Skip to main content
Log in

Abacavir plus Lamivudine

A Review of their Combined Use in the Management of HIV Infection

  • Adis Drug Evaluation
  • Published:
Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Abstract

Abacavir and lamivudine (two nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NRTIs]), as separate formulations in combination with other antiretroviral agents, are effective in the reduction of HIV RNA levels in antiretroviral-naive patients with HIV infection, and are generally well tolerated. A fixed-dose combination tablet of abacavir/lamivudine (Epzicom™, Kivexa™) has been developed for once-daily use and preliminary efficacy data are promising. Although further experience with this formulation is needed to fully determine its position in the management of HIV infection, a single, once-daily tablet that may be taken irrespective of food intake should aid adherence to treatment, a key factor in determining the success of an antiretroviral regimen. Thus, abacavir and lamivudine are two established components of first-line antiretroviral regimens for the management of HIV infection and the fixed-dose abacavir/lamivudine tablet has the potential to be an effective, easily adhered to and generally well tolerated component of first-line therapy.

Pharmacological Properties

The active metabolites of abacavir and lamivudine inhibit the HIV reverse transcriptase enzyme. The two drugs show additive or synergistic in vitro activity against HIV isolates.

HIV variants with reduced susceptibility to abacavir or lamivudine have been selected for in vitro and have also been isolated from patients receiving abacavir and/or lamivudine. Both drugs select for a methionine to valine substitution at position 184 (M184V) of the HIV reverse transcriptase enzyme. Other substitutions associated with abacavir monotherapy are leucine to valine at position 74 (L74V), lysine to arginine at position 65 (K65R) and tyrosine to phenylalanine at position 115 (Y115F).

A single dose of fixed-dose abacavir/lamivudine 600mg/300mg was bioequivalent to single doses of abacavir 600mg plus lamivudine 300mg, based on the values for systemic absorption and peak plasma concentration in healthy volunteers. Systemic exposure to the drugs following administration of the fixed-dose tablet is not altered by food.

Abacavir and lamivudine are both rapidly absorbed after oral administration. Both drugs are eliminated predominantly in the urine: abacavir primarily as metabolites and lamivudine mainly unchanged.

The pharmacokinetic properties of abacavir and lamivudine, including the intracellular pharmacokinetics of their active metabolites, support their use as once-daily therapy.

Therapeutic Efficacy

Abacavir plus lamivudine (administered as separate formulations) have shown efficacy as the backbone of triple or quadruple antiretroviral therapy for antiretroviral-naive adult patients with HIV infection. When concomitant abacavir and lamivudine were used in combination with another NRTI, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor or a protease inhibitor for 48 weeks, up to 76.3% of recipients achieved plasma HIV RNA levels of <50 copies/mL and up to 82.5% achieved levels <400 copies/mL in intent-to-treat analyses.

The efficacy of abacavir plus lamivudine in combination with efavirenz was non-inferior to that of zidovudine plus lamivudine in combination with efavirenz. Once-daily abacavir was non-inferior to twice-daily abacavir, both administered in combination with lamivudine and efavirenz, in adult patients with HIV infection.

Abacavir plus lamivudine was significantly more effective than zidovudine plus lamivudine in the reduction of viral load from baseline in children and adolescents with HIV infection, after results were corrected for concomitant nelfinavir or placebo.

At 24 weeks, 69% and 77% of antiretroviral treatment-naive patients receiving a fixed-dose abacavir/lamivudine 600mg/300mg tablet once daily plus efavirenz 600mg once daily achieved plasma HIV RNA levels of <50 and <400 copies/mL (intention-to-treat analysis). The other arm of this ongoing 48-week trial (fixed-dose abacavir/lamivudine plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) was discontinued after early virological nonresponse was observed in 49% of patients. The efficacy of the fixed-dose abacavir/lamivudine tablet was non-inferior to that of abacavir plus lamivudine as separate formulations (both arms as part of triple or quadruple antiretroviral therapy regimens) after 24 weeks in two trials in antiretroviral treatment-experienced patients.

Tolerability

As individual agents, abacavir and lamivudine are generally well tolerated; as yet, tolerability data for the fixed-dose combination tablet are limited. The most common (≥15%) treatment-emergent adverse events reported in early monotherapy trials in lamivudine recipients included diarrhoea, malaise and fatigue, headache, coughing, sleep disorders, muscle pain, abdominal pain or discomfort, temperature regulation disturbance, nausea and vomiting, and anxiety. Those reported in recipients of concomitant abacavir, lamivudine and zidovudine in several other trials were nausea and vomiting, diarrhoea, fever and headache. Approximately 5% of abacavir recipients developed a hypersensitivity reaction.

The incidence of drug-related adverse events was similar between the two treatment groups when once-daily abacavir was compared with twice-daily abacavir, both administered in combination with lamivudine and efavirenz in patients with HIV infection. A regimen of concomitant abacavir, lamivudine plus efavirenz was generally at least as well tolerated as that of zidovudine, lamivudine plus efavirenz.

Antiretroviral-naive patients with HIV infection receiving concomitant abacavir, lamivudine and efavirenz had a significantly lower rate of lipoatrophy compared with those receiving lamivudine, stavudine and efavirenz.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II
Table III
Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.

References

  1. UNAIDS. AIDS epidemic update: 2003 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.unaids.org [Accessed 2004 Mar 29]

  2. Department of Health and Human Services (US). Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents [online]. Available from URL: http://www.aidsinfo.nih.gov [Accessed 2004 Nov 26]

  3. BHIVA Writing Committee on behalf of the BHIVA Executive Committee. British HIV association (BHIVA) guidelines for the treatment of HIV-infected adults with antiretroviral therapy [online]. Available from URL: http://www.bhiva.org/guidelines/2003/hiv/ [Accessed 2004 Mar 29]

  4. Hervey PS, Perry CM. Abacavir: a review of its clinical potential in patients with HIV infection. Drugs 2000 Aug; 60(2): 447–79

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Foster RH, Faulds D. Abacavir. Drugs 1998 May; 55(5): 729–36; discussion 737-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Perry CM, Faulds D. Lamivudine: a review of its antiviral activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy in the management of HIV infection. Drugs 1997 Apr; 53(4): 657–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. GlaxoSmithKline (US). Epzicom™ (abacavir sulfate and lamivudine) tablets: prescribing information [online]. Available from URL: http://us.gsk.com/products/assets/us_epzicom.pdf [Accessed 2004 Aug 4]

  8. GlaxoSmithKline (US). Epivir (lamivudine): prescribing information [online]. Available from URL: http://us.gsk.com/products/assets/us_epivir.pdf[Accessed 2004 Feb 26]

  9. GlaxoSmithKline (US). Ziagen (abacavir sulfate): prescribing information [online]. Available from URL: http://us.gsk.com/products/assets/us_ziagen_tablets.pdf [Accessed 2004 Oct 26]

  10. Tisdale M, Alnadaf T, Cousens D. Combination of mutations in human immunodefieciency vius type 1 reverse transcriptase required for resistance to the carbocyclic nucleoside 1592U 89. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997 May; 41(5): 1094–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Miller V, Ait-Khaled M, Stone C, et al. HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) genotype and susceptibility to RT inhibitors during abacavir monotherapy and combination therapy. AIDS 2000 Jan 28; 14(2): 163–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Craig C, Bonny T, Zhao H, et al. Analysis of virologic failure in a clinical trial of abacavir (ABC) once daily (OAD) versus twice daily (BID) with lamivudine (3TC) and efavirenz (EFV) (ZODIAC study: CNA30021) [poster no. J-20]. 11th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infection; 2004 Feb 8–11; San Francisco

  13. Gibb DM, Walker AS, Kaye S, et al. Evolution of antiretroviral phenotypic and genotypic drug resistance in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected children treated with abacavir/lamivudine, zidovudine/lamivudine or abacavir/zidovudine, with or without nelfinavir (the PENTA 5 trial). AntivirTher 2002 Dec; 7(4): 293–303

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Irlbeck D, Rouse E, Castillo S, et al. Treatment-emergent mutations for previously naive HIV-infected adults failing ZDV+3TC+EFV and ABC+3TC+EFV (CNA30024) [poster no. 661]. 11th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; 2004 Feb 8–11; San Francisco

  15. MacArthur R, Crane LR, Alvarez D, et al. Factors associated with selection of the K65R mutation: a retrospective chart review [abstract no. 835]. Antiviral Ther 2003; 8 Suppl. 1: S419

    Google Scholar 

  16. Landman R, Peytavin G, Descamps D, et al. Low genetic barrier to resistance is a possible cause of early virological failures in once-daily regimen of abacavir, lamivudine, and tenofovir: the tonus study [abstract no. 52]. 11th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; 2004 Feb 8–11; San Francisco

  17. Craig C, Stone C, Bonny T. Baseline resistance in an ART-naive populations: a possible confounding factor [abstract no. 238 plus poster]? 7th International Congress of Drug Therapy and HIV Infection (ICDTH); 2004 Nov 14–18; Glasgow

  18. Miller M, CoakletD, Cheng A, et al. Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of virologic failure through 48 weeks among treatment-naive patients taking tenofovir DF (TDF) or stavudine (d4T) in combination with lamivudine (3TC) and efavirenz (EFV) [abstract no. P205 plus oral presentation]. 6th International Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV Infection; 2002 Nov 17–21; Glasgow

  19. Valer L, Martin-Carbonero L, de Mendoza C, et al. Predictors of selection of K65R: tenofovir use and lack of thymidine analogue mutations [letter]. AIDS 2004; 18(15): 2094–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Winston A, Pozniak A, Mandalia S, et al. Which nucleoside and nucleotide backbone combinations select for the K65R mutation in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase [letter]. AIDS 2004 Apr 9; 18(6): 949–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gallant JE, Rodriguez AE, Weinberg W, et al. Early non-response to tenofovir DF + abacavir (ABC) and lamivudine (3TC) in a randomized trial compared to efavirenz + ABC and 3TC: ESS30009 unplanned interim analysis [abstract no. H-1722a plus oral presentation]. 43rd Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy: Late Breaker Abstracts; 2003 Sep 14–17; Chicago

  22. Whitcomb JM, Parkin NT, Chappey C, et al. Broad nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor cross-resistance in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 clinical isolates. J Infect Dis 2003 Oct 1; 188(7): 992–1000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Winters MA, Bosch RJ, Albrecht MA, et al. Clinical impact of the M184V mutation on switching to didansoine or maintaining lamivudine treatment in nucleoside reverse-transciptase inhibitor-experienced patients. J Infect Dis 2003; 188: 537–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Shlay JC, Visnegarwala F, Bartsch G, et al. Body composition and metabolic changes in antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients randomized to didansosine and stavudine (ddl + d4T) vs. abacavir and lamivudine (ABC + 3TC) [abstract no. ThOrB1360]. The XV International AIDS Conference; 2004 11–16 July; Bangkok

  25. Shlay JC, Visnegarwala F, Bartsch G, et al. Rates of change in body composition among antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients randomized to a didanosine/stavudine versus abacavir/ lamivudine containing regimen in the Flexible Initial Retrovirus Suppressive Therapies (FIRST) study (CPCRA 058). Antiviral Ther 2003 Aug; 8(4): L12–3

    Google Scholar 

  26. Clumeck N, Goebel F, Rozenbaum W, et al. Simplification with abacavir-based triple nucleoside therapy versus continued protease inhibitor-based highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1-infected patients with undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA. AIDS 2001 Aug 17; 15(12): 1517–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Carr A, Workman C, Smith DE, et al. Abacavir substitution for nucleoside analogs in patients with HIV lipotrophy: a randomised trial. JAMA 2002 Jul 10; 288(2): 207–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Keiser P, Sension M, DeJesus E, et al. Simplification of protease inhibitor (PI)-based highly active antiretoviral regimens with abacavir (ABC) improves hyperlipdemia and maintains viral suppression in HIV-1-infected adults (ESS40003) [abstract no. 6267 plus poster]. 14th International AIDS Conference; 2002 Jul 7–12; Barcelona

  29. Podzamczer D, Ferrer E, Sanchez P, et al. Dyslipidemias and body fat abnormalities: incidence, risk factors, response to therapy [abstract no. 716]. 11th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Intections; 2004 Feb 8–11; San Francisco

  30. Baker K, Lou Y, Yuen G, et al. The bioequivalence and effect of food of a new once-a-day fixed dose combination tablet of abacavir (ABC) and lamivudine (3TC) [abstract no. A-458]. 44th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC); 2004 Oct 30–Nov 2; Washington, DC

  31. Wang LH, Chittick GE, McDowell JA. Single-dose pharmacokinetics and safety of abacavir (1592U89), zidovudine, and lamivudine administered alone and in combination in adults with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999 Jul; 43(7): 1708–15

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Piliero P, Shachoy-Clark AD, Para M. A study examining the pharmacokinetics of abacavir and the intracellular carbovir triphosphate (GSK Protocol CNA10905) [abstract no. A-1797 plus poster]. 43rd Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2003 Sep 14–17; Chicago, 41

  33. Bruno R, Regazzi MB, Ciappina V, et al. Comparison of the plasma pharmacokinetics of lamivudine during twice and once daily administration in patients with HIV. Clin Pharmacokinet 2001; 40(9): 695–700

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Yuen GJ, Lou Y, Bumgarner NT, et al. Equivalent steady-state pharmacokinetics of lamivudine in plasma and lamivudine triaphosphate within cells following administration of lamivudine at 300 milligrams once daily and 150 mg twice daily. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004 Jan; 48(1): 176–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hawkins T, Veikley W, StClaire R, et al. Intracellular pharmacokinetics of tenofovir-DP and carbovir-TP in patients receiving triple nucleoside regimens [abstract no. 6]. 5th International Workshop on Clinical Pharmacology of HIV Therapy; 2004 Apr 1–3; Rome

  36. Raffi F, Benhamou Y, Sereni D, et al. Pharmacokinetics of, and tolerability to, a single, oral, 600mg dose of abacavir in HIV-positive subjects with or without liver disease [abstract no. 1630]. 40th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2000 17–20 Sep; Toronto, 331

  37. Bergshoeff A, Burger D, Farrelly L, et al. Pharmacokinetics of once daily vs. twice daily lamivudine and abacavir in HIV-1 infected children — PENTA 13 [abstract no. 934 plus poster]. 11th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; 2004 Feb 8–11; San Francisco

  38. Kearney BP, Isaacson E, Sayre J, et al. The pharmacokinetics of abacavir, a purine nucleoside analog, are not affected by tenofovir DF [abstract no. A-1615 plus poster]. 43rd Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2003 Sep 14–17; Chicago

  39. Ray A, Vela JE, Olson G, et al. Lack of negative interaction between tenofovir and abacavir in human cells [abstract no. 5]. 5th International Workshop on Clinical Pharmacology of HIV Therapy; 2004 Apr 1–3; Rome

  40. Bartlett JA, Johnson J, Herrera G, et al. Abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) in combination with efavirenz (NNRTI), amprenavir/ritonavir (PI) or stavudine (NRTI): ESS40001 (CLASS) preliminary 48 week results [abstract no. TuOrB1189 plus poster]. 14th International Aids Conference; 2002 Jul 7–12; Barcelona, 373

  41. DeJesus E, Herrera G, Teofilo E, et al. Abacavir versus zidovudine combined with lamivudine and efavirenz, for the treatment of antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected adults. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39(7): 1038–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Gazzard BG, DeJesus E, Cahn P, et al. Abacavir once daily (OAD) plus lamivudine OAD in combination with efavirenz OAD is well-tolerated and effective in the treatment of antiretroviral therapy naive adults with HIV-1 infection (ZODIAC Study: CNA30021) [abstract no. H-1722b plus oral presentation]. 43rd Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy: Late Breaker Abstracts; 2003 14–17 Sep; Chicago

  43. Rodriguez-French A, Boghossian J, Gray GE, et al. The NEAT study: a 48-week open-label study to compare the antiviral efficacy and safety of GW433908 versus nelfinavir in antiretroviral therapy-naive HIV-1-infected patients. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2004 Jan 1; 35(1): 22–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Schurmann D, Gathe J, Sanne I, et al. Efficacy and safety of GW433908/ritonavir once daily in therapy naive subjects, 48 week results: the SOLO study [abstract no. PL 14.4]. 6th International Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV Infection; 2002 Nov 17–21; Glasgow

  45. Ibbotson T, Perry CM. Lamivudine/zidovudine/abacavir: triple combination tablet. Drugs 2003; 63(11): 1089–98; discussion 1099-100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. MacArthur RD, Chen L, Peng G, et al. Efficacy and safety of ABC+3TC versus ddI+d4T when combined with a PI, NNRTI or both in AR-naive persons on their first HAART regimen: the NRTI Substudy of the CPCRA 058 First Study [abstract no. 555]. Antiviral Ther 2003; 8 Suppl. 1: 333–334 plus poster presented at the 2nd International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment; 2003 Jul 13–16; Paris

    Google Scholar 

  47. Gallant J, Rodriguez A, Weinberg W, et al. Efficacy of once-daily abacavir/lamivudine fixed-dose combinations (ABC/ 3TC) + efavirenz and subsequent treatment of tenofovir DF (TDF) + ABC/3TC non-responders (NRs): ESS30009 planned 24 week analysis [abstract no. H-567 plus poster]. 44th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC); 2004 Oct 30–Nov 2; Washington, DC

  48. Paediatric European Network for Treatment of AIDS (PENTA). Comparison of dual nucleoside-analogue reverse-transcriptase inhibitor regimens with and without nelfinavir in children with HIV-1 who have not previously been treated: the PENTA 5 randomised trial. Lancet 2002 Mar 2; 359(9308): 733–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Clumeck N, Lamarca A, Fu K, et al. Safety and efficacy of a once daily (OAD) fixed-dose combination (FDC) of ABC/3TC [FDC arm] versus ADC twice daily (BID) and 3TC OAD as separate entities [SE arm] in ART-experienced HIV-1 infected patients [abstract no. H-558]. 44th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC); 2004 Oct 30–Nov 2; Washington, DC

  50. Sosa N, Hill-Zabala C, DeJesus E., et al. Abacavir + lamivudine (ABC/3TC) fixed dose combination (FDC) once daily (QD) compared to ABC+3TC twice daily (BID) in HIV-1 infected subjects (ESS30008) [abstract no. 71]. 7th International Congress of Drug Therapy and HIV Infection (ICDTH); 2004 Nov 14–18; Glasgow

  51. Watson M, Hill-Zabala C, Sosa N, et al. Patient satisfaction with abacavir (ABC)-lamivudine (3TC) fized dose combination (FDC) tablet once daily (QD) compared with ABC and 3TC twice daily (BID) in HIV-1 infected patients (ESS30008) [abstract no. 344]. 7th International Congress of Drug Therapy and HIV Infection (ICDTH); 2004 Nov 14–18; Glasgow

  52. Matheron S, Descamps D, Boue F, et al. Triple nucleoside combination zidovudine/lamivudine/abacavir versus zidovudine/lamivudine/nelfinavir as first-line therapy in HIV-1-infected adults: a randomized trial. Antiviral Ther 2003; 8: 163–71

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Staszewski S, Keiser P, Montaner J, et al. Abacavir-lamivudine-zidovudine vs indinavir-lamivudine-zidovudine in antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected adults: A randomized equivalence trial. JAMA 2001 Mar 7; 285(9): 1155–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Vibhagool A, Cahn P, Schechter M, et al. Abacavir/combivir is comparable to indinavir/combivir in HIV-1 infected antiretroviral therapy naive adults: preliminary results of a 48-week open label study (CNA3014) [abstract no. 63 plus poster]. 1st International Aids Society Conference; 2001 Jul 8–11; Buenos Aires

  55. Elion RA, Witt MD. Nucleoside and nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in the treatment of HIV: focus on efficacy [online]. Available from URL: http://www.medscape.com/viewprogram/2830_pnt [Accessed 2004 Mar 10]

  56. Barreiro P, Garcia-Benayas T, Soriano V, et al. Simplification of antiretroviral treatment: how to sustain success, reduce toxicity and ensure adherence avoiding PI use. AIDS Rev 2002 Oct; 4(4): 233–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toni M. Dando.

Additional information

Various sections of the manuscript reviewed by: P. Barreiro, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Service of Infectious Diseases Hospital, Madrid, Spain; S. De Wit, Division of Infectious Diseases, St Pierre University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium; J. Gallant, School of Medicine, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; D. Gibb, MRC Clinical Trials Unit, London, England; B. Gazzard, St Stephen’s Centre, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, London, England; R. MacArthur, Department of Infectious Diseases, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA; P. Piliero, Department of Medicine, The Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA.

Data Selection

Sources: Medical literature published in any language since 1980 on lamivudine/abacavir, identified using Medline and EMBASE, supplemented by AdisBase (a proprietary database of Adis International). Additional references were identified from the reference lists of published articles. Bibliographical information, including contributory unpublished data, was also requested from the company developing the drug.

Search strategy: Medline search terms were ‘lamivudine’ and ‘abacavir’. EMBASE search terms were ‘lamivudine’ and ‘abacavir’. AdisBase search terms were ‘lamivudine’ and ‘abacavir’. Searches were last updated 12 November 2004.

Selection: Studies in patients with HIV infection who received lamivudine and abacavir. Inclusion of studies was based mainly on the methods section of the trials. When available, large, well controlled trials with appropriate statistical methodology were preferred. Relevant pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic data are also included.

Index terms: HIV, lamivudine, abacavir, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, therapeutic use, tolerability.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dando, T.M., Scott, L.J. Abacavir plus Lamivudine. Drugs 65, 285–302 (2005). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200565020-00010

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200565020-00010

Keywords

Navigation