Criteria of inclusion (target population)

The target population

This study included 100 COPD patients diagnosed according to GOLD 2017 with acute exacerbation. Informed written consents were taken from all patients enrolled in the study after approval of our institutional research board under code (MD/17.02.88).

Patients who refused participation, or patients presented with other associated diseases such as bronchiectasis, history of tuberculosis, and bronchial carcinoma were excluded from the study.

Location of the study

This study was conducted at the Chest Medicine Department, Mansoura University Hospital, and Mansoura Chest Hospital over 24 months from May 2017 to May 2019 in collaboration with the Microbiology and Immunology Department, Mansoura University.

Background

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common, preventable, and treatable disease that is characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms and airflow limitation [1]. Exacerbations are important events in COPD management because they negatively impact health status, hospitalization rates, and disease progression [2].

Common bacterial organisms causing COPD exacerbation are Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [3].

Atypical mycobacteria are opportunistic bacteria and are therefore more likely to cause disease when there are defects in local or systemic host immunity and have potential to cause respiratory disease, particularly in patients with pre-existing lung damage [4]. Atypical mycobacterial colonization of the lower respiratory tract is an independent stimulus to airway inflammation and can modulate the character and frequency of COPD exacerbations [5]. The potential role of fungal infection in the pathogenesis of COPD is poorly understood [6].

So, this study was planned to investigate the role of infectious pathogens (fungi and atypical mycobacteria in addition to the well-known bacteria) in patients with COPD exacerbation in our locality.

Methods

Study design

This is an observational cross-sectional study.

Duration of the study

This study was conducted at our department, over 24 months from May 2017 to May 2019.

The target population

This study included 100 patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPDAE) diagnosed according to GOLD 2017 [7]. They were included only if they had acute worsening of respiratory symptoms that require an additional therapy [7]. Exclusion criteria include patients who refused participation or patients presented with other associated diseases such as bronchiectasis, history of tuberculosis, and bronchial carcinoma. Patient selection bias was avoided by the clear definition of study population, using standardized protocol to collect data such as questionnaires as modified British Medical Research Council (mMRC), get information from two different sources as participant and participant’s spouse, and implement blinding by being clueless about the disease status of studied participants. Sample size was determined by Epi Info program version 20. Informed written consents were taken from all patients enrolled in the study after approval of our institutional research board under code (MD/17.02.88).

Data collected

Clinical data

Full history taking and clinical examination were done with attention to age, sex, residence, occupation, smoking history, smoking index, severity of airflow limitation, severity of COPD, degree of exacerbation, medications used, and other comorbid diseases.

Spirometry was done for patients who were able to do the test and patients who were not able to do it; their spirometric measures were recorded from their hospital profile of previous admissions. Assessment of airflow limitation was according to GOLD 2017 [7] based on post-bronchodilator fixed ratio FEV1/FVC > 0.70: GOLD 1, FEV1 ≥ 80% predicted; GOLD 2, 50% > FEV1 > 80% predicted; GOLD 3, 30% > FEV1 > 50% predicted; and GOLD 4, FEV1 > 30% predicted [7], severity of COPD according to GOLD 2017 (refined ABCD assessment tool).

COPD exacerbations are classified according to GOLD 2017 as follows: mild (treated with short acting bronchodilators only, SABDs), moderate (treated with SABDs plus antibiotics and/or oral corticosteroids), and severe (patient requires hospitalization or visits the emergency room). Severe exacerbations may also be associated with acute respiratory failure [7].

Radiological data

Chest X-ray was done for radiological assessment of the patients.

Sputum examination and culture for atypical mycobacteria, fungi, and other bacterial agents

Specimens were transported and processed immediately in the Microbiology Unit of our University. If delay was expected, specimens were preserved at refrigerator temperature (4 °C) for 24 h according to Mahon et al. [8].

Microscopic examination of sputum

  1. A.

    Gram staining

Using a piece of stick, a purulent part of the sputum was transferred to a glass slide, and a thin smear was made, allowed to air-dry, heat fixed, and stained by the Gram technique .The Gram smear was examined also for the presence of predominant organisms among the pus cells [8].

  1. B.

    Ziehl-Neelsen staining to detect acid fast bacilli (AFB)

To increase the chances of detecting AFB in sputum smears, the sputum was treated with 5% volume/volume sodium hypochlorite (NaOC1), left for 10–15 min at room temperature followed by centrifugation at 250–1000 r/min for 20 min. Then, the supernatant was discarded, and a drop of the well-mixed sediment was transferred to a clean scratch-free glass slide and it was spread to make a thin preparation and allowed to air-dry. After dryness, the smear was heat-fixed and stained using the Ziehl-Neelsen technique and examined microscopically for AFB. The presence of thin, curved, single, pairs, or groups of pink bacilli that could be beaded on a blue background was reported as positive for AFB [9].

  1. C.

    Potassium hydroxide (KOH) preparation to detect Aspergillus spp. [10]

Cultures of sputum

  1. A.

    Bacterial culture

The purulent part of the sputum was washed from saliva in about 5 ml of sterile physiological saline [11]. Bacterial growth was identified systemically by the colony morphology, by Gram-stained film from the colonies examined for the characteristic morphology, and by biochemical reactions [12].

  1. B.

    Culture of sputum for Mycobacteria tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis)

Sputum was decontaminated using sodium hydroxide, 40 g/l, before being cultured for M. tuberculosis. The Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) egg medium was used for M. tuberculosis cultures. Decontaminated sputum was inoculated on LJ slopes and incubated aerobically at 35–37 °C for 2–6 weeks. The organism is slowly growing. When cultured on the Lowenstein-Jensen medium at 30–35 °C, M. tuberculosis produces raised, dry, cream (buff) colored colonies. Visible colonies are usually produced 2–3 weeks after incubation, but cultures should be incubated for up to 6 weeks before being discarded [8].

Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) can be differentiated from M. tuberculosis by their ability to produce pigment when cultured in darkness and light (scotochromogen), when only exposed to light (photochromogen) or non-pigment producing (nonchromogen), and by their ability to grow at 25 °C and in 4 (p)-nitrobenzoic acid (PNB) medium. Most NTM, like M. tuberculosis, are slow-growing except Mycobacteria chelonae and Mycobacteria fortuitum which are rapid-growers [13]. Species identification in case of growth of NTM would be done by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). Choromosomal DNA of NTM isolates will be extracted using DNA extract kit according to the manufacturer’s recommendations [14].

  1. C.

    Sputum culture for fungi

For fungal isolation, sputum samples were plated on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) containing 50 μg/ml chloramphenicol and incubated at 30 and 37 °C. Cultures were evaluated for growth every 24 h during the first 7 days and weekly till 28 days. If filamentous fungi were detected, colonies were cultured on potato dextrose agar and subcultures were incubated at 30, 37, and 42 °C to identify the species [15].

Differentiation between commensals and pathogenic organisms in this study was done by isolation of the same organism from repeated cultures [16] which showed a pure growth of the same organism and confirmation by identification of the pathogenic forms of the organism on a direct film and correlation of our culture results with clinical, radiological, and laboratory findings of the patients [17].

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) statistical software (SPSS for windows v. 16.0). Categorical data were presented in the form of numbers and proportions. According to the results of normality tests, continuous data were presented either in the form of means and standard deviations or in the form of median (min–max) in case of non-normal distribution.

T test was used to test significance in case of normal distribution, while the Mann-Whitney test was used in non-normally distributed data. Statistical significance was set at a level of p < 0.05.

Results

One hundred patients with COPD exacerbations (mean age 62 years old) were enrolled. Only 10% of them were nonsmokers (Table 1). Sixty-three percent of studied patients were COPD group D. Degree of exacerbation in most of studied patients (53%) was moderate and in about 37% was mild. Only 10% had severe exacerbation (Table 2).

Table 1 Sociodemographic characteristics of studied cases
Table 2 Clinical assessment of studied patients

As regards sputum bacteriology of studied patients, all sputum samples were negative for typical and atypical mycobacteria whereas bacterial culture revealed that Streptococcus pneumoniae was isolated from 16 patients (16%), Klebseilla pneumoniae was isolated from 14 patients (14%), Staphylococcus aureus was isolated from 9 patients (9%), Pseudomonas spp. and Enterobacter spp. were isolated from 5 patients for each (5%), Hemophilus influenzae was isolated from 3 patients (3%), and Escherichia coli was isolated from 3 patients (3%). However, normal flora (commensal flora) was isolated from 43 patients (43%), no bacterial growth was found in 8 patients (8%), and more than one organism was detected in 11 patients (11%). Also, there were no significant associations between the bacterial isolates and sociodemographic and clinical data of studied patients (Tables 3, 4, and 5).

Table 3 Isolated bacteria from sputum of studied cases
Table 4 Isolated bacteria in association to sociodemographic data among the studied cases
Table 5 Bacterial isolates in association to clinical and radiological data of studied cases

As regards sputum examination for fungal growth, Candida was isolated from 67 patients (67%), Aspergillus was isolated from 27 patients (27%), Alternaria was isolated from 3 patients (3%), and other fungi were isolated from 4 patients (4%); no growth of fungi was found in 18 patients (18%); and more than one fungus was found in 19 patients (19%). Also, there were no significant associations between the fungal isolates and sociodemographic and clinical data of studied patients (Tables 6, 7, and 8).

Table 6 Isolated fungi on cultures among the studied cases
Table 7 Fungal isolates in association to sociodemographic characteristics of studied patients
Table 8 Fungal isolates in association to clinical and radiological data of studied patients

Discussion

Pathogenic bacteria are usually colonizing the airways of COPD patients, possibly contributing to increased airway inflammation, and have been implicated in COPD exacerbations (Lin et al. [18] and Erkan et al. [19]).

However, fungal and NTM colonization and their potential role in acute exacerbations of COPD are not widely investigated. This study is therefore designed to assess the role of infectious pathogens (fungi and atypical mycobacteria in addition to the well-known bacteria) in COPD exacerbations.

Sputum samples were utilized for the diagnosis of the offending organisms for COPD exacerbation, as it is an easy method for sampling in spite of its drawbacks in diagnosis. In a study of Bafadhel et al. [20], they used sputum samples and PCR in the diagnosis of fungal isolates, while Guinea et al. [21] used sputum, BAL, bronchial aspirate, and transbronchial lung biopsy samples and serological tests in their study.

In this study, TB and atypical mycobacteria could not be isolated in all studied cases, either by ZN staining or by culture on the Lowenstein-Jensen medium. In a study by Huang et al. [22], they investigated the role of NTM in the clinical course and progression of COPD; their study was done in Taiwan and included 251 patients using Bactec technique in NTM isolation and excluded patients less than 40 years old, nonsmokers, and smokers with smoking index less than 10 pack-years. Char et al. [23] found that 11% of their patients had evidence of mycobacterial infection (TB and NTM), and their study was done in the UK and included 126 patients who underwent LVRS or bullectomy at the Royal Brompton Hospital from 2000 to 2013 and depended on pathological methods in diagnosis (necrotizing granuloma with or without positive ZN staining for acid fast bacilli). These differences may be attributed to utilization of other media such as Bactec method for NTM or TB isolation or pathological examination, disparities in patient selection criteria, study designs, epidemiological factors, environmental factors, and total number of studied patients.

The most common isolated bacteria in this study was Streptococcus pneumoniae (16%), this is the same as that reported by Gupta et al. [24] as they isolated Streptococcus pneumoniae in 16% of their patients, and it is near to that reported by Sharma et al. [25] as they isolated Streptococcus pneumoniae in 13% of their patients.

The second most common organism isolated from the sputum of our patients was Klebseilla pneumoniae, it was isolated from 14% of patients, and it is near to that reported by Lin et al. [18] as they reported that Klebseilla pneumoniae was isolated in 19.6% of sputum samples via aerobic cultures, but in a study by Bari et al. [26], they reported Klebsiella pneumoniae in 26% of their patients and Sharma et al. [25] in 6.3% of sputum samples via aerobic cultures.

The mean age of our patients with bacterial isolates was 62.5 ± 7.6 years, 49% were males, and the median of smoking index was 45 pack-years, while in a study of Papi et al. [27], they reported that the mean age of their patients was 70.6 ± 2.5 years, 87.5% were males, and the median of smoking index was 48.3 ± 5.7 pack-years. Bacterial isolates were associated in 48.6% of patients with mild exacerbation, 49.1% with moderate exacerbation, and 50% with severe exacerbation. In a study by Erkan et al. [19], they reported that COPD exacerbations increased by 88% with bacterial infection, while Sethi et al. [28] mentioned that bacterial isolates were associated with increase in the incidence of COPD exacerbation. As regards airway obstruction, bacterial isolates were associated in 33.3% of patients with mild airway obstruction, 51.2% with moderate obstruction, 52% with severe obstruction, and 55% with very severe obstruction, while Groenwegan and Wouters [29] reported bacterial isolates in 13% of patients with mild obstruction, in 32% of patients with moderate obstruction, and in 47% of patients with severe obstruction.

The most common fungal isolate in this study was Candida albicans that was isolated from 67% of patients, followed by Aspergillus that was isolated from 27% of patients and that is near to that reported by Mahmoud et al. [30], as they isolated Candida from 63.9% of their COPD patients with acute exacerbation, followed by Aspergillus which was isolated in 36% of the patients in spite of their use of sputum, BAL, and serological tests in the diagnosis of fungal infections and their use of Sabaroud agar for fungal growth. The explanation of this relatively high rate of fungal growth may be attributed to association of patients with comorbid diseases and the frequent use of COPD patients to antibiotics and steroids.

The mean age of our patients with fungal isolates was 63.1 ± 8.2 years, 81.6% were males, and 85.1% of patients were associated with comorbid diseases, while Mahomoud et al. [30] reported that the mean age of their patients was 57 ± 3.2 years, 89.5% of patients were males, and the prevalence of fungal isolates was higher with comorbid diseases. Fungal isolates were associated with mild exacerbation in 81.1%, moderate exacerbation in 81.1%, and severe exacerbation in 90%, while Mahmoud et al. [30] reported association of fungal isolates with mild exacerbation in 36.8%, moderate exacerbation in 36.8%, and severe exacerbation in 26.3%. As regards airway obstruction, fungal isolates were associated with mild airway obstruction in 75%, moderate obstruction in 95.1%, severe obstruction in 76%, and very severe obstruction in 70%, while Mahmoud et al. [30] reported association of fungal isolates with moderate obstruction in 58% and severe obstruction in 42% and no fungal isolates were found in cases with very severe obstruction. However, in this study, there was no statistical significance in the association between the fungal isolates and sociodemographic and clinical data of studied patients.

There are limitations to this study. First, doing of extra tools for assessment of patients such as CT scan and using of other media for organism cultures and non-culture-based methods for fungal identification such as serological tests were limited due to the financial cost. Second, this study was done on hospital admitted patients that may represent high-risk patients with more comorbidities; consequently, the results may not be applicable to community-based settings. Third, fungal culture-based methods for organism identification had low sensitivity and low specificity and negative cultures cannot readily exclude fungal infection.

Conclusion

This study showed that fungal and bacterial isolates from the airway could have a role in COPD exacerbation. Non-tuberculous mycobacteria have no role in COPD exacerbation in our locality at the period from 2017 to 2019. These findings suggest that fungal, bacterial, and mycobacterial sputum cultures should be done for all patient of COPD exacerbation. Also, antifungal and antibacterial therapy should be considered in the treatment of COPD exacerbation, although the implication of this has not yet been conclusively established. Further investigations into the nature and consequences of the presence of NTM in COPD patients are required to confirm whether NTM have a role in COPD exacerbation or not.