Skip to main content

Validation of Geant4 Nuclear Reaction Models for Hadron Therapy and Preliminary Results with BLOB

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering 2018

Abstract

Reliable nuclear fragmentation models are of utmost importance in hadron therapy, where Monte Carlo (MC) simulations are used to compute the input parameters of the treatment planning software, to validate the deposited dose calculation, to evaluate the biological effectiveness of the radiation, to correlate the \( \beta + \) emitters production in the patient body with the delivered dose, and to allow a non-invasive treatment verification. Despite of its large use, the models implemented in Geant4 have shown severe limitations in reproducing the measured secondaries yields in ions interaction below 100 MeV/A, in term of production rates, angular and energy distributions. We present a benchmark of the Geant4 models with double-differential cross section of the secondary fragments produced in the \( ^{12} {\text{C}} \) fragmentation at 62 MeV/A on thin carbon target. Such a benchmark includes the recently implemented model “Liège Intranuclear Cascade’’. Moreover, we present the preliminary results, obtained in simulating the same interaction, with the “Boltzmann-Langevin One Body’’ model (BLOB). BLOB is a semiclassical one-body approaches to solve the Boltzmann-Langevin equation. It includes a mean-field propagation term, on the basis of an effective interaction. In addition to the mean field term, BLOB introduces fluctuations in full phase space through a modified collision term where nucleon-nucleon correlations are explicitly involved. It has been developed to simulate the heavy ion interactions in the Fermi-energy regime. In this work, we show the BLOB capabilities in describing \( ^{12} {\text{C}} \) fragmentation, in the perspective of a direct implementation in Geant4. Monte Carlo simulation, nuclear interaction, nuclear fragmentation, hadron therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U. Amaldi and G. Kraft. “Radiotherapy with beams of carbon ions”. In: Reports on Progress in Physics 68.8 (2005), pp. 18611882.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. W. O. Rogers. “Fifty years of Monte Carlo simulations for medical physics”. In: Physics in Medicine and Biology 51.13 (2006), R287-R301.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Krämer et al. “Treatment planning for heavy-ion radiotherapy: physical beam model and dose optimization”. In: Physics in Medicine and Biology 45.11 (2000), p. 3299.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. Parodi et al. “Monte Carlo simulations to support start-up and treatment planning of scanned proton and carbon ion therapy at a synchrotron-based facility”. In: 57.12 (2012), pp. 3759–3784.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Molinelli et al. “Dosimetric accuracy assessment of a treatment plan veri_cation system for scanned proton beam radiotherapy: one-year experimental results and Monte Carlo analysis of the involved uncertainties”. In: Physics in Medicine and Biology 58.11 (2013), pp. 3837–3847.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Yonai, N. Matsufuji, and M. Namba. “Calculation of out-of-eld dose distribution in carbon-ion radiotherapy by Monte Carlo simulation”. In: Medical Physics 39.8 (2012), p. 5028.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Battistoni et al. “The FLUKA code and its use in hadron therapy”. In: Nuovo Cimento Della Societa Italiana Di Fisica C-Colloquia on Physics 31.1 (2008), pp. 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. C. Kraan. “Range Verification Methods in Particle Therapy: Underlying Physics and Monte Carlo Modeling”. In: Frontiers in Oncology 5 (2015), pp. 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Kraft. “Tumor therapy with heavy charged particles”. In: Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 45 (2000), S473-S544.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. De Napoli et al. “Carbon fragmentation measurements and validation of theGeant4 nuclear reaction models for hadrontherapy”. In: Physics in Medicine and Biology 57.22 (2012), pp. 7651–7671.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Agostinelli et al. “Geant4, a simulation toolkit”. In: Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 506.3 (2003), pp. 250–303.

    Google Scholar 

  12. https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/Geant4/Geant4MedicalPhysics.

  13. M. Bernal et al. “Track structure modeling in liquid water: A review of the Geant4-DNA very low energy extension of the Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit”. In: Physica Medica 31.8 (2015), pp. 861–874.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Geant4 Physics Reference Manual.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Folger, V. N. Ivanchenko, and J. P. Wellisch. “The Binary Cascade”. In: The European Physical Journal A - Hadrons and Nuclei 21.3 (2004), pp. 407–417.

    Google Scholar 

  16. T. Koi et al. “New native QMD code in Geant4,” in: Proceedings of the MC2010 Monte Carlo Conference (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Leray et al. “Recent Developments of the Li_ege Intranuclear Cascade Model in View of its Use into High-energy Transport Codes”. In: Nuclear Data Sheets 118 (2014), pp. 312–315.

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Furihata. “Statistical analysis of light fragment production from mediumenergy proton induced reactions”. In: Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B171 (2000), pp. 251–258.

    Google Scholar 

  19. V. F. Weisskopf and D. H. Ewing. “On the Yield of Nuclear Reactions with Heavy Elements”. In: Phys. Rev. 57 (6 1940), pp. 472–485. 18 C. Mancini-Terracciano et al.

    Google Scholar 

  20. http://geant4.cern.ch/support/source/geant4/source/processes/hadronic/models/deexcitation/History.

  21. P. Napolitani and M. Colonna. “Bifurcations in Boltzmann-Langevin one body dynamics for fermionic systems”. In: 726 (2013). Ed. by P. L. B, pp. 382–386.

    Google Scholar 

  22. P. Napolitani and M. Colonna. “Inhomogeneity growth in two-component fermionic systems”. In: Phys. Rev. C 96 (5 2017), p. 054609.

    Google Scholar 

  23. M Colonna et al. “Fluctuations and dynamical instabilities in heavy-ion reactions”. In: Nuclear Physics A 642.3–4 (1998), pp. 449-460.

    Google Scholar 

  24. D. Durand. “An event generator for the study of nuclear collisions in the Fermi energy domain (I). Formalism and _rst applications”. In: Nuclear Physics A 541.2 (1992), pp. 266–294.

    Google Scholar 

  25. P. Napolitani, M. Colonna, and C. Mancini-Terracciano. “Cluster formation in nuclear reactions from mean-eld inhomogeneities”. In: submitted to: Journal of Physics: Conference Series - IOP. 2018. arXiv:1801.07623 [nucl-th] .

  26. B. Braunn et al. “Comparisons of hadrontherapy-relevant data to nuclear interaction codes in the Geant4 toolkit”. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series 420 (2013), p. 012163.

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. Dudouet et al. “Benchmarking Geant4 nuclear models for hadron therapy with 95 MeV/nucleon carbon ions”. In: Phys. Rev. C 89 (2014), p. 054616.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Mancini-Terracciano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mancini-Terracciano, C. et al. (2019). Validation of Geant4 Nuclear Reaction Models for Hadron Therapy and Preliminary Results with BLOB. In: Lhotska, L., Sukupova, L., Lacković, I., Ibbott, G.S. (eds) World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering 2018. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 68/1. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-9035-6_126

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-9035-6_126

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-9034-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-9035-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics