Advertisement

Memory & Cognition

, Volume 46, Issue 2, pp 285–297 | Cite as

How sublexical association strength modulates updating: Cognitive and strategic effects

  • Caterina Artuso
  • Paola Palladino
Article

Abstract

In the current study, we investigated updating of long-term memory (LTM) associations. Specifically, we examined sublexical associations by manipulating preexisting LTM relations between consonant couplets (in encoding and updating phases), and explicitly instructed participants to engage with a specific strategy for approaching the task (item disjunction, grouping, or none). In two experiments, we used a multistep subject-based memory updating task in which we measured processing response times (RTs; Exp. 1, Exp. 2) and recognition RTs (Exp. 2). For the first time, in both experiments, we found costs in dismantling strong pre-existing associations from LTM and benefits in recreating strong preexisting associations. In addition, we found that control of irrelevant information was more difficult when this belonged to a strong association. Regarding task strategies, we showed that inducing a disjunction strategy enhanced updating, no matter the strength of the association. Results were discussed in the light of updating as a process of dismantling and recreating associations. The role of a specific strategic approach in enhancing the updating was also discussed.

Keywords

Updating Long-term memory Working memory Sublexical representation Memory strategy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Candice Morey, Santiago Pelegrina, and a third reviewer for their helpful comments and suggestions, and Sara Bottani for her help with data collection.

References

  1. Acheson, D. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009), Verbal working memory and language production: Common approaches to the serial ordering of verbal information. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 50–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014411 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Artuso, C., Cavallini, E., Bottiroli, S., & Palladino, P. (2017). Updating working memory: Memory load matters with aging. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 29, 371–377. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-016-0581-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Artuso, C., & Palladino, P. (2011). Content-context binding in verbal working memory updating: On-line and off-line effects. Acta Psychologica, 136, 363–369. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.01.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Artuso, C., & Palladino, P. (2014). Binding and content updating in working memory tasks. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 226–242. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12024.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Artuso, C., & Palladino, P. (2016). Modulation of working memory updating: Does long-term memory lexical association matter? Cognitive Processing, 17, 4957. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0735-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Artuso, C., Palladino, P., & Ricciardelli, P. (2015). Social updating: The role of gaze direction in updating and memorizing emotional faces. Social Cognition, 33, 543–561. doi: https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2015.33.6.543 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boujut, A., & Clarys, D. (2015). The effect of ageing on recollection: The role of the binding updating process. Memory, 24, 1231–1242. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2015.1091893
  8. Bunting, M., Cowan, N., & Saults, J. S. (2006). How does running memory span work? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1691–1700. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210600848402 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Chein, J. M., & Morrison, A. B. (2010). Expanding the mind’s workspace: Training and transfer effects with a complex working memory span task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 193–199. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.2.193
  10. Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral Brain Sciences, 24, 87–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cowan, N. (2017). Mental objects in working memory: Development of basic capacity or of cognitive completion? Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 52, 81–104. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acdb.2016.12.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Mauro, T., Mancini, F., Vedovelli, M., & Voghera, M. (1993). Lessico di frequenza dell'italiano parlato. [Frequency lexicon of spoken Italian language]. Milan, Italy: Etas Libri.Google Scholar
  14. Ecker, U. C., Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., & Chee, A. E. (2010). The components of working memory updating: An experimental decomposition and individual differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36 , 170–189. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017891
  15. Gathercole, S. E., Frankish, C. R., Pickering, S. J., & Peaker, S. (1999). Phonotactic influences on short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 84–95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.1.84 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hulme, C., Stuart, G., Brown, G. D. A., & Morin, C. (2003). High- and low-frequency words are recalled equally well in alternating lists: Evidence for associative effects in serial recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 500–518. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00096-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lendínez, C., Pelegrina, S., & Lechuga, M. T. (2011). The distance effect in numerical-memory updating task. Memory & Cognition, 39, 675–685. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-010-0047-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lendínez, C., Pelegrina, S., & Lechuga, M. T. (2014). The role of similarity in updating numerical information in working memory: Decomposing the numerical distance effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 16–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.793375 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Majerus, S. (2013). Language repetition and short-term memory: An integrative framework. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7(357). doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00357
  20. Majerus, S., Perez, T. M., & Oberauer, K. (2012). Two distinct origins of long-term learning effects in verbal short-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 38–51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.07.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Majerus, S., Van der Linden, M., Mulder, L., Meulemans, T., & Peters, F. (2004). Verbal short-term memory reflects the sublexical organization of the phonological language network: Evidence from an incidental phonotactic learning paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 297–306. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Martin, N., & Saffran, E. M. (1992), A computational account of deep dysphasia: Evidence from a single case study. Brain and Language, 43, 240–274. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(92)90130-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. McNamara, D. S., & Scott, J. L. (2001). Working memory capacity and strategy use. Memory & Cognition, 29, 10–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195736 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morris, N., & Jones, D. M. (1990). Memory updating in working memory: The role of central executive. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 111–121. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1990.tb02349.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Morrison, A. B., & Chein, J. M. (2011). Does working memory training work? The promise and challenges of enhancing cognition by training working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18, 46–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-010-0034-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Morrison, A. B., Rosenbaum, G. M., Fair, D., & Chein, J. M. (2016). Variation in strategy use across measures of verbal working memory. Memory & Cognition, 9, 922–936. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0608-9
  27. Nairne, J. S. (1990). A feature model of immediate memory. Memory & Cognition, 18, 251–269. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213879 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oberauer, K. (2005). Binding and inhibition in working memory: Individual and age differences in short-term recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 368–387. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.368 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Palladino, P., Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R., & Pazzaglia, F. (2001). Working memory and updating processes in reading comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 29, 344–354. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194929 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Palladino, P., & Jarrold, C. (2008). Do updating tasks involve updating? Evidence from comparisons with immediate serial recall. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 392–399. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701664989 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Poirier, M., & Saint-Aubin, J. (2005). Word frequency effects in immediate serial recall: Item familiarity and item co-occurrence have the same effect. Memory, 13, 325–332. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210344000369 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Saint-Aubin, J., Ouellette, D., & Poirier, M. (2005). Semantic similarity and immediate serial recall: Is there an effect on all trials? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 171–177. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196364 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Schmiedek, F., Hildebrandt, A., Lövdén, M., Wilhelm, O., & Lindenberger, U. (2009). Complex span versus updating tasks of working memory: The gap is not that deep. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1089–1096. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015730 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Szucs, D., Devine, A., Soltesz, F., Nobes, A., & Gabriel, F. (2013). Developmental dyscalculia is related to visuo-spatial memory and inhibition impairment. Cortex, 49, 2674–2688. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2013.06.007 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Thorn, A., & Frankish, C. (2005). Long-term knowledge effects on serial recall of nonwords are not exclusively lexical. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 729–735. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.4.729 PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of PaviaPaviaItaly

Personalised recommendations