Erratum
After publication of the original article [1], the authors found two errors within the Results section of the Abstract. Details are as follows:
-
1)
In the line ‘Elective content varies markedly across universities (1 to 122 h)’, the number “122” should be “222”.
-
2)
In the line ‘In Australia, medical school curricula contain a median of 2.55 h of compulsory intellectual disability content’, there should be a word “units” inserted between “curricula” and “contain”. The full corrected sentence should read: ‘In Australia, medical school curricula units contain a median of 2.55 h of compulsory intellectual disability content’.
Reference
Trollor JN, et al. Intellectual disability health content within medical curriculum: an audit of what our future doctors are taught. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:105. doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0625-1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0625-1.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
Trollor, J.N., Ruffell, B., Tracy, J. et al. Erratum to: Intellectual disability health content within medical curriculum: an audit of what our future doctors are taught. BMC Med Educ 16, 260 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0784-0
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0784-0