Abstract
Parkinson disease is a movement disorder caused by progressive dopaminergic neuron degeneration in the substantia nigra and characterized by four cardinal symptoms: resting tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity, and postural instability. Levodopa has been considered the first-choice intervention for Parkinson disease for more than three decades. However, up to 50–90% of levodopa-treated patients develop motor complications within 5–10 years of starting treatment. It is important, therefore, to delay the initiation and/or reduce the dosage requirements of levodopa. The non-ergoline dopamine agonist ropinirole (Requip®) is used as monotherapy or in combination with low-dose levodopa in patients with early disease, and as an adjunct to levodopa in patients with advanced Parkinson disease.
As an adjunct to levodopa therapy in patients with more advanced disease, ropinirole is generally more effective than bromocriptine and more effective than placebo. Ropinirole (with or without levodopa) is more effective than placebo and at least as effective as bromocriptine when administered as therapy for early Parkinson disease. It reduces the risk of dyskinesia relative to levodopa and maintains long-term control of the underlying disease symptoms, factors that are associated with improved functional ability. Ropinirole reduced the loss of putamen dopamine storage capacity compared with levodopa in a functional imaging study. However, it was unclear whether this resulted from any neuroprotective activity of ropinirole; further research is required to identify any clinically important neuroprotective activity of dopamine agonists. Ropinirole has a tolerability profile generally similar to that of bromocriptine and levodopa when used as monotherapy. In common with all dopaminergic agents, ropinirole has been linked with sedation and unintended sleep episodes; however, these effects may also result from the underlying disease process in patients with Parkinson disease.
Only limited data are available from pharmacoeconomic evaluations of ropinirole. Nevertheless, a cost-minimization analysis indicates that, from a societal viewpoint in Canada, ropinirole is cost saving relative to treatment with levodopa plus a dopa decarboxylase inhibitor in patients with early Parkinson disease. Further economic and quality-of-life assessments of ropinirole are required, particularly comparisons with other dopamine agonists and antiparkinsonian interventions.
In conclusion, ropinirole is established as an adjunct to levodopa in advanced Parkinson disease, and as monotherapy or in combination with low-dose levodopa in early disease. It is in the setting of early Parkinson disease that ropinirole may see greatest expansion of its overall role in disease management programs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Use of tradenames is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.
References
Olanow CW, Watts RL, Koller WC. An algorithm (decision tree) for the management of Parkinson’s disease (2001): treatment guidelines. Neurology 2001 Jun; 56 (11 Suppl. 5): 1–88
Rubenstein LM, DeLeo A, Chrischilles EA. Economic and health-related quality of life considerations of new therapies in Parkinson’s disease. Pharmacoeconomics 2001; 19(7): 729–52
Hauser RA, Zesiewicz TA. Management of early Parkinson’s disease. Med Clin North Am 1999 Mar; 83(2): 393–414
Matheson AJ, Spencer CM. Ropinirole: a review of its use in the management of Parkinson’s disease. Drugs 2000 Jul; 60(1): 115–37
Gelb DJ, Oliver E, Gilman S. Diagnostic criteria for Parkinson’s disease. Arch Neurol 1999 Jan; 56: 33–9
Hoehn MM. The natural history of Parkinson’s disease in the pre-levodopa and post- levodopa eras. Neurol Clin 1992 May; 10(2): 331–9
Hoehn MM, Yahr MD. Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality. Neurology 1967 May; 17(5): 427–42
Kuhn W, Winkel R, Woitalla D, et al. High prevalence of parkinsonism after occupational exposure to lead-sulfate batteries. Neurology 1998 Jun; 50(6): 1885–6
Choi IS. Parkinsonism after carbon monoxide poisoning. Eur Neurol 2002; 48(1): 30–3
Gorell JM, Rybicki BA, Johnson CC, et al. Occupational metal exposures and the risk of Parkinson’s disease. Neuroepidemiology 1999; 18(6): 303–8
Kim Y, Kim JM, Kim JW, et al. Dopamine transporter density is decreased in parkinsonian patients with a history of manganese exposure: what does it mean? Mov Disord 2002; 17(3): 568–75
Gorell JM, Johnson CC, Rybicki BA, et al. The risk of Parkinson’s disease with exposure to pesticides, farming, well water, and rural living. Neurology 1998 May; 50(5): 1346–50
Marder K, Logroscino G, Alfaro B, et al. Environmental risk factors for Parkinson’s disease in an urban multiethnic community. Neurology 1998 Jan; 50(1): 279–81
Olanow CW. An introduction to the free radical hypothesis in Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol 1992; 32 Suppl.: S2–9
Gorell JM, Rybicki BA, Johnson CC, et al. Smoking and Parkinson’s disease: a dose-response relationship. Neurology 1999 Jan 1; 52(1): 115–9
Ross GW, Abbott RD, Petrovitch H, et al. Association of coffee and caffeine intake with the risk of Parkinson disease. JAMA 2000; 283(20): 2674–9
Tanner CM, Ottman R, Goldman SM, et al. Parkinson disease in twins: an etiologic study. JAMA 1999 Jan 27; 281(4): 341–6
Richter G, Sonnenschein A, Grunewald T, et al. Novel mitochondrial DNA mutations in Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Transm 2002 May; 109: 721–9
Hristova AH, Koller WC. Early Parkinson’s disease: what is the best approach to treatment? Drugs Aging 2000 Sep; 17(3): 165–81
Early Parkinson’s disease: dopamine agonists have increasingly important role in symptom management. Drug Ther Perspect 2001 Aug 27; 17(17): 5–10
Dodel RC, Berger K, Oertel WH. Health-related quality of life and healthcare utilisation in patients with Parkinson’s disease: impact of motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. Pharmacoeconomics 2001; 19(10): 1013–38
Iskedjian M, Einarson TR. Cost analysis of ropinirole versus levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Pharmacoeconomics 2003; 21(2): 115–27
Chio A, Magnani C, Schiffer D, et al. Prevalence of Parkinson’s disease in Northwestern Italy: comparison of tracer methodology and clinical ascertainment of cases. Mov Disord 1998; 13(3): 400–5
Kuopio AM, Marttila RJ, Helenius H, et al. Changing epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease in southwestern Finland. Neurology 1999 Jan 15; 52(2): 302–8
Wermuth L, Joensen P, Bunger N, et al. High prevalence of Parkinson’s disease in the Faroe Island. Neurology 1997; 49(2): 426–32
Melcon MO, Anderson DW, Vergara RH, et al. Prevalence of Parkinson’s disease in Junin, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina. Mov Disord 1997; 12(2): 197–205
Bower JH, Maraganore DM, McDonnell SK, et al. Incidence and distribution of parkinsonism in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1976–1990. Neurology 1999 Apr 12; 52(6): 1214–20
Schrag A, Ben-Shlomo Y, Quinn NP. Cross sectional prevalence survey of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease and Parkinsonism in London. BMJ 2000 Jul 1; 321(7252): 21–2
Errea JM, Ara JR, Aibar C, et al. Prevalence of Parkinson’s disease in Lower Aragon, Spain. Mov Disord 1999; 14(4): 596–604
Montgomery JREB. Two advances in the management of Parkinson disease. Cleve Clin J Med 2002 Aug; 69(8): 639–43
Kuzel MD. Ropinirole: a dopamine agonist for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1999 Feb 1; 56(3): 217–24
Rubenstein LM, Chrischilles EA, Voelker MD. The impact of Parkinson’s disease on health status, health expenditures, and productivity. Estimates from the National Medical Expenditure Survey. Pharmacoeconomics 1997 Oct; 12(4): 486–98
Jenkinson C. Quality-of-life repercussions and costs of Parkinson’s disease [in French]. Dis Manage Health Outcomes 2001; 9(1): 11–9
Whetten-Goldstein K, Sloan F, Kulas E, et al. The burden of Parkinson’s disease on society, family, and the individual. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997 Jul; 45(7): 844–9
Siderowf AD, Holloway RG, Stern MB. Cost-effectiveness analysis in Parkinson’s disease: determining the value of interventions. Mov Disord 2000 May; 15: 439–45
LePen C, Wait S, Moutard-Martin F, et al. Cost of illness and disease severity in a cohort of French patients with Parkinson’s disease. Pharmacoeconomics 1999 Jul; 16(1): 59–69
Kurlan R, Clark S, Shoulson I, et al. Economic impact of protective therapy for early Parkinson’s disease [abstract no. P109]. Ann Neurol 1988 Jul; 24(1): 153
Djaldetti R, Melamed E. Management of response fluctuations: paractical guidelines. Neurology 1998 Aug; 51 (2 Suppl. 2): S36–40
Vidailhet M, Bonnet AM, Marconi R, et al. The phenomenology of L-dopa-induced dyskinesias in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 1999; 14 Suppl. 1: 13–8
Fahn S. The spectrum of levodopa-induced dyskinesias. Ann Neurol 2000; 47 Suppl. 1: S2–S11
Koller WC. Levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 2000; 55 (11 Suppl. 4): S2–7; discussion S8-12
Koller WC. Treatment of early Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 2002; 58 (4 Suppl. 1): S79–86
Dooley M, Markham A. Pramipexole: a review of its use in the management of early and advanced Parkinson’s disease. Drugs Aging 1998 Jun; 12(6): 495–514
Contin M, Riva R, Albani F, et al. Pharmacokinetic optimisation of dopamine receptor agonist therapy for Parkinson’s disease. CNS Drugs 2000 Dec; 14(6): 439–55
Colosimo C, De Michele M. Motor fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease: pathophysiology and treatment. Eur J Neurol 1999 Jan; 6(1): 1–21
Le WD, Jankovic J. Are dopamine receptor agonists neuroprotective in Parkinson’s disease? Drugs Aging 2001; 18(6): 389–96
Whone AL, Watts RL, Stoessl AJ, et al. Slower progression of Parkinson’s disease with ropinirole versus levodopa: The REAL-PET study. Ann Neurol 2003 Jul; 54(1): 93–101
Parkinson Study Group. Dopamine transporter brain imaging to assess the effects of pramipexole vs levodopa on Parkinson disease progression. JAMA 2002 Apr 3; 287(13): 1653–61
Schrag A, Keens J, Warner J. Ropinirole for the treatment of tremor in early Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Neurol 2002 May; 9(3): 253–7
Arle JE, Alterman RL. Surgical options in Parkinson’s disease. Med Clin North Am 1999 Mar; 83(2): 483–98
Hallett M, Litvan I. Evaluation of surgery for Parkinson’s disease: a report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. The Task Force on Surgery for Parkinson’s Disease. Neurology 1999 Dec 10; 53(9): 1910–21
Lang AE. Surgery for Parkinson disease: a critical evaluation of the state of the art. Arch Neurol 2000 Aug; 57(8): 1118–25
Ropinirole hydrochloride. Mosby’s Drug Consult 2003, 2789-94
Whone AL, Rakshi JS, Watts DJ, et al. Two trials demonstrating disease-slowing effects of ropinirole, compared with L-dopa, in early Parkinson’s disease [abstract no. P242]. Mov Disord 2002; 17 Suppl. 5: S85–6
Rascol O, Brooks DJ, Korczyn AD, et al. A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson’s disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa. 056 Study Group. N Engl J Med 2000 May 18; 342(20): 1484–91
Korczyn AD, Brunt ER, Larsen JP, et al. A 3-year randomized trial of ropinirole and bromocriptine in early Parkinson’s disease. The 053 Study Group [erratum published in Neurology 1999 Sep 22; 53: 1162]. Neurology 1999 Jul 22; 53(2): 364–70
Sethi KD, O’Brien CF, Hammerstad JP, et al. Ropinirole for the treatment of early Parkinson disease: a 12-month experience. Ropinirole Study Group. Arch Neurol 1998 Sep; 55(9): 1211–6
Brooks DJ, Abbott RJ, Lees AJ, et al. A placebo-controlled evaluation of ropinirole, a novel D2 agonist, as sole dopaminergic therapy in Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neuropharmacol 1998; 21(2): 101–7
Adler CH, Sethi KD, Hauser RA, et al. Ropinirole for the treatment of early Parkinson’s disease. The Ropinirole Study Group. Neurology 1997 Aug; 49(2): 393–9
Rascol O, Lees AJ, Senard JM, et al. Ropinirole in the treatment of levodopa-induced motor fluctuations in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neuropharmacol 1996 Jun; 19(3): 234–45
Lieberman A, Olanow CW, Sethi K, et al. A multicenter trial of ropinirole as adjunct treatment for Parkinson’s disease. Ropinirole Study Group [erratum in Neurology 1999 Jan 15; 52 (2): 435]. Neurology 1998 Oct; 51(4): 1057–62
Brunt ER, Brooks DJ, Korczyn AD, et al. A six-month multicentre, double-blind, bromocriptine-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of ropinirole in the treatment of patients with Parkinson’s disease not optimally controlled by L-dopa. J Neural Transm 2002; 109(4): 489–502
Perez-Aharon J, Abbot RJ, Playfer JR, et al. Ropinirole, a placebo-controlled study of efficacy as adjunct therapy in parkinsonian patients not optimally controlled on L-dopa. Neurology 1994 Apr; 44 Suppl. 2: A244
Fabbrini G, Barbanti P, Rum A, et al. Combined levodopa test in the evaluation of efficacy of pergolide and ropinirole [abstract]. Mov Disord 1998; 13 Suppl. 2: 50
Im JH, Ha JH, Cho IS, et al. Ropinirole as an adjunct to levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease: a 16-week bromocriptine controlled study. J Neurol 2003; 250(1): 90–6
Gimenez-Roldan S, Esteban EM, Mateo D. Switching from bromocriptine to ropinirole in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease: open label pilot responses to three different dose-ratios. Clin Neuropharmacol 2001; 24(6): 346–51
Canesi M, Antonini A, Mariani CB, et al. Overnight switch to ropinirole improves activities of daily living in Parkinson’s disease patients. Neurology 2000; 54 (7 Suppl. 3): A280
Korczyn AD, Thalamas C, Adler CH. Dosing with ropinirole in a clinical setting. Acta Neurol Scand 2002 Oct; 106(4): 200–4
Clarke CE, Deane KH. Ropinirole for levodopa-induced complications in Parkinson’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; (3): CD001516
Brunt ER, Korczyn AD, Lieberman A, et al. The long-term efficacy of ropinirole as an adjunct to L-dopa. Neurology 1999; 52 Suppl. 2: A408–9
Clarke CE, Deane KH. Ropinirole versus bromocriptine for levodopa-induced complications in Parkinson’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; (3): CD001517
Weiner WJ, Minagar A, Shulman LM. Ropinirole after pramipexole failure in advanced Parkinson’s disease [abstract no. W236]. Ann Neurol 1998 Sep; 44(3): 502
Inzelberg R, Carasso RL, Schechtman E, et al. A comparison of dopamine agonists and catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors in Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neuropharmacol 2000; 23(5): 262–6
Schrag AE, Brooks DJ, Brunt E, et al. The safety of ropinirole, a selective nonergoline dopamine agonist, in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neuropharmacol 1998; 21(3): 169–75
Korczyn AD, Keens J, Oldham M, et al. The safety and efficacy of ropinirole as early therapy in elderly patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 2000 Apr 11; 54 (7 Suppl. 3): A90
Fuell D, Gardiner D, Krieder MS. The effect of concomitant selegiline on Parkinson’s disease patients treated with ropinirole. Neurology 1998 Apr; 50 (4 Suppl. 4): A279
Stocchi F, Destee A. Co-administration of ropinirole and domperidone during rapid dose escalation of the dopamine agonist. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 1998; 4(4): 183–8
SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals. Requip brand of ropinirole hydrochloride tablets. Prescribing information. 2001
Chaudhuri KR, Pal S, Brefel-Courbon C. ’sleep attacks’ or ‘unintended sleep episodes’ occur with dopamine agonists: is this a class effect? Drug Saf 2002; 25(7): 473–83
Larsen JP, Tandberg E. Sleep disorders in patients with Parkinson’s disease: epidemiology and management. CNS Drugs 2001; 15(4): 267–75
Clarke CE, Vieregge P, Ziegler M, et al. The impact of L-Dopa-induced dyskinesias on patients’ quality of life in Parkinson’s disease: a prospective European study [abstract no. P06.109]. Neurology 2002; 58 (7 Suppl. 3): A469
Pechevis MR, Clarke CE, Vieregge M, et al. The impact of L-dopa-induced dyskinesia on direct health care and non-health care costs associated with patients with Parkinson’s disease: a prospective European study [abstract no. P340]. Mov Disord 2002; 17 Suppl. 5: S115
Shimbo T, Hira K, Takemura M, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of dopamine agonists in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease in Japan. Pharmacoeconomics 2001; 19(8): 875–86
Hoerger TJ, Bala MV, Rowland C, et al. Cost effectiveness of pramipexole in Parkinson’s disease in the US. Pharmacoeconomics 1998 Nov; 14(5): 541–57
Bhatia K, Brooks DJ, Burn DJ, et al. Guidelines for the management of Parkinson’s disease. Hosp Med 1998 Jun; 59(6): 469–80
Olanow CW, Schapira AHV, Roth T, et al. Falling asleep at the wheel: motor vehicle mishaps in people taking pramipexole and ropinirole [letter]. Neurology 2000 Jan 11; 54(1): 274–7
American Sleep Disorders Association. International classificaction of sleep disorders revised: diagnostic and coding manual. Rochester (MN): American Sleep Disorders Association, 1997
Hauser RA, Gauger L, McDowell Anderson W, et al. Pramipexole-induced somnolence and episodes of daytime sleep. Mov Dis 2000; 15(4): 658–63
Ebersbach G, Nordon J, Tracik F. Sleep attacks in Parkinson’s disease: polysomnographic recordings. Mov Disord 2000; 15 Suppl. 3: 89
Hobson DE, Lang AE, Martin WR, et al. Excessive daytime sleepiness and sudden-onset sleep in Parkinson disease: a survey by the Canadian Movement Disorders Group. JAMA 2002; 287(4): 455–63
Clarke CE, Guttman M. Dopamine agonist monotherapy in Parkinson’s disease. Lancet 2002 Nov 30; 360: 1767–9
Morrish P. Is it time to abandon functional imaging in the study of neuroprotection? Mov Disord 2002 Mar; 17(2): 229–32
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Murdoch, D., Cheer, S.M. & Wagstaff, A.J. Management of Parkinson Disease. Dis-Manage-Health-Outcomes 12, 39–54 (2004). https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200412010-00004
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200412010-00004