Skip to main content
Download PDF

A molecular survey of spotted fever group rickettsiae in introduced raccoons (Procyon lotor)

Parasites & Vectors volume 15, Article number: 162 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The raccoon Procyon lotor (Linnaeus, 1758) (Carnivora; Procyonidae) is one of the most important and most intensively studied invasive mammal species in Europe. Within the last 30 years the raccoon has spread at an increasing rate, resulting in the establishment of local populations in various regions of Europe. In these newly colonised areas, gaps in knowledge of the raccoon’s biology concern not only most aspects of its ecology in a broad sense, but also its pathogens and parasites. Most micropathogens recorded hitherto in the raccoons that have colonised Europe have documented epizootic and zoonotic potential. Thus, it is considered especially important to investigate the role played by the raccoon in the spread of pathogens through both animal-animal and animal-human pathways.

Methods

Tissue samples of raccoons from Poland and Germany were examined in this study. In total, 384 tissue samples from 220 raccoons (170 spleen samples, 82 liver biopsies, 132 ear biopsies) were examined using molecular methods. The presence of Rickettsia spp. DNA was screened through amplification of a fragment of the gltA gene. Samples that were PCR positive for gltA were tested for other rickettsial genes, ompB and a 17-kDa antigen. For taxonomic purposes, the obtained sequences were compared with corresponding sequences deposited in GenBank using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool, and phylogenetic analyses were conducted using Bayesian inference implemented in MrBayes software.

Results

Rickettsia DNA was confirmed only in skin biopsies; no isolates from the spleen or liver were positive for Rickettsia DNA. With the exception of one sample from Germany, which was positive for Rickettsia helvetica DNA, all the samples positive for Rickettsia DNA derived from the Polish population of raccoons. DNA of Rickettsia spp. was detected in 25 samples, i.e. 11.4% of the tested raccoons, and R. helvetica was confirmed in 52% of the positive samples. Additionally, single cases of Rickettsia monacensis, Rickettsia raoultii, and Candidatus Rickettsia kotlanii-like were found, and in 32% of all the positive samples similarity was shown to different Rickettsia endosymbionts. Out of the samples that tested positive for gltA, amplicons of ompB and 17 kDa were successfully sequenced from 14 and three samples, respectively.

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this study provides, for the first time, evidence of the occurrence of Rickettsia pathogens and endosymbionts in the European population of raccoons. Further, broader research on different species of wild vertebrates, and ticks, as potential vectors and hosts for tick-borne pathogens, in natural as well as in peri-urban environments, is therefore required.

Graphical abstract

Background

The raccoon Procyon lotor (Linnaeus, 1758) (Carnivora; Procyonidae) is one of the most important and most intensively studied invasive mammal species in Europe. Its natural distribution includes much of North America, from southern Canada to Panama. It was first introduced into Europe in the early twentieth century to meet the demands of the then rapidly developing fur industry. Local raccoon populations comprise escapees from fur farms and individuals that have been intentionally released into the wild. The geographical distribution of the species in Europe underwent widespread expansion ca. 20 years after its introduction, mainly from Germany and—to a lesser extent—from Belarus [1, 2]. During the last 30 years the raccoon has spread at an increasing rate, resulting in the establishment of local populations in various regions of Europe. In these newly colonised areas, gaps in knowledge of the raccoon’s biology concern not only most aspects of its ecology in a broad sense, but also its pathogens and parasites. While knowledge of parasitic helminths in European raccoon populations is slowly but steadily improving [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14], knowledge of the parasitic protozoans and bacterial pathogens of this host is still insufficient and fragmentary [15,16,17]. The possibility that the raccoon may be able to transmit pathogens that are new to the Old Continent’s fauna, together with its phenomenal habitat plasticity, omnivorous diet, opportunism, synanthropy and synurbization, suggest that it may pose a risk as a new reservoir of pathogens for European mammals. Though the species composition of the parasites of the European raccoon populations is still being studied, the results of earlier studies indicate that the problem of introduced parasites pertains mostly to parasitic helminths, e.g. one of the most important zoonotic parasites of raccoons is the nematode Baylisascaris procyonis. The species compositions of parasitic protozoans and bacterial pathogens of this carnivore in North America and Europe differ somewhat. Leśniańska et al. [15] and Hildebrand et al. [16] showed that the microparasites and micropathogens recorded in the European raccoon populations are not the same as those recorded in North American populations. On the one hand, this suggests that an obstacle to the transcontinental transmission of these pathogens may be, for example, a lack of adequate vectors of these organisms in the environments newly colonised by the raccoons. On the other hand, raccoons colonising new areas of Europe may acquire new pathogens, and thus may play a role as a potential new environmental reservoir for them. Most micropathogens recorded hitherto in the raccoon colonists of Europe have documented epizoonotic and zoonotic potential. Raccoons co-occurring with native carnivores are increasingly encountered near human habitations. Thus it seems especially important to examine the part played by this species in the spread of pathogens through both animal-animal and animal-human pathways.

Rickettsiae are strictly intracellular vector-borne bacteria which are transmitted to vertebrates by a variety of arthropods, primarily fleas and ticks. The genus Rickettsia includes over 20 validated species, which have been classified into five groups: the spotted fever group (SFG) including Rickettsia helvetica; the transitional group including Rickettsia felis; the typhus group; the ancestral group Rickettsia bellii and Rickettsia canadensis [18, 19]; and an ever-growing number of unnamed and non-cultivated genotypes [20]. Some of these newly identified rickettsiae have been proven to be the causative agents of emerging human diseases; they are often first recognized through their associations with different animals and their ectoparasites and only later detected in clinical specimens and associated with specific diseases [21]. To date, 18 species of Rickettsia are recognized human pathogens [22]. In Europe, rickettsioses are well documented, and there are several circulating Rickettsia species and Candidatus Rickettsia species [23].

Molecular studies on the occurrence of Rickettsia spp. in populations of wild carnivores are scarce in comparison to the large number of studies that have been undertaken on Rickettsia spp. in vectors. The occurrence of Rickettsia spp. among raccoons has been reported in Hokkaido, Japan from a molecular study. To the best of our knowledge, no Rickettsia strain has been isolated from raccoons in Europe so far. Therefore, little is known about the role of raccoons in the epidemiological cycles of Rickettsia in Europe, or elsewhere in the world. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate, through polymerase chain reaction assays, the presence of potentially zoonotic agents, such as Rickettsia spp., in the tissues of invasive raccoons (P. lotor) in Poland and Germany. This survey is a first step in achieving a full understanding of the host–parasite relationship between invasive raccoons and Rickettsia spp. Knowledge of the genetic diversity of Rickettsia species and their reservoirs is useful for predicting the potential risk of infection posed by them and for making decisions regarding their effective management. The isolation of new Rickettsia from wild carnivores such as raccoons will contribute to an understanding of the complexity of these bacteria in wildlife.

Methods

Sample collection

Raccoons were sampled from Poland (Ruszów Forest District, Zgorzelecka Forest) and Germany (districts of Kassel and Dresden). Ruszów Forest District is located in the western part of the Lower Silesian Wilderness—the largest lowland forest complex in Europe. It is part of the large, compact forest complex of the Bory Dolnośląskie Forest, which has a low proportion of deciduous forest types and a high proportion of coniferous forest types [24]. We used tissues in the present study that were obtained through collaboration with other projects financed by different grants. The raccoon carcasses comprised those obtained from hunters undertaking raccoon culling as part of game management activities, road kills, and those collected during a predator control operation conducted as a part of a program to reintroduce the capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) into the Lower Silesian Forest, which was co-financed by the European Commission. Ear, spleen and liver samples were obtained, if possible, during the autopsies, and stored at − 20 °C until analysis. In total, 384 tissue samples (170 spleen samples, 82 liver biopsies and 132 ear biopsies) from 220 raccoons were examined (Table 1).

Table 1 Number of sampled raccoons with regard to the type of tissue examined
Full size table

Molecular analysis

DNA was extracted using the Bio-Trace DNA Purification Kit (EURx, Poland) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions, and stored at − 20 °C until further use. DNA concentrations were determined with a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Nanodrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE).

The presence of Rickettsia spp. DNA was determined through the amplification of a 338-bp fragment of the gltA gene, which has conserved regions shared by all known Rickettsia species, in nested PCR using two primer sets, RpCS.877p-RpCS.1258n and RpCS.896p-RpCS.1233n [25]. All the gltA-positive samples were further examined using nested PCR assays amplifying parts of the other protein coding genes examined, namely ompB (primers Rc.rompB.4362p, Rc.rompB.4,836n, Rc.rompB.4,496p, Rc.rompB.4,762n) [26] and a 17-kDa antigen (primers 17 k-5, 17 k-3, 17KD1, 17KD2) [27]; the resulting 355-bp and 434-bp products were considered to indicate positive samples. Each PCR reaction was performed with 2× PCR Mix Plus (A&A Biotechnology, Gdynia, Poland) in a total reaction volume of 25 μl containing 1 μl of each primer (10 μM) and 3 μl (first reaction) or 1 μl (second reaction) of the DNA sample. Negative controls with nuclease-free distilled water, in the absence of template DNA, were included for each PCR reaction. The PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel, and stained with Midori Green stain (Nippon Genetics). In order to prevent contamination of the PCR, DNA extraction, reaction setup, PCR amplification and electrophoresis were performed in separate rooms.

The selected amplicons were purified using Exo-BAP (EURx) and directly sequenced in both directions by Macrogen (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) with the primers used for DNA amplification. Finally, the nucleotide sequences obtained in this study were edited using DNA Baser Sequence Assembly software (Heracle BioSoft, Romania) and compared with each other and with corresponding sequences registered in GenBank using the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) program [http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi].

Phylogenetic analyses were conducted using Bayesian interface implemented in MrBayes v3.2.7 software [28]. The general time-reversible model with estimates of invariant sites and gamma-distributed among-site variation (GTR + G + I) model was identified as the best-fitting nucleotide substitution model for both gltA and ompB alignments using MEGA X software [29]. The generated consensus trees were visualized using FigTree ver. 1.4.4 software [30].

Results

A total of 220 raccoons collected from two localities in Germany and two localities in Poland were tested for the presence of rickettsial DNA. Due to limited access to a complete range of tissues from all the specimens from each location, only one type of tissue was examined for some of the individual raccoons (Table 1). However, due to a lack of data on the role of raccoons in Rickettsia sp. circulation in Europe, all the results are presented here. In total, 384 tissue isolates derived from the skin, spleen and liver were used in this study.

Using partial gltA gene as a marker, DNA of Rickettsia spp. was detected in 25 samples, i.e. 11.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.7–14.7] of the tested individuals. Amplicons of the rickettsial gltA gene were generated for all positive PCR products, and DNA sequences obtained from 20 isolates along with homologous sequences deposited in GenBank were used for analysis. Rickettsia helvetica was confirmed in 13 isolates, i.e. 52% (95% CI 31.7–70.4) of positive samples. All these sequences were identical to each other and to R. helvetica (GenBank no. U59723). Additionally, single cases of Rickettsia monacensis, Rickettsia raoultii and Candidatus Rickettsia kotlanii—like (100% similarity to all three available sequences of Candidatus Rickettsia kotlanii for gltA deposited in GenBank) are reported. The remaining eight isolates [32% (95% CI 16.1–52.0) of all positive samples] showed varying degrees of similarity to different Rickettsia endosymbionts (Fig. 1). Out of the samples that tested positive for gltA, 14 amplicons of ompB were successfully sequenced, i.e. from R. monacensis (n = 1), R. raoultii (n = 1), R. helvetica (n = 6), and Rickettsia endosymbionts (n = 6) (Fig. 2), but only three sequences of 17 kDa were obtained, i.e. from R. helvetica (n = 2) and Rickettsia endosymbionts (n = 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The phylogenetic relationships of the identified Rickettsia species. Analysis of the gltA partial gene based on Bayesian inference (model GTR + G + I, 2,000,000 generations). Our own isolates are marked with a black circle. Rac indicates sequences previously obtained from raccoons and available in GenBank

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

The phylogenetic relationships of the identified Rickettsia species. Analysis of the ompB partial gene based on Bayesian inference (model GTR + G + I, 1,000,000 generations). Our own isolates are marked with a black circle

Full size image

Rickettsia DNA was confirmed only in skin biopsies; no isolates from the spleen or liver were positive. With the exception of evidence of R. helvetica in one raccoon specimen from Germany (Kassel), all samples positive for this bacterium derived from the Polish population of raccoons.

Discussion

The role of wild animals in the life cycles of different vector-borne pathogens, and primarily those of tick-borne pathogens (TBPs), has been indicated in recent years [31, 32]. Certain species of wildlife, including wild carnivores, are suitable hosts for ticks and other haematophagous arthropods, and are also the main reservoirs of some vector-borne pathogens of medical and veterinary concern. However, for some TBPs, the role of wildlife is related to the persistence of pathogens in the environment, or is still not completely understood. On the one hand, in recent years the spectrum of TBPs affecting domestic animals and humans has increased, whilst on the other hand, due to urbanization and changes in natural ecosystems, populations of many wild species have increased, and they have adapted to environments in close proximity to human populations [33]. Therefore, investigation of the distribution of TBPs among wildlife and domestic animals is important and necessary in studies on their epidemiology and ecology [31, 33,34,35]. A group of wildlife of particularly interest in this context are invasive alien species, as they create new opportunities for pathogens present in the environment by increasing their abundance and their range, which may result in bidirectional pathogen transmission [36,37,38].

Raccoons are hosts to ticks and associated pathogens which can impact the health of humans, livestock, and indigenous wildlife. Although raccoons are widespread in Europe, only a limited number of studies on the prevalence of zoonotic agents in these animals have been undertaken to date, e.g. on Baylisascaris procyonis [10], Trichinella spp. [12], Toxoplasma gondii [17], Cryptosporidium spp. and Enterocytozoon bieneusi [15] and Anaplasma phagocytophilum [16].

Data on Rickettsia pathogens detected in both native and introduced raccoon populations are rather scarce. In areas endemic for Rickettsia pathogens in the USA, various serological investigations have shown a very high prevalence, i.e. 45.8%, of R. rickettsii, the causative agent of Rocky Mountain spotted fever, and 73.7% of Rickettsia parkeri, which is closely related to R. rickettsii [39, 40]. Interestingly, a very recent molecular study confirmed the presence of Rickettsia DNA in only a few raccoon tissue samples, i.e. out of the 39 tested raccoons from the city of New York, Rickettsia spp. was confirmed in three ear biopsy tissue samples and one blood sample [41]. Research carried out in Japan using molecular methods revealed low levels of Rickettsia infection in introduced populations of raccoons, i.e. 1.6% for Rickettsia helvetica, 1.5% for Rickettsia amblyommii and single samples for Rickettsia felis and Rickettsia heliongjiangensis. It should be noted that the tested material, i.e. blood or spleen tissue, derived from a large number of animals, i.e. 194 and 699 samples, respectively [42, 43]. There are no similar data, to the best of our knowledge, on European raccoon populations.

This study showed, to our knowledge for the first time, the presence of genetic material of members of the genus Rickettsia in tissue samples of free-living raccoons in Europe. The detected prevalence of Rickettsia spp., 11.4%, was calculated from all the tested individuals, regardless of the type of tissue examined; however, when we considered only the biopsy samples of the skin (ear) (Table 1), which was the only tissue in which the presence of Rickettsia DNA was confirmed, the prevalence reached 18.9% (95% CI 13.4–26.0). These results suggest that raccoons are not competent (or not yet competent) definitive hosts for Rickettsia spp. in Europe because Rickettsia infection in the present study was limited to a skin reaction. The most frequently identified rickettsiae [64% (95% CI 43.9–80.4) of all the positive samples] were members of the SFG, i.e. R. helvetica, R. monacensis, R. raoultii and Candidatus Rickettsia kotlanii-like. These results are not surprising as tick-borne rickettsiae have been reported from almost all European countries. Ixodes ricinus is the most widespread tick species in Europe, and is known to carry mainly R. helvetica and R. monacensis. The dominant Rickettsia species in Europe is R. helvetica, and numerous European studies have confirmed the presence of this bacterium in I. ricinus, although its prevalence varied greatly [44]. Rickettsia raoultii is the species most commonly connected with the tick Dermacentor reticulatus, which has undergone a rapid expansion in recent years in Europe [45, 46], and specifically in Poland [47,48,49].

Recording the presence of a pathogen in a vertebrate is not sufficient evidence for classifying that host species as a reservoir; it can only be classified as a candidate reservoir if its physiological and behavioural features support amplification and transmission of the pathogen to vectors, or it can be classified as a simple carrier host or a dead-end host [44]. However, it is currently considered that vertebrates can act as amplifying hosts of rickettsiae, thus contributing to their spread in ecosystems, even in the absence of systemic infection [32].

The identification of Candidatus Rickettsia kotlanii-like in Polish raccoons is interesting for various reasons. The genotype of Candidatus Rickettsia kotlanii was described in 2006 as new within the SFG in ixodid ticks from Hungary, but its potential for pathogenicity is still unknown [44]. Ours is the fourth report of this species for the entire world and the third for Europe, and specifically the first from outside Hungary. All previous reports are from studies on Haemaphysalis ticks, i.e. Haemaphysalis concinna was reported as a host for Candidatus Rickettsia in Europe and Haemaphysalis megaspinosa for Candidatus Rickettsia in Japan [50, 51]. Ipso facto, the identification of the DNA of Candidatus Rickettsia in the skin biopsy of a raccoon is the first report of this Candidatus bacterial species from a vertebrate. Additionally, our finding of Candidatus Rickettsia kotlanii-like may be indirect evidence of the occurrence of H. concinna in southwestern Poland. A recent study confirmed the presence of H. concinna among collections of juvenile ticks from rodent hosts and questing ticks from vegetation in western Poland. Interestingly, the occurrence of this tick in Poland has been reported only once so far, in 1953, in northwestern Pomerania, close to the border with Germany [49].

Our research on the potential reservoir role of the raccoon—a relatively new member of the carnivore fauna of Poland and the rest of Europe—in the circulation of vector-borne pathogens showed the presence of the DNA of Rickettsia endosymbionts in the examined tissues at a comparatively high frequency (one-third of positive isolates). We identified seven different endosymbiont strains (five of these are presented on the phylogenetic tree; Fig. 1) with varied homology to sequences previously deposited in GenBank. These endosymbionts have been previously identified as Coxiella, Wolbachia, and Rickettsia spp., and the relationship between them and the pathogenic bacteria which are transmitted by ticks to animals and humans remains unclear, as discussed in the literature [32]. Recent studies have revealed that rickettsial endosymbionts have negative effects on pathogenic rickettsiae within tick vectors, and that they preclude secondary infection. Other studies have addressed the positive influence of rickettsial endosymbionts on tick hosts [32]. However, the ancestral origins of these endosymbionts have yet to be elucidated, although it is speculated that they were originally animal pathogens acquired by ticks through their feeding on bacteremic hosts. These ancestral species of microorganisms probably divided into two groups: the endosymbionts, which have become specialists and completely adapted to ticks; and pathogenic bacteria, which have become generalists and are able to infect and reproduce in ticks as well as in vertebrate hosts [52]. If we accept this theory, it is understandable that reports of endosymbionts detected in vertebrate tissues are so infrequent. Therefore, in the light of our results, Noda et al. [52] appear to be justified in suggesting that there is a need to determine the potential of tick endosymbionts to emerge or reemerge as pathogens under natural conditions.

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this study provides the first evidence of the occurrence of Rickettsia pathogens and endosymbionts in the raccoon population of Europe. The results presented here thus indicate the need for further, broader research on different species of wild vertebrates, and ticks, as potential vectors and hosts of TBPs in natural as well as in peri-urban environments.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the present article, and all the sequences were deposited in GenBank (accession numbers ON157065-ON157075 for gltA and ON157076-ON157083 for ompB genes).

References

  1. Bartoszewicz M, Okarma H, Zalewski A, Szczęsna J. Ecology of the raccoon (Procyon lotor) from western Poland. Ann Zool Fenn. 2008;45:291–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fischer ML, Hochkirch A, Heddergott M, Schulze C, Anheyer-Behmenburg HE, Lang J et al. Historical invasion records can be misleading: genetic evidence for multiple introductions of invasive raccoons (Procyon lotor) in Germany. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0125441

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Priemer J, Lux E. Atriotaenia incisa (Cestoda), a parasite of the badger, Meles meles, and the raccoon Procyon lotor, in Brandenburg, Germany Can J Zool. 1994;72:1848–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gey A. Synopsis der Parasitenfauna des Waschbären (Procyon lotor) unter Beürcksichtigung von Befunden aus Hessen. Ph.D. Dissertation. Fachbereich Veterinärmedizin, Justus Liebig Universität. Giesen, Germany. 1998;201.

  5. Popiołek M, Szczęsna-Staśkiewicz J, Bartoszewicz M, Okarma H, Smalec B, Zalewski A. Helminth parasites of an introduced invasive carnivore species, the raccoon (Procyon lotor L.), from the Warta Mouth National Park (Poland). J Parasitol. 2011;97:357–60.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Davidson RK, Øines Ø, Hamnes IS, Schulze JE. Illegal wildlife imports more than just animals—Baylisascaris procyonis in raccoons (Procyon lotor) in Norway. J Wildl Dis. 2013;49:986–90.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rentería-Solís ZM, Hamedy A, Michler FU, Michler BA, Lücker E, Stier N, et al. Alaria alata mesocercariae in raccoons (Procyon lotor) in Germany. Parasitol Res. 2013;112:3595–600.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rentería-Solís Z, Birka S, Schmäschke R, Król N, Obiegala A. First detection of Baylisascaris procyonis in wild raccoons (Procyon lotor) from Leipzig, Saxony, eastern Germany. Parasitol Res. 2018;117:3289–92.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Karamon J, Kochanowski M, Cencek T, Bartoszewicz M, Kusyk P. Gastrointestinal helminths of raccoons (Procyon lotor) in western Poland (Lubuskie province)—with particular regard to Baylisascaris procyonis. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy. 2014;58:547–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Al-Sabi MNS, Chriél M, Hansen MS, Enemark HL. Baylisascaris procyonis in wild raccoons (Procyon lotor) in Denmark. Vet Parasitol: Reg Stud Rep. 2015;1–2:55–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Piróg A, Kuśmierek N, Popiołek M. The occurrence of avian acanthocephalan Polymorphus minutus (Goeze, 1782) in raccoons (Procyon lotor L.) introduced to Europe. Ann Parasitol. 2018;64:249–52.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cybulska A, Skopek R, Kornacka A, Popiołek M, Piróg A, Laskowski Z, et al. First detection of Trichinella pseudospiralis infection in raccoon (Procyon lotor) in Central Europe. Vet Parasitol. 2018;254:114–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Heddergott M, Steinbach P, Schwarz S, Anheyer-Behmenburg HE, Sutor A, Schliephake A, et al. Geographic distribution of raccoon roundworm, Baylisascaris procyonis, Germany and Luxembourg. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26:821–3.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Biedrzycka A, Popiołek M, Zalewski A. Host-parasite interactions in non-native invasive species are dependent on the levels of standing genetic variation at the immune locus. BMC Evol Biol. 2020;20:43.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Leśniańska K, Perec-Matysiak A, Hildebrand J, Buńkowska-Gawlik K, Piróg A, Popiołek M. Cryptosporidium spp. and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in introduced raccoons (Procyon lotor)—first evidence from Poland and Germany. Parasitol Res. 2016;115:4535–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hildebrand J, Buńkowska-Gawlik K, Adamczyk M, Gajda E, Merta D, Popiołek M, et al. The occurrence of Anaplasmataceae in European populations of invasive carnivores. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2018;9:934–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kornacka A, Cybulska A, Popiołek M, Kuśmierek N, Moskwa B. Survey of Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum in raccoons (Procyon lotor) from the Czech Republic, Germany and Poland. Vet Parasitol. 2018;262:47–50.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Merhej V, Raoult D. Rickettsial evolution in the light of comparative genomics. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2011;2011:379–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Murray GG, Weinert LA, Rhule EL, Welch JJ. The phylogeny of Rickettsia using different evolutionary signatures: how tree-like is bacterial evolution? Syst Biol. 2016;65:265–79.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Parola P, Paddock CD, Socolovschi C, Labruna MB, Mediannikov O, Kernif T, et al. Update on tick-borne rickettsioses around the world: a geographic approach. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013;26:657–702.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Eremeeva ME, Dasch GA. Challenges posed by tick-borne rickettsiae: eco-epidemiology and public health implications. Front Public Health. 2015;21:55.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sekeyová Z, Danchenko M, Filipčík P, Fournier PE. Rickettsial infections of the central nervous system. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13:e0007469.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Portillo A, Santibáñez S, García-Álvarez L, Palomar AM, Oteo JA. Rickettsioses in Europe. Microbes Infect. 2015;17:834–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bobek B, Furtek J, Metra D, Wojciuch-Płoskonka M. The effect of fencing the forest regeneration stages upon the level of damage caused by deer in the lowland forests of south-western Poland. Preprints. 2018;2018070161.

  25. Prakash JA, SohanLal T, Rosemol V, Verghese VP, Pulimood SA, Reller M, et al. Molecular detection and analysis of spotted fever group Rickettsia in patients with fever and rash at a tertiary care centre in Tamil Nadu. India Pathog Glob Health. 2012;106:40–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Choi Y, Jang W, Kim J, Ryu J, Lee S, Park K, et al. Spotted fever group and typhus group rickettsioses in humans, South Korea. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:237–44.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Heise SR, Elshahed MS, Little SE. Bacterial diversity in Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae) with a focus on members of the genus Rickettsia. J Med Entomol. 2010;47:258–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 2012;61:539–42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35:1547–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rambaut A. FigTree v1.4.4. Computer program and documentation distributed by the author. 2016. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/

  31. Otranto D, Cantacessi C, Dantas-Torres F, Brianti E, Pfeffer M, Genchi C, et al. The role of wild canids and felids in spreading parasites to dogs and cats in Europe. Part II. Helminths and arthropods. Vet Parasitol. 2015;213:24–37.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tomassone L, Berriatua E, De Sousa R, Duscher GG, Mihalca AD, Silaghi C, et al. Neglected vector-borne zoonoses in Europe: into the wild. Vet Parasitol. 2018;251:17–26.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Alvarado-Rybak M, Solano-Gallego L, Millán J. A review of piroplasmid infections in wild carnivores worldwide: importance for domestic animal health and wildlife conservation. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:538.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Dantas-Torres F, Chomel BB, Otranto D. Ticks and tick-borne diseases: a One Health perspective. Trends Parasitol. 2012;28:437–46.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hodžić A, Mitkovà B, Modrý D, Juránková J, Frgelecová L, Forejtek P, et al. A new case of the enigmatic Candidatus Neoehrlichia sp. (FU98) in a fox from the Czech Republic. Mol Cell Probes. 2017;31:59–60.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Daszak P, Cunningham AA, Hyatt AD. Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife—threats to biodiversity and human health. Science. 2000;287:443–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sutor A, Schwarz S, Conraths FJ. The biological potential of the raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides, Gray 1834) as an invasive species in Europe-new risks for disease spread? Acta Theriol. 2014;59:49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. André MR. Diversity of Anaplasma and Ehrlichia/Neoehrlichia agents in terrestrial wild carnivores worldwide: implications for human and domestic animal health and wildlife conservation. Front Vet Sci. 2018;5:293.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Magnarelli LA, Anderson JF, Philip RN, Burgdorfer W, Chappell WA. Rickettsiae-infected ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) and seropositive mammals at a focus for Rocky Mountain spotted fever in Connecticut, USA. J Med Entomol. 1983;20:151–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Castellaw AH, Chenney EF, Varela-Stokes AS. Tick-borne disease agents in various wildlife from Mississippi. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011;11:439–42.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Tufts DM, Goodman LB, Benedict MC, Davis AD, VanAcker MC, Diuk-Wasser M. Association of the invasive Haemaphysalis longicornis tick with vertebrate hosts, other native tick vectors, and tick-borne pathogens in New York City, USA. Int J Parasitol. 2021;51:149–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sashika M, Abe G, Matsumoto K, Inokuma H. Molecular survey of rickettsial agents in feral raccoons (Procyon lotor) in Hokkaido, Japan. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2010;63:353–4.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Baba K, Kaneda T, Nishimura H, Sato H. Molecular detection of spotted fever group Rickettsia in feral raccoons (Procyon lotor) in the western part of Japan. J Vet Med Sci. 2013;75:195–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rizzoli A, Silaghi C, Obiegala A, Rudolf I, Hubálek Z, Földvári G, et al. Ixodes ricinus and its transmitted pathogens in urban and peri-urban areas in Europe: new hazards and relevance for public health. Front Public Health. 2014;2:251.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Rubel F, Brugger K, Pfeffer M, Chitimia-Dobler L, Didyk YM, Leverenz S, et al. Geographical distribution of Dermacentor marginatus and Dermacentor reticulatus in Europe. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2016;7:224–33.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Földvári G, Široký P, Szekeres S, Majoros G, Sprong H. Dermacentor reticulatus: a vector on the rise. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:314.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Mierzejewska EJ, Estrada-Peña A, Alsarraf A, Kowalec M, Bajer A. Mapping of tick Dermacentor reticulatus expansion in Poland in 2012–2014. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2016;7:94–106.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Mierzejewska EJ, Estrada-Peña A, Bajer A. Spread of Dermacentor reticulatus is associated with the loss of forest area. Exp Appl Acarol. 2017;72:399–413.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Dwużnik D, Mierzejewska EJ, Alsarraf M, Bajer A. A new focus of the tick Haemaphysalis concinna in western Poland. Exp Appl Acarol. 2019;78:93–112.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hornok S, Meli ML, Perreten A, Farkas R, Willi B, Beugnet F, et al. Molecular investigation of hard ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) and fleas (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae) as potential vectors of rickettsial and mycoplasmal agents. Vet Microbiol. 2010;140:98–104.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Andoh M, Ogasawara Y, Sakata A, Ito T, Fujita H, Kawabata H, et al. Isolation of the rickettsial agent genetically similar to Candidatus Rickettsia kotlanii, from Haemaphysalis megaspinosa in Japan. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2014;14:681–4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Noda H, Munderloh UG, Kurtti TJ. Endosymbionts of ticks and their relationship to Wolbachia spp. and tick-borne pathogens of humans and animals. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997; 63:3926–32.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Janusz Kobielski (M.Sc.), head of the Ruszów Forest District, for invaluable help in the collection of the material studied. Raccoon specimens were collected during the predator control operation conducted as part of a programme to re-introduce the capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) into the Lower Silesian Forest, which was financed by the European Commission, the National Fund for Environmental Protection and Water Management and the Polish State Forests (grant LIFE11 NAT/PL/428).

Funding

The research was partially financed by the National Science Centre, Poland, under the MINIATURA-2 project (grant no. 2018/02/X/NZ6/01983).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Parasitology, University of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland

    Joanna Hildebrand, Agnieszka Perec-Matysiak, Marcin Popiołek, Izabella Myśliwy & Katarzyna Buńkowska-Gawlik

  2. Department of Ecology and Environmental Protection, Institute of Biology, Pedagogical University of Kraków, Kraków, Poland

    Dorota Merta

Authors
  1. Joanna Hildebrand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Agnieszka Perec-Matysiak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marcin Popiołek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dorota Merta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Izabella Myśliwy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Katarzyna Buńkowska-Gawlik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JH conceived and designed the study. DM, IM and MP collected and prepared the tissues for further research. APM, IM and KBG carried out the molecular analyses. JH performed the phylogenetic analysis. JH, MP and KBG drafted the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joanna Hildebrand.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hildebrand, J., Perec-Matysiak, A., Popiołek, M. et al. A molecular survey of spotted fever group rickettsiae in introduced raccoons (Procyon lotor). Parasites Vectors 15, 162 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05280-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05280-0

Keywords

  • Rickettsia
  • Spotted fever group rickettsiae
  • Raccoons