Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Czech alien flora and the historical pattern of its formation: what came first to Central Europe?

  • Community Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Temporal patterns of immigration to the country were analysed using 668 alien species in the flora of the Czech Republic for which the dates of the first record were available (64.8% of the total number of 1031 so-called neophytes, i.e. aliens introduced after the year 1500). After a period of initial slow increase lasting to the 1840s, the accumulation of neophytes over time could be best fitted by a linear model that explained 97% of the variance. The intensity of floristic research, which varied between periods, did not significantly affect the overall increase in the number of aliens. The effect of species traits on the year of introduction was evaluated, with continent of origin, introduction type (deliberate or accidental), life history, Grime's life strategy, onset of flowering, mode of dispersal and propagule size as explanatory variables. Species of European origin and CSR strategists arrived earlier than those with other origins and strategies. Deliberately introduced species appeared earlier than accidental arrivals, and those cultivated for utilitary reasons on average arrived earlier than ornamentals. Species capable of early flowering were remarkably more prevalent among early newcomers. A separate analysis of accidentally introduced American species also identified life history as a significant predictor of immigration time, with annuals being introduced earlier than biennials and perennials. The data contribute to an understanding of a crucial stage of the invasion process that has received little attention in the literature. The model "early alien" to Central Europe is a European species with a CSR strategy deliberately brought for cultivation as a utilitary plant. Once it escaped from cultivation, its establishment in the wild was favoured by its ability to flower early and, therefore, complete the life cycle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2. A
Fig. 3. A
Fig. 4A, B.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashton PJ, Mitchell DS (1989) Aquatic plants: patterns and modes of invasion, attributes of invading species and assessment of control programmes. In: Drake JA, Mooney HA, di Castri F, Groves RH, Kruger FJ, Rejmánek M, Williamson M (eds) Biological invasions: a global perspective. Wiley, Chichester, pp 111–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker HG (1965) Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds. In: Baker HG, Stebbins CL (eds) The genetics of colonizing species. Academic, New York, pp 147–169

  • Baskin CC, Baskin JM (1999) Seeds. Ecology, biogeography and evolution of dormancy and germination. Academic, San Diego

  • Čelakovský L (1867–1881) Prodromus der Flora von Böhmen, enthaltend der wilwachsenden und allgemein kultivierten Gefässpflanzen der Königreiches. I. Gefässkryptogamen, Gymnospermen und Monocotylen, pp 11–12 (1867). II. Apetale und Sympetale Dicotylen, pp 113–388 (1871–1872). III. Eleutheropetale Dicotylen, pp 389–691 (1874). IV. Die Nachträge bis 1880 nebst Schlusswort, Verzeichnissen und Register, pp 693–955 (1881). Commisions-Verlag von Fr. Řivnáč, Prague

  • Clement EJ, Foster MC (1994) Alien plants of the British Isles. A provisional catalogue of vascular plants (excluding grasses). Botanical Society of the British Isles, London

  • Cook RD (1977) Detection of influential observations in linear regression. Technometrics 19:15–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (1993) GLIM for ecologists. Blackwell, Oxford, p 340

  • Crawley MJ, Harvey PH, Purvis A (1996) Comparative ecology of the native and alien floras of the British Isles. Biol Trans R Soc B 351:1251–1259

    Google Scholar 

  • Daehler CC, Carino DA (2000) Predicting invasive plants: prospects for a general screening system based on current regional models. Biol Invas 2:93–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esler AE (1987) The naturalisation of plants in urban Auckland, New Zealand. 1. The introduction and spread of alien plants. N Z J Bot 25:511–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Forcella F, Wood JT (1984) Colonization potentials of alien weeds are related to their 'native' distributions: implications for plant quarantine. J Aust Inst Agric Sci 50:36–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis B, Green M, Payne C (eds) (1994) The GLIM system. Release 4 manual. Clarendon, Oxford

  • Frank D, Klotz S (1990) Biologisch-ökologische Daten zur Flora der DDR. Wissenschaftliche Beiträge Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg 32:1–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert O (1989) The ecology of urban habitats. Chapman and Hall, London

  • Gilchrist R, Green P (1994) The theory of generalized linear models. In: Francis B, Green M, Payne C (eds) The GLIM system. Release 4 manual. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 259–305

  • Goodwin BJ, McAllister AJ, Fahrig L (1999) Predicting invasiveness of plant species based on biological information. Conserv Biol 13:422–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley, Chichester

  • Grime JP, Hodgson JG, Hunt R (1988) Comparative plant ecology: a functional approach to common British species. Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Guide to statistics (1997) Data Analysis Products Division, MathSoft, Seattle, pp 427–430

  • Hejný S, Slavík B (eds) (1988–1992) Flora of the Czech Republic (in Czech), vol1 (1988), 2 (1990), 3 (1992). Academia, Prague

  • Hendrych R (2001) Flora of the Krkonoše Mountains four centuries ago (in Czech). Preslia 73:29–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Holub J, Jirásek V (1967) Zur Vereinheitlichung der Terminologie in der Phytogeographie. Folia Geobot Phytotax 2:69–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehlík V (ed) (1998) Alien expansive weeds of the Czech Republic (in Czech). Academia, Prague

  • Jehlík V, Hejný S (1974) Main migration routes of adventitious plants in Czechoslovakia. Folia Geobot Phytotax 9:241–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2001) Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol Evolut 16:199–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowarik I (1995a) On the role of alien species in urban flora and vegetation. In: Pyšek P, Prach K, Rejmánek M, Wade M (eds) Plant invasions: general aspects and special problems. SPB, Amsterdam, pp 85–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowarik I (1995b) Time-lags in biological invasions. In: Pyšek P, Prach K, Rejmánek M, Wade M (eds) Plant invasions: general aspects and special problems. SPB, Amsterdam, pp 15–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowarik I (2003) Human agency in biological invasions: secondary releases foster naturalisation and population expansion of alien plant species. Biol Invas 5 (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubát K, Hrouda L, Chrtek J Jr, Kaplan Z, Kirschner J, Štěpánek J, Zázvorka J (eds) (2002) Key to the flora of the Czech Republic (in Czech). Academia, Prague

  • Ložek V (1999) Questions of nature conservation in the context of nature development (in Czech). Ochr Přír 54:7–12, 35–40, 67–72, 99–104, 131–136, 163–169, 195–200, 227–233, 259–265, 291–297

  • Mihulka S (1998) The effect of altitude on the pattern of plant invasions: a field test. In: Starfinger U, Edwards K, Kowarik I, Williamson M (eds) Plant invasions: ecological mechanisms and human responses. Backhuys, Leiden, pp 313–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihulka S, Pyšek P (2001) Invasion history of Oenothera congeners in Europe: a comparative study of spreading rates in the last 200 years. J Biogeogr 28:597–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell DS, Gopal B (1991) Invasion of tropical freshwaters by alien aquatic plants. In: Ramakrishnan PS (ed) Ecology of biological invasion in the tropics. Intern, New Delhi, pp 139–155

  • Noble IR (1989) Attributes of invaders and the invading process: terrestrial and vascular plants. In: Drake JA, Mooney HA, di Castri F, Groves RH, Kruger FJ, Rejmánek M, Williamson M (eds) Biological invasions: a global perspective. Wiley, Chichester, pp 301–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Opiz FM (1852) Checklist of the Czech flora (in Czech). Spis Mus XLIV, V kommissí u Fr. Řivnáče, Prague

  • Opiz PM (1823) Böheims phänerogamische und cryptogamische Gewächse. Enders, Prague

  • Panetta FD, Dodd J (1987) Bioclimatic prediction of the potential distribution of skeleton weed (Chondrilla juncea L.) in Western Australia. J Aust Inst Agric Sci 53:11–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrins J, Williamson M, Fitter A (1992) A survey of differing views of weed classification: implications for regulation of introduction. Biol Conserv 60:47–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl JE (1809–1814) Tentamen florae bohemiae. Enders, Prague

  • Polívka F (1900–1904) Illustrative flora of the Crown Lands of Bohemia (in Czech), vol I (1904), II (1900), III (1901), IV (1902). Promberger, Olomouc

  • Prach K, Pyšek P (1999) How do species dominating in succession differ from the others? J Veg Sci 10:383–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Presl JS, Presl CB (1819) Flora Čechica. In comissis apud J. G. Calve, Prague

  • Pyšek P (1997) Clonality and plant invasions: can a trait make a difference? In: de Kroon H, van Groenendael J (eds) The ecology and evolution of clonal plants. Backhuys, Leiden, pp 405–427

  • Pyšek P (1998a) Is there a taxonomic pattern to plant invasions? Oikos 82:282–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P (1998b) Alien and native species in Central European urban floras: a quantitative comparison. J Biogeogr 25:155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P, Prach K (1993) Plant invasions and the role of riparian habitats — a comparison of four species alien to central Europe. J Biogeogr 20:413–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P, Prach K (2003) Research into plant invasions in a crossroads region: history and focus. Biol Invas 5 (in press)

  • Pyšek P, Prach K, Šmilauer P (1995) Relating invasion success to plant traits: an analysis of the Czech alien flora. In: Pyšek P, Prach K, Rejmánek M, Wade M (eds) Plant invasions: general aspects and special problems. SPB, Amsterdam, pp 39–60

  • Pyšek P, Sádlo J, Mandák B (2002) Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic. Preslia 74:97–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P, Sádlo J, Mandák B (2003 b) Alien flora of the Czech Republic, its composition, structure and history. In: Child LE, Brock JH, Brundu G, Prach K, Pyšek P, Wade M, Williamson M (eds) Plant invasions. Backhuys, Leiden (in press)

  • Reichard SH, Hamilton CW (1997) Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conserv Biol 11:193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rejmánek M (1995) What makes a species invasive? In: Pyšek P, Prach K, Rejmánek M, Wade M (eds) Plant invasions: general aspects and special problems. SPB, Amsterdam, pp 3–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejmánek M (1996) A theory of seed plant invasiveness: the first sketch. Biol Conserv 78:171–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rejmánek M (1999) Invasive plant species and invasible ecosystems. In: Sandlund OT, Schei PJ, Viken A (eds) Invasive species and biodiversity management. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 79–102

  • Rejmánek M (2000) Invasive plants: approaches and predictions. Aust J Ecol 25:497–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rejmánek M, Reichard S (2001) Predicting invaders. Trends Ecol Evol 16:545–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rejmánek M, Richardson DM (1996) What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77:1655–1661

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Cowling RM (1992) Why is mountain fynbos invasible, and which species invade? In: Van Wilgen BW, Richardson DM, Kruger FJ, van Hensbergen BJ (eds) Swartboskloof — fire in South African mountain fynbos. University of Cape Town, pp 161–179

  • Richardson DM, Allsopp N, D'Antonio C, Milton SJ, Rejmánek M (2000a) Plant invasions — the role of mutualisms. Biol Rev 75:65–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Rejmánek M, Barbour MG, Panetta FD, West CJ (2000b) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Div Distrib 6:93–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy J (1990) In search of the characteristics of plant invaders. In: di Castri F, Hansen AJ, Debussche M (eds)Biological invasions in Europe and the Mediterranean basin. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 335–352

  • Rozenfelds ACF, Mackenzie R (1999) The weed invasion in Tasmania in the 1870s: knowing the past to predict the future. In: Bishop AC, Boersma M, Barnes M (eds) 12th Australian Weed Conference Papers and Proceedings, pp 581–583

  • Ryves TB, Clement EJ, Foster MC (1996) Alien grasses of the British Isles. Botanical Society of the British Isles, London

  • Saxena KG (1991) Biological invasions in the Indian subcontinent: review of invasion by plants. In: Ramakrishnan PS (ed) Ecology of biological invasion in the tropics. Intern, New Delhi, pp 53–73

  • Schroeder FG (1969) Zur Klassifizierung der Anthropochoren. Vegetatio 16:225–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott JK, Panetta FF (1993) Predicting the Australian weed status of southern African plants. J Biogeogr 20:87–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavík B (ed) (1995–2000) Flora of the Czech Republic (in Czech), vol 4 (1995), 5 (1997), 6 (2000). Academia, Prague

  • Sokal R, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. Freeman, San Francisco, pp 623–634

  • Starfinger U (1998) On success in plant invasions. In: Starfinger U, Edwards K, Kowarik I, Williamson M (eds) Plant invasions: ecological mechanisms and human responses. Backhuys, Leiden, pp 33–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson K, Bakker JP, Bekker RM (1997) The soil seed banks of North West Europe: methodology, density and longevity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb DA (1985) What are the criteria for presuming native status? Watsonia 15:231–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson M (1996) Biological Invasions. Chapman and Hall, London

  • Williamson M, Fitter A (1996) The characters of successful invaders. Biol Conserv 78:163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittig R (1991) Ökologie der Grossstadtflora. Fischer, Stuttgart

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks are due to John Brock for commenting on the manuscript and improving the English, to an anonymous referee for comments, and to I. Ostrý for logistic support. The project was made possible by grant no. 206/99/1239 from the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic, and was partly supported by grant no. AV0Z6005908 from the Grant Agency of the Czech Academy of Sciences. V.J. was supported by MŠMT grant no. J13/98113100004.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic

    Petr Pyšek, Jiří Sádlo & Bohumil Mandák

  2. Department of Zoology, Faculty of Sciences, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 01, Prague 2, Czech Republic

    Vojtěch Jarošík

Authors
  1. Petr Pyšek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jiří Sádlo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bohumil Mandák
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vojtěch Jarošík
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petr Pyšek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pyšek, P., Sádlo, J., Mandák, B. et al. Czech alien flora and the historical pattern of its formation: what came first to Central Europe?. Oecologia 135, 122–130 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-1170-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-1170-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation