Abstract
Clear cell adenocarcinoma (CCC) is generally thought to originate from ovarian, endometrial, or renal tissue. A CCC of the peritoneum (CCAP) is an extremely rare medical condition and is associated with a poor prognosis. To date, only 10 cases of CCAP have been reported, of which half resulted in death or recurrence within 6 months after initial treatment because CCAP is commonly resistant to multiple drugs. In this report, we present a case of CCAP of the pouch of Douglas coexisting with an endometriosis and we offer a review of the related literature.
Similar content being viewed by others
Background
Clear cell adenocarcinoma of the peritoneum is an extremely rare medical condition with poor prognosis. Because of its reality, no standard treatment has been established. Here, we report a case with primary clear cell adenocarcinoma in the pouch of Douglas treated by debulking surgery followed by chemotherapy.
Case
A 59-year-old postmenopausal woman, gravida 2, para 2, was referred to our hospital for the treatment of a pelvic mass. Her initial complaints were appetite loss and 12 kg weight loss over 3 months. Her past medical history was unremarkable, except for an appendectomy, and her gynecological medical history included administration of a gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist for the treatment of adenomyosis manifesting as severe dysmenorrhea.
On her first visit, a vaginal ultrasound revealed a heterogeneous solid mass with cystic areas which was located approximately 6 cm deep within the pelvis (Figure 1a). Pelvic examination revealed a firm adhesion between the tumor and uterus. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis revealed an 8 cm heterogeneous mass located on the posterior (intestinal) surface of the uterus, with possible rectal invasion (Figure 1b). Uterine adenomyosis was also detected by MRI. Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography–computed tomography revealed a mass on the posterior surface of uterus with FDG uptake in the nodules adjacent to right side of the mass and in the pelvic and obturator lymph nodes. The serum level of cancer antigen (CA) 125 was slightly elevated to 76 U/mL (normal limit: 35 U/mL), whereas CA19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels were within normal ranges. Taken together, we made a preoperative diagnosis of a left ovarian malignant tumor. During surgery, surprisingly, the tumor was located in the pouch of Douglas and was found to not originate from the ovary (Figure 2a and b). The tumor was adherent to the uterus at the left uterosacral ligament and had also invaded the rectum. Both ovaries appeared normal. During surgery, the tumor capsule was ruptured; because of this, the tumor was removed together with the rectum, uterus and both ovaries. Total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, partial infracolic omentectomy, pelvic lymphadenectomy, and low anterior resection of the rectum were performed. There were no macroscopic residual tumors, thus the procedures performed were considered an optimal surgical treatment.
Clinical imaging of the tumor. a. Vaginal ultrasonography revealed a 6 cm heterogeneous tumor located in the pouch of Douglas, with a suspected left ovarian involvement. b. T2-weighted MRI revealed an 8 cm heterogeneous tumor located at the posterior (intestinal) surface of the uterus, with a suspected rectal invasion.
On macroscopic evaluation, a multilobular cyst with a yellowish necrotic solid part was found on the cut surface of the tumor (Figure 3a). The tumor had invaded the uterine cervix and rectum, up to the level of the mucosa. Both ovaries were visually tumor free. Microscopic examination of the tumor revealed a clear cell adenocarcinoma. Glandular and papillary structures were lined by clear cells and a hobnail arrangement of cells within the glands was found (Figure 3b). The clear cells contained eosinophilic cytoplasm. Immunochemical staining for cytokeratin 7 was positive, whereas staining for cytokeratin 20, caudal-type homeobox protein 2, and estrogen receptor were negative. These results indicated that the tumor did not originate from the rectum. Microscopically, tumor cells were not observed in either ovary. Lymphatic vessel invasion was observed in the invasive area of the rectum, and 3 of 3 resected pararectal lymph nodes (#251) were involved by the tumor. On the other hand, there were no metastases in 28 of resected regional pelvic lymph nodes. An adenomyoma was found in the uterus and endometriotic lesions were found at the peritoneum near the tumor. Thus, the tumor was diagnosed as CCAP with endometriosis. Postoperative staging was FIGO stage IIB (pT2bN0M0).
Gross and microscopic appearance of the tumor. a. A photograph of the cut surface of the tumor. A multilobular cyst with a yellowish necrotic solid part was observed. Both ovaries were normal. b. Histopathological features of the tumor. Clear cells lined the glandular and papillary structure. A hobnail arrangement of the cells was seen (hematoxylin and eosin; original magnification: ×400).
Six courses of combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin (TC) as adjuvant therapy was planned. At 3 months after the primary surgery, the patient presented with strangulated ileus, which was corrected by a second surgery. No recurrent disease was observed in the abdomen at the surgery. Then, the patient completed the planned adjuvant therapy and has remained well with no evidence of disease 10 months after the primary surgery.
Discussion
Primary peritoneal carcinoma was first described by Swerdlow in 1959 [1]. The Gynecologic Oncology group defines the diagnostic criteria for primary peritoneal carcinoma, where both ovaries are of normal size, with an extraovarian involvement greater than the surface ovarian involvement [2]. Our case met this criterion and was histologically diagnosed as CCC.
To investigate reports of the incidence of CCAP, we performed a search of the PubMed database using the key words “clear cell” or “peritoneal” and “primary”. The search was limited to the English literature and CCAP cases. We identified 10 cases that are summarized in Table 1[3]–[12]. These limited cases were reviewed to provide characteristics of CCAP and identify potentially effective treatments. As summarized in Table 1, 10 of the 11 cases (including our case) were initially treated by debulking surgery. Complete resection was performed in six cases and the residual tumor size was >2 cm in four cases. Eight cases received chemotherapy (seven postoperatively and one with primary chemotherapy). The chemotherapy regimens performed were TC [6],[12], irinotecan hydrochloride + cisplatin (CPT-P) [9], and cyclophosphamide + carboplatin + cisplatin (CCP) [6].
We offered TC combination chemotherapy to our patient. One report had found that a TC combination therapy was effective for the treatment of CCAP. Outcomes were poor in five cases. Of these, three patients died within 6 months, and disease recurrence had occurred in two cases at 4 months and 32 months, respectively, after the initial therapy [6],[8]–[11]. Three patients died within 6 months and each had a residual tumor of >2 cm [5],[7],[9]. Early recurrence occurred in the inoperable patients. The characteristic features of the cases with particularly poor prognosis were large residual tumors after primary surgery and inoperability. On the other hand, there were three cases with relatively good prognosis [8],[9],[11]. The primary features of these cases were having had an optimal or complete debulking surgery followed by chemotherapy.
CCAP can closely resemble ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma (OCC) and it is difficult to distinguish CCAP from OCC by preoperative imaging alone, especially if the tumor is located in the pelvis close to the ovary or uterus, even though the radiological features of CCAP have been reported in some cases. One report cited a multicystic mass with a multiseptate appearance and a heterogeneous solid part arising from the peritoneum, suggesting the occurrence of a CCAP [12].
In our case, we did not observe such features and we were unable to determine whether the pelvic tumor originated from the peritoneum. We recommend further imaging studies to establish a definitive diagnosis of CCAP. An endometriosis coexisted with the CCAP in our case. CCC is seen most frequently in the ovary and is often associated with pelvic endometriosis [6], as an association with endometriosis has been well established [9]. CCC occasionally develops from extraovarian endometriosis [9],[13]. There are several reports of CCAP cases with coexisting endometrial lesions. In some reports, endometriosis was a required precursor of CCC in peritoneal locations. However, others found that the tumor arose de novo from the peritoneum [4]. The pathogenesis of carcinoma coexisting with endometriosis has not been fully elucidated. In past reports, two possible theories for the association of carcinoma and endometriosis were mentioned. These theories included a genetic defect in already existing endometriosis or a defect in the immune response of patients with endometriosis that leads to the progression of endometriosis to subsequent malignant transformation [2]. Hence, the pathogenesis of CCAP associated with endometriosis remains controversial.
The pathogenesis of peritoneal serous carcinoma is similar to that of ovarian cancer and may be dependent on its origin from ovarian tissue remnants in the peritoneum remaining from embryonic development or from the mesoderm that gives rise to both the ovarian epithelium and peritoneum [14]. Therefore, female pelvic and abdominal mesothelium may give rise to primary peritoneal carcinoma resembling ovarian cancer [5]. In addition to these reports, non-serous carcinoma of the peritoneum has also been reported [15]. Therefore, CCAP may arise de novo from the peritoneum.
Conclusions
Here, we report a case of primary clear cell adenocarcinoma arising from the pouch of Douglas. Although 10 similar cases have been reported, there is as yet no established treatment regimen for this disease. Combination chemotherapy with debulking surgery has been suggested for the treatment of residual tumors <2 cm with postoperative chemotherapy, such as TC or CPT-P. To establish an effective treatment regimen for CCAP, a review of a larger number of cases is still needed.
Consent
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this Case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
Authors’ contributions
KY designed and conceived of the study and drafted the manuscript. NS participated in drafting the manuscript and performed literature review. SM and YU contributed critical reading of the manuscript and editing. EM supervised and participated in histopathological evaluation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
References
Swerdlow M: Mesothelioma of the pelvic peritoneum resembling papillary cystadenocarcinoma of the ovary; case report. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1959, 77: 197–200.
Moll UM, Valea F, Chumas J: Role of p53 alteration in primary peritoneal carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1997, 16: 156–162. 10.1097/00004347-199704000-00012
Evans H, Yates WA, Palmer WE, Cartwright RL, Antemann RW: Clear cell carcinoma of the sigmoid mesocolon: a tumor of the secondary mullerian system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990, 162: 161–163. 10.1016/0002-9378(90)90840-4
Lee KR, Verma U, Belinson J: Primary clear cell carcinoma of the peritoneum. Gynecol Oncol 1991, 41: 259–262. 10.1016/0090-8258(91)90320-5
Tziortzioti V, Apessou D, Antoniou S, Giantzoglou A, Paissios P: Clear cell adenocarcinoma of the peritoneum associated with clear cell adenocarcinoma arising in an endometrial polyp. J Obstet Gynaecol 1999, 19: 557–558. 10.1080/01443619964526
Ichimura T, Ishiko O, Nishimura S, Kojima T, Shimura K: Primary peritoneal clear cell carcinoma: excellent results from paclitaxel and carboplatin combination chemotherapy. Oncol Rep 2001, 8: 1243–1245.
Hama Y, Iwasaki Y, Sakata I, Kusano S: Primary peritoneal clear cell carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004, 28: 617–619. 10.1097/01.rct.0000132791.21208.13
Terada T, Kawaguchi M: Primary clear cell adenocarcinoma of the peritoneum. Tohoku J Exp Med 2005, 206: 271–275. 10.1620/tjem.206.271
Takano M, Yoshikawa T, Kato M, Aida S, Goto T, Furuya K, Kikuchi Y: Primary clear cell carcinoma of the peritoneum: report of two cases and a review of the literature. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2009, 30: 575–578.
Matsuo K, Alonsozana EL, Eno ML, Rosenshein NB, Im DD: Primary peritoneal clear cell adenocarcinoma arising in previous abdominal scar for endometriosis surgery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009, 280: 637–641. 10.1007/s00404-009-0962-y
Muezzinoglu B, Corak S, Yucesoy I: Primary peritoneal clear cell adenocarcinoma associated with endometriosis. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2011, 19: 384–385. 10.1097/PAI.0b013e31820528e7
Johnson SB, Prisciandaro JI, Zhou J, Hadley SW, Reynolds RK, Jolly S: Primary peritoneal clear cell carcinoma treated with IMRT and interstitial HDR brachytherapy: a case report. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2014, 15: 4520.
Scarfone G, Bergamini A, Noli S, Villa A, Cipriani S, Taccagni G, Vigano P, Candiani M, Parazzini F, Mangili G: Characteristics of clear cell ovarian cancer arising from endometriosis: a two center cohort study. Gynecol Oncol 2014, 133: 480–484. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.03.017
Iavazzo C, Vorgias G, Katsoulis M, Kalinoglou N, Dertimas V, Akrivos T: Primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma: clinical and laboratory characteristics. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2008, 278: 53–56. 10.1007/s00404-008-0678-4
Chu CS, Menzin AW, Leonard DG, Rubin SC, Wheeler JE: Primary peritoneal carcinoma: a review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1999, 54: 323–335. 10.1097/00006254-199905000-00023
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr Buzard GS for his editing of the manuscript. We also thank Asami Yagi and Kanako Sakiyama for their help with this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ original submitted files for images
Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Shigeta, N., Yoshino, K., Matsuzaki, S. et al. Clear cell adenocarcinoma of the peritoneum: a case report and literature review. J Ovarian Res 7, 86 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-014-0086-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-014-0086-2