Abstract
In conditioning paradigms, morphine has both rewarding and aversive motivational properties. The rewarding motivational property is preferentially associated with places, whereas the aversive property is preferentially associated with tastes. We used this preferential associability of stimuli in combination with a higher order conditioning procedure to ask how the motivational effects of morphine are represented in memory. First-order conditioning involved the pairing of a novel taste or distinct place with an intraperitoneal injection of morphine (15 mg/kg) in two separate groups of rats. As expected, conditioned taste aversions developed in one group and conditioned place preferences developed in the other. Second-order conditioning involved pairing the firstorder taste conditioned stimulus (CS) with a distinct place CS in the absence of morphine in one group and pairing the first-order place CS with a distinct taste CS in the absence of morphine in the other group. If the first-order taste CS, for example, elicits from memory a representation of the entire motivational spectrum of morphine, then the second-order place cues might be expected to reveal conditioned place preferences on the basis of differential associability findings. However, if the first-order taste CS calls up only a representation of morphine’s aversive effects, then second-order conditioned place aversions would be expected. We found that the first-order taste CS produced second-order conditioned place aversions. Similarly, in the other group, the first-order place CS produced second-order taste preferences. In other words, only conditioning within one motivational system was observed. We propose that the first-order stimulus conditioned to morphine represents in memory only that single motivational effect of morphine to which the first-order conditioned stimulus is preferentially associable.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bechara, A., & van der Kooy, D. (1985). Opposite motivational effects of endogenous opiods in brain and periphery. Nature, 314, 533–534.
Bechara, A., & van der Kooy, D. (1987). Kappa receptors mediate the peripheral aversive effects of opiates. Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior, 28, 227–233.
Bechara, A., & van der Kooy, D. (1989). The tegmental pedun-culopontine nucleus: A brainstem output of the limbic system critical for the conditioned place preferences produced by morphine and amphetamine. Journal of Neuroscience, 9, 3400–3409.
Bechara, A., Zito, K., & van der Kooy, D. (1987). Peripheral receptors mediate the aversive conditioning effects of morphine in the rat. Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior, 28, 219–225
Cappell, H., Leblanc, A. E., & Endreny, L. (1973). Aversive conditioning by psychoactive drugs: Effects of morphine, alcohol and chlordiazepoxide. Psychopharmacology, 29, 239–246.
Crowder, W. F., Smith, S. G., Davis, W. M., Noel, T., & Coussens, W. R. (1972). Effect of morphine dose size on the conditioned reinforcing potency of stimuli paired with morphine. Psychology Recordings, 22, 441–448.
Faneslow, M. S., Calcagnetti, D. J., & Helmstetter, F. J. (1989). Modulation of appetitively and aversively motivated behavior by the kappa opioid antagonist MR2266. Behavioral Neuroscience, 103, 663–672.
Garcia, J., & Koelling, R. (1966). Relation of cue to consequence in avoidance learning. Psychonomic Science, 4, 123–124.
Garcia, J., McGowan, B., Ervin, F., & Koelling, R. (1968). Cues: Their relative effectiveness as a function of the reinforcer. Science, 160, 794–795.
Holland, P. C. (1977). Conditioned stimulus as a determinant of the form of the Pavlovian conditioning response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3, 77–104.
Kelleher, R. T. (1966). Chaining and conditioned reinforcement. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application (pp. 160–212). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Krank, M. D. (1985). Asymmetrical effects of Pavlovian excitatory and inhibitory aversive transfer on Pavlovian appetitive responding and acquisition. Learning & Motivation, 16, 35–62.
Mackey, W. B., Keller, J., & van der Kooy, D. (1986). Visceral cortex lesions block conditioned taste aversions induced by morphine. Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior, 24, 71–78.
Mackintosh, N. J. (1983). Conditioning and associative learning. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press.
Marcus, R., Carnathan, G., Meyer, R. E., & Cochin, J. (1976). Morphine-based secondary reinforcement: Effects of different doses of naloxone. Psychopharmacology, 48, 247–250.
Martin, G., Bechara, A., & van der Kooy, D. (1987). Dissociation of morphine’s discriminative stimulus properties from its motivational properties. Society of Neuroscience Abstracts, 3, 1546.
Martin, G., Bechara, A., & van der Kooy, D. (1988). Morphine preexposure attentuates the aversive properties of opiates without affecting the aversive properties. Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior, 39, 687–692.
Mucha, R. F., & Herz, A. (1985). Motivational properties of kappa and mu opioid receptor agonists studied with place and taste conditioning. Psychopharmacology, 86, 281–285.
Mucha, R. F., van der Kooy, D., O’Shaughnessey, M., & Bucenieks, P. (1982). Drug reinforcement studied by the use of place conditioning in rat. Brain Research, 243, 91–105.
Nairne, J. S., & Rescorla, R. A. (1981). Second-order conditioning with diffuse auditory reinforcers in the pigeon. Learning & Motivation, 12, 65–91.
Parker, L. A. (1986). Drug-specific blocking of lithium-, amphetamine-, and apomorphine-induced conditioned flavor avoidance. Learning & Motivation, 17, 965–968.
Phillips, A. G., & Lepaine, F. (1980). Reinforcing effects of morphine microinjection into the ventral tegmental area. Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior, 12, 965–968.
Rossi, N. A., & Reid, L. D. (1976). Affective states associated with morphine injections. Physiological Psychology, 4, 269–274.
Sherman, J. E., Pickman, C, Rice, A., Liebeskind, J. C, & Holman, E. W. (1980). Rewarding and aversive effects of morphine; temporal and pharmacological properties. Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior, 13, 501–505.
Vaccarino, F. J., Bloom, F. E., & Koob, G. F. (1985). Blockade of nucleus accumbens opiate receptors attenuates intravenous heroin reward in the rat. Psychopharmacology, 86, 37–42.
van der Kooy, D., Mucha, R. F., O’Shaughnessey, M., & Bucenieks, P. (1982). Reinforcing effects of brain microinjections of morphine revealed by conditioned place preference. Brain Research, 243, 107–117.
van der Kooy, D., & Phillips, A. G. (1977). Temporal analysis of naloxone attenuation of morphine-induced taste aversion. Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior, 6, 637–641.
Wise, R. A., Yokel, R. A., & Dewitt, H. (1976). Both positive reinforcement and conditioned aversion from amphetamine and from apomorphine in rats. Science, 191, 1273–1275.
Woods, J. H., & Schuster, C. R. (1968). Reinforcement properties of morphine, cocaine and SPA as a function of unit dose. International Journal of Addiction, 3, 231–237.
Zito, K. A., Bechara, A., Greenwood, C, & van der Kooy, D. (1988). The dopamine innervation of the visceral cortex mediates the aversive effects of opiates. Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior, 30, 693–699.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by the Medical Research Council of Canada
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stefurak, T.L., Martin, G. & van der Kooy, D. The representation in memory of morphine’s unconditioned motivational effects depends on the nature of the conditioned stimulus. Psychobiology 18, 435–442 (1990). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333091
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333091