Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Phase 2 Study of Induction Chemotherapy Using Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and S-1 for Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastasis (KUGC06)

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The authors previously showed the significant efficacy of S-1 plus cisplatin for gastric cancer with limited peritoneal metastasis. They conducted a phase 2 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of induction chemotherapy using a docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 (DCS) triplet regimen to treat gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis.

Methods

The key eligibility criteria were gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis or positive peritoneal cytology but no other distant metastases and capability of oral administration. The patients received three 28-day cycles of DCS (60 mg/m2 of cisplatin, 40 mg/m2 of docetaxel on day 1, and 80 mg/m2 of S-1 from day 1 to day 14), then underwent D2 gastrectomy if R0 was possible. The primary end point was the R0 resection rate. The sample size was determined to have 80% power for detecting a 20% improvement in the R0 resection rate over a 45% baseline for a one-tailed alpha of 0.1.

Results

Among 30 enrolled patients, 24 completed three cycles of DCS. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 toxicity was neutropenia (60%). A complete response of peritoneal metastasis was observed in 16 patients, and 14 patients achieved R0 resection (47%; 95% confidence interval 28–66%). When the extent of peritoneal metastasis was classified as P0CY1, P1, P2, and P3 according to the Japanese classification, the R0 resection rates were respectively 63%, 60%, 46% and 0%.

Conclusions

Induction chemotherapy with DCS is safe and can achieve R0 resection for some patients with limited peritoneal metastasis or positive peritoneal cytology. The efficacy, however, appears similar to that of S-1 plus cisplatin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miyashiro I, Takachi K, Doki Y, et al. When is curative gastrectomy justified for gastric cancer with positive peritoneal lavage cytology but negative macroscopic peritoneal implant? World J Surg. 2005; 29:1131–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bando E, Yonemura Y, Takeshita Y, et al. Intraoperative lavage for cytological examination in 1297 patients with gastric carcinoma. Am J Surg. 1999; 178:256–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Desiderio J, Chao J, Melstrom L, et al. The 30-year experience: a meta-analysis of randomised and high-quality non-randomised studies of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the treatment of gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2017;79: 1–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Okabe H, Ueda S, Obama K, et al. Induction chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin followed by surgery for treatment of gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:3227–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sato Y, Takayama T, Sagawa T, et al. Phase II study of S-1, docetaxel, and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with unresectable metastatic gastric cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2010;66:721–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tamegai H, Kaiga T, Kochi M, et al. Pharmacokinetics of docetaxel in gastric cancer patients with malignant ascites. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013;71:727–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Koizumi W, Nakayama N, Tanabe S, et al. A multicenter phase II study of combined chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer (KDOG 0601). Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012;69:407–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14:101–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gilly F, Carry P, Sayag A, et al. Regional chemotherapy (with mitomycin C) and intraoperative hyperthermia for digestive cancers with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Hepatogastroenterology. 1994;41:124–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer. The general rules for gastric cancer study. 1st ed. Tokyo: Kanehara Shuppan; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Takayama T, Sato Y, Sagawa T, et al. Phase I study of S-1, docetaxel and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with unresectable metastatic gastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 2007;97:851–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ito S, Sano T, Mizusawa J, et al. A phase II study of preoperative chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 followed by gastrectomy with D2 plus para-aortic lymph node dissection for gastric cancer with extensive lymph node metastasis: JCOG1002. Gastric Cancer. 2017;20:322–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hosoda K, Azuma M, Katada C, et al. A phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1, followed by gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for high-risk advanced gastric cancer: results of the KDOG1001 trial. Gastric Cancer. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-018-0884-0.

  16. Ishigami H, Fujiwara Y, Fukushima R, et al. Phase III trial comparing intraperitoneal and intravenous paclitaxel plus S-1 versus cisplatin plus S-1 in patients with gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis: PHOENIX-GC trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:1922–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsuburaya A, Mizusawa J, Tanaka Y, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 and cisplatin followed by D2 gastrectomy with paraaortic lymph node dissection for gastric cancer with extensive lymph node metastasis. Br J Surg. 2014;101:653–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kodera Y, Ito S, Mochizuki Y, et al. Long-term follow up of patients who were positive for peritoneal lavage cytology: final report from the CCOG0301 study. Gastric Cancer. 2012;15:335–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mezhir JJ, Shah MA, Jacks LM, et al. Positive peritoneal cytology in patients with gastric cancer: natural history and outcome of 291 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:3173–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jamel S, Markar SR, Malietzis G, et al. Prognostic significance of peritoneal lavage cytology in staging gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastric Cancer. 2018;21:10–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Yuriko Hayashi for data collection and management, and all members of KUSOG who participated in this multicenter study. This work was supported by operating support Grants from Kyoto University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroshi Okabe MD, PhD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Okabe, H., Hata, H., Hosogi, H. et al. A Phase 2 Study of Induction Chemotherapy Using Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and S-1 for Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastasis (KUGC06). Ann Surg Oncol 26, 1779–1786 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07229-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07229-7

Navigation