The American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation: Choosing Wisely® Campaign. http://www.choosingwisely.org/about-us/research-report/ (2015). Accessed 4 Dec 2015.
Hassett MJ, Neville BA, Weeks JC. The relationship between quality, spending and outcomes among women with breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014; doi:10.1093/jnci/dju242.
PubMed
Google Scholar
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). The state of cancer care in America, 2015: a report by the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Oncol Pract. 2015;11(2):79–113.
Article
Google Scholar
Hewitt M, Simone JV. Ensuring quality cancer care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1999.
Google Scholar
Institute of Medicine. Delivering high-quality cancer care: charting a new course for a system in crisis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2013. doi:10.17226/18359.
Google Scholar
Malin JL, Schneider EC, Epstein AM, Adams J, Emanuel EJ, Kahn KL. Results of the National Initiative for Cancer Care Quality: how can we improve the quality of cancer care in the United States? J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:626–34.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Greenberg CC, Lipsitz SR, Neville B, et al. Receipt of appropriate surgical care for Medicare beneficiaries with cancer. Arch Surg. 2011;146(10):1128–34. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2011.141.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Cheng SH, Wang CJ, Lin JL, et al. Adherence to quality indicators and survival in patients with breast cancer. Med Care. 2009;47(2):217–25. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181893c4a.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Makarov DV, Soulos PR, Gold HT, et al. Regional-level correlations in inappropriate imaging rates for prostate and breast cancers: potential implications for the choosing wisely campaign. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(2):185–94. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.37.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Ramsey SD, Fedorenko C, Chauhan R, et al. Baseline estimates of adherence to American Society of Clinical Oncology/American Board of Internal Medicine Choosing Wisely® initiative among patients with cancer enrolled with a large regional commercial health insurer. J Oncol Pract. 2015;11(4):338–43. doi:10.1200/JOP.2014.002717.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wilke LG, Ballman KV, McCall LM, et al. Adherence to the National Quality Forum (NQF) breast cancer measures within cancer clinical trials: a review from ACOSOG Z0010. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(8):1989–94. doi:10.1245/s10434-010-0980-9.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Jagsi R, Griffith KA, Heimburger D, et al. Choosing wisely? Patterns and correlates of the use of hypofractionated whole-breast radiation therapy in the state of Michigan. Int J Radiat
Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;90(5):1010–6. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.09.027.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hahn EE, Tang T, Lee JS, et al. Use of imaging for staging of early-stage breast cancer in two integrated health care systems: adherence with a choosing wisely recommendation. J Oncol
Pract. 2015;11(3):e320–8. doi:10.1200/JOP.2014.002998.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Crivello ML, Ruth K, Sigurdson ER, et al. Advanced imaging modalities in early stage breast cancer: preoperative use in the United States Medicare population. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:102–10.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
In H, Jiang W, Lipsitz SR, et al. Variation in the utilization of reconstruction following mastectomy in elderly women. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:1872–9.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Erickson FJ, Velasco JM, Hieken TJ. Adverse outcomes associated with noncompliance with melanoma treatment guidelines. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2395–402.
Article
Google Scholar
The Darthmouth Institute. The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care. www.dartmouthatlas.org (2015). Accessed 4 Dec 2015.
The Commonwealth Fund report on state health system scorecards. http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/press-releases/2015/dec/state-scorecard. Accessed 9 Dec 2015.
Brody H. Medicine’s ethical responsibility for health care reform—the Top Five list. N Engl
J Med. 2010;362:283–5. doi:10.1056/NEJMp0911423.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
The American Society of Breast Surgeons. https://www.breastsurgeons.org/new_layout/index.php (2014). Accessed 4 Dec 2015.
Choosing Wisely
®. Clinician list of “breast” choices. http://www.choosingwisely.org/clinician-lists/ (2015). Accessed 4 Dec 2015.
Berry, Leonard L. Discovering the Soul of Service: the nine drivers of sustainable business success. New York: The Free Press, a Division of Simon and Schuster, 1999.
Google Scholar
Porter ME. What is value in health care? N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2477–81.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
The National Quality Forum. ABC’s of measurement. http://www.qualityforum.org/Measuring_Performance/ABCs_of_Measurement.aspx (2015). Accessed 4 Dec 2015.
Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MD, et al. The Rand/UCLA appropriateness method user’s manual. Arlington: RAND, 2001.
Google Scholar
Bilimoria KY, Raval MV, Bentrem DJ, Wayne JD, Balch CM, Ko CY. National assessment of melanoma care using formally developed quality indicators. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(32):5445–51.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
American Society of Breast Surgeons. Position statement on breast MRI. https://www.breastsurgeons.org/statements/index.php (2010). Accessed 2 Dec 2015.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer, Version 3. http://www.nccn.org/ (2015). Accessed 2 Dec 2015.
Pilewskie M, Morrow M. Applications for breast magnetic resonance imaging. Surg Oncol
Clin N Am. 2014;23(3):431–49. doi:10.1016/j.soc.2014.03.001.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Houssami N, Turner R, Macaskill P, et al. An individual person data meta-analysis of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and breast cancer recurrence. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(5):392–401.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Houssami N, Turner R, Morrow M. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: meta-analysis of surgical outcomes. Ann Surg. 2013;257(2):249–55. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827a8d17.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Peters NH, van Esser S, van den Bosch MA, et al. Preoperative MRI and surgical management in patients with nonpalpable breast cancer: the MONET—randomized controlled trial. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47(6):879–86.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I, et al. Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9714):563–71.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and metaanalysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(19):3248–58.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
American Society of Breast Surgeons. Position statement on management of axillary lymph nodes. https://www.breastsurgeons.org/statements/index.php (2011). Accessed 2 Dec 2015.
Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, et al. Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis. A randomized clinical trial. Clinicaltrials.gov, Identifier: NCT00003855. JAMA. 2011;305:569–75.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(27):2817–26.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Dowsett M, Cuzick J, Wale C, et al. Prediction of risk of distant recurrence using the 21-gene recurrence score in node negative and node-positive postmenopausal patients with breast cancer treated with anastrozole or tamoxifen: a TransATAC study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(11):1829–34.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Augustovski F, Soto N, Caporale J, et al. Decision-making impact on adjuvant chemotherapy allocation in early node-negative breast cancer with a 21-gene assay: systematic review and metaanalysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;152(3):611–25. doi:10.1007/s10549-015-3483-3.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Carlson JJ, Roth JA. The impact of the Oncotype Dx breast cancer assay in clinical practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;141(1):13-22. doi:10.1007/s10549-013-2666-z.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, et al. Prospective validation of a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(21):2005–14. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1510764.
CAS
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:704–16.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
American Society of Breast Surgeons. Position statement on lumpectomy margins. https://www.breastsurgeons.org/statements/index.php (2013). Accessed 2 Dec 2015.
Houssami N, Macaskill P, Marinovich ML, Morrow M. The association of surgical margins and local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:717–30.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer, Version 1. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast.pdf (2016). Accessed 15 Dec 2015.
Angelos P, Bedrosian I, Euhus DM, Herrmann VM, Katz SJ, Pusic A. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: challenging considerations for the surgeon. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(10):3208–12. doi:10.1245/s10434-015-4758-y.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Grimmer L, Liederbach E, Velasco J, Pesce C, Wang CH, Yao K. Variation in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rates according to racial groups in young women with breast cancer, 1998 to 2011: a report from the National Cancer Data Base. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221(1):187–96. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.03.033.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Pesce CE, Liederbach E, Czechura T, Winchester DJ, Yao K. Changing surgical trends in young patients with early stage breast cancer, 2003 to 2010: a report from the National Cancer Data Base. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219(1):19-28. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.03.043.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Fayanju OM, Stoll CR, Fowler S, Colditz GA, Margenthaler JA. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy after unilateral breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2014;260(6):1000-10. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000000769; Review.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Giuliano AE, Boolbol S, Degnim AC, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology: position statement on prophylactic mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2425–7.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Portschy PR, Abbott AM, Burke EE, et al. Perceptions of contralateral breast cancer risk: a prospective, longitudinal study. Ann Surg
Oncol. 2015;22:3846–52.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Portschy PR, Kuntz KM, Tuttle TM. Survival outcomes after contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: a decision analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;doi:10.1093/jnci/dju160.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Mutter RW, Frost MH, Hoskin TL, Johnson JL, Hartmann LC, Boughey JC. Breast cancer after prophylactic mastectomy (bilateral or contralateral prophylactic mastectomy), a clinical entity: presentation, management, and outcomes. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;153(1):183–90. doi:10.1007/s10549-015-3515-z.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
The American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation. Choosing Wisely Campaign: Collaborative activities of the ABIM. http://www.choosingwisely.org/in-action/ (2015). Accessed 4 Dec 2015.
The American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation. Choosing Wisely
® Campaign: Choosing Wisely Toolkits. http://www.nbch.org/choosing-wisely-employer-toolkit (2015). Accessed 7 Dec 2015.
Fayanju MO, Mayo TL, Spinks TE, et al. Value-based breast cancer care: a multidisciplinary approach for defining patient-centered outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016. doi:10.1245/s10434-016-5184-5.
Google Scholar
Rakovitch E, Nofech-Mozes S, Hanna W, et al. A population-based validation study of the DCIS score predicting recurrence risk in individuals treated by breast-conserving surgery alone. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;152(2):389–98. doi:10.1007/s10549-015-3464-6.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Wisconsin Collaborative for Healthcare Quality. WCHQ to Partner with Froedtert & the Medical College of Wisconsin and Monroe Clinic on New ABIM Foundation Grant Focusing on Reducing Overuse of Tests and Treatments Identified by Choosing Wisely
® Campaign. http://www.wchq.org/news/documents/choosing_wisely_062215.pdf (2015). Accessed 7 Dec 2015.
Gebhardt BJ, Rajagopalan MS, Gill BS, et al. Impact of dynamic changes to a bone metastases pathway in a large, integrated, National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center network. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2015;5(6):398–405. doi:10.1016/j.prro.2015.06.013.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar