Skip to main content
Log in

The efficacy of cefazolin in reducing surgical site infection in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A prophylactic antibiotic is recommended in open cholecystectomy surgeries, but in laparoscopic cholecystectomies such prophylaxis is controversial. Recent reviews have not found conclusive evidence that routine prophylaxis, especially in low risk patients, is effective. This clinical trial was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of cefazolin in reducing surgical site infection SSI in laparoscopic cholecystectomies in a sample not screened for high or low risk patients.

Methods

A randomized double-blind controlled trial was conducted in a single university hospital. Scheduled cholecystectomy patients without selection for patient risk factors were randomized into two groups. Pre-operatively, group A patients received a placebo of 10 ml isotonic sodium chloride, and group B patients received 1 g of cefazolin as a prophylactic antibiotic. All patients underwent a standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and were followed up for at least 30 days.

Results

Two hundred ninety-nine patients were randomized (149 in group A and 150 in group B). SSI occurred in seven patients (2.34 %), five (1.67 %) in the placebo group, and two (0.67 %) in the prophylactic antibiotic group. The difference was not statistically significant (p value = 0.512), and no specific risk factors for post-operative infection were identified.

Conclusions

A single dose of preoperative prophylactic cefazolin has no significant benefit in reducing the incidence of SSI in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Whether or not to use a prophylactic depends on the individual patient, and the consideration of the attending surgeon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ruangsin S, Jaroonrach V, Petpichetchian C, Puttawibul P, Sunpaweravong S, Chewatanagongun S (2010) Establishment the cost-effectiveness through set criteria of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Med Assoc Thail 93:789–793

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agrawal CS, Sehgal R, Singh RK, Gupta AK (1999) Antibiotic prophylaxis in elective cholecystectomy: a randomized, double blinded study comparing ciprofloxacin and cefuroxime. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 43:501–504

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR (1999) Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control 27:97–132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Richards C, Edwards J, Culver D, Emori TG, Tolson J, Gaynes R, National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2003) Does using a laparoscopic approach to cholecystectomy decrease the risk of surgical site infection? Ann Surg 237:358–362

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. den Hoed PT, Boelhouwer RU, Veen HF, Hop WC, Bruining HA (1998) Infections and bacteriological data after laparoscopic and open gallbladder surgery. J Hosp Infect 39:27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Illig KA, Schmidt E, Cavanaugh J, Krusch D, Sax HC (1997) Are prophylactic antibiotics required for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy? J Am Coll Surg 184:353–356

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Higgin A, London J, Charland S, Ratzer E, Clark J, Haun W, Maher DP (1999) Prophylactic antibiotics for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: are they necessary? Arch Surg 134:611–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tocchi A, Lepre L, Costa G, Liotta G, Mazzoni G, Maggiolini F (2000) The need for antibiotic prophylaxis in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. Arch Surg 135:67–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Harling R, Moorjani N, Perry C, MacGowan AP, Thompson MH (2000) A prospective, randomised trial of prophylactic antibiotics versus bag extraction in the prophylaxis of wound infection in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 82:408–410

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mahatharadol V (2001) A reevaluation of antibiotic prophylaxis in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Assoc Thail 84:105–108

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Koc M, Zulfikaroglu B, Kece C, Ozalp N (2003) A prospective randomized study of prophylactic antibiotic in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 17:1716–1718

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chang WT, Lee KT, Chuang SC, Wang SN, Kuo KK, Chen JS, Sheen PC (2006) The impact of prophylactic antibiotics on postoperative infection complication in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. Am J Surg 191:721–725

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuthe SA, Kaman L, Verma GR, Singh R (2006) Evaluation of the role of prophylactic antibiotic in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Trop Gastroenterol 27:54–57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Al-Ghnaniem R, Benjamin IS, Patel AG (2003) Meta-analysis suggests antibiotic prophylaxis is not warranted in low-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 90:365–366

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Catarci M, Mancini S, Gentileschi P, Camplone C, Sileri P, Grassi GB (2004) Antibiotic prophylaxis in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lack of need or lack of evidence? Surg Endosc 18:638–641

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Choudhary A, Bechtold ML, Puli SR, Othman MO, Roy PK (2008) Role of prophylactic antibiotics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 12:1847–1853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou H, Zhang J, Wang Q, Hu Z (2009) Meta-analysis: antibiotic prophylaxis in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 29:1086–1095

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sanabria A, Dominguez LC, Valdivieso E, Gomez G (2010) Antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD005265. doi:10.1002/14651858

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG (1992) CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 13:606–608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ruangsin S, Wanasuwannakul T, Sangkhathat S (2007) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Songklanagarind Hospital. Songkla Med J 25:315–321

    Google Scholar 

  21. Uludag M, Yetkin G, Citgez B (2009) The role of prophylactic antibiotics in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 13:337–341

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yildiz B, Abbasoglu O, Tirnaksiz B, Hamaloglu E, Ozdemir A, Sayek I (2009) Determinants of postoperative infection after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 56:589–592

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shah JN, Maharjan SB, Paudyal S (2012) Routine use of antibiotic prophylaxis in low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy is unnecessary: a randomized clinical trial. Asian J Surg 35:136–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yan RC, Shen SQ, Chen ZB, Lin FS, Riley J (2011) The role of prophylactic antibiotics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy in preventing postoperative infection: a meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:301–306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Darkahi B, Videhult P, Sandblom G, Liljeholm H, Ljungdahl M, Rasmussen IC (2012) Effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in cholecystectomy: a prospective population-based study of 1171 cholecystectomies. Scand J Gastroenterol 47:1242–1246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yanni F, Mekhail P, Morris-Stiff G (2013) A selective antibiotic prophylaxis policy for laparoscopic cholecystectomy is effective in minimising infective complications. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 95:345–348

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chattopadhyay D, Lochan R, Balupuri S, Gopinath BR, Wynne KS (2005) Outcome of gall bladder polypoidal lesions detected by transabdominal ultrasound scanning: a nine year experience. World J Gastroenterol 11:2171–2173

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ito H, Hann LE, D’Angelica M, Allen P, Fong Y, Dematteo RP, Klimstra DS, Blumgart LH, Jarnagin WR (2009) Polypoid lesions of the gallbladder: diagnosis and followup. J Am Coll Surg 208:570–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ruangsin S, Wanasuwannakul T (2012) Variation of prophylactic antibiotic in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: songklanagarind Hospital perspective. J Med Assoc Thail 95:48–51

    Google Scholar 

  30. Grande M, Torquati A, Farinon AM (1992) Wound infection after cholecystectomy. Correlation between bacteria in bile and wound infection after operation on the gallbladder for acute and chronic gallstone disease. Eur J Surg 158:109–1012

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sharma N, Garg PK, Hadke NS, Choudhary D (2010) Role of prophylactic antibiotics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy and risk factors for surgical site infection: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 11:367–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kuthe SA, Kaman L, Verma GR, Singh R (2006) Evaluation of the role of prophylactic antibiotics in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Trop Gastroenterol 27:54–57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hassan AM, Nasr MM, Hamdy HE, Abbas M, Hedaya MS, Elsebae MM (2012) Role of prophylactic antibiotic in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Egypt Soc Parasitol 42:129–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Colizza S, Rossi S, Picardi B, Carnuccio P, Pollicita S, Rodio F, Cucchiara G (2004) Surgical infections after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: ceftriaxone vs ceftazidime antibiotic prophylaxis. A prospective study. Chir Ital 56:397–402

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to give our great thanks to our supporting team: Assistant Professor Thunchanok Wanasuwannakul, MD, Kanjana Nuanjun, RN, Praisuda Bualoy, RN, Miss Jureerat Seangthong (statistical analysis), Mr. Dave Patterson (English editing), and Associate Professor Vicha Jaroonrach, MD (internal reviewer).

Disclosures

Sakchai Ruangsin, Supparerk Laohawiriyakamol, Somkiat Sunpaweravong, Somrit Mahattanobon, have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. The Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University provided the funding for the clinical trial without other external sources. They had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, and report to submission paper. The corresponding author had complete access to all data and responsibility for submission for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sakchai Ruangsin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ruangsin, S., Laohawiriyakamol, S., Sunpaweravong, S. et al. The efficacy of cefazolin in reducing surgical site infection in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial. Surg Endosc 29, 874–881 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3745-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3745-x

Keywords

Navigation