Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of the Antimicrobial Prophylactic Efficacy of Cefotaxime and Cephazolin in Obstetric and Gynaecological Surgery

A Randomised Multicentre Study

  • Section 3: Newer Experiences with Cefotaxime in Prophylaxis
  • Published:
Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A prospective randomised multicentre study was designed to assess the efficacy of 2 different cephalosporins as short term prophylactic treatment in obstetric and gynaecological surgery. A single dose of cefotaxime (2g IV before surgery) was compared with 2 doses of cephazolin (2g IV before surgery and after 8 hours). Patients exposed to antibacterial drugs within 7 days, who had preoperative infections, or with known β-lactam hypersensitivity were excluded. 612 patients entered the study, of whom 552 were evaluable. 276 were given cephazolin (group A) and 276 cefotaxime (group B). Groups A and B were similar for mean age, obesity, diabetes, types of diseases and obstetric history. No significant differences were observed in type of surgery (vaginal hysterectomy, abdominal hysterectomy, myomectomy and caesarean section) between the 2 groups. The mean duration of surgery was 89 and 85 minutes in group A and B, respectively. 25 patients (9.1%) in group A and 20 (7.2%) in group B developed wound infections (not statistically significantly different). The percentages of patients with infections other than surgical infections were similar (i.e. 13.0 and 11.2 for the cefotaxime and the cephazolin groups, respectively). These preliminary data show that a single 2g IV dose of cefotaxime and two 2g IV doses of cephazolin have equal antimicrobial prophylactic activity in obstetric and gynaecological surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benigno BB, Evrard J, Faro S, Ford LC, LaCroix G, et al. A comparison of piperacillin, cephalothin and cefoxitin in the prevention of postoperative infections in patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy. Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics 163: 421–427, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blanco JD, Lipscomb KA. Single-dose prophylaxis in vaginal hysterectomy: a double-blind, randomised comparison of ceftazidime versus cefotaxime. Current Therapeutic Research 36: 389–393, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • DiPiro JT, Cheung RPF, Bowden TA, Mansberger JA. Single dose systemic antibiotic prophylaxis of surgical wound infections. American Journal of Surgery 152: 552–559, 1986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs RS. Infection after caesarean section. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 28: 697–710, 1985

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harger SG, English DH. Selection of patients for antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean section. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 141: 752–758, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hemsell DL, Hemsell PG, Nobles BJ, Heard M, Bawdon R. Moxalactam versus cefazolin prophylaxis for vaginal hysterectomy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 147: 379–385, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hemsell DL, Johnson ER, Bawdon R, Hemsell PG, Heard M, et al. Cefoperazone and cefoxitin prophylaxis for abdominal hysterectomy. Obstetrics and Gynecology 63: 467–472, 1984a

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hemsell DL, Menon MD, Friedman AJ. Ceftriaxone or cefazolin prophylaxis for the prevention of infection after vaginal hysterectomy. American Journal of Surgery 18: 22–26, 1984b

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemsell DL, Hemsell PG, Nobles BJ. Doxycycline and cefamandole prophylaxis for premenopausal women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy. Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics 161: 462–464, 1985a

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hemsell DL, Johnson ER, Bawdon RE, Hemsell PG, Nobles BJ, et al. Ceftriaxone and cefazolin prophylaxis for hysterectomy. Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics 161: 197–203, 1985b

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ledger WS. Prophylactic antibiotics. Obstetrics and Gynecology 10: 23–26, 1983

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lett WJ, Ansbacher R, Davidson BL, Otterson WN. Prophylactic antibiotics for women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 19: 1–4, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlejohn TW, Evrard HM, Moonsammy G. Comparison of cefonicid and cefoxitin for prevention of infection following vaginal hysterectomy. Advances in Therapy 2: 240–249, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangioni C, Privitera G, Regallo M, Milani R, Ortisi G, et al. Single dose antibiotic prophylaxis in gynecologic surgery: a prospective study with ceftriaxone versus cephalexin and placebo in 847 cases. In Spitzy & Karrer (Eds) Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Chemotherapy, Vienna, 1983. Abstract no. PS 4.2/3-17, pp. 100/60-63, 1983

  • Parsons MT, Gibson R, Rimando-Ramos J, Spellacy WN. Comparison of single-dose cefonicid and multiple-dose cefoxitin for surgical prophylaxis in women undergoing cesarean section. Advances in Therapy 2: 223–229, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Periti P, Mazzei T, Lamanna S, Mini E. Single-dose ceftriaxone versus multi-dose cefotaxime antimicrobial prophylaxis in gynecological and obstetrical surgery. Preliminary results of a multi-center prospective randomized study. Chemioterapia 3: 299–304, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roy S, Wilkins J. Single-dose cefotaxime versus 3 to 5 doses cefoxitin for prophylaxis of vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 14 (Suppl. B): 217–221, 1984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saltzman DH, Eron LJ, Kay HH, Sites JG. Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in high risk patients undergoing cesarean section. Obstetrics & Gynecology 65: 655–657, 1985

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro M, Munoz A, Tager IB, Schoenbaum SC, Polk B. Risk factors for infection at the operative site after abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy. New England Journal of Medicine 307: 1661–1666, 1982

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stiver HG, Forward KR, Livingstone RA, Fugére P, Lemay M, et al. Multicenter comparison of cefoxitin versus cefazolin for prevention of infectious morbidity after nonelective cesarean section. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 145: 158–163, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swartz WH, Grolle K. The use of prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section. A review of the literature. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 26: 595–609, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Widerman GL, Matthijsen C. Comparative efficacy of cefotaxime and cefazolin as prophylaxis against infections following elective hysterectomy. Clinical Therapeutics 5 (Suppl. 4): 67–73, 1982

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Additional information

For participants and collaborating centres see page 131

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Periti, P., Mazzei, T., Orlandini, F. et al. Comparison of the Antimicrobial Prophylactic Efficacy of Cefotaxime and Cephazolin in Obstetric and Gynaecological Surgery. Drugs 35 (Suppl 2), 133–138 (1988). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-198800352-00028

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-198800352-00028

Keywords

Navigation