Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Oral sodium phosphate solution is a superior colonoscopy preparation to polyethylene glycol with bisacodyl

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and patient tolerance of two bowel preparations for colonoscopy. METHODS: Three hundred twenty-three consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy were randomly assigned to receive either oral sodium phosphate, or 2 liters of polyethylene glycol solution preceded by the stimulant laxative bisacodyl. Patients were asked to record the effects of the preparation, noting any vomiting, nausea, or abdominal pain, and to determine a discomfort rating on a scale of 1 to 5. One hundred sixty-nine patients were assigned to the oral sodium phosphate solution, and 154 to polyethylene glycol with bisacodyl. Surgeons were blinded to the preparation used and rated the quality of the bowel preparation on a scale of 1 to 5. RESULTS: Ninety-nine percent of patients in the sodium phosphate group drank all of the solution as opposed to 91 percent of patients in the polyethylene glycol with bisacodyl group. Patients in the sodium phosphate group reported significantly less discomfort (P=0.002). No significant difference was reported for vomiting, nausea, or abdominal pain associated with the preparations. The quality of bowel cleansing was considered by the colonoscopists significantly better for the sodium phosphate group than the polyethylene glycol with bisacodyl group (P<0.000001). CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy preparation with sodium phosphate solution is better tolerated and more effective than polyethylene glycol with bisacodyl.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams WJ, Meagher AP, Lubowski DZ, King DW. Bisacodyl reduces the volume of polyethylene glycol solution required for bowel preparation. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:229–34.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen SM, Wexner SD, Binderow SR,et al. Prospective, randomized, endoscopic-blinded trial comparing precolonoscopy bowel cleansing methods. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:689–96.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vanner SJ, MacDonald PH, Paterson WG, Prentice RS, DaCosta LR, Beck IT. A randomized prospective trial comparing oral sodium phosphate with standard polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution (GoLYTELY) in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 1990;85:422–7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kolts BE, Lyles WE, Achem SR, Burton L, Geller AJ, MacMath T. A comparison of the effectiveness and patient tolerance of oral sodium phosphate, castor oil, and standard electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy preparation. Am J Gastroenterol 1993;88:1218–23.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Frommer D. Cleansing ability and tolerance of three bowel preparations of colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:100–4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Haroon N, Iber FL. Randomized clinical trial comparing oral Sodium Phosphate (NaP) with standard polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution (Colyte) in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy[abstract]. Gastroenterology 1992;102:A13.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Golub RW, Kerner BA, Wise WE Jr,et al. Colonoscopic bowel preparation—which one? A blinded, prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:594–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Marshall JB, Pineda JJ, Barthel JS, King PD. Prospective randomized trial comparing sodium phosphate solution with polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 1993;39:631–4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Church JM. Effectiveness of polyethylene glycol antegrade gut lavage bowel preparation for colonoscopy—timing is the key! Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41:1223–5.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Oliveira L, Wexner SD, Daniel N,et al. Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery: a prospective, randomized, surgeon-blinded trial comparing sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol-based lavage solutions. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:585–91.

    Google Scholar 

  11. DiPalma JA, Brady CE, Pierson WP. Colon cleansing: acceptance by older patients. Am J Gastroenterol 1986;81:652–5.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Caswell A, ed. MIMIS annual. 23rd ed. Sydney: Medi Media, 1999:20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. From the Colorectal Unit, St. George Hospital, Sydney, Australia

    C. J. Young (F.R.A.C.S.), R. R. Simpson (F.R.A.C.S.), D. W. King (F.R.A.C.S.) &  D. Z. Lubowski (F.R.A.C.S.)

Authors
  1. C. J. Young
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. R. Simpson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. W. King
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D. Z. Lubowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Young, C.J., Simpson, R.R., King, D.W. et al. Oral sodium phosphate solution is a superior colonoscopy preparation to polyethylene glycol with bisacodyl. Dis Colon Rectum 43, 1568–1571 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236740

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236740

Key words

Search

Navigation