Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is the newly emergent acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that elicits a cytokine storm [1]. A cytokine storm is an aberrant systemic inflammatory response caused by an uncontrolled overproduction of inflammatory cytokines [2, 3]. If no appropriate treatment is given to patients suffering from a cytokine storm, acute lung damage progresses to ARDS accompanied by multi-organ failure, followed by death [4]. The development of COVID-19-associated ARDS (CARDS) has shown inter-individual differences in terms of risk and clinical outcomes. Plasma cytokine levels were found to be associated with the clinical severity of CARDS [5, 6, 7, 8,9,10]. Pharmacogenetic variations have been shown to affect the response of COVID-19 patients as well [11]. Polymorphisms in genes related to pulmonary protection, innate immune response, and inflammation have been reported to be associated with clinical outcomes in SARS-CoV-2 [5, 12,13,14,15] infections other than those related to ARDS [16, 17]. More attention was brought to studying the interaction between IL-10 alleles with the tumor necrotic factor alpha (TNFa) alleles, for their opposing roles [18, 19]. Three polymorphisms; the IL-10; the − 592 C > A (rs1800872) and IL-10 -1082 A > G (rs1800896) and the TNFa; -308 G > A (rs1800629) were found to correlate with susceptibility and clinical progress of different viral infections [18, 20,21,22,23] and as predictors for severity and mortality in patients with COVID-19 [3]. The − 592 C > A and − 1082 A > G polymorphisms of the IL-10 gene lie within a negative regulatory region that binds to ETS and STAT-3 transcription factors, respectively [24, 25] while the TNFa − 308 G > A polymorphism is a regulatory variant that functionally impacts TNFa expression depending on the type of stimulus and the cell type [24]. Different populations have been evaluated for the impact of these polymorphisms [12, 13] on clinical outcomes and severity yet no studies were conducted in Egyptian populations. Thus, we were interested in investigating the association between the same polymorphisms and susceptibility to COVID-19 infection, clinical outcomes and response to remdisivir, in an Egyptian cohort.

Materials and methods

Ethical considerations

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the School of Medicine Suez Canal University (#4425). It was conducted in compliance with the ethical principles of the Helsinki Declaration for medical research involving human subjects. All participants provided written informed consent.

Specimens and patient data

One hundred and ten inpatients with COVID-19 and 110 healthy controls were included. Samples were collected through the time frame between April and July 2021, from the Suez Canal Medical School Hospitals. Sample size was calculated using the following equation: n= [(Zα/2)/E]2 *P(1-p),where: n = sample size, Zα/2 = 1.96 (The critical value that divides the central 95% of the Z distribution from the 5% in the tail), P = the prevalence of SARS-CoV2 = 0.1% (as confirmed by the WHO for December 2020 divided by the Egyptian population in December 2020) (https://covid19.who.int/region/emro/country/eg). E = Margin of error (= Width of confidence interval) = 5%. Patients of both genders were randomly selected.

COVID-19 was diagnosed based on a chest computed tomography (CT) scan (multiple bilateral ground-glass opacities mainly in the periphery), then nasopharyngeal specimens were confirmed for SARS-CoV-2, using molecular PCR assay (Viasure, CerTest Biotec) [26]. For COVID-19 patients, inclusion criteria included a confirmed diagnosis. Controls were documented as COVID-19 negative, matched for age, gender, and demographics, and free from severe respiratory conditions. Exclusion criteria for controls involve a history of COVID-19 and chronic diseases unless of specific interest.

Clinical data

Clinical data were collected from patients’ records. Symptom-onset date and comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease (CKD), coronary heart disease (CHD), or chronic liver disease (CLD)) were collected using a questionnaire filled by the physician at patient’s admission. At the time of diagnosis, all COVID-19 patients had routine tests such as a complete blood count, C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, serum ferritin, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) [27] and severity was classified as severe versus non-severe based on cut-off values [28]. Patients with pulmonary infiltrates above 50% on CT of the lung were considered severely affected. The need for high flow oxygen therapy; > 40% (by nasal cannula, oxygen face mask, or venturi mask, or continuous positive airway pressure via non-invasive CPAP) was used to determine the severity of respiratory symptoms [29]. The pO2 levels of all patients was monitored during their stay in the hospital.

Antiviral treatment

To investigate the relationship between the response of patients to remdesivir treatment and the polymorphisms, we studied the response of patients to remdesivir treatment (n = 30) in different polymorphisms and compared to non remdesivir treated patients (n = 81) in regard to CT picture, laboratory findings, and survival. The data of other drugs that were prescribed to the patients such as tocilizumab, antimicrobials, corticosteroids, anticoagulants, were also collected.

Genotyping assays

Peripheral blood was collected from each patient and DNA was extracted using the GeneJET Whole Blood Genomic DNA Purification Minikit (Thermo Scientific, inc) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Genotyping was done using TaqMan SNP assays for Interleukin-10 SNPs; rs1800872(ID_ C___1747363_10), rs1800896 (ID_ C___1747360_10 ) and TNFa SNP rs1800629(ID_ C___7514879_10) (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).

Statistical analysis

Different genotypes of IL10 and TNFa were compared in terms of disease severity, laboratory findings, response to treatment, and final outcome after genotyping. IBM SPSS 2013 was used to analyze the data. SNP stat, was used to identify polymorphisms. Using Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, we compared group genotype distributions to the population’s overall genotype distributions. The significance of the obtained results was set at 0.05. To calculate the percent of survival in Remdesivir treated versus the non remdesivir- treated patients in different polymorphisms, the number of the patients survived after treatment with or without remdesivir treatment in each polymorphism was divided by the total number of patients in each polymorphism in each group and this number was multiplied by 100. The significance of the percentage of patient survival among the different alleles in each polymorphism and in the remdesivir treated group versus the non remdesivir treated was analyzed by ANOVA.

Results

Characteristics of studied groups and genotype distribution within COVID-19 patients

This way a case-control study including 110 COVID-19 patients matched with age and gender to 110 healthy individuals. The patients’ group had comorbidities like diabetes, hypertension, heart diseases, chronic liver diseases, and chronic kidney diseases while individuals within the control group were completely free (Table S1).

The mean age of the studied patients was 57 ± 15.2 in cases versus 56.6 ± 14.5 in controls. PCR positive patients represented 80% of cases, and a significant positive association was only observed between positive PCR and TNFa rs1800629 genotypes (p < 0.05). A significant difference was observed with the genotypes of TNFa polymorphism and hypertension (p = 0.04) (Table 1). On comparing different genotypes with laboratory results, no significant difference was observed between groups except for the GG versus the GA genotypes of the IL-10 gene polymorphism; rs1800896 (− 1082), where a significant difference was observed between low lymphocyte count and increased CRP (p < 0.05) (Table 1).

Table 1 Demographic, clinical characteristics and laboratory parameters of COVID-19 patients and healthy subject*

Alleles/Genotype frequencies and distribution of IL10 and TNFa polymorphisms under different inheritance models

The genotype distribution among the patients versus the control groups are shown in Table 2. The AA genotype of IL-10 (-592) (rs1800872) showed significantly higher frequency among the patients compared to the control group (p < 0.001). Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium was found among controls but not among the cases. Under all models, the mutant A allele frequency was higher in COVID − 19 patients than in healthy individuals (Table 3).

Table 2 Genotype distribution of IL-10 and TNFa polymorphisms in COVID-19 patients versus healthy subjects

For the second IL-10 polymorphism, (− 1082) (rs1800896), a higher frequency of the wild type A (70%) allele and AA genotype (63%) in patients as compared to healthy individuals, was observed (Table 2). Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium was only observed in cases (p < 0.001). Under multiple models, the G allele and GA genotypes were associated with a lower risk of developing COVID-19 disease (Table 3). TNFa polymorphism was tested, and only two genotypes were detected: the AG and GG. The wild-type allele G was present in 100% of healthy individuals and 91% of patients (p = 0.0079). The GA genotype was more prevalent in patients than in healthy subjects (p = 0.0065, OR = 50.0608, CI = 2.9863 to 839.1787) (Table 2).

Table 3 Genotype frequencies of IL-10 studied SNPs in COVID-19 patients versus healthy subjects under different inheritance models

Haplotype distribution of IL-10 and TNFa polymorphisms

Further haplotype association analysis was done for the genetic polymorphisms under investigation, and the risk of developing COVID-19 (Table 4). The haplotypes for the IL-10 polymorphisms showed that the CG haplotype was more frequent in COVID-19 patients (p < 0.0001, OR = 16.97, CI = 6.36–45.29). Then, the TNFa polymorphism haplotype was evaluated along with the IL-10 alleles. The AAG was the prevalent haplotype in healthy individuals as compared to patients with COVID-19, with CGG haplotype showing higher frequency in COVID-19 patients (p < 0.0001, OR = 14.96, CI = 5.55–40.32). Other haplotypes did not show significant associations (Table 4).

Table 4 Haplotype frequencies and distribution of IL-10 and TNFa in COVID-19 patients versus healthy subjects (n = 220)

Association of inheritance models of IL-10 and TNFa SNPs with clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 disease

Being involved in cytokine storm [30], we evaluated the association of genotypes with the serum ferritin and D-dimer results in addition to the radiological findings, and oxygen support. Table 5 shows the distribution of different models of inheritance and odds ratios were calculated between severe versus non-severe cases.

Table 5 Association of inheritance models of IL-10 and TNFa SNPs with clinical and laboratory severity*

Under the additive inheritance model, the IL-10 polymorphisms (− 1082) showed non-significant association with severe HCRT finding (p = 0.45, OR = 1.64, CI = 1.01–2.66) while severe COVI-19, based on D-dimer levels, was associated with the recessive model (p = 0.02, OR = 3.5, CI = 1.10–11.0). Although the TNFa polymorphism (-308) didn’t show any association with clinical and laboratory severity findings, the AG genotype was associated with favorable outcomes and patients’ survival on discharge (p = 0.024, OR = 3.3(1.16–9.54)4.29, CI = 1.2–15.3), unlike the IL-10 polymorphisms (Table 6).

Table 6 Association between IL-10 and TNFa SNPs with condition at discharge

After adjustment of interventional parameters and comorbidities, a strong association with survival outcome was observed with the AGG (p = 0.019, OR = 3.92, CI = 1.28–12.04) and the AAA haplotypes (Table 7).

Table 7 Haplotype association with survival on discharge

Association with clinical outcomes; whether deceased or survived were analyzed (based on data availability), after adjustment to remdisivir treatment (Table S2). The AG genotype associated with the TNFa polymorphism showed protective effect (p = 0.022, CI = 0.25 (0.08–0.81).

Discussion

The innate immune response is recognized as the primary line of defense against viral infections, including SARS-CoV-2 and MERS. Severe lung damage and elevated mortality rates in these infections are associated with increased levels of both anti-inflammatory and pro-inflammatory cytokines, along with heightened counts of neutrophils and monocyte-macrophages [31, 32]; [33, 34]. Limited studies have delved into the genetic variations of the host innate immune status in COVID-19 patients [12, 13]. o In this study, the focus is on the association between IL-10 and TNFa promoter polymorphisms and susceptibility to clinical outcomes in SARS-CoV-2 infections.The frequencies of IL-10 -592 A and C alleles were 0.55 and 0.45, respectively, resembling the East Asian population but differing from the African population where the C allele predominated over 0.5. IL-10 -1082 A and G allele frequencies were 0.66 and 0.34, respectively, consistent with African populations and global frequencies of 0.7 and 0.3, respectively. TNFa-308 allele frequencies were 0.95 for the G allele and 0.05 for the A allele, resembling some American populations, east and south Asian populations, and the global frequency [24]. Notably, our data were different from Saleh et al. [20] where similar polymorphisms were analyzed in another Egyptian population and G allele of TNFa-308 frequency didn’t exceed 0.5(0.4), while the A allele was 0.6, which might be explained by their bigger sample size. Our results have also shown that susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with all the genotypes of IL-10 -592 C > A polymorphism, with the C allele favoring protection against infection which was consistent with different viral infections [35]. Additionally, the A-allele was associated with higher IL-10 serum levels and hence, was considered a predictor of HBV recovery and with HIV susceptibility, especially in the dominant model [36] while the C containing genotypes have shown increased risk for viral infections, in both hetero and homozygote states([37] ([38]) [23, 39].

Interestingly, the GA genotype of IL-10-1082 A > G had a significant association with case fatality in influenza A/H1N1pdm09 infections in Indian patients [22, 40] and other viruses [41]. A possible explanation to the association of the IL-10 polymorphisms, the AA in IL-10 -592 and the GG in IL-10 -1082, with viral infection susceptibility/persistence, is that the increase in IL-10 serum levels exerts sustained inhibitory effects on immune cells that are responsible for viral clearance [42]. On the contrary, no association was observed between the IL-10 polymorphisms and the Mediterranean spotted fever [43] dengue virus [44, 45] and hepatitis sustained viral responses [46, 47]. Our results of diminished AA genotype of the TNFa − 308G > A polymorphism were consistent with other studies on different populations such as the Sicilian patients (1.2%) [43] and the Chinese patients (1%) [47], but not with another Egyptian population where the AA genotype had a prominent presence among patients (32.0%) and was associated with an aggressive disease outcome [20]. A significantly higher frequency of TNFa − 308G > A polymorphism genotype was associated with severity in Influenza A/H1N1pdm09 in Indian patients [22]. We show that the G allele confers protection to symptomatic COVID-19 in contrary to dengue virus where the A allele was protective. While the GA genotype of TNFa − 308 was protective against dengue virus infection, it was significantly associated with COVID-19 infection. In addition, the A allele of TNFa − 308G > A was protective against TTV [23]. In this study, CRP, leucocyte and lymphocytes count, D-dimer, ferritin levels, and LDH levels were tested. High levels of CRP and low lymphocytes in COVID-19 patients showed significant differences between the different IL-10 -1082 A > G polymorphisms, specifically between AG and GG genotypes (p < 0.05) which was consistent with other studies on the effect of these polymorphisms on the CRP levels land lymphocytes’ counts in viral-induced encephalitis [37]. Noteworthy, the risk of venous thrombosis was found to be associated with the IL-10 promoter polymorphisms; -592 and − 1059, through down-regulation to tissue factor (TF) expression [48]. This is consistent with our results where, the IL-10-1082 GG genotype is significantly associated with higher hypercoagulability status of the patients, as indicated by D-dimer levels. Studying the effect of IL-10 polymorphisms and TNFa on the risk of ARDS, showed inconsistent results. The IL-10 -1082 GG genotype was significantly associated with an increased ARDS odds (< 52 years of age) [49]. This was consistent with our data where a significant association of the additive model of IL-10 -1082, with severe HRCT results was observed. We found that there is no association between the IL-10 -509 polymorphism and the ARDS development. Similarly, there is currently no reported association between IL-10-509 polymorphisms and the ARDS development. There was no association between IL-10 and TNFa polymorphisms and interstitial lung fibrosis [27]. Our results showed a significant association between COVID-19 and either the − 592/-1082 (CG) haplotype or the − 592/-1082/-308(CGG) haplotypes, which was similar to CG disease association in Caucasians [49] Not only this, but also, we found a strong association between the − 592/-1082/-308 AGG and AAA haplotypes and favorable outcomes. A similar risk has been reported between the IL-10 AA haplotypes and the outcome of EBV [42]. The SARS-CoV-2 antiviral treatment; Remdivir, has been used for its anti-inflammatory effect. Although better survival outcomes were associated with remdesivir treatment. One limitation in this study, especially for the investigation to the response of the patients to remdesivir therapy, is the small sample size for the patients on remdesivir treatment. This is because remdesivir is not given as a routine therapy for all COVID-19 patients, but it is reserved to those who are severely ill. However, the normal distribution of the data between the treated and the non-treated group allowed for the comparison between the 2 groups. Deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium is another limitation that can be justified by considering factors such as selection pressure, population substructure, migration, mutation, genetic drift, and genotyping errors. Bigger sample size and more robust genotyping is recommended to validate our results. Elaborated studies on other cytokines, IL-6 and INF gamma, and their correlation/association to COVID-19 clinical outcomes need to be done. Our data is the first to unravel the association between polymorphisms in IL-10 gene promoter and COVID-19 in an Egyptian population, which gives insight into the genetic diversity of immune responses towards SARS-COV2. We provided complementary evidence to the role of TNFa-308 polymorphism in a different Egyptian population [20] and were consistent with findings in Iranian population [50]. In conclusion, this study sheds light on the genetic determinants influencireatment response, and clinical outcomes in SARS-CoV-2 infection. The identification of specific polymorphisms in genes related to inflammatory responses not only allows for risk stratification and personalized treatment approaches but also aids in predicting disease severity and assessing survival outcomes. These findings provide a foundation for individualized patient management, with the potential to optimize resource allocation, enhance monitoring strategies, and improve overall clinical decision-making. While these genetic insights offer valuable contributions to the understanding of COVID-19, further research and validation are imperative for the translation of these findings into routine clinical practice, ensuring their applicability across diverse populations.