Skip to main content

Right Hemicolectomy and Ileocecectomy: Robotic Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advanced Techniques in Minimally Invasive and Robotic Colorectal Surgery

Abstract

In this chapter, we will review the potential advantages and disadvantages of the robotic approach to a right hemicolectomy and discuss the technical differences to the laparoscopic approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zimmern A, Prasad L, Desouza A, Marecik S, Park J, Abcarian H. Robotic colon and rectal surgery: a series of 131 cases. World J Surg. 2010;34(8):1954–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Liao G, Zhao Z, Lin S, Li R, Yuan Y, Du S, Chen J, Deng H. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials. World J Surg Oncol. 2014;12(1):122.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim CW, Kim CH, Baik SH. Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(4):816–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Spinoglio G, Summa M, Priora F, Quarati R, Testa S. Robotic colorectal surgery: first 50 cases experience. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1627–32. PubMed.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Deutsch GB, Sathyanarayana SA, Gunabushanam V, Mishra N, Rubach E, Zemon H, Klein JD, Denoto G. Robotic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: an institutional experience. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(4):956–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Huettner F, Pacheco PE, Doubet JL, Ryan MJ, Dynda DI, Crawford DL. One hundred and two consecutive robotic-assisted minimally invasive colectomies–an outcome and technical update. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15(7):1195–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Baek SK, Carmichael JC, Pigazzi A. Robotic surgery: colon and rectum. Cancer J. 2013;19(2):140–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Saklani AP, Lim DR, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH, Lee KY, Kim NK. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: comparison of oncologic outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013;28(12):1689–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. deSouza AL, Prasad LM, Park JJ, Marecik SJ, Blumetti J, Abcarian H. Robotic assistance in right hemicolectomy: is there a role? Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(7):1000–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. D’Annibale A, Pernazza G, Morpurgo E, Monsellato I, Pende V, Lucandri G, Termini B, Orsini C, Sovernigo G. Robotic right colon resection: evaluation of first 50 consecutive cases for malignant disease. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(11):2856–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Luca F, Ghezzi TL, Valvo M, Cenciarelli S, Pozzi S, Radice D, Crosta C, Biffi R. Surgical and pathological outcomes after right hemicolectomy: case-matched study comparing robotic and open surgery. Int J Med Robot. 2011. doi:10.1002/rcs.398 [Epub ahead of print].

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Trastulli S, Desiderio J, Farinacci F, Ricci F, Listorti C, Cirocchi R, Boselli C, Noya G, Parisi A. Robotic right colectomy for cancer with intracorporeal anastomosis: short-term outcomes from a single institution. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013;28(6):807–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Witkiewicz W, Zawadzki M, Rząca M, Obuszko Z, Czarnecki R, Turek J, Marecik S. Robot-assisted right colectomy: surgical technique and review of the literature. Wideochir Inne Tech Malo Inwazyjne. 2013;8(3):253–7.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ballantyne GH, Ewing D, Pigazzi A, Wasielewski A. Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: lateral to medial or medial to lateral dissection? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2006;16ci:406–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zawadzki M, Velchuru VR, Albalawi SA, Park JJ, Marecik S, Prasad LM. Is hybrid robotic laparoscopic assistance the ideal approach for restorative rectal cancer dissection? Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(8):1026–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vamsi Ramana Velchuru MRCS, FRCS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Ileocolic pedicle isolation with laparoscopic ligation (MP4 44131 kb)

Ileocolic pedicle isolation with robotic ligation (MP4 45439 kb)

Lateral to medial mobilization (MP4 42049 kb)

Hepatic flexure mobilization for superior (MP4 42281 kb)

Hepatic flexure mobilization from lateral (MP4 35615 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Velchuru, V.R., Prasad, L.M. (2015). Right Hemicolectomy and Ileocecectomy: Robotic Approach. In: Bardakcioglu, O. (eds) Advanced Techniques in Minimally Invasive and Robotic Colorectal Surgery. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7531-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7531-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-7530-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7531-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics