Abstract
Rats and pigeons responded for food delivered according to multiple schedules. The session length varied from 10 to 120 min, and the programmed rate of reinforcement varied from 15 to 240 reinforcers per hour. Response rates usually changed systematically within experimental sessions. For both rats and pigeons, responding reached a peak after an approximately constant amount of time since the beginning of the session, regardless of session length. When rats, but not pigeons, served as subjects, the peak rates of responding occurred later in the session and the within-session changes were smaller for lower than for higher rates of reinforcement. The similarities between the results for rats and for pigeons when session length varied suggest that at least one of the factors that produces the within-session changes in responding is shared by the present species, responses, and reinforcers. The differences in results when rate of reinforcement varied are more difficult to interpret.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Balsam, P. (1984). Relative time in trace conditioning. In J. Gibbon & L. Allan (Eds.),Timing and time perception (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 423, pp. 211–227). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Bitterman, M. E. (1960). Toward a comparative psychology of learning.American Psychologist,15, 704–712.
Bitterman, M. E. (1965). Phyletic differences in learning.American Psychologist,20, 396–410.
Catania, A. C., &Reynolds, G. S. (1968). A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,11, 327–383.
Fleshler, M., &Hoffman, H. S. (1962). A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,5, 529–530.
McSweeney, F. K. (1992). Rate of reinforcement and session duration as determinants of within-session patterns of responding.Animal Learning & Behavior,20, 160–169.
McSweeney, F. K., Hatfield, J., &Allen, T. M. (1990). Within-session responding as a function of post-session feedings.Behavioural Processes,22, 177–186.
McSweeney, F. K., &Roll, J. M. (1993). Responding changes systematically within sessions during conditioning procedures.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,60, 621–640.
Schneider, B. A. (1969). A two-state analysis of fixed-interval responding in the pigeon.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,12, 677–687.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant IBN-9207346. The authors wish to thank John Hinson for his comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mcsweeney, F.K., Roll, J.M. & Cannon, C.B. The generality of within-session patterns of responding: Rate of reinforcement and session length. Animal Learning & Behavior 22, 252–266 (1994). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209833
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209833