Potential Use of Waste-to-Bioenergy By-Products in Bioremediation of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH)-Contaminated Soils

Gielnik, Anna; Pechaud, Yoan; Huguenot, David; Esposito, Giovanni; Guibaud, Gilles; van Hullebusch, Eric D.

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-40348-5_5

Anna Gielnik^10,11,12,
Yoan Pechaud¹⁰,
David Huguenot¹⁰,
Giovanni Esposito¹³,
Gilles Guibaud¹² &
…
Eric D. van Hullebusch¹⁴

Part of the book series: Applied Environmental Science and Engineering for a Sustainable Future ((AESE))

758 Accesses
6 Citations

Abstract

Detoxification of soils contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons constitutes a worldwide challenge. Bioremediation is an efficient strategy for soil cleanup, but low nutrients level and microbial density in contaminated soils are limiting the process. Reasonable practice of waste management encourages soil application of organic wastes, and thus, reduction of the amount of wastes deposited on landfills. Land application of organic matter is likewise a resource-saving alternative to chemical fertilizers and moreover supports carbon sequestration in soil organic matter (SOM) reducing the emission of greenhouse gasses such as CO₂. Addition of mature organic matter to soil represents a sustainable and cost-effective bioremediation strategy. Here, we have reviewed (1) the use of organic matter and mineral nutrients in bioremediation during composting treatments at laboratory and full scale; (2) properties of digestate including biological stability, nutrients, pathogens, and organic contaminants; (3) monitoring approaches in bioremediation of soil amended with digestate including chemical and biological assays as well as the use of molecular markers. Organic matter is an efficient nutrient source during composting of polluted soils. Remediation efficiency of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH)-contaminated soils during composting with organic amendments at laboratory scale was reported to be high with 99% alkanes removal after 60 days. For full-scale biopiles treatment, 38–57% of TPH could be removed after 53 days. Addition of organic matter to soils also improves soil characteristics like pH and structure as well as elevates bacterial density and diversity. Studies on organic matter have indicated that anaerobic digestion and post-treatment of digestate, (e.g., composting), decrease pathogen content. Digestate has also elevated nutrient status and biological stability in comparison with raw feedstock which may be further improved by composting. Organic contaminants present in feedstock are decreasing during anaerobic digestion and composting while trace elements accumulate. As toxicity of soils after bioremediation is not always directly associated with contaminant concentration decrease, in remediation monitoring field, a battery of ecotoxicological tests are applied including ecotoxicological markers and bioassays. This chapter is focused on the valorization of digestate as a nutrient source for bioremediation of TPH-contaminated soils by composting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Chapter: USD 29.95; Price excludes VAT (USA)

eBook: USD 129.00; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Softcover Book: USD 169.99; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Hardcover Book: USD 169.99; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

ACS:: Acyl-CoA Synthetase
acyl-coA:: Acetyl Coenzyme A
AH:: Alkane Hydroxylase
ALD:: Aldehyde Dehydrogenase
AlkB:: Integral-Membrane Non-Heme Di-Iron Monooxygenase
BAA:: N-benzoyl-L-argininamid
BTEX:: Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and Xylenes
BVM:: Baeyer–Villiger monooxygenase
CFU:: Colony Forming Unit
DEHP:: Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
DHD:: dihydrodiol dehydrogenase
E:: Esterase
EXDO:: Extradiol Dioxygenase
HA:: Hydratase Aldolase
HX:: Hydroxylase
IS:: Isomerase
ISO:: International Organization for Standardization
MAD:: Mesophilic Anaerobic Digestion
MMOs:: Methane Monooxygenases
MPN:: Most Probable Number
NADH:: Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide
NDO:: Naphthalenedioxygenase
OECD:: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
pAHs:: Particulate Alkane Hydroxylases
PAHs:: Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons
PCR:: Polymerase Chain Reaction
RHD:: Ring Hydroxylating Dioxygenase
SOM:: Soil Organic Matter
TPH:: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
US EPA:: United States Environmental Protection Agency

References

Abdullahi YA, Akunna JC, White NA, Hallett PD, Wheatley R (2008) Investigating the effects of anaerobic and aerobic post-treatment on quality and stability of organic fraction of municipal solid waste as soil amendment. Bioresour Technol 99:8631–8636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.04.027
Article CAS Google Scholar
Aemig Q, Chéron C, Delgenès N, Jimenez J, Houot S, Steyer J-P, Patureau D (2016) Distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in sludge organic matter pools as a driving force of their fate during anaerobic digestion. Waste Manag 48:389–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.11.045
Article CAS Google Scholar
Alfa MI, Adie DB, Igboro SB, Oranusi US, Dahunsi SO, Akali DM (2014) Assessment of biofertilizer quality and health implications of anaerobic digestion effluent of cow dung and chicken droppings. Renew Energy 63:681–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.09.049
Article Google Scholar
Appels L, Baeyens J, Degrève J, Dewil R (2008) Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge. Prog Energy Combust Sci 34(6):755–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2008.06.002
Article CAS Google Scholar
Atlas RM, Hazen TC (2011) Oil biodegradation and bioremediation: a tale of the two worst spills in U.S. history. Environ Sci Technol 45:6709–6715. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2013227
Article CAS Google Scholar
ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry) (1999) Toxicological profile for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH). U.S Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service. Available https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp.asp?id=424&tid=75
Baboshin MA, Golovleva LA (2012) Aerobic bacterial degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and its kinetic aspects. Microbiology 81:639–650. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026261712060021
Article CAS Google Scholar
Bagge E, Sahlström L, Albihn A (2005) The effect of hygienic treatment on the microbial flora of biowaste at biogas plants. Water Res 39:4879–4886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.03.016
Article CAS Google Scholar
Barrena R, d’Imporzano G, Ponsá S, Gea T, Artola A, Vázquez F, Sánchez A, Adani F (2009) In search of a reliable technique for the determination of the biological stability of the organic matter in the mechanical–biological treated waste. J Hazard Mater 162:1065–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.141
Article CAS Google Scholar
Barrington S, Choinière D, Trigui M, Knight W (2002) Effect of carbon source on compost nitrogen and carbon losses. Bioresour Technol 83(3):189–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00229-2
Article CAS Google Scholar
Bertoldi M (2010) Production and utilization of suppressive compost: environmental, food and health benefits. In: Insam H, Franke-Whittle I, Goberna M (eds) Microbes at work from wastes to resources. Springer, Berlin, pp 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04043-6
Chapter Google Scholar
Beškoski VP, Gojgić-Cvijović G, Milić J, Ilić M, Miletić S, Šolević T, Vrvić MM (2011) Ex situ bioremediation of a soil contaminated by mazut (heavy residual fuel oil) - a field experiment. Chemosphere 83(1):34–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.01.020
Article CAS Google Scholar
Braddock JF, Ruth ML, Catterall PH (1997) Enhancement and inhibition of microbial activity in hydrocarbon-contaminated arctic soils: implications for nutrient-amended bioremediation. Environ Sci Technol 31(7):2078–2084. https://doi.org/10.1021/es960904d
Article CAS Google Scholar
Bundy JG, Paton GI, Campbell CD (2004) Combined microbial community level and single species biosensor responses to monitor recovery of oil polluted soil. Soil Biol Biochem 36(7):1149–1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.02.025
Article CAS Google Scholar
Bustamante MA, Alburquerque JA, Restrepo AP, de la Fuente C, Paredes C, Moral R, Bernal MP (2012) Co-composting of the solid fraction of anaerobic digestates, to obtain added-value materials for use in agriculture. Biomass Bioenergy 43:26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.04.010
Article CAS Google Scholar
Bustamante MA, Restrepo AP, Alburquerque JA, Pérez-Murcia MD, Paredes C, Moral R, Bernal MP (2013) Recycling of anaerobic digestates by composting: effect of the bulking agent used. J Clean Prod 47:61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.018
Article CAS Google Scholar
Carballa M, Omil F, Alder AC, Lema JM (2006) Comparison between the conventional anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge and its combination with a chemical or thermal pre-treatment concerning the removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products. Water Sci Technol 53:109–117. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2006.241
Article CAS Google Scholar
Carballa M, Omil F, Ternes T, Lema JM (2007) Fate of pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) during anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Water Res 41:2139–2150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.02.012
Article CAS Google Scholar
Carmichael LM, Pfaender FK (1997) The effect of inorganic and organic supplements on the microbial degradation of phenanthrene and pyrene in soils. Biodegradation 8(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008258720649
Article CAS Google Scholar
Cea-Barcia G, Carrère H, Steyer JP, Patureau D (2013) Evidence for PAH removal coupled to the first steps of anaerobic digestion in sewage sludge. Int J Chem Eng 2013:6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/450542
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ceccanti B, Garcia C, Masciandaro G, Macci C, Doni S (2006) Soil bioremediation: combination of earthworms and compost for the ecological remediation of a hydrocarbon polluted soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 177:383–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-006-9180-4
Article CAS Google Scholar
Cerniglia CE (1992) Biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Biodegradation 3:351–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129093
Article CAS Google Scholar
Coulon F, Al Awadi M, Cowie W, Mardlin D, Pollard S, Cunningham C, Risdon G, Arthur P, Semple KT, Paton GI (2010) When is a soil remediated? Comparison of biopiled and windrowed soils contaminated with bunker-fuel in a full-scale trial. Environ Pollut 158:3032–3040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2010.06.001
Article CAS Google Scholar
Duarte EA, Mendes B, Oliveira JS (1992) Removal of Salmonella, Streptococci and coliforms in pig breeding effluent by anaerobic mesophilic digestion. Water Sci Technol 26(9–11):2169–2172. http://wst.iwaponline.com/content/26/9-11/2169
Article CAS Google Scholar
EEC (2008) Council directive of 19 November 2008 concerning waste framework (2008/98/EC). Available http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX: 32008L0098. Accessed 13 Mar 2016
El-Hadj TB, Dosta J, Mata-Álvarez J (2006) Biodegradation of PAH and DEHP micro-pollutants in mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic sewage sludge digestion. Water Sci Technol 53:99–107. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2006.240
Article CAS Google Scholar
European Commission (2001) Working document. Biological treatment of biowaste. 2nd draft. Available http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/waste/factsen.htm. Accessed 3 Mar 2016
European Commission (2014) Progress in the management of contaminated sites in Europe. Available http://eusoils.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ESDB_Archive/eusoils_docs/other/EUR26376EN.pdf. Accessed 3 Mar 2016
Fedorak PM, Westlake DWS (1981) Microbial degradation of aromatics and saturates in Prudhoe Bay crude oil. Can J Microbiol 27(4):432–443. https://doi.org/10.1139/m81-066
Article CAS Google Scholar
Frutos FJ, Pérez R, Escolano O, Rubio A, Gimeno A, Fernandez MD, Carbonell G, Perucha C, Laguna J (2012) Remediation trials for hydrocarbon-contaminated sludge from a soil washing process: evaluation of bioremediation technologies. J Hazard Mater 199–200:262–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.11.017
Article CAS Google Scholar
Fuentes S, Méndez V, Aguila P, Seeger M (2014) Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons: catabolic genes, microbial communities, and applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98(11):4781–4794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-5684-9
Article CAS Google Scholar
Gan S, Lau EV, Ng HK (2009) Remediation of soils contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). J Hazard Mater 172(2–3):532–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.118
Article CAS Google Scholar
Gao Y-C, Wang J-N, Xu J-B, Kong X, Zhao L, Zeng D-H (2013) Assessing the quality of oil-contaminated saline soil using two composite indices. Ecol Indic 24:105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.06.005
Article CAS Google Scholar
García-Ruiz R, Ochoa V, Viñegla B, Hinojosa M, Peña-Santiago R, Liébanas G, Linares JC, Carreria JA (2009) Soil enzymes, nematode community and selected physico-chemical properties as soil quality indicators in organic and conventional olive oil farming: influence of seasonality and site features. Appl Soil Ecol 41:305–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.12.004
Article Google Scholar
Gargouri B, Karray F, Mhiri N, Aloui F, Sayadi S (2014) Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons-contaminated soil by bacterial consortium isolated from an industrial wastewater treatment plant. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 89(7):978–987. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4188
Article CAS Google Scholar
Genouw G, Naeyer F, van Meenen P, van de Weft H, Nijs W, Verstraete W (1994) Degradation of oil sludge by landfarming - a case-study at the Ghent harbor. Biodegradation 5:37–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00695212
Article CAS Google Scholar
Gómez-Brandón M, Fernández-Delgado Juárez M, Zangerle M, Insam H (2016) Effects of digestate on soil chemical and microbiological properties: a comparative study with compost and vermicompost. J Hazard Mater 302:267–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.09.067
Article CAS Google Scholar
Graj W, Lisiecki P, Szulc A, Chrzanowski Ł, Wojtera-Kwiczor J (2013) Bioaugmentation with petroleum-degrading consortia has a selective growth-promoting impact on crop plants germinated in diesel oil-contaminated soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 224:1676–1691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-013-1676-0
Article CAS Google Scholar
Heath JS, Koblis K, Sager SL (1993) Review of chemical, physical, and toxicologic properties of components of total petroleum hydrocarbons. J Soil Contam 2(1):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15320389309383426
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hentati O, Lachhab R, Ayadi M, Ksibi M (2013) Toxicity assessment for petroleum-contaminated soil using terrestrial invertebrates and plant bioassays. Environ Monit Assess 185(4):2989–2998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-012-2766-y
Article CAS Google Scholar
Heuer H, Smalla K (1997) Evaluation of community-level catabolic profiling using BIOLOG GN microplates to study microbial community changes in potato phyllosphere. J Microbiol Methods 30(1):49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(97)00044-4
Article CAS Google Scholar
Holm-Nielsen JB, Al Seadi T, Oleskowicz-Popiel P (2009) The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization. Bioresour Technol 100:5478–5484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.046
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hubálek T, Vosáhlová S, Matějů V, Kováčová N, Novotný Č (2007) Ecotoxicity monitoring of hydrocarbon-contaminated soil during bioremediation: a case study. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 52(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-006-0030-6
Article CAS Google Scholar
Isobaev P, McCartney D, Wichuk K, Neumann N (2012) Assessing the temperature contact time criteria and turning effect in compost sanitation. In: Proceedings, annual conference - Canadian society for civil engineering, vol 2, pp 888–898. Available http://www.wtert.eu/paper/3610/Assessing-the-temperature-contact-time-criteria-and-turning-effect-in-compost-sanitation.html. Accessed 5 Mar 2016
Google Scholar
Jadczyk P, Kołwzan B (2013) Genotoxicity of soil pollutants extracted with different solvents. Pol J Environ Stud 22(1):141–147. Available http://www.pjoes.com/abstracts/2013/Vol22/No01/15.html. Accessed 3 Mar 2016
CAS Google Scholar
Jager T, van der Wal L, Fleuren RHLJ, Barendregt A, Hermens JLM (2005) Bioaccumulation of organic chemicals in contaminated soils: evaluation of bioassays with earthworms. Environ Sci Technol 39(1):293–298. https://doi.org/10.1021/es035317o
Article CAS Google Scholar
Jørgensen KS, Puustinen J, Suortti A-M (2000) Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soil by composting in biopiles. Environ Pollut 107:245–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00144-X
Article Google Scholar
Juteau P, Bisaillon J-G, Lépine F, Ratheau V, Beaudet R, Villemur R (2003) Improving the biotreatment of hydrocarbons-contaminated soils by addition of activated sludge taken from the wastewater treatment facilities of an oil refinery. Biodegradation 14(1):31–40. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023555616462
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kataki S, Hazarika S, Baruah DC (2017) Assessment of by-products of bioenergy systems (anaerobic digestion and gasification) as potential crop nutrient. Waste Manag 59:102–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.018
Article CAS Google Scholar
Khudur LS, Shahsavari E, Miranda AF, Morrison PD, Nugegoda D, Ball AS (2015) Evaluating the efficiency of bioremediating a diesel-contaminated soil using ecotoxicological and bacterial community indices. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(19):14809–14819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4624-2
Article CAS Google Scholar
Klobučar GIV, Štambuk A, Šrut M, Husnjak I, Merkaš M, Traven L, Cvetković Z (2011) Aporrectodea caliginosa, a suitable earthworm species for field based genotoxicity assessment? Environ Pollut 159(4):841–849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.01.009
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kriipsalu M, Marques M, Nammari DR, Hogland W (2007) Bio-treatment of oily sludge: the contribution of amendment material to the content of target contaminants, and the biodegradation dynamics. J Hazard Mater 148:616–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.03.017
Article CAS Google Scholar
Krishnasamy K, Nair J, Bell R (2014) Evaluation of anaerobic digestate as a substrate for vermicomposting. Int J Environ Waste Manag 14(2):149–164. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEWM.2014.064084
Article CAS Google Scholar
Labud V, Garcia C, Hernandez T (2006) Effect of hydrocarbon pollution on the microbial properties of a sandy and a clay soil. Chemosphere 66(10):1863–1871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.08.021
Article CAS Google Scholar
Lah B, Vidic T, Glasencnik E, Cepeljnik T, Gorjanc G, Marinsek-Logar R (2008) Genotoxicity evaluation of water soil leachates by Ames test, comet assay, and preliminary Tradescantia micronucleus assay. Environ Monit Assess 139(1–3):107–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9819-7
Article CAS Google Scholar
Lamy E, Tran TC, Mottelet S, Pauss A, Schoefs O (2013) Relationships of respiratory quotient to microbial biomass and hydrocarbon contaminant degradation during soil bioremediation. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 83:85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.04.015
Article CAS Google Scholar
Lapygina EV, Lysak LV, Bakulina EA, Zvyagintsev DG (2006) Resistance of autochthonous soil bacteria to shock biocide effects. Eurasian Soil Sci 39(11):1228–1232. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106422930611010X
Article Google Scholar
Lasaridi KE, Stentiford EDI (1998) A simple respirometric technique for assessing compost stability. Water Res 32(12):3717–3723. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00143-2
Article CAS Google Scholar
Li P, Sun T, Stagnitti F, Zhang C, Zhang H, Xiong X, Allinson G, Ma X, Allinson M (2002) Field-scale bioremediation of soil contaminated with crude oil. Environ Eng Sci 19(5):277–289. https://doi.org/10.1089/10928750260418926
Article Google Scholar
Liang Y, Britt DW, McLean JE, Sorensen DL, Sims RC (2007) Humic acid effect on pyrene degradation: finding an optimal range for pyrene solubility and mineralization enhancement. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 74:1368–1375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-006-0769-8
Article CAS Google Scholar
Liang Q, Lei M, Chen T, Yang J, Wan X, Yang S (2014) Application of sewage sludge and intermittent aeration strategy to the bioremediation of DDT- and HCH-contaminated soil. J Environ Sci 26(8):1673–1680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2014.06.007
Article CAS Google Scholar
Lin JL, Dong CD, Chen CW, Chen SH, Hsieh TE, Kao CM (2017) Development of a two-stage washing and biodegradation system to remediate octachlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin-contaminated soils. Int J Environ Sci Technol 14(9):1919–1930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.018
Article CAS Google Scholar
Liu PWG, Chang TC, Chen C-H, Wang M-Z, Hsu H-W (2014) Bioaugmentation efficiency investigation on soil organic matters and microbial community shift of diesel-contaminated soils. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 95:276–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2014.05.004
Article CAS Google Scholar
Loureiro S, Soares AMVM, Nogueira AJA (2005) Terrestrial avoidance behaviour tests as screening tool to assess soil contamination. Environ Pollut 138(1):121–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2005.02.013
Article CAS Google Scholar
Lu M, Zhang Z, Sun S, Wang Q, Zhong W (2009) Enhanced degradation of bioremediation residues in petroleum-contaminated soil using a two-liquid-phase bioslurry reactor. Chemosphere 77(2):161–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.08.001
Article CAS Google Scholar
Mackay D, Shiu W-Y, Ma K-C, Lee SC (2006) Handbook of physical-chemical properties and environmental fate for organic chemicals, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, Abingdon, UK
Book Google Scholar
Maier T, Förster H-H, Asperger O, Hahn U (2001) Molecular characterization of the 56-kDa CYP153 from Acinetobacter sp. EB104. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 286:652–658. https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.2001.5449
Article CAS Google Scholar
Maila MP, Cloete TE (2005) The use of biological activities to monitor the removal of fuel contaminants—perspective for monitoring hydrocarbon contamination: a review. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 55:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2004.10.003
Article CAS Google Scholar
Mao D, Lookman R, van de Weghe H, Weltens R, Vanermen G, Brucker ND, Diels L (2009) Estimation of ecotoxicity of petroleum hydrocarbon mixtures in soil based on HPLC-GCXGC analysis. Chemosphere 77(11):1508–1513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.10.004
Article CAS Google Scholar
Margesin R, Zimmerbauer A, Schinner F (2000) Monitoring of bioremediation by soil biological activities. Chemosphere 40(4):339–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00218-0
Article CAS Google Scholar
Masciandaro G, Macci C, Peruzzi E, Ceccanti B, Doni S (2013) Organic matter–microorganism–plant in soil bioremediation: a synergic approach. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 12:399–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-013-9313-3
Article CAS Google Scholar
Mata-Alvarez J, Macé S (2004) Anaerobic bioprocess concepts. In: Lens P, Hamelers B, Hoitink H, Bidlingmaier W (eds) Resource recovery and reuse in organic solid waste management. IWA, London, pp 290–312
Google Scholar
Mihial D, Viraraghavan T, Jin Y (2006) Bioremediation of petroleum-contaminated soil using composting. Pract Period Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste Manage 10(2):108–115. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-025X(2006)10:2(108)
Article CAS Google Scholar
Möller K, Müller T (2012) Effects of anaerobic digestion on digestate nutrient availability and crop growth: a review. Eng Life Sci 12:242–257. https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201100085
Article CAS Google Scholar
Moody JD, Freeman JP, Doerge DR, Cerniglia CE (2001) Degradation of phenanthrene and anthracene by cell suspensions of Mycobacterium sp. strain PYR-1. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:1476–1483. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67.4.1476-1483.2001
Article CAS Google Scholar
Namkoong W, Hwang EY, Park JS, Choi JY (2002) Bioremediation of diesel-contaminated soil with composting. Environ Pollut 119(1):23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00328-1
Article CAS Google Scholar
Nardi S, Morari F, Berti A, Tosoni M, Giardini L (2004) Soil organic matter properties after 40 years of different use of organic and mineral fertilisers. Eur J Agron 21(3):357–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2003.10.006
Article Google Scholar
Natal-da-Luz T, Amorim MJB, Römbke J, Sousa JP (2008) Avoidance tests with earthworms and springtails: defining the minimum exposure time to observe a significant response. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 71(2):545–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.09.005
Article CAS Google Scholar
Nishiwaki J, Kawabe Y, Sakamoto Y, Komai T, Zhang M (2012) Effects of soil organic matter on the transport of non-aqueous phase liquid in soils. In: Björklund PA, Mello FV (eds) Soil organic matter: ecology, environmental impact and management. Nova Science, Hauppauge, NY, pp 131–137
Google Scholar
OECD 207 (1984) Earthworms acute toxicity tests. Guideline for testing of chemicals. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Available http://www.oecd- ilibrary.org/environment/test-no-207-earthworm-acute-toxicity-tests_9789264070042-en. Accessed 7 Mar 2016
Orzi V, Scaglia B, Lonati S, Riva C, Boccasile G, Alborali GL, Adani F (2015) The role of biological processes in reducing both odor impact and pathogen content during mesophilic anaerobic digestion. Sci Total Environ 526:116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.038
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ottoson JR, Schnurer A, Vinnera B (2008) In situ ammonia production as a sanitation agent during anaerobic digestion at mesophilic temperature. Lett Appl Microbiol 46:325–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2007.02317.x
Article CAS Google Scholar
Owamah HI, Dahunsi SO, Oranusi US, Alfa MI (2014) Fertilizer and sanitary quality of digestate biofertilizer from the co-digestion of food waste and human excreta. Waste Manag 34(4):747–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.01.017
Article CAS Google Scholar
Pagnout C, Rast C, Veber A-M, Poupin P, Férard J-F (2006) Ecotoxicological assessment of PAHs and their dead-end metabolites after degradation by Mycobacterium sp. strain SNP11. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 65:151–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2006.03.005
Article CAS Google Scholar
Paraíba LC, Queiroz SCN, De Souza DRC, Saito ML (2011) Risk simulation of soil contamination by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from sewage sludge used as fertilizers. J Braz Chem Soc 22(6):1156–1163. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-50532011000600022
Article Google Scholar
Pasteris G, Werner D, Kaufmann K, Höhener P (2002) Vapor phase transport and biodegradation of volatile fuel compounds in the unsaturated zone: a large scale Lysimeter experiment. Environ Sci Technol 36(1):30–39. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0100423
Article CAS Google Scholar
Patureau D, Delgenes N, Delgenes J-P (2008) Impact of sewage sludge treatment processes on the removal of the endocrine disrupters nonylphenol ethoxylates. Chemosphere 72:586–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.03.007
Article CAS Google Scholar
Pivato A, Vanin S, Raga R, Lavagnolo MC, Barausse A, Rieple A, Laurent A, Cossu R (2016) Use of digestate from a decentralized on-farm biogas plant as fertilizer in soils: an ecotoxicological study for future indicators in risk and life cycle assessment. Waste Manag 49:378–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.12.009
Article CAS Google Scholar
Płaza G, Nałęcz -Jawecki G, Ulfig K, Brigmon RL (2005) The application of bioassays as indicators of petroleum-contaminated soil remediation. Chemosphere 59:289–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.11.049
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ponsá S, Gea T, Alerm L, Cerezo J, Sánchez A (2008) Comparison of aerobic and anaerobic stability indices through a MSW biological treatment process. Waste Manag 28:2735–2742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.12.002
Article CAS Google Scholar
Qi G, Yue D, Fukushima M, Fukuchi S, Nie Y (2012) Enhanced humification by carbonated basic oxygen furnace steel slag - I. characterization of humic-like acids produced from humic precursors. Bioresour Technol 104:497–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.021
Article CAS Google Scholar
Qin G, Gong D, Fan M-Y (2013) Bioremediation of petroleum-contaminated soil by biostimulation amended with biochar. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 85:150–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.07.004
Article CAS Google Scholar
Rahman KSM, Rahman TJ, McClean S, Marchant R, Banat IM (2002) Rhamnolipid biosurfactant production by strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa using low-cost raw materials. Biotechnol Prog 18(6):1277–1128. https://doi.org/10.1021/bp020071x
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ramirez-Fuentes E, Lucho-Constantino C, Escamilla-Silva E, Dendooven L (2002) Characteristics, and carbon and nitrogen dynamics in soil irrigated with wastewater for different lengths of time. Bioresour Technol 85:179–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00035-4
Article CAS Google Scholar
Rivera-Espinoza Y, Dendooven L (2004) Dynamics of carbon, nitrogen and hydrocarbons in diesel-contaminated soil amended with biosolids and maize. Chemosphere 54:379–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00653-2
Article CAS Google Scholar
Robles-González IV, Fava F, Poggi-Varaldo HM (2008) A review on slurry bioreactors for bioremediation of soils and sediments. Microb Cell Factories 7:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-7-5
Article CAS Google Scholar
Rojas-Avelizapa NG, Roldán-Carrillo T, Zegarra-Martínez H, Muñoz-Colunga AM, Fernández-Linares LC (2007) A field trial for an ex-situ bioremediation of a drilling mud-polluted site. Chemosphere 66(9):1595–1600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.08.011
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sahlström L, Aspan A, Bagge E, Tham ML, Albihn A (2004) Bacterial pathogen incidences in sludge from Swedish sewage treatment plants. Water Res 38:1989–1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.01.031
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sakulthaew C, Comfort S, Chokejaroenrat C, Harris C, Li X (2014) A combined chemical and biological approach to transforming and mineralizing PAHs in runoff water. Chemosphere 117(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.05.041
Article CAS Google Scholar
Salanitro JP (2001) Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil. Adv Agron 72:53–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(01)72011-1
Article CAS Google Scholar
Salanitro JP, Dorn PB, Huesemann MH, Moore KO, Rhodes IA, Rice Jackson LM, Vipond TE, Western MM, Wisniewski HL (1997) Crude oil hydrocarbon bioremediation and soil ecotoxicity assessment. Environ Sci Technol 31(6):1769–1776. https://doi.org/10.1021/es960793i
Article CAS Google Scholar
Salminen JM, Tuomi PM, Jørgensen KS (2008) Functional gene abundances (nahAc, alkB, xylE) in the assessment of the efficiency of bioremediation. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 151(2–3):638–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-008-8275-3
Article CAS Google Scholar
Saterbak A, Toy RJ, Wong DCL, Mcmain BJ, Williams MP, Dorn PB, Brzuzy LP, Chai EY, Salanitro JP (1999) Ecotoxicological and analytical assessment of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils and application to ecological risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 18(7):1591–1607. https://doi.org/10.1897/1551-5028(1999)018<1591:EAAAOH>2.3.CO;2
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sauret C, Böttjer D, Talarmin A, Guigue C, Conan P, Pujo-Pay M, Ghiglione J-F (2015) Top-down control of diesel-degrading prokaryotic communities. Microb Ecol 70(2):445–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-015-0596-5
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sayara T, Pognani M, Sarrà M, Sánchez A (2010a) Anaerobic degradation of PAHs in soil: impacts of concentration and amendment stability on the PAHs degradation and biogas production. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 64:286–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2010.02.005
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sayara T, Sarrà M, Sánchez A (2010b) Effects of compost stability and contaminant concentration on the bioremediation of PAHs-contaminated soil through composting. J Hazard Mater 179:999–1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.03.104
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sayara T, Sarrà M, Sánchez A (2010c) Optimization and enhancement of soil bioremediation by composting using the experimental design technique. Biodegradation 21:345–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-009-9305-8
Article Google Scholar
Scaglia B, D’Imporzano G, Garuti G, Negri M, Adani F (2014) Sanitation ability of anaerobic digestion performed at different temperature on sewage sludge. Sci Total Environ 466:888–897
Article Google Scholar
Schaefer M (2003) Behavioural endpoints in earthworm ecotoxicology: evaluation of different test systems in soil toxicity assessment. J Soils Sediments 3(2):79–84. https://doi.org/10.1065/jss2003.02.066
Article CAS Google Scholar
Shahi A, Aydin S, Ince B, Ince O (2016) Evaluation of microbial population and functional genes during the bioremediation of petroleum-contaminated soil as an effective monitoring approach. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 125:153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.11.029
Article CAS Google Scholar
Shen W, Zhu N, Cui J, Wang H, Dang Z, Wu P, Luo Y, Shi C (2016) Ecotoxicity monitoring and bioindicator screening of oil-contaminated soil during bioremediation. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 124:120–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.10.005
Article CAS Google Scholar
Shu-Hsien T, Ching-Piao L, Shang-Shyng Y (2007) Microbial conversion of food wastes for biofertilizer production with thermophilic lipolytic microbes. Renew Energy 32:904–915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2006.04.019
Article CAS Google Scholar
Smith KE, Thullner M, Wick LY, Harms H (2009) Sorption to humic acids enhances polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon biodegradation. Environ Sci Technol 43:7205–7211. https://doi.org/10.1021/es803661s
Article CAS Google Scholar
Speight JG (2002) Handbook of petroleum product analysis. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
Google Scholar
Stasinakis AS (2012) Review on the fate of emerging contaminants during sludge anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol 121:432–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.06.074
Article CAS Google Scholar
Steiner C, Teixeira WG, Lehmann J, Nehls T, De MacÊdo JLV, Blum WEH, Zech W (2007) Long term effects of manure, charcoal and mineral fertilization on crop production and fertility on a highly weathered Central Amazonian upland soil. Plant Soil 291(1–2):275–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9193-9
Article CAS Google Scholar
Steliga T, Jakubowicz P, Kapusta P (2012) Changes in toxicity during in situ bioremediation of weathered drill wastes contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons. Bioresour Technol 125:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.092
Article CAS Google Scholar
Stevens JL, Northcott GL, Stern GA, Tomy G, Jones KC (2003) PAHs, PCBs, PCNs, organochlorine pesticides, synthetic musks and polychlorinated n-alkanes in UK sewage sludge, survey results and implications. Environ Sci Technol 37:462–467. https://doi.org/10.1021/es020161y
Article CAS Google Scholar
Straube WL, Jones-Meehan J, Pritchard PH, Jones WR (1999) Bench-scale optimization of bioaugmentation strategies for treatment of soils contaminated with high molecular weight polyaromatic hydrocarbons. Resour Conserv Recycl 27(7):27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(98)00083-4
Article Google Scholar
Su H, Liu L, Wang S, Wang Q, Jiang Y, Hou X, Tan T (2015) Semi-continuous anaerobic digestion for biogas production: influence of ammonium acetate supplement and structure of the microbial community. Biotechnol Biofuels 8(1):13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-015-0197-z
Article Google Scholar
Sutton NB, van Gaans P, Langenhoff AAM, Maphosa F, Smidt H, Grotenhuis T, Rijnaarts HHM (2013) Biodegradation of aged diesel in diverse soil matrixes: impact of environmental conditions and bioavailability on microbial remediation capacity. Biodegradation 24:487–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-012-9605-2
Article CAS Google Scholar
Tambone F, Genevini P, D’Imporzano G, Adani F (2009) Assessing amendment properties of digestate by studying the organic matter composition and the degree of biological stability during the anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of MSW. Bioresour Technol 100:3140–3142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.02.012
Article CAS Google Scholar
Tambone F, Scaglia B, D’Imporzano G, Schievano A, Orzi V, Salati S, Adani F (2010) Assessing amendment and fertilizing properties of digestates from anaerobic digestion through a comparative study with digested sludge and compost. Chemosphere 81:577–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.08.034
Article CAS Google Scholar
Tambone F, Terruzzi L, Scaglia B, Adani F (2015) Composting of the solid fraction of digestate derived from pig slurry: biological processes and compost properties. Waste Manag 35:55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.10.014
Article CAS Google Scholar
Tampio E, Salo T, Rintala J (2016) Agronomic characteristics of five different urban waste digestates. J Environ Manag 169:293–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.01.001
Article CAS Google Scholar
Tang J, Lu X, Sun Q, Zhu W (2012) Aging effect of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil under different attenuation conditions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 149:109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.12.020
Article CAS Google Scholar
Tejada M, Gonzalez JL, Hernandez MT, Garcia C (2008) Application of different organic amendments in a gasoline contaminated soil: effect on soil microbial properties. Bioresour Technol 99:2872–2880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.06.002
Article CAS Google Scholar
Thapa B, Kumar A, Ghimire A (2012) A review on bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants in soil. Kathmandu Univ J Sci Eng Technol 8(1):165–170. https://doi.org/10.3126/kuset.v8i1.6056
Article Google Scholar
Torres-Climent A, Martin-Mata J, Marhuenda-Egea F, Moral R, Barber X, Perez-Murcia MD, Paredes C (2015) Composting of the solid phase of digestate from biogas production: optimization of the moisture, C/N ratio, and pH conditions. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 46(S1):197–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2014.988591
Article Google Scholar
Toxnet (2016). Available https://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/. Accessed 30 Mar 2016
Trémier A, Buet J, Daumoin M, Corrand V (2013) Composting as digestate post-treatment: composting behaviour and gaseous emissions of three types of digestate compared to non-digested waste. In: 15th RAMIRAN international conference. Recycling of organic residues for agriculture: from waste management to ecosystem services, Versailles, p 4
Google Scholar
van Beilen JB, Funhoff EG (2007) Alkane hydroxylases involved in microbial alkane degradation. Appl Environ Microbiol 74(1):13–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-006-0748-0
Article CAS Google Scholar
van Beilen JB, Funhoff EG, van Loon A, Just A, Kaysser L, Bouza M, Holtackers R, Röthlisberger M, Li Z, Witholt B (2006) Cytochrome P450 alkane hydroxylases of the CYP153 family are common in alkane-degrading eubacteria lacking integral membrane alkane hydroxylases. Appl Environ Microbiol 72(1):59–65. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.72.1.59-65.2006
Article CAS Google Scholar
van Herwijnen R, Springael D, Slot P, Govers HAJ, Parsons JR (2003) Degradation of anthracene by Mycobacterium sp. strain LB501T proceeds via a novel pathway, through o-phthalic acid. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:186–190. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.1.186-190.2003
Article CAS Google Scholar
Vinnerås B, Agostini F, Jonsson H (2010) Sanitation by composting. In: Insam H, Franke-Whittle I, Goberna M (eds) Microbes at work from wastes to resources. Springer, Berlin, pp 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04043-6
Chapter Google Scholar
Wang X, Feng J, Zhao J (2010) Effects of crude oil residuals on soil chemical properties in oil sites, Momoge Wetland, China. Environ Monit Assess 161(1–4):271–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0744-1
Article CAS Google Scholar
Wang S, Wang X, Zhang C, Li F, Guo G (2016) Bioremediation of oil sludge contaminated soil by landfarming with added cotton stalks. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 106:150–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.10.014
Article CAS Google Scholar
Weiland P (2010) Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85(4):849–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2246-7
Article CAS Google Scholar
Wentzel A, Ellingsen TE, Kotlar H-K, Zotchev SB, Throne-Holst M (2007) Bacterial metabolism of long-chain n-alkanes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 76(6):1209–1221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-007-1119-1
Article CAS Google Scholar
Xu Y, Lu M (2010) Bioremediation of crude oil-contaminated soil: comparison of different biostimulation and bioaugmentation treatments. J Hazard Mater 183:395–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.07.038
Article CAS Google Scholar
Yeh CK-J, Young C-C (2003) Effects of soil fines and surfactant sorption on contaminant reduction of coarse fractions during soil washing. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 38(11):2697–2709. https://doi.org/10.1081/ESE-120024457
Article CAS Google Scholar
Yun YS, Park JI, Suh MS, Park JM (2000) Treatment of food wastes using slurry-phase decomposition. Bioresour Technol 73:21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00131-5
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zappi ME, Rogers BA, Teeter CL, Gunnison D, Bajpai R (1996) Bioslurry treatment of a soil contaminated with low concentrations of total petroleum hydrocarbons. J Hazard Mater 46:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3894(95)00091-7
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zhang XL, Tao S, Liu WX, Yang Y, Zuo Q, Liu SZ (2005) Source diagnostics of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons based on species ratios: a multimedia approach. Environ Sci Technol 39:9109–9114. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0513741
Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge the financial support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 643071 (“Advanced Biological Waste-to-Energy Technologies—ABWET”).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Laboratoire Géomatériaux et Environnement, Université Gustave Eiffel, Champs-sur-Marne, France
Anna Gielnik, Yoan Pechaud & David Huguenot
Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, FR, Italy
Anna Gielnik
Faculté des Sciences et Techniques, Groupement de Recherche Eau Sol Environnement (EA 4330), Université de Limoges, Limoges, France
Anna Gielnik & Gilles Guibaud
Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, University of Napoli “Federico II”, Napoli, Italy
Giovanni Esposito
Institut de physique du globe de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
Eric D. van Hullebusch

Authors

Anna Gielnik
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yoan Pechaud
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
David Huguenot
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Giovanni Esposito
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Gilles Guibaud
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Eric D. van Hullebusch
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Anna Gielnik or Eric D. van Hullebusch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Institut de physique du globe de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
Eric D. van Hullebusch
Laboratoire Géomatériaux et Environnement, Université Gustave Eiffel, Champs-sur-Marne, France
David Huguenot
Laboratoire Géomatériaux et Environnement, Université Gustave Eiffel, Champs-sur-Marne, France
Yoan Pechaud
Laboratoire Réactions et Génie des Procédés, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
Marie-Odile Simonnot
BRGM - Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières, Orléans, France
Stéfan Colombano

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gielnik, A., Pechaud, Y., Huguenot, D., Esposito, G., Guibaud, G., van Hullebusch, E.D. (2020). Potential Use of Waste-to-Bioenergy By-Products in Bioremediation of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH)-Contaminated Soils. In: van Hullebusch, E., Huguenot, D., Pechaud, Y., Simonnot, MO., Colombano, S. (eds) Environmental Soil Remediation and Rehabilitation. Applied Environmental Science and Engineering for a Sustainable Future. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40348-5_5

Download citation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40348-5_5
Published: 23 April 2020
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-40347-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-40348-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics