Skip to main content
Log in

Robotic Colon and Rectal Surgery: A Series of 131 Cases

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery has become a mainstay in the treatment of benign and malignant colorectal diseases. There are inherent limitations to conventional laparoscopy which can be overcome by the robot. Here we present our experience with 131 cases of robotic and robot-assisted colon and rectal resections.

Methods

This is a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database. From August 2005 through June 2009, we performed a total of 131 totally robotic and robot-assisted colorectal resections. These included 42 right colectomies (RC), 16 anterior resections (AR) for benign disease, 8 AR with rectopexy for prolapse, 7 total proctocolectomies (TPC), 47 low and ultralow anterior resections (LAR) for rectal cancer, and 11 abdominal perineal resections (APR). All LARs were done as a hybrid procedure (laparoscopic splenic flexure mobilization followed by robotic rectal dissection), and all APR specimens were extracted through the perineal incision. All coloanal anastomoses were diverted with a loop ileostomy.

Results

There were no intraoperative complications in this series. Postoperative complications included 10 patients with ileus or small bowel obstruction (SBO), 2 patients with anastomotic leaks, 1 patient with an abscess, and 3 patients with temporary peripheral neuropathy that resolved spontaneously. Five patients required reoperation and there were a total of 4 conversions (3.7%) across all case types.

Conclusions

Robotic colon and rectal resections are safe and feasible options for the treatment of both benign and malignant disease processes. Further studies comparing oncologic and perioperative outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic, and open techniques are needed to determine the utility and efficacy of this technology in the field of colorectal surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jung YW, Lee DW, Kim SW et al (2010) Robot-assisted staging using three robotic arms for endometrial cancer: comparison to laparoscopy and laparotomy at a single institution. J Surg Oncol 101:116–121

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Palmer KJ et al (2009) Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a review of current outcomes. BJU Int 104:1428–1435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hakimi AA, Blitstein J, Feder M et al (2009) Direct comparison of surgical and functional outcomes of robotic-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: single-surgeon experience. Urology 73:119–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rozet F, Jaffe J, Braud G et al (2007) A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience. J Urol 178:478–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lowe MP, Chamberlain DH, Kamelle SA et al (2009) A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 113:191–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Luca F, Cenciarelli S, Valvo M et al (2009) Full robotic left colon and rectal cancer resection: technique and early outcome. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1274–1278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Balch GC (2009) Emerging role of laparoscopic and robotic surgery for rectal cancers. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1451–1453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term end points of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASSIC trial): multicenter randomized controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Spinoglio G, Summa M, Prioria F et al (2008) Robotic colorectal surgery: first 50 cases experience. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1627–1632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. D’Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V et al (2004) Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 47:2162–2168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Baik SH, Ko YT, Kang CM et al (2008) Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial. Surg Endosc 22:1601–1608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Soravia C, Schwieger I, Witzig JA et al (2008) Laparoscopic robotic-assisted gastrointestinal surgery: the Geneva experience. J Robotic Surg 1:291–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hellan M, Stein H, Pigazzi A (2009) Totally robotic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and splenic flexure mobilization. Surg Endosc 23:447–451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Blumetti J, deSouza AL, Prasad LM (2009) Hybrid laparoscopic-robotic low anterior resection. Semin Colon Rectal Surg 20:181–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Zimmern.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zimmern, A., Prasad, L., deSouza, A. et al. Robotic Colon and Rectal Surgery: A Series of 131 Cases. World J Surg 34, 1954–1958 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0591-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0591-4

Keywords

Navigation