Abstract
Naturalization is the introduction and establishment of a nonnative species with sustainable populations in a novel environment. The success of nonnative species may be influenced by their relatedness to the native flora. Darwin proposed that if a nonnative plant species is introduced into an environment without native congeners, the nonnative species will have a greater chance of becoming naturalized. To test Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis, we compiled a Kentucky plant database consisting of 821 vascular plant species and subsequently selected species traits and distribution information to determine the effect of congeneric species and traits on the probability of successful naturalization and invasion. The predictors used include reproductive traits, growth form, abundance, habitat type, native congeners, and biogeographical origin. We fit three sets of generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) with a binomial family and a logit link. Backward selection based on minimizing the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) was used in the analyses. Our results from these three sets of models clearly indicate that the validity of Darwin’s hypothesis is invasion stage dependent. More specific, the naturalized and invasive models (predicting the probability of being naturalized and invasive respectively) did not support Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis. The number of native congeners had no effect on the likelihood that a particular species would naturalize and become invasive. Our results suggest that Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis is more relevant during the early stage of establishment as demonstrated by the native model (predicting the probability of being native) and it becomes irrelevant during the late stages of invasion as indicated by the naturalized and invasive models. Thus, it can be generalized that biotic interactions, especially competition, is a critical determinant of initial success for nonnative species in the recipient communities. Once established, the fate of non-native species during the late stages of invasion may be more related to other factors such as biogeographic origin and habitat conditions. Furthermore, we found reproductive traits such as flowering phenology and flower type are associated with invasion success. We also recognized contrasting traits between native and nonnative species, indicating niche differentiation between these two groups of species. Niche overlapping was found as well among species regardless of the status of being native or otherwise. Our study provides a novel approach to advance the understanding of phylogenetic relatedness between nonnative species and native flora by integrating traits and niche concepts at the regional scale.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alpert, P. 2006. The advantages and disadvantages of being introduced. Biol Invasions 8: 1523–1534.
Bates, D., Maechler, M. and Bolker, B. 2011. Lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-42. https://doi.org/CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4.
Blossey, B. and Notzgold, R. 1995. Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive non-indigenous plants: a hypothesis. J. Ecol. 83: 887–889.
Cadotte, M.W. and Lovett-Doust, J. 2001. Ecological and taxonomic differences between native and introduced plants of southwestern Ontario. Ecoscience 8: 230–238.
Carboni, M., Münkemüller, T., Gallien, L., Lavergne, S., Acosta, A., and Thuiller, W. 2013. Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis: scale matters in coastal plant communities. Ecography 36: 560–568.
Colautti, R.I., Ricciardi, A., Grigorovich, I.A. and MacIsaac, H.J. 2004. Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis? Ecol. Lett. 7: 721–733.
Daehler, C.C. 2001. Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis revisited. Am. Nat. 158: 324–330.
Daehler, C.C. 2003. Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien plants: Implications for conservation and restoration. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34: 183–211.
Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of the Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. J. Murray, London.
D’Antonio, C.M. and Vitousek, P.M. 1992. Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle and global change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 23: 63–87.
Davis, M.A., Grime, J.P. and Thompson, K. 2000. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J. Ecol. 88: 528–534.
Diez, J.M., Sullivan, J.J., Hulme, P.E., Edwards, G. and Duncan, R.P. 2008. Darwin’s naturalization conundrum: dissecting taxonomic patterns of species invasions. Ecol. Lett. 11: 674–681.
Diez, J.M., Williams, P.A., Randall, R.P., Sullivan, J.J., Hulme, P. E., and Duncan, R.P. 2009. Learning from our failures: testing broad taxonomic hypotheses about plant naturalization. Ecol. Lett. 12: 1174–1183.
Duncan, R.P. and Williams, P.A. 2002. Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis challenged. Nature 417: 608.
Elton, C.S. 1958. The Ecology of Invasions of Animals and Plants. Methuen, London.
Fox, J., and Weisberg, S. 2011. An R Companion to Applied Regression (2nd ed.). Sage, Thousand Oaks.
Godoy, O., Richardson, D.M., Valladares, F. and Castro-Dýez, P. 2009. Flowering phenology of invasive alien plant species compared with native species in three Mediterranean-type ecosystems. Ann. Bot. 103: 485–494.
Hierro, J.L, Maron J.L. and Callaway, R.M. 2005. A biogeographical approach to plant invasions: the importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range. J. Ecol. 93: 5–15.
Hulme, P.E. 2011. Consistent flowering response to global warming by European plants introduced into North America. Funct. Ecol. 25: 1189–1196.
Hutchinson, G.E. 1959. Homage to Santa Rosalia or why are there so many kinds of animals? Am. Nat. 93: 145–159.
Jiang, L, Tan, J. and Pu, Z. 2010. An experimental test of Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis. Am. Nat. 175: 415–423.
Jones, R.L. 2005. Plant Life of Kentucky: An Illustrated Guide to the Vascular Flora. University of Kentucky Press, Lexington.
KY – EPPC, 2005. Invasive exotic plant list. <https://doi.org/www.seeppc.org/ky/list.htm.>
Lambdon, P.W. and Hulme, P.E. 2006. How strongly do interactions with closely-related native species influence plant invasions? Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis assessed on Mediterranean islands. J. Biogeogr. 33: 1116–1125.
Levine, J. and D’Antonio, C.M. 1999. Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos 87: 15–26.
Levine, J.M., Vila, M., D’Antonio, C.M., Dukes, J.S., Grigulis, K., and Lavorel, S. 2003. Mechanisms underlying the impacts of exotic plant invasions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 270: 775–781.
Lloret, F., Medail, F., Brundu, G., Camarda, I., Moragues, E., Rita, J., Lambdon, P. and Hulme, P.E. 2005. Species attributes and invasion success by alien plants on Mediterranean islands. J. Ecol. 93: 512–520.
Lockwood, J.L. 2005. Introduction: Insights into biogeography.In: Sax, D., Stachowicz, J. and Gaines, S. (eds.), Species Invasions - Insights into Ecology, Evolution and Biogeography. Sinauer Press, Sunderland, pp. 309–314
MacDougall, A.S, Gilbert, B. and Levine, J.M. 2009. Plant invasions and the niche. J. Ecol. 97: 609–615.
MacArthur, R.H. 1970. Species packing and competitive equilibrium for many species. Theor. Popul. Biol.1: 1–11.
MacArthur, R.H. and Levins, R. 1967. The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. Am. Nat. 101: 377–385.
Mack, R.N., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W.M., Evans, H., Clout, M. and Bazzaz, F.A. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Appl. 10: 689–710.
Mitchell C.E., Agrawal A.A., Bever J.D., Gilbert G.S., Hufbauer R.A., Klironomos J.N., Maron J.L., Morris W.F., Parker I.M., Power A.G., Seabloom E.W., Torchin M.E., and Vázquez, D.P. 2006. Biotic interactions and plant invasions. Ecol. Lett. 9: 726–740.
Nakagawa, S. and Schielzeth, H. 2013. A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4: 133–142.
Pearson, D.E., Ortega, Y.K. and Sears, J.D. 2012 Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis up-close: Intermountain grassland invaders differ morphologically and phenologically from native community dominants. Biol. Invasions 14: 901–913.
Proches, S., Wilson, J.R.U., Richardson, D.M. and Rejmánek, M. 2008. Searching for phylogenetic pattern in biological invasions. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 17: 5–10.
Pyšek, P., Sadlo, J., Mandak, B. and Jarošik, V. 2003. Czech alien flora and a historical pattern of its formation: what came first to Central Europe? Oecologia 135: 122–130.
Pyšek, P., and Richardson, D.M. 2007. Traits associated with invasiveness in alien plants: where do we stand? In: Nentwig, W. (ed.), Biological Invasions. Springer, Berlin, pp. 97–125.
Qian, H. and Ricklefs, R.E. 2000. Large-scale processes and the Asian bias in temperate plant species diversity. Nature 407: 180–182.
R Development Core Team. 2012. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, 2012. URL.R-project.org/.
Rejmánek, M. 1999. Invasive plant species and invasible ecosystems. In: Sandlund, O.T., Schei, P.J. and Vilken, A. (eds.), Invasive Species and Biodiversity Management. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 79–102.
Rejmánek, M. 2011. Invasiveness. In: Simberloff, D. and M. Rejmánek (eds.), Encyclopedia of Biological Invasions. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 379–385.
Rejmánek, M., Richardson, D.M., Higgins, S.I., Pitcairn, M.J. and Grotkopp, E. 2005. Ecology of invasive plants: state of the art. In: Mooney, H.A., Mack, R.M., McNeely, J.A., Neville, L., Schei, P. and Waage, J. (eds.), Invasive Alien Species: Searching for Solutions. Island Press, Washington, pp. 104–161.
Rejmánek M, Richardson D.M. and Pysek, P. 2013. Plant invasions and invisibility of plant communities. In: van der Maarel E. and Franklin, J. (eds.), Vegetation Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, pp. 387–424.
Richardson, D.M. and Pyšek, P. 2012. Naturalization of introduced plants: ecological drivers of biogeographical patterns. New Phytol. 196: 383–396.
Richardson, D.M., Pysek, P., Rejmánek, M., Barbour, M.G., Panetta, F.D. and West, C.J. 2000. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers. Distrib. 6: 93–107.
Richardson, D.M. and Rejmánek, M. 2011. Trees and shrubs as invasive alien species-a global review. Divers. Distrib. 17: 788–809.
Schaefer, H., Hardy, O.J., Silva, L., Barraclough, T.G. and Savolainen, V. 2011. Testing Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis in the Azores. Ecol. Lett. 14: 389–396.
Strauss, S.Y., Webb, C.O. and Salamin, N. 2006. Exotic taxa less related to native species are more invasive. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 5841–5845.
Thuiller, W., Gallien, L., Boulangeat, I., Bello, F., Münkemuller, T., Roquet, C. and Lavergne, S. 2010. Resolving Darwin’s naturalization conundrum: a quest for evidence. Divers. Distrib. 16: 461–475.
Violle, C., Navas, M.-L., Vile, D., Roumet, C., Kazakou, E., Fortunel, C., Hummel, I. and Garnier, E. 2007. Let the concept of plant trait be functional! Oikos 116: 882–892.
Wiens, J.J. and Graham, C.H. 2005. Niche conservatism: integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36: 519–539.
Wolkovich, E.M. and Cleland, E.E. 2011. The phenology of plant invasions: a community ecology perspective. Frontiers Ecol. Environ. 9: 287–294.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Pellock, S., Thompson, A., He, K.S. et al. Validity of Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis relates to the stages of invasion. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 14, 172–179 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.14.2013.2.7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.14.2013.2.7