Abstract
Due to the Bragg peak’s (BP) shown ballistic accuracy and increasing relative biological effectiveness (RBE) at the end of the course, hadron therapy promises to significantly improve radiation therapy. As a result, tumors that are challenging to treat, incompletely resected, or radiation-resistant are specially treated with hadron therapy. The energy loss is predominantly driven by inelastic electron collision mechanisms in the energy range used in charged particle treatment (60 to 450 MeV/u). However, in several cases, nuclear collisions contribute to the generation of fragments. These fragments present a significant disadvantage for medical applications as they deposit energy that reduces the quality of the Bragg peak (BP), particularly in its tail, leading to unnecessary dose to healthy tissue behind the target. The purpose of this research is to assess, via Monte-Carlo simulation, the contribution to the dose of secondary particles created during the interaction of a 12C ion beam in a water phantom using the Particle and Heavy Ion Transport Code System (PHITS) code. First, the code was validated by comparing the simulation output to an experimental result derived from NSRL data. The second step was to assess the depth dose from the 12C ion beam as well as the contribution of primary and secondary particles to the overall dose in a water phantom. Finally, a thorough simulation of the contribution of fragments from a 400 MeV/u carbon ion beam was carried out. The results of these distributions are of great interest for considering the effect of fragments in carbon therapy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Wilson, R.R.: Radiological use of fast protons. Radiology 47(5), 487–491 (1946). https://doi.org/10.1148/47.5.487
Bragg, W.H.S., Kleeman, R.: LXXIV. On the ionization curves of radium, Philosophical Magazine Series 1, 8, 726–738 (1904).https://doi.org/10.1080/14786440409463246
Lawrence, J.H., et al.: Pituitary irradiation with high-energy proton beams: a preliminary report. Cancer Res. 18(2), 121–134 (1958)
Tsujii, H., et al.: Overview of clinical experiences on carbon ion radiotherapy at NIRS. Radiother Oncol. 73 Suppl 2, S41–9 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8140(04)80012-4
Particle therapy co-operative group homepage. https://www.ptcog.site/index.php/facilities-in-operation-public. Accessed 16 Apr 2023
Schardt, D., Elsässer, T., Schulz-Ertner, D.: Heavy-ion tumor therapy: physical and radiobiological benefits. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82(1), 383–425 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.383
Byun, H.K., et al.: Physical and biological characteristics of particle therapy for oncologists. Cancer Res. Treat. 53(3), 611–620 (2021). https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2021.066
Yonai, S., Furukawa, T., Inaniwa, T.: Measurement of neutron ambient dose equivalent in carbon-ion radiotherapy with an active scanned delivery system. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry 161(1–4), 433–436 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nct251
Zeitlin, C., et al.: Fragmentation cross sections of 290 and 400 MeV/nucleon 12C beams on elemental targets. Phys. Rev. C 76(1), 014911 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.76.014911
Agostinelli, S., et al.: Geant4—a simulation toolkit. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A: 506(3), 250–303 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8
Ferrari, A., Sala Paola, R., Fasso, A., Ranft, J.: FLUKA: A multi-particle transport code (Program version 2005). CERN-2005–010, SLAC-R-773, INFN-TC-05–11, CERN-2005–10, (2005). https://doi.org/10.2172/877507, https://doi.org/10.5170/CERN-2005-010
Battistoni, C.F., et al.: The FLUKA code: description and benchmarking (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2720455
Pelowitz, D.B., et al.: MCNPX 2.7E extensions. (in English), no. LA-UR-11–01502; LA-UR-11–1502, p. Medium: ED (2011). https://doi.org/10.2172/1058045
Sato, T., et al.: Features of particle and heavy Ion transport code system (PHITS) version 3.02. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 55(6), 684–690 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2017.1419890
Dementyev, A.V., Sobolevsky, N.M.: Shield — universal Monte Carlo hadron transport code: scope and applications. Radiat. Meas. 30(5), 553–557 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00231-0
Brookhaven national laboratory homepage. https://www.bnl.gov/nsrl/userguide/bragg-curves-and-peaks.php. Accessed 1 Oct 2022
Iwamoto, Y., et al.: Benchmark study of the recent version of the PHITS code. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 54(5), 617–635 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2017.1297742
ATIMA homepage. https://web-docs.gsi.de/~weick/atima/. Accessed 20 Oct 2022
Hirayama, H., Namito, Y., Bielajew, A.F, Wilderman, S.J., Nelson, W.R: The EGS5 code system. Report No.: Technical Report SLAC-R-730 and KEK Report 2005–8 (2005)
International commission on radiation units and measurements. key data for ionizing-radiation dosimetry: measurement standards and application. ICRU Report 90. 14 (2016)
Boudard, A., Cugnon, J., David, J.C., Leray, S., Mancusi, D.: New potentialities of the Liège intranuclear cascade model for reactions induced by nucleons and light charged particles. Phys. Rev. C 87(1), 014606 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.87.014606
Shibata, K., et al.: JENDL-4.0: a new library for nuclear science and engineering. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 48(1), 1–30 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.2011.9711675
Niita, K., et al.: Analysis of the (N, xN’) reactions by quantum molecular dynamics plus statistical decay model. Phys. Rev. C Nucl. Phys. 52(5), 2620–2635 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.52.2620
Ogawa, T., Sato, T., Hashimoto, S., Satoh, D., Tsuda, S., Niita, K.: Energy- dependent fragmentation cross sections of relativistic 12C. Phys. Rev. C 92, 024614 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.024614
Iida, K., Kohama, A., Oyamatsu, K.: Formula for proton-nucleus reaction cross section at intermediate energies and its application. J. Phys. Soc. Japan. 76, 044201 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1143/jpsj.76.044201
Sihver, K.A., Iida, L., Oyamatsu, K., Hashimoto, S., Iwase, H., et al.: Current status of the “hybrid Kurotama model” for total reaction cross sections. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B. 334, 34–39 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2014.04.021
Satoh, D., Sato, T.: Improvements in the particle and heavy-ion transport code system (PHITS) for simulating neutron-response functions and detection efficiencies of a liquid organic scintillator. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 59(8), 1047–1060 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2021.2019622
Furihata, S.: The GEM Code - the generalized evaporation model and the fission model. In: Kling, A., Baräo, F.J.C., Nakagawa, M., Távora, L., Vaz, P. (eds.) Advanced Monte Carlo for Radiation Physics, Particle Transport Simulation and Applications, pp. 1045–1050. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18211-2_168
Haettner, E., Iwase, H., Kramer, M., Kraft, G., Schardt, D.: Experimental study of nuclear fragmentation of 200 and 400 MeV/u (12)C ions in water for applications in particle therapy. Phys. Med. Biol. 58(23), 8265–8279 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/58/23/8265
Serber, R.: Nuclear reactions at high energies. Phys. Rev. 72(11), 1114–1115 (1947). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.72.1114
Gunzert-Marx, K., Iwase, H., Schardt, D., Simon, R.S.: Secondary beam fragments produced by 200 MeV u−1 12C ions in water and their dose contributions in carbon ion radiotherapy. New Journal. Phys. 10(7) 2008.https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/10/7/075003
Puchalska, M., Tessonnier, T., Parodi, K., Sihver, L.: Benchmarking of PHITS for carbon Ion therapy. Int. J. Part Ther. 4(3), 48–55 Winter (2018). https://doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-17-00029.1
Ying, C.K., Bolst, D., Tran, L.T., Guatelli, S., Rosenfeld, A.B., Kamil, W.A.: Contributions of secondary fragmentation by carbon ion beams in water phantom: Monte Carlo simulation. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 851, 012033 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/851/1/012033
Abe, T., et al.: A multi-institutional retrospective study of carbon-ion radiotherapy for non-squamous cell malignant tumors of the nasopharynx: subanalysis of Japan carbon-ion radiation oncology study group study 1402 HN. Cancer Med. 7(12), 6077–6083 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1884
Reiazi, R., Norozi, A., Etedadialiabadi, M.: A literature survey on cost-effectiveness of proton beam therapy in the management of breast cancer patients. Iran. J. Cancer Prev. 8(6), e4373 (2015). https://doi.org/10.17795/ijcp-4373
Ou, H.-F., Zhang, B., Zhao, S.-J.: Monte Carlo simulation for calculation of fragments produced by 400MeV/u carbon ion beam in water. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res., Sect. B 396, 18–25 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2017.01.077
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
El Bekkouri, H. et al. (2024). A New Study of Bragg Curve of the 12C Ion at Energies Ranging 200–400 MeV/u with the Contribution of Secondary Fragments in Hadrontherapy Using the PHITS Monte Carlo Code. In: Ezziyyani, M., Kacprzyk, J., Balas, V.E. (eds) International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems for Sustainable Development (AI2SD’2023). AI2SD 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 904. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52388-5_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52388-5_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-52387-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-52388-5
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)