Advertisement

Bionanomaterials from Agricultural Wastes

  • Manpreet Kaur
  • Akshita Mehta
  • Kamal Kumar Bhardwaj
  • Reena GuptaEmail author
Chapter
  • 25 Downloads
Part of the Advanced Structured Materials book series (STRUCTMAT, volume 126)

Abstract

Agricultural biomass is the organic material left as a by-product after agricultural activities, particularly in developing countries. Present-day scenario witnesses a declined supply of raw materials which is a cause for concern. Natural fiber possesses properties that make them a suitable alternative material to be used in local timber industries for the production of value-added products. Agricultural cellulose offers many advantages because of its renewable and biodegradable properties. Cellulose fibers exhibit a unique structural hierarchy derived from their biological origin. Cellulose nanofibers (CNFs) owing to their morphology and physical properties have been proven a promising material not only in the fields of cosmetics, medicine, biocomposites and health care but are also progressing immensely to many other unlimited applications including high gas barrier packaging material, filter material and electronic devices. Depletion of natural resources, growing population and environmental concerns has increased the attention for the extreme development and use of nanomaterials from biomass. Marvelous and complex structure of bionanoparticles is helpful while understanding the chemical applications, and as a result the bionanomaterials can serve as the filler/reinforcement in polymer composites. The goal of this chapter is to discuss the properties of agricultural wastes along with its use as a bionanomaterial and its potential applications.

Keywords

Cellulose Bionanomaterials Agricultural biomass Biocomposites Biopolymers 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The financial support granted to Ms. Manpreet Kaur in the form of JRF from the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) is thankfully acknowledged. The financial assistance from the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) in the form of SRF to Mr. Kamal Kumar Bhardwaj is also thankfully acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interests The author(s) declare(s) that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article.

References

  1. Abdul Khalil HPS, Fizree HM, Jawaid M, Alattas OS (2011) Preparation and characterization of nano-structured materials from oil palm ash: a bio-agricultural waste from oil palm mill. BioResources 64:4537–4546Google Scholar
  2. Abdul Khalil HPS, Bhat AH, Ireana Yusra AF (2012) Green composites from sustainable cellulose nanofibrils: a review. Carbohydr Polym 87:963–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abdul Khalil HPS, Aprilia NAS, Bhat AH, Jawaid M, Paridah MT, Dungani R (2013) A Jatropha biomass as renewable materials for biocomposites and its applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2013:667–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahmed S, Saiqa Ikram S (2015) Synthesis of gold nanoparticles using plant extract: an overview. Nano Res Appl 1:1–5Google Scholar
  5. Akbari B, Tavandashti MP, Zandrahimi M (2011) Particle size characterization of nanoparticles—a practical approach. Iran J Mater Sci Eng 8:48–56Google Scholar
  6. Akil HM, Omar MF, Mazuki AAM, Safiee S, Ishak ZAM, Bakar AA (2011) Kenaf fiber reinforced composites: a review. Mater Design 32:4107–4121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Alemdar A, Sain M (2008) Isolation and characterization of nanofibers from agricultural residues-wheat straw and soy hulls. Bioresour Technol 99:1664–1671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Andersen TR, Yan Q, Larsen-Olsen TT, Søndergaard R, Li Q, Andreasen B et al (2012) A nanoparticle approach towards morphology controlled organic photovoltaics (OPV). Polymers 4:1242–1258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Aprilia NS, Davoudpour Y, Zulqarnain W, Khalil HA, Hazwan CC, Hossain MS et al (2016) Physicochemical characterization of microcrystalline cellulose extracted from kenaf bast. BioResources 11:3875–3889Google Scholar
  10. Ayrilmis N, Jarusombuti S, Fueangvivat V, Bauchongkol P, White R (2011) Coir fiber reinforced polypropylene composite panel for automotive interior applications. Fibers Polym 12:919–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Azeredo HMC (2013) Antimicrobial nanostructures in food packaging. Trends Food Sci Technol 30:56–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Azwa Z, Yousif B, Manalo A, Karunasena W (2013) A review on the degradability of polymeric composites based on natural fibers. Mater Des 47:424–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bajwa SG, Bajwa DS, Holt G, Coffelt T, Nakayama F (2011) Properties of thermoplastic composites with cotton and guayule biomass residues as fiber fillers. Ind Crops Prod 33:747–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bartus SD, Vaidya UK, Ulven CA (2005) Design and development of a long fiber thermoplastic bus seat. Compos Struct 67:263–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bi Y, Luo R, Li J, Feng Z, Jin Z (2008) The effects of the hydraulic oil on mechanical and tribological properties of C/C composites. Mater Sci Eng, A 484:274–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chaker A, Mutjé P, Vilar MR, Boufi S (2014) Agriculture crop residues as a source for the production of nanofibrillated cellulose with low energy demand. Cellulose 21:4247–4259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chand N, Prajapati SC, Singh RK (2012) Development and characterization of sisal nano fiber reinforced polyolefin composites. J Sci Res Rev 1:26–32Google Scholar
  18. Chen H (2014) Chemical composition and structure of natural lignocellulose. In: Chen H (ed) Biotechnology of lignocellulose. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 25–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen WS, Yu HP, Liu YX, Chen P, Zhang MX, Hai YF (2011) Individualization of cellulose nanofibers from wood using high-intensity ultrasonication combined with chemical pretreatments. Carbohydr Polym 83:1804–1811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chen H, Wang W, Martin JC, Oliphant AJ, Doerr PA, Xu JF et al (2013) Extraction of lignocellulose and synthesis of porous silica nanoparticles from rice husks: a comprehensive utilization of rice husk biomass. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 1:254–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cherian BM, Leão AL, de Souza SF, Thomas S, Pothan LA, Kottaisamy M (2010) Isolation of nanocellulose from pineapple leaf fibers by steam explosion. Carbohydr Polym 81:720–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dungani R, Islam N, Abdul Khalil HPS, Hartati S, Abdullah CK, Dewi M et al (2013) Termite resistance study of oil palm trunk lumber (OPTL) impregnated with oil palm shell meal and phenol-formaldehyde resin. BioResources 8:4937–4950Google Scholar
  23. Durán N, Lemes AP, Seabra AB (2012) Review of cellulose nanocrystals patents: preparation, composites and general applications. Recent Pat Nanotechnol 6:16–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fatah IYA, Abdul Khalil HPS, Hossain MdS, Aziz AA, Davoudpour Y, Dungani R et al (2014) Exploration of a chemo-mechanical technique for the isolation of nanofibrillated cellulosic fiber from oil palm empty fruit bunch as a reinforcing agent in composites materials. Polymers 6:2611–2624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ghaedi M, Jahromi MN, Sajedi M, Mousavi H (2015) Comparison of modified palladium nanoparticles and homemade activated carbon derived from medlar for solid phase extraction of metal ions prior to their flame atomic absorption spectrometry determination. Environ Stud Persian Gulf 2:1–14Google Scholar
  26. Ghorbani F, Sanati AM, Maleki M (2015) Production of silica nanoparticles from rice husk as agricultural waste by environmental friendly technique. Environ Stud Persian Gulf 2:56–65Google Scholar
  27. Hariharan V, Sivakumar G (2013) Studies on synthesized nanosilica obtained from bagasse ash. Int J ChemTech Res 5:1263–1266Google Scholar
  28. Hill K, Swiecki B, Cregger J (2012) The bio-based materials automotive value chain. Center Automot Res 2012:23–27Google Scholar
  29. Hua K, Carlsson DO, Ålander E, Lindström T, Strømme M, Mihranyan A et al (2014) Translational study between structure and biological response of nanocellulose from wood and green algae. RSC Adv 4:2892–2903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Huang JL, Gray DG, Li CJ (2013) A3-Coupling catalyzed by robust Au nanoparticles covalently bonded to HS-functionalized cellulose nanocrystalline films. J Org Chem 9:1388–1396Google Scholar
  31. Jawaid M, Abdul Khalil HPS (2011) Cellulosic/synthetic fiber reinforced polymer hybrid composites: a review. Carbohydr Polym 86:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jiang J, Oberdorster G, Biswas P (2009) Characterization of size, surface charge and agglomeration state of nanoparticle dispersions for toxicological studies. Nanopart Res 11:77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Johar N, Ahmad I, Dufresne A (2012) Extraction, preparation and characterization of cellulose fibers and nanocrystals from rice husk. Ind Crop Prod 37:93–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. John MJ, Thomas S (2008) Biofibers and biocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 71:343–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kalia S, Dufresne A, Cherian BM, Kaith BS, Averous L, Njuguna J et al (2011) Cellulose-based bio- and nanocomposites: a review. Inter J Polym Sci 2011:1–35Google Scholar
  36. Kaur M, Mehta A, Gupta R (2018) Biomedical applications of synthetic and natural biodegradable polymers. In: Shakeel Ahmed et al (eds) Green and sustainable advanced materials, vol 2. Scrivener Publishing LLC, pp 281–310Google Scholar
  37. Kiziltas A, Nazari B, Gardner DJ, Bousfield DW (2013) Polyamide 6-cellulose composites: effect of cellulose composition on melt rheology and crystallization behaviour. Polym Eng Sci 54:739–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lavoine N, Desloges I, Dufresne A, Bras J (2012) Microfibrillated cellulose–its barrier properties and applications in cellulosic materials: a review. Carbohydr Polym 90:735–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Leblanc JL (2002) Rubber–filler interactions and rheological properties in filled compounds. Prog Polym Sci 27:627–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Li Z, Wang L, Wang X (2007) Cement composites reinforced with surface modified coir fibers. J Compos Mater 41:1445–1457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lin N, Dufresne A (2014) Nanocellulose in biomedicine: current status and future prospect. Eur Polym J 59:302–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Liu L, Ding X, Li J, Luo Z, Hu Y, Liu J et al (2015) Enzyme responsive drug delivery system based on mesoporous silica nanoparticles for tumor therapy in vivo. Nanotechnology 26:15–24Google Scholar
  43. Masoodi R, El-Hajjar RF, Pillai KM, Sabo R (2012) Mechanical characterization of cellulose nanofiber and bio-based epoxy composite. Mater Des 36:570–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Miao C, Hamad WY (2013) Cellulose reinforced polymer composites and nanocomposites: a critical review. Cellulose 20:2221–2262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Millon E, Wan WK (2006) The polyvinyl alcohol-bacterial cellulose system as a new nanocomposite for biomedical applications. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 79:245–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mollick MdMR, Rana D, Dash SK, Chattopadhyay S, Bhowmick B, Maity D et al (2016) Studies on green synthesized silver nanoparticles using Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) pulp extract having anticancer (in vitro) and antimicrobial applications. Arabian J Chem.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2015.04.033
  47. Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40:3941–3994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Namvar F, Jawaid M, Tanir PM, Mohamad R, Azizi S, Khodavandi A et al (2014) Potential use of plant fibers and their composites for biomedical applications. BioResources 9:5688–5706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nisha SN, Aysha OS, Rahaman JSN, Kumar PV, Valli S, Nirmala P et al (2014) Lemon peels mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles and its antidermatophytic activity. Spectrochim Acta Part A Mol Biomol Spectros 124:194–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ooi ZX, Ismail H, Bakar AA (2013) Optimisation of oil palm ash as reinforcement in natural rubber vulcanisation: a comparison between silica and carbon black fillers. Polym Test 32:625–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pickering K (2008) Properties and performance of natural-fiber composites. Woodhead Publishing, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Purkait BS, Ray D, Sengupta S, Kar T, Mohanty A, Misra M (2011) Isolation of cellulose nanoparticles from sesame husk. Ind Eng Chem Res 50:871–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Regan BC, Aloni S, Jensen K, Ritchie RO, Zettl A (2005) Nanocrystal-powered nanomotor. Nano Lett 5:1730–1733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Robles E, Urruzola I, Labidi J, Serrano L (2015) Surface modified nano-cellulose as reinforcement 390 in poly(lactic acid) to conform new composites. Ind Crops Prod 71:44–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rowell RM, Han JS, Rowell JS (2000) Characterization and factors effecting fiber properties. In: Frollini E, Leao AL, Mattoso LHC (eds) Natural polymers and agrofibers composites. Embrapa Agricultural Instrumentation, San Carlos, Brazil, pp 115–134Google Scholar
  56. Saritha S, Nair SM, Kumar NC (2013) Nano-ordered cellulose containing Iα crystalline domains derived from the algae Chaetomorpha antennina. BioNano Sci 3:423–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sasthiryar S, Abdul Khalil HPS, Bhat AH, Ahmad ZA, Islam MdZ, Zaidon A et al (2014) Nanobioceramic composites: a study of mechanical, morphological and thermal properties. BioResources 9:861–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Saurabh CK, Dungani R, Owolabi AF, Atiqah NS, Zaidon A, Aprilia NAS et al (2016) Effect of hydrolysis treatment on cellulose nanowhiskers from oil palm (Elaeis guineesis) fronds: morphology, chemical, crystallinity, and thermal characteristics. BioResources 11:6742–6755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Seo HJ, Kim S, Huh W, Park KW, Lee DR, Son DW et al (2015) Enhancing the flame-retardant performance of wood-based materials using carbon-based materials. J Therm Anal Calorim 123:1935–1942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sheltami RM, Abdullah I, Ahmad I, Dufresne A, Kargarzadeh H (2012) Extraction of cellulose nanocrystals from mengkuang leaves (Pandanus tectorius). Carbohyd Polym 88:772–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shinoj S, Visvanathan R, Panigrahi S, Kochubabu M (2011) Oil palm fiber (OPF) and its composites: a review. Ind Crops Prod 33:7–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Siqueira G, Bras J, Dufresne A (2010) Cellulosic bionanocomposites: a review of preparation, properties and applications. Polymers 2:728–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Siro I, Placket D (2010) Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose 17:459–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stenstad P, Andresen M, Tanem BS, Stenius P (2008) Chemical surface modifications of microfibrillated cellulose. Cellulose 15:35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sulaeman A, Dungani R, Islam MN, Abdul Khalil HPS, Sumardi I, Hermawan D et al (2016) Preliminary study of characterization of nanoparticles from coconut shell as filler agent in composites materials. MAYFEB J Mater Sci 1:1–9Google Scholar
  66. Tabatabaei S, Shukohfar A, Aghababazadeh R, Mirhabibi A (2006) Experimental study of the synthesis and characterisation of silica nanoparticles via the sol-gel method. J Phys: Conf Ser 26:371–374Google Scholar
  67. Tang Y, He Z, Mosseler JA, Ni Y (2014) Production of highly electro-conductive cellulosic paper via surface coating of carbon nanotube/graphene oxide nanocomposites using nanocrystalline cellulose as a binder. Cellulose 21:4569–4581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Thomas S, Paul SA, Pothan LA, Deepa B (2011) Cellulose fibers: bio-and nano-polymer composites. In: Kalia S, Kaith BS, Kaur I (eds) Natural fibers: structure, properties and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–42Google Scholar
  69. Vaccaro L, Spallino L, Agnello S, Buscarino G, Cannas M (2013) Defect-related visible luminescence of silica nanoparticles. Phys Status Solidi C 10:658–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vaibhav V, Vijayalakshmi U, Mohana Roopan S (2015) Agricultural waste as a source for the production of silica nanoparticles. Spectrochim Acta, Part A 139:515–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wambua P, Ivens J, Verpoest I (2003) Natural fibers: can they replace glass in fiber reinforced plastics? Compos Sci Technol 63:1259–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wang S, Zhang Y, Xing C (2007) Effects of strand drying methods on wood surface wettability. Holz Roh Werkst 65:437–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Watcharakul N, Poompradub S, Prasassarakich P (2011) In situ silica reinforcement of methyl methacrylate grafted natural rubber by sol–gel process. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 58:407–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wu X, Radovic LR (2006) Inhibition of catalytic oxidation of carbon/carbon composites by phosphorus. Carbon 44:141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Yahaya S, Giwa SO, Ibrahim M, Giwa A (2016) Extraction of oil from jatropha seed kernels: optimization and characterization. Int J ChemTech Res 9:758–770Google Scholar
  76. Zhou Y, Fan M, Chen L, Zhuang J (2015) Lignocellulosic fiber mediated rubber composites: an overview. Compos Part B 76:180–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zhu H, Fang Z, Preston C, Li Y, Hu L (2014) Transparent paper: fabrications, properties, and device applications. Energy Environ Sci 7:269–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manpreet Kaur
    • 1
  • Akshita Mehta
    • 1
  • Kamal Kumar Bhardwaj
    • 1
  • Reena Gupta
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of BiotechnologyHimachal Pradesh UniversitySummerhill, ShimlaIndia

Personalised recommendations