Abstract
Manipulating experience with the reinforcer, through either home cage presentations of Noyes pellets or availability of the free reinforcer immediately prior to testing, attenuated the preference for earned as opposed to free reinforcers. Similarly, changing the reinforcer to one of a different flavor at testing increased the preference for the noncontingent reinforcer. These results are consistent with an interpretation of earned reinforcer preference which emphasizes the role of the reinforcer as a discriminative signal for further instrumental responding. It is suggested that the tendency to perform instrumental responses for reinforcers when free reinforcers are available can be explained in terms of traditional learning processes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Boakes, R. A. Response decrements produced by extinction and by response-independent reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1973,19, 293–302.
Boakes, R. A., Halliday, M. S., &Poli, M. Response additivity: Effects of superimposed free reinforcement on a variable-interval baseline.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1975,23, 177–191.
Carder, B. Rats’ preference for earned in comparison with free liquid reintorcers.Psychonomic Science, 1972,26, 25–26.
Carder, B., &Berkowitz, K. Rats’ preference for earned in comparison with tree food.Science, 1970,167, 1273–1274.
Denny, M. R. A theory of experimental extinction and its relation to a general theory. In H. H. Kendler & J. T. Spence (Eds).Essays in neobehaviorism: A memorial volume to Kenneth W. Spence. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1971.
Hothersall, D., Huey, D., &Thatcher, K. The preference of rats for free or response-produced food.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1973,1, 241–243.
Jensen, G. D. Preference for bar pressing over “freeloading” as a function of number of rewarded presses.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963,65, 451–454.
Knutson, J. F., &Carlson, C. W. Operant responding with free access to the reinforcer: A replication and extension.Animal Learning A Behavior, 1973,1, 133–136.
Mitchell, D., Scott, D. W.’ &Williams, K. D. Container neophobia and the preference for earned food.Behavioral Biology, 1973,9, 613–624.
Neuringer, A. J. Animals respond for food in the presence of free food.Science, 1969,166, 399–401.
Reid, R. L. The role of the reinforcer as a stimulus.British Journal of Psychology, 1957,49, 202–209.
Rescorla, R. A., &Skucy, J. C. Effect of response-independent reintorcers during extinction.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1969,67, 381–389.
Singh, D. Preference for bar pressing to obtain reward over freeloading in rats and children.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1970,73, 320–327.
Tarte, R. D., &Snyder, R. L. Some sources of variation in the bar-pressing versus freeloading phenomenon in rats.Journal Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1973,84, 128–133.
Tarte, R. D., Townsend, S. G., &Vernon, C. R. Housing environments and the barpressing vs. freeloading phenomenon in rats.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1973,2, 69–71.
Taylor, G. T. A limitation of the contrafreeloading phenomenon.Psychonomic Science, 1972,29, 173–174.
Taylor, G. T. Discriminability and the contrafreeloading phenomenon.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1975,88, 104–109.
Wallace, F. R., Osborne, S., Norborg, J., &Fantino, E. Stimulus change contemporaneous with food presentation maintains responding in the presence of free food.Science, 1973,182, 1038–1039.
Zamble, E. A “freeloading” effect: Changes in response rate following non-contingent food reward.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1972,26, 336–347.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper is based on a thesis submitted by the first author to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the MA degree. This research was supported in part by NSF Grant GB 41488 to the second author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carlson, C.W., Riccio, D.C. Experience with the reinforcer and the preference for earned rather than free reinforcers in rats. Animal Learning & Behavior 4, 269–272 (1976). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214048
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214048