Abstract
If both the number of one-dimensional signals and their range are sufficiently large (about 7 and 20 dB for loudness), the information transmitted in absolute identification is not much increased by increasing either variable (Miller, 1956; Braida & Durlach, 1972). The data can be represented in terms of Thurstonian discriminal dispersions in which the variance is proportional to the square of the signal range in decibels (Durlach & Braida, 1969; Gravetter & Lockhead, 1973), but it is by no means obvious what sorts of mechanisms would lead to this model. An alternative is proposed, namely, that there is a roving attention band, about 10 to 15 dB wide, such that signals falling within the band are represented by a sensory sample size about an order ot magnitude larger than when the same signal falls outside the band. With reasonable choices for parameters, including the subjective continuum growing as a power function of intensity with an exponent about 3, this nicely accounts for the data. In an attempt to examine the change of performance with range, we replicated the BraidaoDurlach experiment with many additional points. These data are not, however, adequate to decide between the two models.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Braida, L. D.. &Durlach, N. I. Intensity perception. 11. Resolution in one-interval paradigms.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1972,51, 483–502.
Durlach.N. I., &Braida, L. D. Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1969,46, 372–383.
Garner, W. R. An informational analysis of absolute judgments of loudness.Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1953,46, 373–380.
Gravetter, F., &Lockhead, G. R. Criterial range as a frame of reference for stimulus judgment.Psychological Review. 1973,80, 203–216.
Green, D. M., &Luce, R. D. Variability of magnitude esttmates: A timing theory analysis.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,15, 291–300.
Luce.R. D., &Green, D. M. A neural timing theory for response times and the psychophysics of intensity.Psychological Review, 1972,79, 4–57.
Luce, R. D., &Green, D. M. The response ratio hypothesis for magnitude estimation.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1974,11, 1–14. (al
Luce, R. D., &Green, D. M. Neural coding and psychophysical discrimination data.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1974,56, 1554–1564. (b)
Miller, G. A. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.Psychological Review, 1956,63, 81–97.
Pollack, I. Information of elementary auditory displays.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1952,24, 745–750.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported in part by a National Science Foundation grant to the University of California, Irvine, and one to Harvard University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luce, R.D., Green, D.M. & Weber, D.L. Attention bands in absolute identification. Perception & Psychophysics 20, 49–54 (1976). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198705
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198705