Abstract
Objectives: Although small-bore high-field magnets are useful for research in small rodent models,this technology, however, has not been easily accessible to most researchers. This current study, thus,tried to evaluate the usability of 4CH-Mouse coil (Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands) forpreclinical investigations in clinical 3T MR scan environment. We evaluated the effects of ischemicpreconditioning (IP) in the mouse stroke model with clinical 3T MR scanner and 4CH-Mouse coil.
Materials and Methods: Experiments were performed on male C57BL/6 mice that either received the IP or sham operation (control). Three different MR sequences including diffusion weighted images (DWI), T2-weighted images (T2WI), and fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) were performed on the mouse brains following 24, 72 hours of middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) and analyzed for infarct lesions.
Results: The images showed that the IP-treated mouse brains had significantly smaller infarct volumes compared to the control group. Of the MR sequences employed, the T2WI showed the highest level of correlations with postmortem infarct volume measurements.
Conclusions: The clinical 3T MR scanner turned out to have a solid potential as a practical tool for imaging small animal brains. MR sequences including DWI, T2WI, FLAIR were obtained with acceptable resolution and in a reasonable time constraint in evaluating a mouse stroke model brain.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. L. Swain, R. L. Sabina, J. J. Hines, J. C. Greenfield Jr. and E. W. Holmes, Cardiovasc. Res. 18, 264 (1984).
Y. M. Yang, X. Feng, Z. W. Yao, W. J. Tang, H. Q. Liu and L. Zhang, J. Neurosci. Methods 167, 176 (2008).
A. Barrier et al., Dis. Colon Rectum 48, 2238 (2005).
E. M. Park, T. H. Joh, B. T. Volpe, C. K. Chu, G. Song and S. Cho, Neuroscience 123, 147 (2004).
P. G. Mullins, D. G. Reid, P. D. Hockings, S. J. Hadingham, C. A. Cambell, J. B. Chalk and D. M. Doddrell, MR Biomed. 14, 204 (2001).
T. N. Lin, Y. Y. He, G. Wu, M. Khan and C. Y. Hsu, Stroke 24, 117 (1993).
K. Kitagawa et al., Brain Res. 528, 21 (1990).
S. Cho, E. M. Park, P. Zhou, K. Frys, M. E. Ross and C. Iadecola, J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 25, 493 (2005).
A. Barrier et al., FASEB. J. 19, 1617 (2005).
T. Ohtsuki, C. A. Ruetzler, K. Tasaki and J. M. Hallenbeck, J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 16, 1137 (1996).
F. C. Barone, R. F. White, P. A. Spera, P. A. Spera, J. Ellison, R. W. Currie, X. Wang and G. Z. Feuerstein, Stroke 29, 1937 (1998).
J. A. Shin, E. M. Park, J. S. Choi, S. M. Seo, J. L. Kang, K. E. Lee and S. Cho, J. Neuroimmunol 217, 14 (2009).
U. Dirnagl, R. P. Simon and J. M. Hallenbeck, Trends Neurosci. 26, 248 (2003).
U. Dirnagl and A. Meisel, Neuropharmacology 55, 334 (2008).
F. Chen, F. De Keyzer, H. Wang, V. Vandecaveye, W. Landuyt, H. Bosmans, R. Hermans, G. Marchal and Y. Ni, Methods 43, 12 (2007).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lim, S.M., Park, E.M., Lyoo, I.K. et al. MR images of mouse brain using clinical 3T MR scanner and 4CH-Mouse coil. Journal of the Korean Physical Society 67, 237–242 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.67.237
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.67.237