Advertisement

Flexural Analysis for Syntactic Foam Sandwich Panels

  • Zulzamri SallehEmail author
  • M. Islam
  • J. Epaarachchi
  • M. Zulkarnain
  • Yaseen Adenan Ahmed
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

The investigation on the strain value for flexural sandwich panel syntactic foam were also carried out using the FEA approach to predict the properties’ behaviour in this study. It was found that the micro strain for SG1 for FEA was 17% higher than the experimental value, even though they were at the same loading setting. However, the prediction for the micro strain of SG2 was only 2.7% different, which was considered a good agreement to predict the properties of syntactic foam core sandwich panel for different loading values.

Keywords

Syntactic foam Strain gauge Finite element analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Gupta N, Woldesenbet E (2003) Hygrothermal studies on syntactic foams and compressive strength determination. Compos Struct 61:311–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sauvant-Moynot V, Gimenez N, Sautereau H (2006) Hydrolytic ageing of syntactic foams for thermal insulation in deep water: degradation mechanisms and water uptake model. J Mater Sci 41:4047–4054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vasanth C, Dinesh P, Gupta N (2012) Thermal expansion behaviour of hollow glass particle/vinyl ester composites. J Mater Sci 47:5596–5604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Swetha C, Kumar R (2011) Quasi-static uni-axial compression behaviour of hollow glass microspheres/epoxy based syntactic foams. Mater Des 32:4152–4163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gupta N, Woldesenbet E, Mensah P (2004) Compression properties of syntactic foams: Effect of cenosphere radius ratio and specimen aspect ratio. Composites: Part A 35:103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gupta N, Ye R, Porfiri M (2010) Comparison of tensile and compressive characteristics of vinyl ester/glass microballoon syntactic foams. Compos B Eng 41:236–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Devi K, John B, Ninan CNK (2007) Effect of low-density filler on mechanical properties of syntactic foams of cyanate ester. J Appl Polym SciGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Salleh Z, Islam M, Ku H (2014) Study on compressive properties of syntactic foams for marine applications. J Multifunct Compos 21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tien C, Gupta N, Talalayev A (2009) Thermoanalytical characterization of epoxy matrix-glass microballoon syntactic foams. J Mater Sci 44:1520–1527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Poveda R, Gupta N, Porfiri M (2010) Poisson’s ratio of hollow particle filled composites. Mater Lett 64:2360–2362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gladysz G, Perry B, McEachen G, Lula J (2006) Three-phase syntactic foams: structure property relationships. J Mater Sci 41:4085–4092 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jain N, Mittal N (2008) Finite element analysis for stress concentration and deflection in isotropic orthotropic and laminated composite plates with central circular hole under transverse static loading. Mater Sci Eng 498:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gupta N, Woldesenbet E, Kishore, Sankaran S (2001) Studies on compressive failure features in syntactic foam material. JS Sandw Struct Mater 4:249–272Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Deshpande V, Fleck N (2000) Isotropic constitutive models for metallic foams. J Mech Phys Solid 48:1253–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zulzamri Salleh
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Islam
    • 2
  • J. Epaarachchi
    • 2
  • M. Zulkarnain
    • 1
  • Yaseen Adenan Ahmed
    • 1
  1. 1.Malaysian Institute of Marine Engineering TechnologyUniversiti Kuala LumpurLumutMalaysia
  2. 2.Centre for Future Materials and School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Health, Engineering and SciencesUniversity of Southern QueenslandToowoombaAustralia

Personalised recommendations