Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Critical Systems Heuristics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Systems Approaches to Managing Change: A Practical Guide

Abstract

Critical systems heuristics (CSH) is a framework for reflective professional practice organised around the central tool of boundary critique. This paper, written jointly by the original developer, Werner Ulrich, and Martin Reynolds, an experienced practitioner of CSH, offers a systematic introduction to the idea and use of boundary critique. Its core concepts are explained in detail and their use is illustrated by means of two case studies from the domain of environmental planning and management. A particular focus is on working constructively with tensions between opposing perspectives as they arise in many situations of professional intervention. These include tensions such as ‘situation’ versus ‘system’, ‘is’ versus ‘ought’ judgements, concerns of ‘those involved’ versus ‘those affected but not involved’, stakeholders’ ‘stakes’ versus ‘stakeholding issues’, and others. Accordingly, boundary critique is presented as a participatory process of unfolding and questioning boundary judgements rather than as an expert-driven process of boundary setting. The paper concludes with a discussion of some essential skills and considerations regarding the practice of boundary critique.

Parts of the account of the NRUA-Botswana study in Section 6.2 of the present paper are reproduced from an earlier publication by one of the authors (Reynolds 2007); we are grateful to the publishers of Edge Press, Point Reyes, CA, for granting us permission to reproduce this material. We do not need the systems concept at all if we are not interested in handling systems boundaries critically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Achterkamp, M.C., & Vos, J.F J. (2007). Critically identifying stakeholders: evaluating boundary critique as a vehicle for stakeholder identification. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 24(1), 3-14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R.L. (1981). Creating the Corporate Future: Plan or Be Planned For. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berardi, A., Bernard, C., Buckingham-Shum, S., Ganapathy, S., Mistry, J., Reynolds, M., Ulrich, W. (2006). The ECOSENSUS project: co-evolving tools, practices and open content for participatory natural resource management. 2nd International Conference on e-Social Science, 28-30 June, Manchester, UK. Presentation and full paper available in the website of the National Centre for e-Social Science (NCeSS) of the Economic & Social Research Council (ESRC), http://www.ncess.ac.uk/research/sgp/ecocensus. Also available in the Open University’s Open Research Online site, http://oro.open.ac.uk/2692/.

  • Carr, S. & Oreszczyn, S. (2003). Critical systems heuristics: a tool for the inclusion of ethics and values in complex policy decisions. In Ethics as a Dimension of Agrifood Policy, Proceedings of the Fourth Congress of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics, Toulouse, France, 20-22 March 2003. Paper available in the website of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics (EurSafe), http://technology.open.ac.uk/cts/EURSAFE4-CSH-paper.pdf.

  • Chambers, R. (1994a). The origin and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development, 22(7), 953-969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1994b). Participatory rural appraisal: challenges, potentials and paradigm. World Development 22(10), 1437-1454.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1997). Whose Reality Counts? Putting the Last First. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P.B. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Chichester, UK, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C.W. (1968). The Systems Approach. New York: Delta/Dell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C.W. (1971). The Design of Inquiring Systems: Basic Concepts of Systems and Organizations. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C.W. (1979). The Systems Approach and its Enemies. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, J. (2005). Dialogue Mapping. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1925). The development of American pragmatism. Studies in the History of Ideas 2(Supplement), 353-377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fals-Borda, O. (1996). Power/knowledge and emancipation. Systems Practice 9(2), 177-181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York and London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and Human Interests. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984/87). The Theory of Communicative Action. 2 Volumes, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1907). Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking. New York: Longman.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1787). Critique of Pure Reason (2nd ed). Transl. by N.K. Smith, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1965 (orig. Macmillan, New York, 1929).

    Google Scholar 

  • Korzybski, A. (1933). A Non-Aristotelian System and its necessity for rigour in mathematics and physics. In A. Korzybski, Science and Sanity: An Introduction to Non-Aristotelian Systems and General Semantics, Lakeville, CT: International Non-Aristotelian Library, pp. 747-761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S (1878). How to make our ideas clear. Popular Science Monthly 12(January), 386-302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, M. (1998). ‘Unfolding’ natural resource-use information systems: fieldwork in Botswana. Systemic Practice and Action Research 11(2), 127-152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, M. (2004). Churchman and Maturana: enriching the notion of self-organisation for social design. Systemic Practice and Action Research 17(6), 539-556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, M. (2007). Evaluation based on critical systems heuristics. In B. Williams and I. Imam (eds.), Systems Concepts in Evaluation: An Expert Anthology, Point Reyes, CA: Edge Press, pp. 101-122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, M. (2008a). Getting a grip: a critical systems framework for corporate responsibility. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 25(3), 383-395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, M. (2008b). Reframing expert support for development management. Journal of International Development 20(6), 768-782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, M., Berardi, A., Bernard, C., Bachler, M., Buckingham-Shum, S., Mistry, J., Ulrich, W. (2007). ECOSENSUS: developing collaborative learning systems for stakeholding development in environmental planning. Curriculum, Teaching & Student Support Conference, The Open University, Milton Keynes, 1-2 May 2007. Paper available in the Open University’s Open Research Online site, http://oro.open.ac.uk/8580/. Also available through the site of the Knowledge Media Institute, http://oro.open.ac.uk/view/faculty_dept/kmi.html.

  • Ulrich, W. (1983). Critical Heuristics of Social Planning: A New Approach to Practical Philosophy. Bern, Switzerland, and Stuttgart, Germany: Haupt. Paperback reprint version, Chichester, UK: Wiley, 1994 (same pagination).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1987). Critical heuristics of social systems design. European Journal of Operational Research 31(3), 276-283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1988a). Systems thinking, systems practice, and practical philosophy: a programme of research. Systems Practice 1(2), 137-163.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1988b). Churchman’s ‘process of unfolding’ - its significance for policy analysis and evaluation. Systems Practice 1(4), 415-428.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1993). Some difficulties of ecological thinking, considered from a critical systems perspective: a plea for critical holism. Systems Practice 6(6), 583-611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1996). A Primer to Critical Systems Heuristics for Action Researchers. Hull, UK: University of Hull, Centre for Systems Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (2000). Reflective practice in the civil society: the contribution of critically systemic thinking. Reflective Practice 1(2), 247-268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (2001). The quest for competence in systemic research and practice. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 18(1), 3-28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (2002). Boundary critique. In H.G. Daellenbach and R.L. Flood (eds.), The Informed Student Guide to Management Science, London: Thomson Learning, pp. 41-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (2003). Beyond methodology choice: critical systems thinking as critically systemic discourse. Journal of the Operational Research Society 54(4), 325-342.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (2004). C. West Churchman, 1913-2004 (obituary). Journal of the Operational Research Society,55(11), 1123-1129.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (2005). A brief introduction to critical systems heuristics (CSH). Paper available in the Open University’s ECOSENSUS project web site, http://projects.kmi.open.ac.uk/ecosensus/about/csh.html, or in the CSH section of Werner Ulrich’s Home Page, http://wulrich.com/csh.html.

  • Ulrich, W. (2006). Critical pragmatism: a new approach to professional and business ethics. In L. Zsolnai (ed.), Interdisciplinary Yearbook of Business Ethics, Vol. 1, Oxford, UK, and Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang, pp. 53-85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (2007a). Philosophy for professionals: towards critical pragmatism. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58(8), 1109-1113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (2007b). The greening of pragmatism (three reflections on the past, present, and future of critical pragmatism). Ulrich’s Bimonthly, March-April, May-June, and September-October 2007, http://wulrich.com/bimonthly_march2007.html.

  • Ulrich, W. (2008). The mainstream concept of reflective practice and its blind spot. Ulrich’s Bimonthly, March-April 2008, http://wulrich.com/bimonthly_march2008.html.

  • Žižek, S. (1989). The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom, MK7 6AA

    Werner Ulrich & Martin Reynolds

Authors
  1. Werner Ulrich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin Reynolds
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Werner Ulrich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Communication & Systems Dept., Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, United Kingdom

    Martin Reynolds

  2. Communication & Systems Dept., Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, United Kingdom

    Sue Holwell

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ulrich, W., Reynolds, M. (2010). Critical Systems Heuristics. In: Reynolds, M., Holwell, S. (eds) Systems Approaches to Managing Change: A Practical Guide. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-809-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-809-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-808-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-809-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation