Skip to main content
Download PDF

Visit-to-visit fasting blood glucose variability and lifetime risk of cardiovascular disease: a prospective study

Cardiovascular Diabetology volume 20, Article number: 207 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Aims

Previous studies suggested an adverse association between higher fasting blood glucose (FBG) variability and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Lifetime risk provides an absolute risk assessment during the remainder of an individual’s life. However, the association between FBG variability and the lifetime risk of CVD is uncertain.

Objective

We aimed to investigate the effect of the visit-to-visit FBG variability on the lifetime risk of CVD.

Methods

This study included participants from the Kailuan Study who did not have CVD at index ages 35, 45, and 55 years. The FBG variability was defined as the coefficient of variation (CV) of three FBG values that were measured during the examination periods of 2006–2007, 2008–2009, and 2010–2011. We used a modified Kaplan-Merrier method to estimate lifetime risk of CVD according to tertiles of FBG variability.

Results

At index age 35 years, the study sample comprised 46,018 participants. During a median follow-up of 7.0 years, 1889 participants developed CVD events. For index age 35 years, participants with high FBG variability had higher lifetime risk of CVD (32.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 28.9–36.1%), compared with intermediate (28.3%; 95% CI: 25.5 –31.1%) and low (26.3%; 95% CI: 23.0–29.5%) FBG variability. We found that higher FBG variability was associated with increased lifetime risk of CVD in men but not women. Similar patterns were observed at index ages 45 and 55 years.

Conclusions

Higher FBG variability was associated with increased lifetime risk of CVD at each index age. Focusing on the FBG variability may provide an insight to the clinical utility for reducing the lifetime risk of CVD.

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide, and imposes a substantial burden on health care and the social economy [1]. Identifying and managing the risk factors of CVD are necessary for achieving primary prevention of CVD. Dysregulation of glycometabolism is a risk factor for CVD [2,3,4]. Traditional evaluation of dysglycaemia relies primarily on fasting blood glucose (FBG). FBG values fluctuate continuously over time. Therefore, FBG alone may not be suitable for evaluating dysglycaemia and explaining its association with CVD. FBG variability, an emerging marker of glycemic control, is a measurement that determines the fluctuations in glucose over a given time interval [5, 6]. As an integral component of glucose homoeostasis, measuring FBG variability may be an essential addition to the use of FBG in clinical practice, and may contribute to identifying those at high risk of CVD [7]. A growing body of studies suggest that visit-to-visit FBG variability is an independent predictor of CVD events in patients with diabetes or with acute coronary syndrome [8,9,10,11], while evidence on the association between visit-to-visit FBG variability and CVD in the general population is limited [12,13,14]. Moreover, previous studies primarily estimated the short-term relative risk of CVD, which may not provide a comprehensive assessment for the overall burden of FBG variability on CVD [15].

Lifetime risk represents a quantification of the absolute cumulative risk of developing a disease during an individual’s remaining lifespan. Estimation of the lifetime risk enables a long-term perspective for diseases and may be more easily understood by the lay public than relative risk [16,17,18]. To date, only one recent study evaluated the association between FBG and lifetime risk of heart failure [19]. However, no studies are available that evaluate the association between visit-to-visit FBG variability and the lifetime risk of CVD.

We thus sought to estimate the effect of visit-to-visit FBG variability on the lifetime risk of CVD. Understanding how changes in lifetime risk of CVD are associated with FBG variability may inform strategies for primary prevention of CVD, such as controlling fluctuation in FBG.

Methods

Study population

We used data from the Kailuan Study, which is an ongoing prospective cohort study conducted in Tangshan City, China. The detailed study design and procedures can be found elsewhere [20]. Briefly, from June 2006 to October 2007, 101,510 participants aged 18–98 years were recruited from 11 hospitals affiliated with the Kailuan Group. All participants underwent questionnaire interviews, health examinations, and laboratory assessments at enrollment and were followed up biennially since 2006.

The study baseline was set at the date of the third examination between 2010 and 2011. A total of 57,927 participants completed the two biennial follow-up health examinations between 2008–2009 and 2010–2011. On the basis of this sample, we extracted three study samples at index ages 35, 45, and 55 years. The lifetime risk of CVD was estimated from the index age to 95 years of age. Individuals who had reached the age of 35 years when entering the study were included in the group of index age 35 group. Definitions of the group of index ages 45 and 55 years group were similar to that for the group of index age 35 years group. At index age 35 years, we excluded the participants according to the following criteria: a) attended the study at age < 35 years; (b) lack of data on FBG measurements; (c) use of antidiabetic drugs; and (d) had history of CVD before the 2010–2011. The same procedures were used to select participants for study samples at index ages 45 and 55 years. Ultimately, there were 46,018, 38,149, and 21,124 participants at index ages 35, 45 and 55 years, respectively (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of the study population

Full size image

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committees of Kailuan General Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from all the participants.

Assessments of variables

Information on the demographic variables including age, sex, education level, smoking status, alcohol drinking status, and use of antidiabetic medications was collected from standard questionnaires. Body weight and height were measured by trained nurses according to the standard protocols. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. Blood samples for the measurement of FBG were drawn after an overnight fast. All measurements in blood were performed using an automatic analyzer following standard operating procedures and were subjected to regular quality control.

Calculation of visit-to-visit FBG variability

FBG values were measured during the examination periods of from 2006 to 2007, 2008 to 2009, and 2010 to 2011. The specific time interval for FBG assessment was 2.03 ± 0.23 years. We used a common indicator of variability measurement, the coefficient of variation (CV, standard deviation [SD]/mean), to define the FBG variability. Furthermore, SD and average real variability (ARV) for FBG were also included as supplementary measures to increase the robustness of the analysis, and were calculated according to the following equations:

\({\varvec{SD}} = \sqrt {\frac{{\mathop \sum \nolimits_{{{\varvec{i}} = 1}}^{{\varvec{n}}} ({\varvec{x}}_{{\varvec{i}}} - \overline{\user2{x}})^{2} }}{{{\mathbf{n}} - 1}}}\), where \({x}_{i}\) is the ith point value of FBG, \(\overline{x }\) is the mean of the FBG value, and n is the number of measurements for FBG.

\({\varvec{ARV}} = \user2{ }\frac{1}{{{\mathbf{N}} - 1}}{{\varvec{\Sigma}}}_{{{\mathbf{k}} = 1}}^{{{\mathbf{n}} - 1}} \left| {{\mathbf{C}}_{{{\mathbf{k}} + 1}} - {\mathbf{C}}_{{\mathbf{k}}} } \right|\), where C is the value of FBG, k ranges from 1 to n−1, and n is the number of measurements for FBG [21].

Each parameter was categorized into tertiles based on the distributions in the overall sample specific to each index age. Tertile 1 was considered low FBG variability, tertile 2 was considered intermediate FBG variability, and tertile 3 was considered high FBG variability. Ranges of the categories for FBG variability were defined as follows: low FBG variability (< 6.19% for index age 35 years; < 6.26% for index age 45 years; and < 6.57% for index age 55 years); intermediate FBG variability (6.19–10.86% for index age 35 years; 6.26–11.03% for index age 45 years; and 6.57–11.40% for index age 55 years); and high FBG variability (> 10.86% for index age 35 years; > 11.03% for index age 45 years; and > 11.40% for index age 55 years).

Outcome ascertainment

The main outcomes were incident CVD events, including myocardial infarction and stroke. Assessment of incident CVD events has been described in detail [22, 23]. Briefly, we determined CVD events from the Municipal Social Insurance Institution that covered all study participants, the discharge registers of all 11 Kailuan hospitals, death certificates, and questionnaire surveys (biennially since 2006). Incident CVD events were identified by following the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision. To further identify potential CVD events, a panel of three experienced physicians reviewed the medical records and adjudicated the cases annually. Information on death was collected from death certificates from state vital statistics offices.

Participants in the three study samples (at index ages 35, 45, and 55 years) were followed from the baseline (2010–2011) until the occurrence of an initial CVD event or death, attainment of 95 years of age, or the end of follow up (December 31, 2017), whichever occurred first.

Statistical analysis

Lifetime risks for initial incident CVD were estimated from index ages 35, 45, and 55 years until age 95 years. Given that the standard Kaplan–Meier method does not take into account the competing risk of death, we used a modified Kaplan–Meier method (the Practical Incidence Estimators macro) with age as the time-scale, to adjust for the competing risk of death for estimating the lifetime risk of CVD [24]. Briefly, this method accounts for the competing risks of non-cardiovascular death by treating non-cardiovascular death as a separate event rather than a withdrawal, which avoids overestimation of the lifetime risk. We estimated the lifetime risk and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) according to the categories of FBG variability (high, intermediate, and low FBG variability) at each index age, with the low FBG variability as the reference. Furthermore, we conducted an analysis stratified by sex to investigate associations between FBG variability and the lifetime risk of CVD in men and women.

All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS (version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc.). A two-tailed P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Characteristics of the three study samples stratified by sex are shown in Table 1. Among the participants, 35,062 (76.2%), 29,316 (76.8%), and 16,570 (78.4%) were men at index ages 35, 45, and 55 years, respectively. The mean BMI in each index age group ranged from 25.0–25.2 kg/m2 in men, while the corresponding values in women were 24.6–25.3 kg/m2 for women. Compared with men, women have lower mean entry age and mean FBG variability (SD, ARV, and CV) at each index age. The median follow-up time and number of participants with first developed CVD were 7.0 years (interquartile range: 6.7–7.3) years and 1889, respectively, for index age 35 years. Corresponding values were 7.0 (6.6–7.3) years and 1790 for index age 45 years, and 6.9 (6.5–7.1) years and 1221 for index age 55 years. We compared baseline characteristics of participants who were included in and excluded from our analysis (Additional file 1: Tables S1). For most of these parameters, the differences were very small, albeit statistically significant.

Table 1 Characteristics of participants among men and women in three study samples
Full size table

Table 2 and Fig. 2 showed the lifetime risk of CVD (up to age 95 years) at index ages 35, 45, and 55 years according to the categories of FBG variability, after adjustment for competing risk of death. In each index age, individuals with high FBG variability (CV) had higher lifetime risk of CVD compared with those with intermediate or low FBG variability in each index age. For example, at index age 35 years, the lifetime risks of CVD were 26.3% (95% CI: 23.0%–29.5%), 28.3% (95% CI: 25.5%–31.1%) and 32.5% (95% CI: 28.9%–36.1%) for individuals with low, intermediate, and high FBG variability, respectively. We also calculated the lifetime risk of CVD in men and women according to the categories of FBG variability (Table 2 and Fig. 2). Among men at index age 35 years, those with high FBG variability had higher lifetime risk of CVD (34.7%; 95% CI: 30.9–38.5%) than those with intermediate (30.8%; 95% CI: 27.9–33.8%) or low (28.0%; 95% CI: 24.5–31.4%) FBG variability. Among women, no significant association was found between the FBG variability and the lifetime risk of CVD. Patterns were similar at index ages 45 and 55 years (Table 2 and Fig. 2).

Table 2 The lifetime risk of CVD up to age 95 adjusted for the competing risk of death for men and women at age 35, 45 and 55 according to individual fasting blood glucose variability (CV)
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

The lifetime risk of CVD adjusted for the competing risk of death for men and women at ages 35, 45 and 55 according to the categories of fasting blood glucose variability (CV). CVD Cardiovascular diseases, CV Coefficient of variation

Full size image

To further evaluate the robustness of the analysis, SD and ARV of FBG were used to replace CV in all the models, and the analyses yielded similar findings (Additional file 1: Tables S2, S3 and Figures S1, S2).

Discussion

In the present study, we estimated the lifetime risk of CVD adjusted for the competing risk of death in total, male, and women participants at index ages 35, 45, and 55 years according to categories of FBG variability. We found that across different index ages high FBG variability was associated with increased lifetime risk of CVD compared with low FBG variability, and this association was not significant in women.

Previous studies have suggested an adverse effect of high FBG variability on CVD in high risk populations, such as patients with diabetes or acute coronary syndrome [8,9,10]. However, whether high FBG variability can increase the risk of CVD in the general population remains uncertain. To date, only three studies have explored the association between FBG variability and CVD in the general population, and have yielded inconsistent results [12,13,14]. Two cohort studies, conducted in Korea and China, found that high FBG variability was associated with an increased risk of CVD [12, 13]. In contrast, another cohort study conducted in the United States reported no excess risk of CVD in individuals with high FBG variability [14]. Furthermore, all previous studies were limited by relative risk of CVD, which could not provide a long-term and much more accessible descriptions of the effect of the FBG variability on CVD [15]. Our findings expand on the prior analyses that quantified the absolute risk of FBG variability on CVD during the remaining life of an individual. We found that individuals with high FBG variability had greater lifetime risk of CVD than those with intermediate or low FBG variability at each index age.

Although the potential mechanisms underlying the association between FBG variability and lifetime risk of CVD are unclear, our findings are plausible. Experimental studies in vivo and in vitro have found that, compared with stable glucose levels, glucose fluctuation was associated with significantly higher levels of oxidative stress markers and inflammatory cytokines and was accompanied by impaired endothelial function [25,26,27]. These pathophysiological changes are the major triggers for CVD [28]. Moreover, a clinical study found that high glycemic variability was associated with an increased risk of thrombosis [29], which may directly promote the development of CVD [30, 31].

We further found that the positive association between FBG variability and the lifetime risk of CVD was insignificant in women. A possible explanation for the sex-specific observations may be the higher estrogen level in women [32,33,34]. Studies have suggested that higher estrogen levels can up-regulate the expression of antioxidant genes [35, 36] and inhibit the expression of pro-inflammatory genes [37]. Furthermore, estrogen has known anti-apoptotic properties [38, 39]. For example, 17β-estradiol, the most active metabolite of estrogen, can prevent both endothelial cell and endothelial progenitor cell apoptosis [40, 41]. Therefore, because of estrogen protection, women may be more adaptable to FBG variability than men, which may reduce the risk of CVD caused by FBG variability.

The findings from our study may be useful for formulating the glycaemia management strategies for the primary prevention of CVD. The present data showed that high FBG variability can increase the risk of CVD, which suggests it is important for individuals to maintain stable FBG levels in daily life. Moreover, newly updated clinical practice guidelines recommended that the primary purpose of assessment of CVD risk is to provide the basis for a discussion of risk with patients [42]. Our estimates for the effect of FBG variability on the lifetime risk of CVD can be applied to extend the existing counselling of patients and for decision making, which are currently based on the relative risk of CVD alone.

Strengths of the present study include its prospective design and large sample size, and that the association between visit-to-visit FBG variability and lifetime risk of CVD was estimated for the first time. However, several limitations should also be noted. First, the observational study design limited the ability to establish causal pathways. Second, we did not measure other parameters that also reflect blood glucose variability, such as glycated hemoglobin and continuous glucose monitoring. Third, although we excluded patients taking antidiabetic drugs, we could not fully eliminate some unmeasured confounding factors, which may blunt the FBG variability, such as diet management. Fourth, FBG values were only measured for three times and the median follow-up time was approximately 7 years, which is relatively short. Finally, all the participants in our study were Chinese, which may limit the generalizability of the results of our investigation.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our findings emphasized the adverse effect of high FBG variability on the lifetime risk of CVD, particularly in men. These findings may contribute to refining the preventative strategies for CVD and motivate individuals to effectively maintain stable FBG.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

FBG:

Fasting blood glucose

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

CI:

Confidence interval

BMI:

Body mass index

CV:

Coefficient of variation

SD:

Standard deviation

ARV:

Average real variability

References

  1. World Health Organization, Cardiovascular Diseases. https://www.who.int/health-topics/cardiovascular-diseases#tab=tab_1. Accessed 10 Apr 2021.

  2. International Hypoglycaemia Study Group. Hypoglycaemia, cardiovascular disease, and mortality in diabetes. Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(5):385–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chia CW, Egan JM, Ferrucci L. Age-related changes in glucose metabolism, hyperglycemia, and cardiovascular risk. Circ Res. 2018;123(7):886–904.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Laakso M, Kuusisto J. Insulin resistance and hyperglycaemia in cardiovascular disease development. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014;10(5):293–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Turnbull FM, Abraira C, Anderson RJ, Byington RP, Chalmers JP, Duckworth WC, et al. Intensive glucose control and macrovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2009;52(11):2288–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ray KK, Seshasai SR, Wijesuriya S, Sivakumaran R, Nethercott S, Preiss D, et al. Effect of intensive control of glucose on cardiovascular outcomes and death in patients with diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet (London, England). 2009;373(9677):1765–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ceriello A, Monnier L, Owens D. Glycaemic variability in diabetes: clinical and therapeutic implications. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(3):221–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee DY, Han K, Park S, Yu JH, Seo JA, Kim NH, et al. Glucose variability and the risks of stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality in individuals with diabetes: retrospective cohort study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020;19(1):144.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gerbaud E, Darier R, Montaudon M, Beauvieux MC, Coffin-Boutreux C, Coste P, et al. Glycemic variability is a powerful independent predictive factor of midterm major adverse cardiac events in patients with diabetes with acute coronary syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(4):674–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin CC, Yang CP, Li CI, Liu CS, Chen CC, Lin WY, et al. Visit-to-visit variability of fasting plasma glucose as predictor of ischemic stroke: competing risk analysis in a national cohort of Taiwan Diabetes Study. Bmc Med. 2014;12:165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou JJ, Schwenke DC, Bahn G, Reaven P, Investigators V. Glycemic variation and cardiovascular risk in the veterans affairs diabetes trial. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(10):2187–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim MK, Han K, Park YM, Kwon HS, Kang G, Yoon KH, et al. Associations of variability in blood pressure, glucose and cholesterol concentrations, and body mass index with mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in the general population. Circulation. 2018;138(23):2627–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang A, Liu X, Xu J, Han X, Su Z, Chen S, et al. Visit-to-visit variability of fasting plasma glucose and the risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in the general population. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.006757.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Zhao S, Brock G, Matsouaka RA, Kline D, Joseph JJ. Visit-to-visit glycemic variability and risks of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality: the ALLHAT Study. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(3):486–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Noordzij M, van Diepen M, Caskey FC, Jager KJ. Relative risk versus absolute risk: one cannot be interpreted without the other. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfw465.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lloyd-Jones DM, Larson MG, Beiser A, Levy D. Lifetime risk of developing coronary heart disease. Lancet. 1999;353(9147):89–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Feuer EJ, Wun LM, Boring CC, Flanders WD, Timmel MJ, Tong T. The lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85(11):892–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Narayan KM, Boyle JP, Thompson TJ, Sorensen SW, Williamson DF. Lifetime risk for diabetes mellitus in the United States. JAMA. 2003;290(14):1884–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sinha A, Ning H, Ahmad FS, Bancks MP, Carnethon MR, O’Brien MJ, et al. Association of fasting glucose with lifetime risk of incident heart failure: the Lifetime Risk Pooling Project. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021;20(1):66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang Q, Zhou Y, Gao X, Wang C, Zhang S, Wang A, et al. Ideal cardiovascular health metrics and the risks of ischemic and intracerebral hemorrhagic stroke. Stroke. 2013;44(9):2451–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bancks MP, Carnethon MR, Jacobs DR Jr, Launer LJ, Reis JP, Schreiner PJ, et al. Fasting glucose variability in young adulthood and cognitive function in middle age: the coronary artery risk development in young adults (CARDIA) Study. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(12):2579–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jin C, Chen S, Vaidya A, Wu Y, Wu Z, Hu FB, et al. Longitudinal change in fasting blood glucose and myocardial infarction risk in a population without diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(11):1565–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Li W, Jin C, Vaidya A, Wu Y, Rexrode K, Zheng X, et al. Blood pressure trajectories and the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage and cerebral infarction: a prospective study. Hypertension. 2017;70(3):508–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Beiser A, D’Agostino RB Sr, Seshadri S, Sullivan LM, Wolf PA. Computing estimates of incidence, including lifetime risk: Alzheimer’s disease in the Framingham Study. The Practical Incidence Estimators (PIE) macro. Statist Med. 2000;19(11–12):1495–522.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Monnier L, Mas E, Ginet C, Michel F, Villon L, Cristol JP, et al. Activation of oxidative stress by acute glucose fluctuations compared with sustained chronic hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. JAMA. 2006;295(14):1681–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Horvath EM, Benko R, Kiss L, Muranyi M, Pek T, Fekete K, et al. Rapid “glycaemic swings” induce nitrosative stress, activate poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and impair endothelial function in a rat model of diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 2009;52(5):952–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ceriello A, Esposito K, Piconi L, Ihnat MA, Thorpe JE, Testa R, et al. Oscillating glucose is more deleterious to endothelial function and oxidative stress than mean glucose in normal and type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes. 2008;57(5):1349–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Steven S, Frenis K, Oelze M, Kalinovic S, Kuntic M, Bayo Jimenez MT, et al. Vascular inflammation and oxidative stress: major triggers for cardiovascular disease. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019;2019:7092151.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nusca A, Tuccinardi D, Proscia C, Melfi R, Manfrini S, Nicolucci A, et al. Incremental role of glycaemic variability over HbA1c in identifying type 2 diabetic patients with high platelet reactivity undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019;18(1):147.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Oikonomou E, Leopoulou M, Theofilis P, Antonopoulos AS, Siasos G, Latsios G, et al. A link between inflammation and thrombosis in atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases: clinical and therapeutic implications. Atherosclerosis. 2020;309:16–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Pifarré R. Thrombosis and cardiovascular disease. Med Clin North Am. 1998;82(3):511–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kander MC, Cui Y, Liu Z. Gender difference in oxidative stress: a new look at the mechanisms for cardiovascular diseases. J Cell Mol Med. 2017;21(5):1024–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mendelsohn ME, Karas RH. The protective effects of estrogen on the cardiovascular system. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(23):1801–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Knowlton AA, Lee AR. Estrogen and the cardiovascular system. Pharmacol Ther. 2012;135(1):54–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Viña J, Borrás C, Gambini J, Sastre J, Pallardó FV. Why females live longer than males? Importance of the upregulation of longevity-associated genes by oestrogenic compounds. FEBS Lett. 2005;579(12):2541–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Tarry-Adkins JL, Ozanne SE, Norden A, Cherif H, Hales CN. Lower antioxidant capacity and elevated p53 and p21 may be a link between gender disparity in renal telomere shortening, albuminuria, and longevity. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2006;290(2):F509–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hamilton KL, Lin L, Wang Y, Knowlton AA. Effect of ovariectomy on cardiac gene expression: inflammation and changes in SOCS gene expression. Physiol Genomics. 2008;32(2):254–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Patten RD, Pourati I, Aronovitz MJ, Baur J, Celestin F, Chen X, et al. 17beta-estradiol reduces cardiomyocyte apoptosis in vivo and in vitro via activation of phospho-inositide-3 kinase/Akt signaling. Circ Res. 2004;95(7):692–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Liu H, Pedram A, Kim JK. Oestrogen prevents cardiomyocyte apoptosis by suppressing p38α-mediated activation of p53 and by down-regulating p53 inhibition on p38β. Cardiovasc Res. 2011;89(1):119–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Razandi M, Pedram A, Levin ER. Estrogen signals to the preservation of endothelial cell form and function. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(49):38540–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Strehlow K, Werner N, Berweiler J, Link A, Dirnagl U, Priller J, et al. Estrogen increases bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cell production and diminishes neointima formation. Circulation. 2003;107(24):3059–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, Buroker AB, Goldberger ZD, Hahn EJ, et al. 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;140(11):e596–646.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all participants, data managers, and clinical administrative staff involved in the present study.

Funding

This research was supported the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81273083).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jianing Bi and Lulu Song contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No.13 Hangkong Road, Wuhan, 430030, China

    Jianing Bi, Lulu Song, Lulin Wang, Mingyang Wu, Youjie Wang & Yaohua Tian

  2. Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Environment and Health, and State Key Laboratory of Environmental Health (Incubating), School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

    Jianing Bi, Lulu Song, Lulin Wang, Mingyang Wu, Youjie Wang & Yaohua Tian

  3. Department of Cardiology, Kailuan Hospital, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan City, China

    Shouhua Chen & Shouling Wu

Authors
  1. Jianing Bi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lulu Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lulin Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mingyang Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shouhua Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Youjie Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shouling Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yaohua Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JB, LS, YT and SW contributed to the conception or design of the work. JB, LS, LW, MW, SC, and YW contributed to the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work. JB and LS drafted the manuscript. YT and SW critically revised the manuscript. All gave final approval and agree to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shouling Wu or Yaohua Tian.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The protocol of Kailuan study was approved by the Ethnic Committees of Kailuan General Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1. Table S1.

Characteristics of the participants who were included in and excluded from the analysis. Table S2. The lifetime risk of CVD up to age 95 adjusted for the competing risk of death for men and women at age 35, 45 and 55 according to the categories of fasting blood glucose variability (ARV). Table S3. The lifetime risk of CVD up to age 95 adjusted for the competing risk of death for men and women at ages 35, 45 and 55 according to the categories of fasting blood glucose variability (SD). Figure S1. The lifetime risk of CVD adjusted for the competing risk of death for men and women at age 35, 45 and 55 according to individual fasting blood glucose variability (ARV). Figure S2. The lifetime risk of CVD adjusted for the competing risk of death for men and women at age 35, 45 and 55 according to individual fasting blood glucose variability (SD).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bi, J., Song, L., Wang, L. et al. Visit-to-visit fasting blood glucose variability and lifetime risk of cardiovascular disease: a prospective study. Cardiovasc Diabetol 20, 207 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-021-01397-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-021-01397-1

Keywords

  • Fasting blood glucose variability
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Lifetime risk