Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcome of intertrochanteric fractures treated by intramedullary nail with two integrated lag screws

A study in Asian population

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: The incidence of intertrochanteric fracture has increased during recent years as life expectancy has also increased. Currently, orthopedic surgeons use various fixation methods for intertrochanteric fractures like, intramedullary (IM) nailing or dynamic hip screws and plates. The intramedullary (IM) nail with two integrated lag screws has been used recently in intertrochanteric fractures to overcome Z-affect phenomenon. However, no study is available in an Asian population. This prospective study was undertaken to document the clinical and radiologic outcomes of the IM nail with two integrated lag screws and its limitations in Asian patients.

Materials and Methods: Osteosynthesis was performed using InterTAN nail in 100 patients with an intertrochanteric fractures followed up for at least 1 year after surgery. We evaluated the recovery rates to prefracture status, time to bony union and the incidence of complications.

Results: Seventy four patients were available for at least 1 year followup examinations. Forty-five patients (60.8%) recovered prefracture status. Mean time to bony union was 18.3 ± 8.6 weeks. Intraoperative technical problems related to an unavoidable superior positioning of the lag screw occurred in five cases. Postoperative complications requiring reoperation occurred in three patients; two cases of varus collapse with cut out and one case of periprosthetic fracture.

Conclusions: The IM nail with two integrated lag screws showed favorable outcomes in Asian patients with an intertrochanteric fracture even though several complications that were not previously reported with this nail were found. The proper selection of patients and careful insertion of two lag screws should be mandatory in Asian patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kannus P, Parkkari J, Sievänen H, Heinonen A, Vuori I, Järvinen M. Epidemiology of hip fractures. Bone 1996;18:57S–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zuckerman JD, Koval KJ, Aharonoff GB, Hiebert R, Skovron ML. A functional recovery score for elderly hip fracture patients: I. Development. J Orthop Trauma 2000;14:20–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hagino H, Katagiri H, Okano T, Yamamoto K, Teshima R. Increasing incidence of hip fracture in Tottori Prefecture, Japan: Trend from 1986 to 2001. Osteoporos Int 2005;16:1963–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rowe SM, Song EK, Kim JS, Lee JY, Park YB, Bae BH, et al. Rising incidence of hip fracture in Gwangju City and Chonnam Province, Korea. J Korean Med Sci 2005;20:655–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bienkowski P, Reindl R, Berry GK, Iakoub E, Harvey EJ. A new intramedullary nail device for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures: Perioperative experience. J Trauma 2006;61:1458–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Palm H, Lysén C, Krasheninnikoff M, Holck K, Jacobsen S, Gebuhr P. Intramedullary nailing appears to be superior in pertrochanteric hip fractures with a detached greater trochanter: 311 consecutive patients followed for 1 year. Acta Orthop 2011;82:166–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Forte ML, Virnig BA, Kane RL, Durham S, Bhandari M, Feldman R, et al. Geographic variation in device use for intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90:691–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kubiak EN, Bong M, Park SS, Kummer F, Egol K, Koval KJ. Intramedullary fixation of unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures: One or two lag screws. J Orthop Trauma 2004;18:12–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Werner-Tutschku W, Lajtai G, Schmiedhuber G, Lang T, Pirkl C, Orthner E. Intra- and perioperative complications in the stabilization of per- and subtrochanteric femoral fractures by means of PFN. Unfallchirurg 2002;105:881–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Papasimos S, Koutsojannis CM, Panagopoulos A, Megas P, Lambiris E. A randomised comparison of AMBI, TGN and PFN for treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2005;125:462–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tyllianakis M, Panagopoulos A, Papadopoulos A, Papasimos S, Mousafiris K. Treatment of extracapsular hip fractures with the proximal femoral nail (PFN): Long term results in 45 patients. Acta Orthop Belg 2004;70:444–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Qin H, An Z. Therapeutic evaluation of femoral intertrochanteric fractures by InterTan. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2010;24:1424–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ruecker AH, Rupprecht M, Gruber M, Gebauer M, Barvencik F, Briem D, et al. The treatment of intertrochanteric fractures: Results using an intramedullary nail with integrated cephalocervical screws and linear compression. J Orthop Trauma 2009;23:22–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fogagnolo F, Kfuri M Jr, Paccola CA. Intramedullary fixation of pertrochanteric hip fractures with the short AO-ASIF proximal femoral nail. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004;124:31–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM. The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:1058–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cleveland M, Bosworth DM, Thompson FR, Wilson HJ Jr, Ishizuka T. A ten-year analysis of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1959;41-A: 1399–408.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Corrales LA, Morshed S, Bhandari M, Miclau T 3rd. Variability in the assessment of fracture-healing in orthopaedic trauma studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90:1862–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Docquier PL, Manche E, Autrique JC, Geulette B. Complications associated with gamma nailing. A review of 439 cases. Acta Orthop Belg 2002;68:251–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sadowski C, Lübbeke A, Saudan M, Riand N, Stern R, Hoffmeyer P. Treatment of reverse oblique and transverse intertrochanteric fractures with use of an intramedullary nail or a 95 degrees screw-plate: A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84-A: 372–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schipper IB, Marti RK, van der Werken C. Unstable trochanteric femoral fractures: Extramedullary or intramedullary fixation. Review of literature. Injury 2004;35:142–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Leung KS, Procter P, Robioneck B, Behrens K. Geometric mismatch of the Gamma nail to the Chinese femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996;323:42–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim KM, Brown JK, Kim KJ, Choi HS, Kim HN, Rhee Y, et al. Differences in femoral neck geometry associated with age and ethnicity. Osteoporos Int 2011;22:2165–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hsueh KK, Fang CK, Chen CM, Su YP, Wu HF, Chiu FY. Risk factors in cutout of sliding hip screw in intertrochanteric fractures: An evaluation of 937 patients. Int Orthop 2010;34:1273–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mainds CC, Newman RJ. Implant failures in patients with proximal fractures of the femur treated with a sliding screw device. Injury 1989;20:98–100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Parker MJ. Cutting-out of the dynamic hip screw related to its position. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992;74:625.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Utrilla AL, Reig JS, Muñoz FM, Tufanisco CB. Trochanteric gamma nail and compression hip screw for trochanteric fractures: A randomized, prospective, comparative study in 210 elderly patients with a new design of the gamma nail. J Orthop Trauma 2005;19:229–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yaozeng X, Dechun G, Huilin Y, Guangming Z, Xianbin W. Comparative study of trochanteric fracture treated with the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation and the third generation of gamma nail. Injury 2010;41:1234–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pu JS, Liu L, Wang GL, Fang Y, Yang TF. Results of the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in elderly Chinese patients. Int Orthop 2009;33:1441–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhao X, Yan SG, Li H, Wu HB. Short reconstruction nail for intertrochanteric fracture: Does it really fit Asian feature? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2012;132:81–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tae-Young Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, JW., Kim, TY., Ha, YC. et al. Outcome of intertrochanteric fractures treated by intramedullary nail with two integrated lag screws. IJOO 49, 436–441 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.159647

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.159647

Key words

MeSH terms

Navigation