Pandora's Box. Pluto Press, London, pp 31–54

    Google Scholar 

  45. Fox MW (1992) Superpigs and Wondercorn. Lyons and Burford, London

    Google Scholar 

  46. Fox MW (1999) Beyond Evolution: The Genetically Engineered Future of Plants, Animals and Humans. The Lions Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  47. Frewer LJ, Howard C, Shepherd R (1997) Public Concerns in the United Kingdom about General and Specific Applications of Genetic Engineering: Risk, Benefit and Ethics. Sci Technol Human Values 22:98–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Frewer LJ, Lassen J, Kettlitz B, Scholderer J, Beekman V, Berdal KG (2004) Societal aspects of genetically modified foods. Food Chem Toxicol 42:1181–1193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Friedland WH, Barton AE, Thomas RJ (1981) Maufacturing Green Gold: Capital, Labor, and Technology in the Lettuce Industry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  50. Gaskell G, Bauer MW (eds) (2001) Biotechnology 1996–2000: The Years of Controversy. The Science Museum, London

    Google Scholar 

  51. Gaskell G, Thompson P, Allum N (2002) Worlds Apart? Public Opinion in Europe and the USA. In: Bauer MW, Gaskell G (eds) Biotechnology: The Making of a Global Controversy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 351–378

    Google Scholar 

  52. Gifford F (2000) Gene concepts and genetic concepts. In: Beurton P, Falk R, Rheinberger H-J (eds) The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  53. Goklany I (2000) Applying the Precautionary Principle to Genetically Modified Crops. In: Ruse M, Castle D (eds) Genetically Modified Foods: Debating Biotechnology. Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY, pp 265–291

    Google Scholar 

  54. Goldberg R, Rissler J, Shand H, Hassebrook C (1990) Biotechnology's Bitter Harvest: Herbicide Tolerant Crops and the Threat to Sustainable Agriculture. Biotechnology Working Group, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  55. Goodman D, Sorj B, Wilkinson J (1987) From Farming to Biotechnology: A Theory of Agro-industrial Development. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  56. Graham JD, Green LC, Roberts MJ (1988) In Search of Safety: Chemicals and Cancer Risk. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  57. Gray JS (1993) A Scientist's Perspective. In: Earll R (ed) The Precautionary Principle: Making it Work in Practice. Environment Council, London

    Google Scholar 

  58. Grinnell F (1992) The Scientific Attitude, 2nd edn. The Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  59. Habermas J (1990) Discourse Ethics: Notes on a Program of Philosophical Justification. In: Benhabib S, Dallmayr F (eds) The Communicative Ethics Controversy. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  60. Hanson P (1986) Morality, Posterity and Nature. In: Hanson P (ed) Environmental Ethics: Philosophical and Policy Perspectives. Institute for the Humanities, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, pp 51–66

    Google Scholar 

  61. Hansson S (2004) Great Uncertainty About Small Things. Techne 8(2):26–35

    Google Scholar 

  62. Hansson S (2004) Weighing Risks and Benefits. Topoi 23:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Heller C (2001) McDonald's, MTV and Monsanto: Resisting Biotechnology in the Age of Information Capital. In: Tokar B (ed) Redesigning Life? The Worldwide Challenge to Genetic Engineering. Zed Books, London, pp 405–419

    Google Scholar 

  64. Hettinger N (1995) Patenting Life: Biotechnology, Intellectual Property, and Environmental Ethics. Boston College Environ Affairs Law Rev 22:267–275

    Google Scholar 

  65. Hobbelink H (1991) Biotechnology and the Future of World Agriculture. Zed Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  66. Huttner S (1993) Risk and Reason: An Assessment of APHIS. In: Weaver RD (ed) US Agricultural Research: Strategic Opportunities and Options. Agricultural Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, pp 155–168

    Google Scholar 

  67. Jackson D (2000) Labelling Products of Biotechnology: Towards Communication and Consent. J Agric Environ Ethics 12:319–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Jamieson D (2000) Discourse and Moral Responsibility in Biotechnical Communication. Sci Eng Ethics 6:265–273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Jasper JM, Nelkin D (1992) The Animal Rights Crusade: The Growth of a Moral Protest. Maxwell Macmillan International, New York

    Google Scholar 

  70. Jonas H (1984) The Imperative of Responsibility: The Search for Ethics in a Technological Age. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  71. Juma C (1988) The Gene Hunters: Biotechnology and the Scramble for Seeds. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  72. Kalaitzandonakes N, Marks LA, Vickner SS (2007) Consumer Response to Labeling of Genetically Modified Foods. In: Weirich P (ed) Labeling Genetically Modified Food: The Philosophical and Legal Debate. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, pp 106–127

    Google Scholar 

  73. Kalter RJ (1985) The New Biotech Agriculture: Unforeseen Economic Consequences. Issues Sci Technol 13:125–133

    Google Scholar 

  74. Kant I (1963) Lectures on Ethics. Louis Infield, Tr. Hackett, Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  75. Kautsky K (1899) Die Agrarfrage; eine Uebersicht über die Tendenzen des modernen Landwirthschaft und die Agrarpolitik der Sozialdemokratie. JHW Dietz Nachf., Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  76. Kass L (1997) The wisdom of repugnance. The New Republic, June 2, 1997, pp 17–26

    Google Scholar 

  77. Kenney M, Buttel F (1985) Biotechnology: Prospects and Dilemmas for Third World Development. Dev Change 16:61–91

    Google Scholar 

  78. Kettner M (1993) Scientific Knowledge, Discourse Ethics, and Consensus Formation on Public Policy Issues. In: Von Schomberg R (ed) Science, Politics and Morality: Scientific Uncertainty and Decision Making. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 161–180

    Google Scholar 

  79. Kirschenmann F (1999) Can We Say “Yes” to Agriculture Using the Precautionary Principle: A Farmer's Perspective. In: Raffensperger C, Tickner JA (eds) Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 279–293

    Google Scholar 

  80. Kirkendall R (1984) The Central Theme of American Agricultural History. Agric Human Values 1(2):6–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Kloppenburg J Jr (1984) The Social Impacts of Biogenetic Technology in Agriculture: Past and Future. In: Berardi GM, Geisler CC (eds) The Social Consequences and Challenges of New Agricultural Technologies. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp 291–323

    Google Scholar 

  82. Kloppenburg J Jr (1988) First the Seed: The Political Economy of Plant Technology, 1492–2000. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  83. Krimsky S (1991) Biotechnics in Society: The Rise of Industrial Genetics. Praeger Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  84. Krimsky S, Wrubel R (1996) Agricultural Biotechnology and the Environment: Science, Policy and Social Issues. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL

    Google Scholar 

  85. Jesper L, Allansdottir A, Liakopoulos M, Thing Mortensen A, Olofsson A (2004) Testing Times – The Reception of Roundup Ready Soya in Europe. In: Bauer MW, Gaskell G (eds) Biotechnology: The Making of a Global Controversey. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 27–312

    Google Scholar 

  86. Lacey H (2005) Values and Objectivity: The Current Controversy about Transgenic Crops. Lexington Books, Lanham, MA

    Google Scholar 

  87. Lechtenberg VI, Schmid AA (1991) Intellectual Property Rights. In: Baumgardt BR, Martin MA (eds) Agricultural Biotechnology: Issues and Choices. Purdue Agricultural Experiment Station, West Lafayette, IN

    Google Scholar 

  88. Linzey A (1995) Animal Theology. University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  89. Magnus D (2002) Intellectual Property and Agricultural Biotechnology: Bioprospecting or Biopiracy? In: Magnus D, McGee G (eds) Who Owns Life? Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY, pp 265–276

    Google Scholar 

  90. Magnus D, Caplan A (2002) Food for Thought: The Primacy of the Moral in the GMO Debate. In: Ruse M, Castle D (eds) Genetically Modified Foods: Debating Biotechnology. Prometheus Press, Amherst, NY, pp 80–87

    Google Scholar 

  91. Mandel GN (2004) Gaps, Inexperience, Inconsistencies, and Overlaps: Crisis in the Regulation of Genetically Modified Plants and Animals. William Mary Law Rev 45:2167

    Google Scholar 

  92. Martin MA (2000) Agricultural Biotechnology: What's All the Fuss About? Purdue Agricultural Economics Report. Purdue University Department of Agricultural Economics, March 2000, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  93. Mayo D (1991) Sociological vs. Metascientific Views of Risk Assessment. In: Mayo DG, Hollander RD (eds) Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 249–280

    Google Scholar 

  94. McGinn R (1994) Technology, Demography and the Anachronism of Traditional Rights. J Appl Philos 11(1):57–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Mellon M, Rissler J (2004) Gone to Seed: Transgenic Contaminents in the Traditional Seed Supply. Union of Concerned Scientists, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  96. Mepham B (2000) A Framework for the Ethical Analysis of Novel Foods: The Ethical Matrix. J Agric Environ Ethics 12:165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Mepham TB, Combes RD, Balls M, Barbieri O, Blokhuis HJ, Costa P, Crilly RE, De Cock Buning T, Delpire VC, O'Hare MJ, Houdebine L-M, Van Kreijl CF, Van der Meer M, Reinhardt CA, Wolf E, Van Zeller A-M (1998) ECVAM Workshop Report 28: The use of transgenic animals in the European Union. Altern Lab Anim 26:21–43

    Google Scholar 

  98. Midden C, Boy D, Einseidel E, Fjæstad B, Liakopoulos M, Miller JD, Öhman S, Wagner W (2002) The Structure of Public Perceptions. In: Bauer MW, Gaskell G (eds) Biotechnology: The Making of a Global Controversy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 203–223

    Google Scholar 

  99. Midgely M (2000) Biotechnology and Monstrosity: Why We Should Pay Attention to the “Yuk Factor”. Hastings Center Report 30(5):7–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Mies M, Shiva V (eds) (1993) Ecofeminism. Zed Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  101. Miller HI (2000) Agricultural biotechnology, law, and food biotechnology regulation In: Murray TH, Mehlman MJ (eds) Encyclopedia of Ethical, Legal and Policy Issues in Biotechnology. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 37–46

    Google Scholar 

  102. Miller HI, Conko G (2001) Precaution without Principle. Nature Biotechnol 19:302–303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Montmarquet J (1987) The Idea of Agrarianism. University of Idaho Press, Moscow, ID

    Google Scholar 

  104. Muir WM, Howard RD (1999) Possible ecological risks of transgenic organism release when transgenes affect mating success: sexual selection and the Trojan gene hypothesis. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 96:13853–13856

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Nelkin D, Lindee MS (1995) The DNA Mystique: The Gene as a Cultural Icon. WH Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  106. Nelson JR (1994) On the New Frontiers of Genetics and Religion. Eerdmans Publishing, Grand Rapids, MI

    Google Scholar 

  107. Nestle M (1998) Food Biotechnology: Labeling Will Benefit Industry as Well as Consumers. Nutrit Today 13(1):6–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. NRC (National Research Council) (1983) Risk Assessment in the Federal Government. National Academy Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  109. NRC (National Research Council) (1989) Field Testing Genetically Modified Organisms: Framework for Decisions. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  110. NRC (National Research Council) (2000) Genetically Modified Pest Protected Plants: Science and Regulation. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  111. NRC (National Research Council) (2002a) Environmental Effects of Transgenic Plants. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  112. NRC (National Research Council) (2002b) Animal Biotechnology: Science-Based Concerns. National Academies Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  113. Nuffield Council on Bioethics (1999) Genetically Modified Crops: The Ethical and Social Issues. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, London

    Google Scholar 

  114. Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2003) The use of genetically modified crops in developing countries. http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org ; accessed: May 31, 2005

  115. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1993) Safety evaluation of foods produced by modern biotechnology: Concepts and principles. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  116. O'Riordan T, Jordan A (1995) The Precautionary Principle in Contemporary Environmental Politics. Environ Values 4:191–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Ortiz SEG (2004) Beyond Welfare: Animal Integrity, Animal Dignity and Genetic Engineering. Ethics Environ 9:94–120

    Google Scholar 

  118. Ozonoff D (1999) The Precautionary Principle as a Screening Device. In: Raffensperger C, Tickner JA (eds) Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 100–105

    Google Scholar 

  119. Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (1998) Genetically Modified Foods – Benefits and Risks, Regulation and Public Acceptance. Parliamentary Bookshop, London

    Google Scholar 

  120. Pence GE (2002) Designer Food: Mutant Harvest or Breadbasket of the World? Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD

    Google Scholar 

  121. Peritore NP, Glave-Peritore AK (eds) (1995) Biotechnology in Latin America: Politics, Impacts, and Risks. SR Books, Wilmington, DE

    Google Scholar 

  122. Persley GJ (1990) Beyond Mendel's Garden; Biotechnology in the Service of World Agriculture. CAB Int, Wallingford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  123. Peters T (1997) Playing God: Genetic Determinism and Human Freedom. Routledge Publishing Co, New York

    Google Scholar 

  124. Petrina S, Volk K, Kim S (2004) Technology and Rights. Int J Technol Des Educ 14:181–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Phillips PWB, Onwuekwe CB (eds) (2007) Accessing and Sharing the Benefits of the Genomics Revolution. Springer, Dordrecht, NL

    Google Scholar 

  126. Postma D (2006) Why Care for Nature? Springer, Dordrecht, NL

    Google Scholar 

  127. Powell D, Leiss W (1997) Mad Cows and Mothers Milk: The Perils of Poor Risk Communication. McGill-Queens University Press, Montreal and Kingston

    Google Scholar 

  128. Press E, Washburn J (2000) The Kept University. The Atlantic Monthly 285(3):39–54

    Google Scholar 

  129. Priest SH (2000) US Public Opinion Divided Over Biotechnology? Nature Biotechnol 18:939–942

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  130. Regan T (1983) The Case for Animal Rights. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  131. Regan T (2003) Animal Rights and Human Wrongs: An Introduction to Moral Philosophy. Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  132. Reiss MJ, Straughan R (1996) Improving Nature? The Science and Ethics of Genetic Engineering. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  133. Robinson J (1999) Ethics and Transgenic Crops: A Review. Electron J Biotechnol 2:71–81

    Google Scholar 

  134. Rifkin J (1985) Declaration of a Heretic. Routledge and Kegan Paul, Boston and London

    Google Scholar 

  135. Rifkin J (1995) Farm Animals and the Biotechnology Revolution. In: Wheale P, McNally R (eds) Animal Genetic Engineering: Of Pigs, Oncomice and Men. Pluto Press, London, pp 19–38

    Google Scholar 

  136. Rippe KP (2000) Novel Foods and consumer Rights: Concerning Food Policy in a Liberal State. J Agric Environ Ethics 12:71–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  137. Rissler J, Mellon M (1996) The Ecological Risks of Engineered Crops. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  138. Rollin B (1995) The Frankenstein Syndrome: Ethical and Social Issues in the Genetic Engineering of Animals. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  139. Rollin B (1996) Bad Ethics, Good Ethics and the Genetic Engineering of Animals in Agriculture. J Animal Sci 74:535–541

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  140. Royal Society of Canada (2001) Elements of Precaution. Royal Society of Canada, Ottawa, ON http://www.agbios.com/docroot/articles/2001035-A.pdf ; accessed: March 30, 2005

  141. Rubial-Mendieta NL, Lints FA (1998) Novel and Transgenic Food Crops: Overview of Scientific versus Public Perception. Transgenic Res 7:379–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Rudacille D (2000) The Scalpel and the Butterfly: The War Between Animal Research and Animal Protection. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York

    Google Scholar 

  143. Ryder R (1995) Animal Genetic Engineering and Human Progress. In: Wheale P, McNally R (eds) Animal Genetic Engineering: Of Pigs, Oncomice and Men. Pluto Press, London, pp 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  144. Sagoff M (2001) Biotechnology and the Natural. Philos Public Policy Quart 21:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  145. Sandler R (2004) An Aretaic Objection to Agricultural Biotechnology. J Agric Environ Ethics 17:301–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. Sandøe P, Nielsen BL, Christensen LG, Sørensen P (1999) Staying good while playing god: the ethics of breeding farm animals. Anim Welf 8:313–328

    Google Scholar 

  147. Saner MA (2000) Ethics as problem and ethics as a solution. Int J Biotechnol 2:219–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. Saner MA (2001) Real and Metaphorical Moral Limits in the Biotech Debate. Nature Biotechnol 19:609

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  149. Schmid AA (2004) Conflict and Cooperation: Institutional and Behavioral Economics. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK and Malden, MA

    Google Scholar 

  150. Schmitz A, Seckler D (1970) Mechanized Agriculture and Social Welfare: The Case of the Tomato Harvester. Am J Agric Econ 52:569–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  151. Schor J (1994) The Evolution and Development of Biotechnology: A Revolutionary Force in American Agriculture. Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Staff Report No. AGES 9424

    Google Scholar 

  152. Sen A (1987) On Ethics and Economics. Basil Blackwell, London

    Google Scholar 

  153. Shand H (2001) Gene Giants: Understanding the Life Industry. In: Tokar B (ed) Designing Life? The Worldwide Resistance to Genetic Engineering. Zed Books, London, pp 222–237

    Google Scholar 

  154. Sherlock R, Kawar A (1990) Regulating Genetically Engineered Organisms: The Case of the Dairy Industry. In: Webber DJ (ed) Biotechnology: Assessing Social Impacts and Policy Implications. Greenwood Press, New York, pp 117–129

    Google Scholar 

  155. Shiva V (1993) Monocultures of the Mind: Perspectives on Biodiversity and Biotechnology. Zed Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  156. Shiva V (1995) Epilogue: Beyond Reductionism. In: Shiva V, Moser I (eds) Biopolitics: A Feminist and Ecological Reader on Biotechnology. Zed Books, London, pp 267–284

    Google Scholar 

  157. Shiva V (1997) Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge. South End Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  158. Shiva V (2000) Stolen Harvest: The Hijacking of the Global Food Supply. South End Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  159. Singer P (1975) Animal Liberation: A New Ethic for Our Treatment of Animals. Avon Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  160. Singer P (2002) Animal Liberation, Revised Edition. HarperCollins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  161. Smith KK (2003) Wendell Berry and the Agrarian Tradition: A Common Grace. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence

    Google Scholar 

  162. Sorabji R (1993) Animal Minds and Human Morals: the origin of the Western debate. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  163. Sparks P, Shepherd R, Frewer L (1995) Assessing and structuring attitudes towards the use of gene technology in food production: The role of perceived ethical obligation. J Basic Appl Social Psychol 16:267–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  164. Straughn R (1995) Ethical aspects of crop biotechnology. In: Mepham TB, Tucker GA, Wiseman J (eds) Issues in Agricultural Bioethics. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, pp 163–176

    Google Scholar 

  165. Streiffer R, Rubel A (2004) Democratic Principles and Mandatory Labeling of Genetically Engineered Food. Public Affairs Quart 18:223

    Google Scholar 

  166. Streiffer R, Hedemann T (2005) The Political Import of Intrinsic Objections to Genetically Engineered Food. J Agric Environ Ethics 18:191–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  167. Suk J, Bruce A, Gertz R, Warkup C, Whitelaw C, Braun A, Oram C, Rodriguez-Cerezo E, Papatryfon I (2007) Dolly for dinner? Assessing commercial and regulatory trends in cloned livestock. Nature Biotechnol 25:47–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  168. Tauli-Corpuz V (2001) Biotechnology and Indigenous Peoples. In: Tokar B (ed) Designing Life? The Worldwide Challenge to Genetic Engineering. Zed Books, London, pp 252–270

    Google Scholar 

  169. Taylor MR, Tick JS, Sherman DM (2004) Tending the Fields: State and Federal Oversight of Genetically Modified Crops. Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  170. Thompson EP (1971) The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century. Past Present 50:76–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  171. Thompson PB (1986) Uncertainty Arguments in Environmental Issues. Environ Ethics 8:59–75

    Google Scholar 

  172. Thompson PB (1987) Agricultural Biotechnology and the Rhetoric of Risk: Some Conceptual Issues. Environ Profess 9:316–326

    Google Scholar 

  173. Thompson PB (2000) Discourse Ethics for Agricultural Biotechnology: Its Limits and Its Inevitability. Sci Eng Ethics 6:275–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  174. Thompson PB (2003) Value Judgments and Risk Comparisons: The Case of Genetically Engineered Crops. Plant Physiol 132:10–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  175. Thompson PB (2007) Food Biotechnology in Ethical Perspective, 2nd edn. Springer, Dordrecht, NL

    Google Scholar 

  176. Thompson PB (2008) Current ethical issues in animal biotechnology. Reprod Fertil Dev 20:67–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  177. Tokar B (2001) Resisting the Engineering of Life. In: Redesigning Life? The Worldwide Challenge to Genetic Engineering. Zed Books, London, pp 320–336

    Google Scholar 

  178. Tripp R (2001) Can biotechnology reach the poor? The adequacy of information and seed delivery. Food Policy 26:249–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  179. UNEP (United Nations Environmental Program) (1992) Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. http://www.unep.org/Documents/Default.asp?DocumentID=78&ArticleID=1163 ; accessed: March 30, 2004

  180. Van den Belt H (2003) Debating the Precautionary Principle: “Guilty until Proven Innocent” or “Innocent until Proven Guilty”? Plant Physiol 132:1122–1126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  181. Varner G (2000) Cloning, overview of animal cloning. In: Murray T, Mehlman M (eds) Encyclopedia of Ethical, Legal and Policy Issues in Biotechnology. John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, pp 139–148

    Google Scholar 

  182. Verhoog H (1992) The concept of intrinsic value and transgenic animals. J Agric Environ Ethics 5:147–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  183. Verhoog H (1993) Biotechnology and ethics. In: Brante T, Fuller S, Lynch W (eds) Controversial Science. SUNY Press, New York, pp 83–106

    Google Scholar 

  184. Vogt DU (1999) Food Biotechnology in the United States: Science Regulation, and Issues. Congressional Research Service, Washington DC (Order Code RL30198)

    Google Scholar 

  185. de Vries R (2006) Genetic Engineering and the Integrity of Animals. J Agric Environ Ethics 19:469–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  186. Von Schomberg R (ed) (1995) Contested Technology: Ethics, Risk and Public Debate. International Centre for Human and Public Affairs, Tilburg

    Google Scholar 

  187. Von Wartburg WP, Liew J (1999) Gene Technology and Social Acceptance. University Press of America, Lanham, MA

    Google Scholar 

  188. Wagner W, Kronberger N, Allum N, de Cheveigné S, Diego C, Gaskell G, Heinßen M, Midden C, Ødegaard M, Öhman S, Rizzo B, Rusanen T, Stathopoulou A (2002) Pandora's Genes – Images of Genes and Nature. In: Bauer MW, Gaskell G (eds) Biotechnology: The Making of A Global Controversy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 244–276

    Google Scholar 

  189. Wambugu F (2002) Why Africa Needs Biotech. In: Ruse M, Castle D (eds) Genetically Modified Foods: Debating Biotechnology. Prometheus Press, Amherst, NY, pp 304–308

    Google Scholar 

  190. WCC (World Council of Churches) (2005) Transforming Life, Volume 2: Genetics, Agriculture and Human Life. World Association for Christian Communication, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  191. Weaver SA, Morris MC (2005) Risks Associated with Genetic Modification: An Annotated Bibliography of Peer Reviewed Natural Science Publications. J Agric Environ Ethics 18:157–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  192. Wolfenbarger LL, Phifer PR (2000) The Ecological Risks and Benefits of Genetically Engineered Plants. Science 290:2088–2093

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  193. WTO (World Trade Organization) (1994) Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/t_agm0_e.htm ; accessed: June 28, 2005

  194. Yang X, Tian C, Kubota C, Page R, Xu J, Cibelli J, Seidel G (2007) Risk assessment of meat and milk from cloned animals. Nature Biotechnol 25:77–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  195. Zwart H (2000) A Short History of Food Ethics. J Agric Environ Ethics 12:113–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Michigan State University, 48824-1320, East Lansing, MI, USA

    Paul B. Thompson & William Hannah

Authors
  1. Paul B. Thompson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William Hannah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul B. Thompson .

Editor information

Ulf Stahl Ute E. B. Donalies Elke Nevoigt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thompson, P.B., Hannah, W. (2008). Food and Agricultural Biotechnology: A Summary and Analysis of Ethical Concerns. In: Stahl, U., Donalies, U.E., Nevoigt, E. (eds) Food Biotechnology. Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, vol 111. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2008_100

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation