Abstract
The relationships between hit, remember, and false alarm rates were examined across individual subjects in three remember-know experiments in order to determine whether signal detection theory would be consistent with the observed data. The experimental data differed from signal detection predictions in two critical ways. First, remember reports were unrelated, or slightly negatively related, to the commission of false alarms. Second, both response types (remembers and false alarms) were uniquely related to hit rates, which demonstrated that the hit rate cannot be viewed as the result of a single underlying strength process. These results are consistent with the dual-process signal detection model of Yonelinas (1994), in which performance is determined by two independent processes— retrieval of categorical context information (remembering) and discriminations based on continuous item strength. Remember and false alarm rates selectively tap these processes, whereas the hit rate is jointly determined. Monte Carlo simulations in which the dual-process model was used successfully reproduced the pattern in the experimental data, whereas simulations in which a signal detection model, with separate “old” and “remember” criteria, was used, did not. The results demonstrate the utility of examining individual differences in response types when one is evaluating memory models.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Conger, A. J. (1974). A revised definition for suppressor variables: A guide to their identification and interpretation.Educational & Psychological Measurement,34, 35–46.
Dobbins, I. G. (2000). The systematic discrepancy between A′ for overall recognition and remembering: A dual process account. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Dobbins, I. G., Kroll, N. E. A., &Liu, Q. (1998). Confidence-Accuracy inversions in scene recognition: A remember-know analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1306–1315.
Donaldson, W. (1996). The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing.Memory & Cognition,24, 523–533.
Duzel, E., Yonelinas, A. P., Mangun, G. R., Heinze, H. J., &Tulving, E. (1997). Event-related brain potential correlates of two states of conscious awareness in memory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,94, 5973–5978.
Gardiner, J. M., &Gregg, V. H. (1997). Recognition memory with little or no remembering: Implications for a detection model.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 474–479.
Gardiner, J. M., Ramponi, C., &Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1998). Experiences of remembering, knowing, and guessing.Consciousness & Cognition,7, 1–26.
Hirshman, E. (1998). On the utility of the signal detection model of the remember-know paradigm.Consciousness & Cognition,7, 103–107.
Hirshman, E., &Henzler, A. (1998). The role of decision processes in conscious recollection.Psychological Science,9, 61–65.
Hirshman, E., &Master, S. (1997). Modeling the conscious correlates of recognition memory: Reflections on the remember-know paradigm.Memory & Cognition,25, 345–351.
Inoue, C., &Bellezza, F. S. (1998). The detection model of recognition using know and remember judgments.Memory & Cognition,26, 299–308.
Khoe, W., Kroll, N. E. A., Yonelinas, A. P. Dobbins, I. G., &Knight, R. T. (2000). The contribution of recollection and familiarity to yes-no and forced-choice recognition testss in healthy subjects and amnesics.Neuropsychologia,38, 1333–1341.
Kučcera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Macmillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D. (1991).Detection theory: A user’s guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Macmillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D. (1996). Triangles in ROC space: History and theory of “nonparametric” measures of sensitivity and response bias.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 164–170.
Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.Psychological Review,87, 252–271.
Pedhazur, E. J. (1997).Multiple regression in behavioral research. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.
Rajaram, S., &Roediger, H. L., III. (1996). Remembering and knowing as states of consciousness during retrieval. In J. Cohen & J. W. Schooler (Eds.),Scientific approaches to consciousness (pp. 213–240). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ratcliff, R., Sheu, C.-F., &Gronlund, S. D. (1992). Testing global memory models using ROC curves.Psychological Review,99, 518–535.
Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 803–814.
Roediger, H. L., III,McDermott, K. B., &Robinson, K. (1998). The role of associative processes in creating false memories. In M. A. Conway, S. E. Gathercole, & C. Cornoldi (Eds.),Theories of Memory: Volume II (pp. 187–245). East Sussex: Psychology Press.
Stretch, V., &Wixted.J. T. (1998). On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1379–1396.
Swets, J. A. (1986). Indices of discrimination or diagnostic accuracy: Their ROCs and implied models.Psychological Bulletin,99, 100–117.
Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness.Canadian Psychology,26, 1–12.
Wiggins, J. S. (1973).Personality and prediction: Principles of personality assessment. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 1341–1354.
Yonelinas, A. P., Dobbins, I., Szymanski, M. D., Dhaliwal, H. S., &King, L. (1996). Signal detection, threshold, and dual-process models of recognition memory: ROCs and conscious recollection.Consciousness & Cognition,5, 418–441.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants MH59352-01 to A.P.Y. and NS17778 to N.E.A.K.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dobbins, I.G., Khoe, W., Yonelinas, A.P. et al. Predicting individual false alarm rates and signal detection theory: A role for remembering. Memory & Cognition 28, 1347–1356 (2000). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211835
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211835