AMB Express

, 4:29 | Cite as

Mushroom as a product and their role in mycoremediation

  • Shweta KulshreshthaEmail author
  • Nupur Mathur
  • Pradeep Bhatnagar
Open Access


Mushroom has been used for consumption as product for a long time due to their flavor and richness in protein. Mushrooms are also known as mycoremediation tool because of their use in remediation of different types of pollutants. Mycoremediation relies on the efficient enzymes, produced by mushroom, for the degradation of various types of substrate and pollutants. Besides waste degradation, mushroom produced a vendible product for consumption. However, sometimes they absorb the pollutant in their mycelium (biosorption process) and cannot be consumed due to absorbed toxicants. This article reviews the achievement and current status of mycoremediation technology based on mushroom cultivation for the remediation of waste and also emphasizes on the importance of mushroom as product. This critical review is also focused on the safety aspects of mushroom cultivation on waste.


Biodegradation Bioremediation Genotoxicity Biosorption Mushroom Ames test Product Industrial waste Agroindustrial waste Bioconversion 


Biological approaches based on industrial and environmental biotechnology is focusing on the development of “clean technologies" which emphasizes on the maximum production, reduced waste generation, treatment and conversion of waste in some useful form. Further, these clean technologies focus on the use of biological methods for the remediation of waste. One such biological method is mycoremediation which is based on the use of fungi and mushroom for the removal of waste from the environment. The mushrooms and other fungi possess enzymatic machinery for the degradation of waste/pollutants and therefore, can be applied for a wide variety of pollutants (Purnomo et al. [2013]; Kulshreshtha et al. [2013]). However, mushrooms, a basidiomycetous fungus, are becoming more popular nowadays for remediation purposes because it is not only a bioremediation tool but also provide mycelium or fruiting bodies as a source of protein. The efficiency of mushroom species in producing food protein in the form of biomass or fruiting bodies from different wastes lies in their ability to degrade waste via secretion of a variety of hydrolyzing and oxidizing enzymes (Kuforiji and Fasidi [2008]; Zhu et al. [2013]). This has attracted research attention in the field of mushroom cultivation and waste remediation.

Many reports have published to emphasize the role of mushroom in bioremediation of wastes by the process of biodegradation, biosorption and bioconversion (Akinyele et al. [2012], Kulshreshtha et al. [2013a]; Kumhomkul and Panich-pat [2013]; Lamrood and Ralegankar [2013]). Many scientists have studied the role of different enzymes in the degradation process; degradation products formed by it and conditions affecting the degradation process (Novotný et al. [2004]; Akinyele et al. [2011]; Zhu et al. [2013]). However, safety aspects of the process and products have not been reported so far. There is scarcity of reports indicating the pros and cons of mushroom cultivation on wastes and their further utilization as food. Moreover, mushroom as a product is meagerly reported.

Keeping this in mind, in this review we are discussing the use of mushroom as a biological tool for cleanup the environment. Mushroom is not only a mycoremediation tool but also a product. Mushroom fruiting bodies generated on industrial and agro-industrial wastes are considered as a product. We have also focused on the safety aspects of mushroom cultivation on waste.

Mushroom as a product

Mushrooms are the product of biological origin and can be developed from biological wastes, agricultural wastes, agro-industrial wastes and industrial wastes. Besides this, these mushrooms can be used as a source of proteins, amino acids and several biological active molecules which not only provide nutrition but also use for therapeutic purposes (Table 1). Therefore, these can be considered as an important product.
Table 1

Role of mushroom as an important product

S. no.


As a product



Pleurotus, Agaricus, Ganoderma Schizophyllan commune, Grifola frondosa Coriolus versicolor, Ganoderma lucidum,

Used as medicine to boost immune responses against cancer

Kodama et al. ([2002]); Gao et al. ([2003]); Maehara et al. ([2012])


Pleurotus, Agaricus,

Possess antimutagenic or antigenotoxic power to fight against cancer

Gameiro et al. ([2013]); Kang et al. ([2012])


Ganoderma lucidum, Phellinus rimosus, Pleurotus florida and Pleurotus pulmonaris

Used as antioxidant and antitumor agent

Ajith and Janardhanan ([2007])


Pleurotus, Agaricus

Used as food


Edible mushrooms are highly nutritious and can be compared with eggs, milk and meat (Oei [2003]). Mushroom is a protein rich food and has been considered as the source of single cell protein. These are easily digestible and possess a high amount of amino acids but lacks cholesterol. These possess high quantities of fibers, few sugars and low calories and a high quantity of the amino acids phenylalanine, threonine and tyrosine.

As far as the nutrient profile of mushroom are concerned, these are influenced by many factors including the type of substrate on which these are cultivated. There are some differences in the nutrient content of the mushroom cultivated on different substrates (Mabrouk and Ahwanyi [2008]; Akinyele et al. [2011]; Kulshreshtha et al. [2013b]). However, this change in nutritional content never found to affect their edibility. Therefore, it is still a beneficial technology because it solves two major problems simultaneously i.e. waste accumulation and shortage of proteinaceous food.

Besides, use for edible purpose, mushroom is used for other industrial processes like biopulping and biobleaching. Hence, the importance of this as product cannot be ignored.

Mushroom as mycoremediation tool

Remediation through fungi is also called as mycoremediation. Mycoremediation tool refers to mushrooms and their enzymes due to having ability to degrade a wide variety of environmentally persistent pollutants, transform industrial and agro-industrial wastes into products.

Mycoremediation potential of mushroom

Mushroom uses different methods to decontaminate polluted spots and stimulate the environment. These methods include - (i) Biodegradation (ii) Biosorption (iii) Bioconversion.


The term ‘Biodegradation’ is used to describe the ultimate degradation and recycling of complex molecule to its mineral constituents. It is the process which leads to complete mineralization of the starting compound to simpler ones like CO2, H2O, NO3 and other inorganic compounds by living organisms. A lot of research has been done on the degradation abilities of mushroom and their enzymes and is depicted in Table 2. Many reports have been published on the compounds produced by degradation of various wastes and factor affecting the processes.
Table 2

Role of mushroom in degradation of pollutants

S. no.

Mushroom spp.





Pleurotus ostreatus

Oxo-Biodegradable plastic

Mushrooms degraded the plastic and grew on it.

da Luz et al. ([2013])


Lentinula edodes


Mushrooms degraded 2,4-dichlorophenol (DCP) by using vanillin as an activator

Tsujiyama et al. ([2013])


Pleurotus pulmonarius

Radioactive cellulosic-based waste

Waste containing mushroom mycellium was solidified with portland cement and then this solidified waste act as first barrier against the release of radiocontaminants

Eskander et al. ([2012])


Jelly sp., Schizophyllum commune and Polyporous sp.

malachite green

99.75% (Jelly sp.), 97.5% (Schizophyllum commune), 68.5% (Polyporous sp.2) dye was degraded in 10 days

Rajput et al. ([2011])


Pleurotus pulmonarius

crude oil

crude oil was degraded

Olusola and Anslem ([2010])


Coriolus versicolor MKACC 52492


Mushroom possesses ability to degrade Poly-R 478 which decides its suitability to degrade PAH. Lignin-modifying enzymes laccase, manganese-dependent peroxidase (MnP), and lignin peroxidase (LiP)was found to produce for degradation

Jang et al. ([2009])

Mushroom can produce extracellular peroxidases, ligninase (lignin peroxidase, manganese dependent peroxidase and laccase), cellulases, pectinases, xylanases and oxidases (Nyanhongo et al. [2007]). These are able to oxidize recalcitrant pollutants in vitro. These enzymes are typically induced by their substrates.

These enzymes have also been found to degrade nonpolymeric, recalcitrant pollutants such as nitrotoluenes (VanAcken et al. [1999]), PAHs (Hammel et al. [1991]; Johannes et al. [1996]), organic and synthetic dyes (Ollikka et al. [1993]; Heinfling et al. [1998]), and pentachlorophenol (Lin et al. [1990]) under in vitro conditions. Recently, it is reported that mushroom species are able to degrade polymers such as plastics (da Luz et al. [2013]).

The biodegradation mechanism is very complex. The reason is the influence of other biochemical systems and interactions of ligninolytic enzymes with cytochrome P450 monooxygenase system, hydroxyl radicals and the level of H2O2 which are produced by the mushroom.


The second important process of removal of metals/pollutants from the environment by mushroom is - biosorption. Biosorption is considered as an alternative to the remediation of industrial effluents as well as the recovery of metals present in effluent. Biosorption is a process based on the sorption of metallic ions/pollutants/xenobiotics from effluent by live or dried biomass which often exhibits a marked tolerance towards metals and other adverse conditions (Gavrilescu [2004]). Biosorbents can be prepared from mushroom mycelium and spent mushroom compost.

The uptake of pollutants/xenobiotics by mushrooms involves a combination of two processes: (i) bioaccumulation i.e. active metabolism-dependent processes, which includes both transport into the cell and partitioning into intracellular components; and (ii) biosorption i.e. the binding of pollutants to the biomass without requiring metabolic energy. Several chemical processes may be involved in biosorption, including adsorption, ion exchange processes and covalent binding. According to Mar'in et al. ([1997]), the polar groups of proteins, amino acids, lipids and structural polysaccharides (chitin, chitosan, glucans) may be involved in the process of biosorption.

A lot of study has been done on the biosorptive capacity of biomass of mushroom and are shown in Table 3. It is reported that the biosorption capacity of dead biomass may be greater, similar to or less than that of living cells (Mar'in et al. [1997]). In the case of biosorption, dead biomass of mushroom offers certain advantages over living cells. Dead mushroom biomass can be obtained from industries as a waste of fermentation processes. Further, this is not sensitive to concentrations of toxicants and their toxicity effects and adverse operating conditions (pH, temperature, nutrient supply, initial metal ion concentration, and the concentration of cells etc.) unlike living mushroom biomass. The uptake of xenobiotic by living cells depends on fungal species and contact time. Biosorption techniques are now becoming very popular for the removal of pollutants. Biosorption is an effective method due to the high uptake capacity and very cost-effective source of the raw material.
Table 3

Removal of pollutants by biomass of mushroom using biosorption process

S. no

Mushroom spp.





Agaricus bisporus, Lactarius piperatus

Cadmium (II) ions

Wild L. piperatus showed higher removal efficiency on Cd(II) ions compared to the cultivated A. bisporus

Nagy et al. ([2013])


Fomes fasciatus

Copper (II)

Mushroom is efficient in biosorption of Cu (II) ions and hot-alkali treatment increased their affinity for Cu (II) ions

Sutherland and Venkobachar ([2013])


Pleurotus platypus, Agaricus bisporus, Calocybe indica

Copper, Zinc, Iron, Cadmium, Lead, Nickle

Mushrooms are efficient biosorbent for the removal these ions from aqueous solution

Lamrood and Ralegankar ([2013])


Flammulina velutipes


Mushroom compost used as biosorbent for removing copper ions from aqueous solution

Luo et al. ([2013])


Pleurotus tuber- regium

Heavy metals

Pleurotus tuber-regium biosorb the pollutant heavy metals from the soil artificially contaminated with some heavy metals

Oyetayo et al. ([2012])


Pleurotus ostreatus


Mushroom possess biosorption capacity and mechanism of biosorption was observed

Tay et al. ([2011])


Pleurotus sajor-caju

heavy metal Zn

Mushrooms biosorb the heavy metals

Jibran and Milsee Mol ([2011])


Nowadays, the research on conversion of industrial or agro-industrial sludges into some other useful forms is going on. The most important bioconversion product is - mushroom. Any lignocellulosic waste, generated by industries, can be used for cultivation of mushroom which can be further use as a product. Mushroom species cultivated on industrial and agro-industrial wastes are given in Table 4. The choice of the substrate for the cultivation of mushroom is generally determined by the regional availability of the material.
Table 4

Bioconversion of waste by mushroom species

S. no.

Mushroom spp.

Bioconversion of waste




Pleurotus citrinopileatus

Handmade paper and cardboard industrial waste

Successfully cultivated. Basidiocarps possessed good nutrient content and no genotoxicity

Kulshreshtha et al. [(2013)]


Pleurotus ostreatus

Extract from the sawdust

Biomass of mushroom was produced in submerged liquid culture were analyzed

Akinyele et al. ([2012])


Volvariella volvacea

Agro-industrial residues such as cassava, sugar beet pulp, wheat bran and apple pomase

Enzyme activities were measured during the fermentation of substrates

Akinyele et al. ([2011])


Pleurotus florida

Handmade paper and cardboard industrial waste

Successfully cultivated. Basidiocarps possessed normal morphology and no genotoxicity

Kulshreshtha et al. ([2010])



Cotton waste, rice straw, cocoyam peels and sawdusts of Mansonia altissima, Boscia angustifolia and Khaya ivorensis

Successfully cultivated with good crude protein, crude fat and carbohydrate contents in sporophores.

Kuforiji and Fasidi ([2009])


Pleurotus eous and Lentinus connotus

Paddy straw, sorghum stalk, and banana pseudostem

Waste successfully bioconverted by mushroom with good biological efficiency

Rani et al. ([2008])


Pleurotus tuber-regium

Nigerian trees; Terminalia superba, Mansonia altissima, Holoptelia grandis and Miliciaexcelsa

Grow on trees

Jonathan et al. ([2008])


Pleurotus tuber-regium

Cotton waste, sawdust of Khaya ivorensis and rice straw

Sclerotia propagated on groundnut shells and cocoyam peels with lipase and phenoloxidase; cellulase, carboxymethyl cellulase enzymatic activities

Kuforiji and Fasidi ([2008])


Lentinula edodes

Eucalyptus waste

Successfully convert this waste and qualitative and quantitative changes were also measured

Brienzo et al. ([2007])


Lentinula edodes

Vineyard pruning (VP), barley straw (BS), and wheat straw

Bioconversion of VP waste with shortest primordium formation, highest biological efficiency, highest yield and shortest production cycle (6 days)

Gaitán- Hernández et al. ([2006])


Lentinula tigrinus

Wheat straw

Characterize the production of lignocellulosic enzymes and bioconvert the wheat straw

Lechner and Papinutti ([2006])


V. volvacea

Banana leaves (Musa sapientum lina)

Efficient bioconversion with good yield

Belewu and Belewu ([2005])

Mushroom cultivation has also been successfully done on various industrial wastes (Singhal et al. [2005]; Kulshreshtha et al. [2010]; Dulay et al. [2012] and Kulshreshtha et al. [2013b]). Applications of mushroom as mycoremediation tool in the bioconversion of these industrial wastes into protein rich mushroom carpophores (fruiting bodies of mushroom), on one hand provides mushroom and on the other hand helps in solving pollution problems, which their disposal may otherwise cause.

Feasibility of the mycoremediation tool and processes

It is extremely important to carry out feasibility study before starting a remediation project in order to determine the best conditions for the process and toxicity in the fruiting bodies. The most important parameters to define a contaminated site are: biodegradability, contaminant distribution, chemical reactivity of the contaminants, soil type and properties, oxygen availability and occurrence of inhibitory substances (Martín et al. [2004]). The success of mycoremediation is governed by three important factors- availability of mushroom, accessibility of contaminants and a conductive environment. Therefore, the knowledge on the physiology and ecology of the biological species or consortia involved and the characteristics of the polluted sites are decisive factors to select an adequate mycoremediation protocol (Martín et al. [2004]).

Mycoremediation of waste from the environment by mushroom has many advantages but at the same time it is a challenge for the researchers and engineers. Mycoremediation of wastes can be done in in situ and ex situ conditions. When it is carried out on site, it eliminates the need to transport the toxic materials to treatment sites. It is an environmentally friendly approach and needs only a small space, low cost, less skilled persons and can be applied easily in the field. In contrast to above, there are some disadvantages in applying this mycoremediation tool. Mushrooms require time to adapt to the environment and cleanup wastes. Mushroom cultivated on industrial wastes may possess toxicity/genotoxicity. Genotoxicity of mushrooms is influenced by genotoxicants that are present in waste used for their cultivation. Therefore, it is necessary to assess toxicity/genotoxicity of mushrooms if used for bioremediation purpose.

Toxicity level in the fruiting bodies is based on two facts, i.e. biodegradation and biosorption. Mushroom possesses the suitable enzymatic machinery for biodegradation which lead to the degradation of pollutants from the substrate and convert it into less toxic products. This renders the fruiting bodies safe for consumption. Recently, many papers have published which reported that mushroom not only able to degrade pollutants but also able to reduce the toxicity or mutagenicity (Kulshreshtha et al. [2013b]; Choi et al. [2013]; Malachová et al. [2006]). Numerous studies stated that mutagenicity reduction by mushrooms is primarily species dependent. Kulshreshtha et al. ([2011]) and Kulshreshtha et al. ([2013b]) reported Pleurotus florida was not found to have genotoxicity, however, Pleurotus citrinopileatus have had genotoxicity in their fruiting bodies when both were cultivated on industrial wastes and the mixture of wheat straw and industrial wastes under the same cultivation conditions.

Toxicity reduction is also dependent on the substrate. Same fungi may have different capability in degrading the different pollutants (Choi et al. [2013]) due to the enzymes of mushrooms that are not only involved in degradation but also reducing the effects of toxic and genotoxic pollutants. Several researchers have proved the antimutagenic and antigenotoxic power of mushroom (Mendez-Espinoza et al. [2013]; Taira et al. [2005]; Mlinaric et al. [2004]; Filipic et al. [2002]; Menoli et al. [2001]) which may be used to reduce the genotoxicity of the pollutants. Therefore, it is proved that besides having degradation power mushrooms can reduce the genotoxicants and toxic pollutants due to having antimutagenic and antigenotoxic power. These types of species of mushroom can be used for edible purposes and as feed for animals. This concept provides a natural guide to future research which should be focused on the need of research to degrade the pollutants in such a way that their disposal will not create another problem and fruiting bodies can be consumed safely. In contrast to this, absorption of pollutants by mushroom makes them unsuitable for consumption. Many researchers have reported the very high amount of metal content and mutagenicity in the fruiting bodies of mushrooms growing on polluted substrate, naturally or artificially, which is due to the absorption process (Tables 3and 5). Wild Further information is needed about the level of toxicity in these mushrooms, ignorance of which will cause the associated health related problems.
Table 5

Mutagenicity of naturally occurring and cultivated mushroom species detected by Ames test

S. no.

Mushroom types

Mutagenicity test results



Nine wild and two cultivated species of Spanish edible mushrooms

The mushrooms were mutagenic to TA100 and TA98 strains

Morales et al., ([1990])


Wild and commercially grown mushrooms

Presence of microsomal enzymes (S-9) reduced the mutagenic effects of all the mushrooms, with the exception of Agaricus abruptibulbus and Cantharellus cibarius.

Gruter et al., ([1991])


Agaricus bisporus

Direct-acting mutagenic response in various Salmonella typhimurium strains, TA104. Agaritine is not responsible for the mutagenicity of mushroom extracts

Papaparaskeva et al., ([1991])


Agaricus bisporus

Agaritine was weakly mutagenic, in the absence of an activation system, in Salmonella typhimurium strain TA104.

Walton et al., ([1997])


Pleurotus florida cultivated on handmade paper and cardboard industrial waste

Not mutagenic with either TA 98 or TA 100 strain

Kulshreshtha et al., ([2011])


Pleurotus citrinopileatus cultivated on handmade paper and cardboard industrial waste

Mushroom extract is mutagenic with TA 98 strain

Kulshreshtha et al., [(2013)]

Biosorption can become a good tool to remediate toxic metals threatening the environment (Lamrood and Ralegankar [2013]) but on the other hand, this process generates non-consumable biomass which gives rise to the new problem of disposing it. Usually researchers have been focused on the use of mushroom mycelium for biosorption and compare the abilities of biomass for sorption (Table 3). A very few publications reported the reason of varying power of biosorption to various types of mushroom (Kumhomkul and Panich-pat [2013]; Das [2005]). This fact may be a decisive factor for further use of mushroom species.

It is proved that mushrooms have different abilities of biosorption, bioremediation, biodegradation and toxicity reduction. In my opinion, researchers should try to first remediate the heavy metals by cultivating high metal absorbing species of mushroom. However, low absorbing edible species can be used to cultivate on waste so that absorption of the pollutants can be minimized. Researchers should also try to develop the method of using biomass repeatedly for the biosorption of pollutants which will also reduce the waste generation. The toxicity or genotoxicity of these mushroom species should be assessed and thereafter, non-toxic mushroom species can be used for consumption. However, in the case of remediation of pollutants preference should be given to those species which can degrade the pollutants. The safe species will be selected to remediate a particular type of waste and further use for consumption.


Mushroom is a tremendous boon to the idea of using this for mycoremediation process as a real-world solution. The cultivation of edible mushroom on agricultural and industrial wastes may thus be a value added process capable of converting these discharges, which are otherwise considered to be wastes, into foods and feeds. Besides producing nutritious mushroom, it reduces genotoxicity and toxicity of mushroom species. Mycoremediation through mushroom cultivation will alleviate two of the world’s major problems i.e. waste accumulation and production of proteinaceous food simultaneously. Thus, there is a need for further research towards the exploitation of potential of mushroom as bioremediation tool and its safety aspects for consumption as product.



We are thankful to Rajasthan Department of Science and Technology (DST), Jaipur for providing financial support for conducting work (Sanction No. 2005/3951-67). We are also thankful to University Grants commission (UGC) for their support and grant (F. No. 40-113/2011, SR). We are also thankful to DST (Delhi), and Center for International Co-operation in Science (CICS), Chennai for providing travel grant to present my research in an International conference “Bioproduct-2012”.


  1. Ajith TA, Janardhanan KK: Indian Medicinal Mushrooms as a Source of Antioxidant and Antitumor Agents. J Clin Biochem Nutr 2007, 40: 157–162. doi:10.3164/jcbn.40.157 10.3164/jcbn.40.157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akinyele BJ, Olaniyi OO, Arotupin DJ: Bioconversion of selected agricultural wastes and associated enzymes by Volvariella volvacea : An edible mushroom. Res J Microbiol 2011, 6: 63–70. doi:10.3923/jm.2011.63.70 10.3923/jm.2011.63.70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akinyele JB, Fakoya S, Adetuyi CF: Anti-growth factors associated with Pleurotus ostreatus in a submerged liquid fermentation. Malaysian J Microbiol 2012, 8: 135–140.Google Scholar
  4. Belewu MA, Belewu KY: Cultivation of mushroom ( Volvariella volvacea ) on banana leaves. African J Biotechnol 2005, 4: 1401–1403.Google Scholar
  5. Brienzo M, Silva EM, Milagres AM: Degradation of eucalyptus waste components by Lentinula edodes strains detected by chemical and near-infrared spectroscopy methods. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2007, 141: 37–50. 10.1007/s12010-007-9209-1CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Choi YS, Long Y, Kim MJ, Kim JJ, Kim GH: Decolorization and degradation of synthetic dyes by Irpex lacteus KUC8958. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 2013, 48: 501–508. doi:10.1080/10934529.2013.730419 10.1080/10934529.2013.730419CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Da Luz JMR, Paes SA, Nunes MD, da Silva MCS, Kasuya MCM: Degradation of Oxo-Biodegradable Plastic by Pleurotus ostreatus . PLoS ONE 2013, 8(8):69386. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0069386 10.1371/journal.pone.0069386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Das N: Heavy metals biosorption by mushrooms. NPR 2005, 4: 454–459.Google Scholar
  9. Dulay RMR, Parungao AG, Kalaw SP, Reyes RG: Aseptic cultivation of Coprinus comatus (O. F. Mull.) Gray on various pulp and paper wastes. Mycosphere 2012, 3: 392–397. doi:10.5943/mycosphere/3/3/10. 392 10.5943/mycosphere/3/3/10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eskander SB, Abd El-Aziz SM, El-Sayaad H, Saleh HM (2012) Cementation of bioproducts generated from biodegradation of radioactive cellulosic-based waste simulates by mushroom. ISRN Chemical Engineering, doi:10.5402/2012/329676Google Scholar
  11. Filipic M, Umek A, Mlinaric A: Screening of Basidiomycete mushroom extracts for antigenotoxic and bio-antimutagenic activity. Harmazie 2002, 57: 416–420.Google Scholar
  12. Gaitán-Hernández R, Esqueda M, Gutiérrez A, Sánchez A, Beltrán-García M, Mata G: Bioconversion of agrowastes by Lentinula edodes : The high potential of viticulture residues. Appl Microbiol Biot 2006, 71: 432–439. doi:10.1590/S1517–83822011000100004 10.1007/s00253-005-0241-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gameiro PH, Nascimento JS, Rocha BH, Piana CF, Santos RA, Takahashi CS: Antimutagenic effect of aqueous extract from Agaricus brasiliensis on culture of human lymphocytes. J Med Food 2013, 16: 180–183. doi:10.1089/jmf.2012.0068 10.1089/jmf.2012.0068CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gao Y, Dai X, Chen G, Ye J, Zhou S: A randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study of Ganoderma lucidum (W. Curt.:Fr.) Lloyd (Aphylloromycetidae) polysaccharides (Ganopoly R) in patients with advanced lung cancer. Int J Med Mushrooms 2003, 5: 369–381. 10.1615/InterJMedicMush.v5.i4.40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gavrilescu M: Removal of heavy metals from the environment by biosorption. Eng Life Sci 2004, 4: 219–232. doi:10.1002/elsc.200420026 10.1002/elsc.200420026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gruter A, Friederich U, Wurgler FE: The mutagenicity of edible mushrooms in a histidine-independent bacterial test system. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1991, 29: 159–65. 10.1016/0278-6915(91)90033-4CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hammel KE, Green B, Gai WZ: Ring fission of anthracene by a eukaryote. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991, 88: 10605–10608. doi:10.1073/pnas.88.23.10605 10.1073/pnas.88.23.10605PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Heinfling MJ, Martínez AT, Martínez M, Bergbauer Szewzyk U: Transformation of industrial dyes by manganese peroxidases from Bjerkandera adusta and Pleurotus eryngii in a manganese-independent reaction. Appl Environ Microbiol 1998, 64: 2788–2793.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Jang KY, Cho SM, Seok SJ, Kong WS, Kim GH, Sung JM: Screening of biodegradable function of indigenous ligno-degrading mushroom using dyes. Mycobiology 2009, 37: 53–61. doi:10.4489/MYCO.2009.37.1.053 10.4489/MYCO.2009.37.1.053PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Jibran AK, Milsee Mol JP: Pleurotus sajor-caju Protein: A potential biosorptive agent. Adv Bio Tech 2011, 11: 25–27.Google Scholar
  21. Johannes C, Majcherczyk A, Hüttermann A: Degradation of anthracene by laccase of Trametes versicolor in the presence of different mediator compounds. Appl Microbiol Biot 1996, 46: 313–317. doi:10.1007/s002530050823 10.1007/s002530050823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jonathan SG, Fasidi IO, Ajayi AO, Adegeye O: Biodegradation of Nigerian wood wastes by P leurotus tuber-regium (Fries) Singer. Bioresource Technol 2008, 99: 807–811. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.005 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kang MY, Rico CW, Lee SC: In vitro antioxidative and antimutagenic activities of oak mushroom ( Lentinus edodes ) and king Oyster mushroom ( Pleurotus eryngii ) byproducts. Food Sci Biotechnol 2012, 21: 167–173. doi:10.1007/s10068–012–0021–5 10.1007/s10068-012-0021-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kodama N, Komuta K, Nanba H: Can maitake MD-fraction aid cancer patients? Altern Med Rev 2002, 7: 236–239.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kuforiji OO, Fasidi IO: Enzyme activities of Pleurotus tuber-regium (Fries) Singer, cultivated on selected agricultural wastes. Bioresource Technol 2008, 99: 4275–4278. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.08.053 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.08.053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kuforiji OO, Fasidi IO: Biodegradation of agro-industrial wastes by an edible mushroom Pleurotus tuber-regium (Fr.). J Environ Biol 2009, 30: 355–358.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kulshreshtha S, Mathur N, Bhatnagar P: Pros and cons of P.florida cultivation for managing waste of handmade paper and cardboard industries. IIOAB Journal, spl. 2011, 2: 45–48.Google Scholar
  28. Kulshreshtha S, Mathur N, Bhatnagar P: Mycoremediation of paper, pulp and cardboard industrial wastes and pollutants. In Fungi as Bioremediators: Soil Biology. Edited by: Goltapeh EM, Danesh YR, Varma A. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg; 2013:77–116. 10.1007/978-3-642-33811-3_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kulshreshtha S, Mathur N, Bhatnagar P, Jain BL: Bioremediation of industrial wastes through mushroom cultivation. J Environ Biol 2010, 31: 441–444.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kulshreshtha S, Mathur N, Bhatnagar P, Kulshreshtha S: Cultivation of Pleurotus citrinopileatus on handmade paper and cardboard industrial wastes. Ind Crop Prod 2013, 41: 340–346. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.04.053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kumhomkul T, Panich-pat T: Lead accumulation in the straw mushroom, Volvariella volvacea , from lead contaminated rice straw and stubble. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 2013, 91: 231–234. doi:10.1007/s00128–013–1025–4 10.1007/s00128-013-1025-4PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lamrood PY, Ralegankar SD: Biosorption of Cu, Zn, Fe, Cd, Pb and Ni by non-treated biomass of some edible mushrooms. Asian J Exp Biol Sci 2013, 4: 190–195.Google Scholar
  33. Lechner BE, Papinutti VL: Production of lignocellulosic enzymes during growth and fruiting of the edible fungus Lentinus tigrinus on wheat straw. Process Biochem 2006, 41: 594–598. doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2005.08.004 10.1016/j.procbio.2005.08.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lin JE, Wang HY, Hickey RF: Degradation kinetics of pentachloro-phenol by Phanerochaete chrysosporium . Biotechnol Bioeng 1990, 35: 1125–1134. doi:10.1002/bit.260351108 10.1002/bit.260351108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Luo D, Yf X, Tan ZL, Li XD: Removal of Cu2+ ions from aqueous solution by the abandoned mushroom compost of Flammulina velutipes . J Environ Biol 2013, 34: 359–365.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Mabrouk EM, Ahwany MD: Production of mannanase by Bacillus amylolequifaciens 10A1 cultured on potato peels. Afr J Biotechnol 2008, 7: 1123–1128. doi:10.5897/AJB08.047Google Scholar
  37. Maehara Y, Tsujitani S, Saeki H, Oki E, Yoshinaga K, Emi Y, Morita M, Kohnoe S, Kakeji Y, Yano T, Baba H: Biological mechanism and clinical effect of protein-bound polysaccharide K, review of development and future perspectives. Surg Today 2012, 42: 8–28. doi:10.1007/s00595–011–0075–7 10.1007/s00595-011-0075-7PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Malachová K, Pavlícková Z, Novotný C, Svobodová K, Lednická D, Musílková E: Reduction in the mutagenicity of synthetic dyes by successive treatment with activated sludge and the ligninolytic fungus Irpex lacteus . Environ Mol Mutagen 2006, 47: 533–540. doi:10.1002/em.20224 10.1002/em.20224CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Mar'in A, Conti C, Gobbi G: Sorption of lead and caesium by mushrooms grown in natural conditions. Res Environ Biotechnol 1997, 2: 35–49.Google Scholar
  40. Martín MC, González BA, Blanco SMJ: Biological treatments for contaminated soils: hydrocarbon contamination. Fungal applications in bioremediation treatment. Rev Iberoam Micol 2004, 21: 103–120.Google Scholar
  41. Mendez-Espinoza C, Garcia-Nieto E, Esquivel AM, Gonzalez MM, Bautista EV, Ezquerro CC, Santacruz LJ: Antigenotoxic potential of aqueous extracts from the chanterelle mushroom, Cantharellus cibarius (higher Basidiomycetes) on human mononuclear cell cultures. Int J Med Mushrooms 2013, 15: 325–32. doi:10.1615/IntJMedMushr.v15.i3.90 10.1615/IntJMedMushr.v15.i3.90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Menoli RC, Mantovani MS, Ribeiro LR, Speit G, Jordão BQ: Antimutagenic effects of the mushroom Agaricus blazei Murrill extracts on V79 cells. Mutat Res 2001, 496: 5–13. doi:10.1016/S1383–5718(01)00227–3 10.1016/S1383-5718(01)00227-3CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Mlinaric A, Kac J, Fatur T, Filipic M: Anti-genotoxic activity of the mushroom Lactarius vellereus extract in bacteria and in mammalian cells in vitro. Pharmazie 2004, 59: 217–221.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Morales P, Bermúdez E, Hernández PE, Sanz B: The mutagenicity of some Spanish edible mushrooms in the ames test. Food Chem. 1990, 38: 279–288. 10.1016/0308-8146(90)90185-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nagy B, Măicăneanu A, Indolean C, Mânzatu C, Silaghi-Dumitrescu MC (2013) Comparative study of Cd(II) biosorption on cultivated Agaricus bisporus and wild Lactarius piperatus based biocomposites. Linear and nonlinear equilibrium modelling and kinetics J Taiwan Inst Chem E. doi:10.1016/j.jtice.2013.08.013Google Scholar
  46. Novotný C, Svobodová K, Erbanová P, Cajthaml T, Kasinath A, Lang E, Šašeka V: Ligninolytic fungi in bioremediation: extracellular enzyme production and degradation rate. Soil Biol Biochem 2004, 36: 1545–1551. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.07.019 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.07.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nyanhongo GS, Gübitz G, Sukyai P, Leitner C, Haltrich D, Ludwig R: Oxidoreductases from Trametes spp. in biotechnology: A wealth of catalytic activity. Food Technol Biotechnol 2007, 45: 250–268.Google Scholar
  48. Oei P: Mushroom cultivation, appropriate technology for mushroom growers. Backhugs Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands; 2003.Google Scholar
  49. Ollikka P, Alhonmäki K, Leppänen VM, Glumoff T, Raijola T, Suominen I: Decolorization of azo, triphenylmethane, heterocyclic, and polymeric dyes by lignin peroxidase isoenzymes from Phanerochaete chrysosporium . Appl Environ Microbiol 1993, 59: 4010–4016.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Olusola SA, Anslem EE: Bioremediation of a crude oil polluted soil with Pleurotus Pulmonarius and Glomus Mosseae using Amaranthus Hybridus as a test plant. J Bioremed Biodegrad 2010, 1: 111. doi:10.4172/2155–6199.1000113Google Scholar
  51. Oyetayo VO, Adebayo AO, Ibileye A: Assessment of the biosorption potential of heavy metals by Pleurotus tuber-regium . Int J Advanced Biol Res 2012, 2: 293–297.Google Scholar
  52. Papaparaskeva C, Ioannides C, Walker R: Agaritine does not mediate the mutagenicity of the edible mushroom Agaricus bisporus . Mutagenesis 1991, 6: 213–217. 10.1093/mutage/6.3.213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Purnomo AS, Mori T, Putra SR, Kondo R: Biotransformation of heptachlor and heptachlor epoxide by white-rot fungus Pleurotus ostreatus . Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 2013, 82: 40–44. doi:10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.02.013 10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.02.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rajput Y, Shit S, Shukla A, Shukla K: Biodegradation of malachite green by wild mushroom of Chhatisgrah. J Exp Sci 2011, 2: 69–72.Google Scholar
  55. Rani P, Kalyani N, Prathiba K: Evaluation of lignocellulosic wastes for production of edible mushrooms. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2008, 151: 151–159. doi:10.1007/s12010–008–8162-y 10.1007/s12010-008-8162-yCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Singhal V, Kumar A, Rai JP: Bioremediation of pulp and paper mill effluent with Phanerochaete chrysosporium . J Environ Biol 2005, 26: 525–529.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Sutherland C, Venkobachar C: Equilibrium modeling of Cu (II) biosorption onto untreated and treated forest macro-fungus Fomes fasciatus . International Journal of Plant, Animal and Environment Sciences 2013, 3: 193–203.Google Scholar
  58. Taira K, Miyashita Y, Okamoto K, Arimoto S, Takahashi E, Negishi T: Novel antimutagenic factors derived from the edible mushroom Agrocybe cylindracea . Mutat Res 2005, 586: 115–123. doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2005.06.007 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2005.06.007CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Tay CC, Liew HH, Yin CY, Abdul-Talib S, Surif S, Suhaimi AA, Yong SK: Biosorption of Cadmium ions using Pleurotus ostreatus : Growth kinetics, isotherm study and biosorption mechanism. Korean J Chem Eng 2011, 28: 825–830. doi:10.1007/s11814–010–0435–9 10.1007/s11814-010-0435-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tsujiyama S, Muraoka T, Takada N: Biodegradation of 2,4-dichlorophenol by shiitake mushroom ( Lentinula edodes ) using vanillin as an activator. Biotechnol Lett 2013, 35: 1079–1083. doi:10.1007/s10529–013–1179–5 10.1007/s10529-013-1179-5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. VanAcken LM, Godefroid CM, Peres H, Naveau ASN: Mineralization of 14C-U ring labeled 4-hydroxylamino-2,6-dinitrotoluene by manganese-dependent peroxidase of the white-rot basidiomycete Phlebia radiate . J Biotech 1999, 68: 159–169. 10.1016/S0168-1656(98)00194-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Walton K, Coombs MM, Catterall FS, Walker R, Ioannides C: Bioactivation of the mushroom hydrazine, agaritine, to intermediates that bind covalently to proteins and induce mutations in the Ames test. Carcinogenesis 1997, 18: 1603–1608. 10.1093/carcin/18.8.1603CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhu MJ, Du F, Zhang GQ, Wang HX, Ng TB: Purification a laccase exhibiting dye decolorizing ability from an edible mushroom Russula virescens . Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 2013, 82: 33–39. doi:10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.02.010 10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.02.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kulshreshtha et al.;licensee Springer 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shweta Kulshreshtha
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nupur Mathur
    • 2
  • Pradeep Bhatnagar
    • 3
  1. 1.Amity Institute of BiotechnologyAmity University RajasthanJaipurIndia
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyUniversity of RajasthanJaipurIndia
  3. 3.Department of Life SciencesThe IIS UniversityJaipurIndia

Personalised recommendations