Skip to main content
Log in

Molecular genetic characterization of canine and rangiferine Brucella isolates from different regions of Russia

  • Experimental Works
  • Published:
Molecular Genetics, Microbiology and Virology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to carry out a comparative molecular genetic characterization of Brucella isolates obtained from dogs and deer in Russia using current methods of typing. Isolates from dogs (n = 19) and deer (n = 2) were studied by PCR using primers to species and biovar specific Brucella differentiating gene target sequences and multiple locus variable number tandem repeats analysis (MLVA) with 12 pairs of primers to known variable loci of the Brucella genome. As a result of differentiating gene targets PCR identification, isolates from dogs were characterized as B. canis species, and those from deer as B. suis biovar 4. The MLVA molecular typing method of isolates revealed five identical and seven variable loci. A dendrogram constructed on the basis of MLVA-12 data combined all the isolates into a genetically related cluster together with reference strains B. canis RM6/66 and B. suis 1330, Tomsen, 686, 40 biovars 1–4. Seventeen MLVA genotypes have been revealed in isolates with a Hunter and Gaston discriminatory index (HGDI) = 0.9842. Molecular genetic characterization of B. canis and B. suis Russian isolates geographically distant from each other confirm the existing data that there is a close genetic relation between these two Brucella species. In addition, using the MLVA approach, the genetic diversity of these isolates and the association of closely related genotypes with a geographical region of primary isolation have been shown. In order to improve the system of epidemiological control of brucellosis in Russia, it is necessary to perform MLVA typing of isolates obtained from dogs and deer, which pose an epidemiological threat for human health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vershilova, P.A., Brutsellez (Brucellosis), Moscow: Meditsina, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zheludkov, M.M., Brucellosis in Russia: Modern Epidemiology and Laboratory Diagnostics, Extended Abstract of Doctoral (Med.) Dissertation, Moscow, 2009.

  3. Zheludkov, M.M., Tsirel’son, L.E., Kulakov, Yu.K., et al., Epidemiol. Vaktsinoprofilakt., 2009, no. 6, pp. 23–28.

  4. Kalinovskii, A.I., Brucellosis in Eastern Siberia and in the Far East, Extended Abstract of Doctoral (Med.) Dissertation, Irkutsk, 2006.

  5. Kulakov, Yu.K., Zheludkov, M.M., Dranovskaya, E.A., et al., Mol. Genet., 1997, no. 3, pp. 15–17.

  6. Kulakov, Yu.K., Zheludkov, M.M., Tolmacheva, T.A., et al., Mol. Genet., 2000, no. 4, pp. 7–12.

  7. Kulakov, Yu.K., Erdenebaatar, J., Tsirel’son, L.E., et al., Zh. Mikrobiol. Epidemiol. Immunobiol., 2010, no. 3, pp. 17–22.

  8. Kulakov, Yu.K., Erdenebaatar, J., Zheludkov, M.M., et al., Mol. Genet., 2011, no. 2, pp. 8–12.

  9. Zhumilov, K.V., Kalmukov, V.V., Michailova, Y.P., et al., Veterinary, 1996, no. 5, pp. 55–59.

  10. Al Dahouk, S., Le Fleche, P., Nockler, K., et al., J. Microbiol. Methods, 2007, vol 69, pp. 137–145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Alton, G.G., Jones, L.M., Angus, R.D. et al., Techniques for the brucellosis laboratory, Paris. 1988, pp. 54–58.

  12. Bikandi, J., San Millan, R., Rementeria, A., et al., Bioinformatics, 2004, vol 20, pp. 798–799.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Boom, R., Sol, C.J., Salimans, M.M., et al., J. Clin. Microbiol., 1990, vol. 28, pp. 495–503.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bricker, B.J., Ewalt, D.R., Bio. Med. Central Microbiol., 2005, vol. 5. pp. 37.

  15. Forbes, L.B., Can. Vet. J., 1991, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 686–688.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Halling, S.M., Peterson-Burch, B.D., Bricker, B.J., et al., J. Bacteriol., 2005, vol. 187, pp. 2715–2726.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Her, M., Kang, S.I., Kim, J.W., et al., J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2010, vol. 20, pp. 1750–1755.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hunter, P.R., Gaston, M.A., J. Clin. Microbiol., 1988. vol. 26, pp. 2465–2466.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jiang, H., Mao, L.L., Zhao, H.Y., et al., Vet. Microbiol., 2012, vol.154, nos. 3–4, pp. 419–421.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jiang, H., Mao, L.L., Zhao, H.Y., et al., Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg., 2010, vol.104, no. 12, pp. 796–800.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kang, S.I., Heo, E.J., Cho, D., et al., J. Vet. Med. Sci., 2011, vol.73, no. 6, pp. 779–786.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kulakov, Y.K., Zheludkov, M.M., Sclyarov, O.D., Vaccine, 2010, vol. 28,Suppl. 5, pp. 41–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Le Fleche, P., Jacques, I., Grayon, M., et al., Bio. Med. Central Microbiol., 2006, vol. 6, pp. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Maquart, M., Le Fleche, P., Foster, G., et. al., Bio. Med. Central Microbiol., 2009, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 145.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Microorganisms Tandem Repeats Database, http://minisatellites.u-psud.fr

  26. Nockler, K., Maves, R., Cepeda, D., et al., J. Clin. Microbiol., 2009, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 3147–3155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nomura, A., Imaoka, K., Imanishi, H., et al., Emerg. Infect. Dis., 2010, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 1183–1185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rees, R.K., Graves, M., Caton, N., et al., J. Microbiol. Methods, 2009, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 66–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sayan, M., Erdenlig, S., Stack, J., et al., Jpn. J. Infect. Dis., 2011, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 516–519.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Strom Holst, B., Lofqvist, K., Ernholm, L., et al., Acta Vet. Scand., 2012, vol. 27, no. 54(1), pp. 18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tiller, R.V., De, B.K., Boshra, M., et al., J. Clin. Microbiol., 2009, vol.47, no. 7, pp. 2226–2231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Valdezate, S., Navarro, A., Villalon, P., et al., J. Clin. Microbiol., 2010, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 2734–2740.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wattam, A.R., Williams, K.P., Snyder, E.E., et al., J. Bacteriol., 2009, vol.191, pp. 3569–3579.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Whatmore, A.M., Shankster, S.J., Perrett, L.L., et al., J. Clin. Microbiol., 2006, vol. 44, pp. 1982–1993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Zheludkov, M.M., Tsirelson, L.E., Biol. Bulletin., 2010, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 709–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu. K. Kulakov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © Yu.K. Kulakov, L.E. Tsirel’son, M.M. Zheludkov, 2012, published in Molekulyarnaya Genetika, Mikrobiologiya i Virusologiya, 2012, No. 4, pp. 28–32.

About this article

Cite this article

Kulakov, Y.K., Tsirel’son, L.E. & Zheludkov, M.M. Molecular genetic characterization of canine and rangiferine Brucella isolates from different regions of Russia. Mol. Genet. Microbiol. Virol. 27, 167–173 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0891416812040052

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0891416812040052

Keywords

Navigation