Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Oral sodium phosphate solution is an effective option in patients requiring colorectal cleansing

  • Drug and Profile Reports
  • Published:
Drugs & Therapy Perspectives Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Table I
Fig. 1

Notes

  1. The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.

References

  1. Tooson JD, Gates Jr LK. Bowel preparation before colonoscopy: choosing the best lavage regimen. Postgrad Med 1996 Aug; 100(2): 203–14

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Curran MP, Plosker CL. Oral sodium phosphate solution: a review of its use as a colorectal cleanser. Drugs 2004; 64(15): 1697–714

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nelson BD, Barkun AN, Block KP, et al. Technology status evaluation report: colonoscopy preparations. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54(6): 829–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Toledo TK, DiPalma JA. Review article: colon cleansing preparation for gastrointestinal procedures. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2001 May; 15(5): 605–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Frommer D. Cleansing ability and tolerance of three bowel preparations for colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 1997 Jan; 40(1): 100–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Linden TB, Waye JD. Sodium phosphate preparation for colonoscopy: onset and duration of bowel activity. Gastrointest Endosc 1999 Dec; 50(6): 811–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Balaban DH, Leavell Jr BS, Oblinger MJ, et al. Low volume bowel preparation for colonoscopy: randomized, endoscopist-blinded trial of liquid sodium phosphate versus tablet sodium phosphate. Am J Gastroenterol 2003 Apr; 98(4): 827–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kolts BE, Lyles WE, Achem SR, et al. A comparison of the effectiveness and patient tolerance of oral sodium phosphate, castor oil, and standard electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy preparation. Am J Gastroenterol 1993 Aug; 88(8): 1218–23

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen SM, Wexner SD, Binderow SR, et al. Prospective, randomized, endoscopic-blinded trial comparing precolonoscopy bowel cleansing methods. Dis Colon Rectum 1994 Jul; 37(7): 689–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vanner SJ, MacDonald PH, Paterson WG, et al. A randomized prospective trial comparing oral sodium phosphate with standard polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution (Golytely) in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 1990 Apr; 85(4): 422–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Young CJ, Simpson RR, King DW, et al. Oral sodium phosphate solution is a superior colonoscopy preparation to polyethylene glycol with bisacodyl. Dis Colon Rectum 2000 Nov; 43(11): 1568–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Canard JM, Gorce D, Napoleon B, et al. Fleet Phosphosoda: for greater acceptability of the colonic preparation before colonoscopy. Randomised comparative single blind study versus polyethylene glycol [in French]. Acta Endosc 2001; 31(5): 703–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Keeffe EB. Colonoscopy preps: what’s best? Gastrointest Endosc 1996 May; 43(5): 524–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Afridi SA, Barthel JS, King PD, et al. Prospective, randomized trial comparing a new sodium phosphate-bisacodyl regimen with conventional PEG-ES lavage for outpatient colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 1995 May; 41(5): 485–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Golub RW, Kerner BA, Wise Jr WE, et al. Colonoscopic bowel preparations: which one? A blinded, prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 1995 Jun; 38(6): 594–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Henderson JM, Barnett JL, Turgeon DK, et al. Single-day, divided-dose oral sodium phosphate laxative versus intestinal lavage as preparation for colonoscopy: efficacy and patient tolerance. Gastrointest Endosc 1995 Sep; 42(3): 238–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee J, McCallion K, Acheson AG, et al. A prospective randomised study comparing polyethylene glycol and sodium phosphate bowel cleansing solutions for colonoscopy. Ulster Med J 1999 Nov; 68(2): 68–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bujanda L, Muñoz C, Sánchez A, et al. Tolerance to and colon cleansing with two preparations: polyethylene glycol versus sodium phosphate [in Spanish]. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2001 Jan; 24(1): 9–12

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Martinek J, Hess J, Delarive J, et al. Cisapride does not improve precolonoscopy bowel preparation with either sodium phosphate or polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage. Gastrointest Endosc 2001 Aug; 54(2): 180–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chilton AP, O’Sullivan M, Cox MA, et al. A blinded, randomized comparison of a novel, low-dose, triple regimen with Fleet Phospho-soda: a study of colon cleanliness, speed and success of colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2000 Jan; 32(1): 37–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ell C, Fischbach W, Keller R, et al. A randomized, blinded, prospective trial to compare the safety and efficacy of three bowel-cleansing solutions for colonoscopy (HSG-01*). Endoscopy 2003 Apr; 35(4): 300–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fleet Pharmaceuticals. Fleet Phospho-soda: prescribing information [online]. Available from URL: http://www.phospho-soda.com [Accessed 2004 Dec 31]

  23. British national formulary. No. 47. London: The Pharmaceutical Press, 2005 Mar

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oral sodium phosphate solution is an effective option in patients requiring colorectal cleansing. Drugs Ther. Perspect 21, 1–3 (2005). https://doi.org/10.2165/00042310-200521080-00001

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00042310-200521080-00001

Search

Navigation