Skip to main content
Download PDF

High expression of S100A2 predicts poor prognosis in patients with endometrial carcinoma

BMC Cancer volume 22, Article number: 77 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

S100A2, a member of the S100 protein family, is abnormally expressed and plays a vital role in multiple cancers. However, little is known about the clinical significance of S100A2 in endometrial carcinoma.

Methods

Clinicopathological data were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx), Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), and Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC). First, the expression and prognostic value of different S100 family members in endometrial carcinoma were evaluated. Subsequently, the Kaplan–Meier plotter and Cox regression analysis were used to assess the prognostic significance of S100A2, while the association between S100A2 expression and clinical characteristics in endometrial carcinoma was also analyzed using logistic regression. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and a nomogram were constructed. The putative underlying cellular mechanisms were explored using Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA).

Results

Our results revealed that S100A2 expression was significantly higher in endometrial carcinoma tissue than in non-cancerous tissue at both the mRNA and protein levels. Analysis of Kaplan–Meier plotter data revealed that patients with high S100A2 expression had shorter overall survival (OS) and disease specific survival (DSS) compared with those of patients with low S100A2 expression. Multivariate Cox analysis further confirmed that high S100A2 expression was an independent risk factor for OS in patients with endometrial carcinoma. Other clinicopathologic features found to be related to worse prognosis in endometrial carcinoma included age, clinical stage, histologic grade, and tumor invasion. Importantly, ROC analysis also confirmed that S100A2 has a high diagnostic value in endometrial carcinoma. KEGG enrichment analysis and GSEA revealed that the estrogen and IL-17 signaling pathways were significantly upregulated in the high S100A2 expression group, in which estrogen response, JAK-STAT3, K-Ras, and TNFα/NF-κB were differentially enriched.

Conclusions

S100A2 plays an important role in endometrial carcinoma progression and may represent an independent diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for endometrial carcinoma.

Peer Review reports

Background

Endometrial carcinoma is one of the most commonly diagnosed gynecological malignancies, with nearly 400,000 new cases reported in 2020 [1]. It comprises a group of malignant epithelial tumors that originate in the inner lining of the uterus and frequently occur in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. The incidence of endometrial carcinoma has shown a gradual increase over recent years concomitant with an improvement in economic conditions and an increase in the average life expectancy. Despite the survival rate of patients with endometrial carcinoma seems optimistic [2], the validated biological markers for its detection remains poor.

The S100s encompass a family of calcium-binding proteins composed of more than 20 members that share a conserved structure comprising two EF-hand domains with a high affinity for calcium ions [3]. Additionally, S100A2 can also bind zinc, which significantly reduces its affinity for calcium [4, 5]. Upon binding of those ions, most S100 proteins undergo conformational changes, which allows them to interact with other proteins and thereby play key roles in a wide range of cellular functions. Although S100 family members share structural similarity, they serve different biological functions [6]. Most S100 genes, including those forming the S100A group (S100A1–14, S100A7A, and S100A16), are located in human chromosome 1q21, a region frequently associated with recombination events in tumor tissues, resulting in the uncontrolled expression of S100 members, such as the upregulation of S100A11 and S100A14 reported in breast cancer [7]. Additionally, high expression levels of S100A2, S100A4, S100A6, S100A7A, S100A10, S100A14, S100A16, S100B, and S100P have been associated with lower survival, whereas the upregulated expression of S100A1, S100A13, S100A5, S100A13, and S100G proteins have been associated with improved survival in patients with ovarian cancer [8]. Dysregulated expression of S100 family members can impair the regulation of diverse cellular functions such as proliferation, apoptosis, migration, and differentiation of cancer cells [9, 10]. In colorectal cancer, S100A2 acts as a tumor promoter by modulating glycolytic reprogramming [11]. Nevertheless, how S100 proteins affect the pathogenesis and prognosis of endometrial carcinoma remains to be determined.

The aim of this study was to identify members of the S100 gene family with prognostic value in endometrial carcinoma using comprehensive bioinformatic analysis. First, we compared the mRNA expression pattern of each S100 member between carcinoma tissues and normal tissues and assessed the prognostic role of S100 mRNA expression in patients with endometrial carcinoma. Subsequently, we selected S100A2 from the S100 family members and evaluated the correlations between S100A2 expression and clinical characteristics in endometrial carcinoma patients, and sought to determine the biological pathways related to S100A2 using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis. Our results suggested that S100A2 may be a promising diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for endometrial carcinoma.

Methods

UALCAN

UALCAN is a comprehensive and interactive web resource that provides easy access to publicly available cancer OMICS data (The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), MET500, and Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) databases and allows users to identify biomarkers or perform in silico validation of potential genes of interest (http://ualcan.path.uab.edu/index.html). Here, the mRNA and protein expression of S100A2 in endometrial carcinoma was evaluated using TCGA, Human Protein Atlas, and CPTAC [12] databases.

Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) dataset

GEPIA is a newly developed interactive web server for analyzing the RNA sequencing data from TCGA and Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) projects (http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/). GEPIA provides customizable functions such as tumor/normal differential expression analysis, profiling according to cancer types or pathological stages, and patient survival analysis, among others. The expression of S100A2 in endometrial carcinoma was analyzed in the GEPIA database [13].

Gene-gene interaction and protein-protein interaction networks

GeneMANIA (https://genemania.org/) helps us predict the function of gene/gene sets and STRING (https://cn.string-db.org/) aims to predict associations between proteins, both of which were used to explore the S100A2 gene and protein network.

Kaplan–Meier plotter database

The prognostic value of S100A2 in endometrial carcinoma was assessed according to overall survival (OS) and disease specific survival (DSS) using Kaplan–Meier plotter. Sources for the databases include Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), The European Genome-phenome Archive (EGA), and TCGA (https://kmplot.com/analysis/). The primary purpose of the tool is the meta-analysis-based discovery and validation of survival biomarkers [14].

Patients in TCGA database

S100A2 gene expression in endometrial carcinoma and the corresponding clinical information data were downloaded from TCGA database (https://tcga-data.nci.nih.gov/tcga/) [15]. UCEC data were included the clinical stage, tumor grade, pathological subtypes, age and other data of patients. In this study, S100A2 mRNA expression and its association with the OS of patients with endometrial carcinoma were also analyzed in TCGA-UCEC dataset. Based on the median mRNA expression values, patients with endometrial carcinoma were divided into high and low expression groups. Data were collected and analyzed using R3.6.3 software [16].

Screening for integrated differentially expressed genes (DEGs)

The gene expression profiles (GSE 17025 and GSE 39099), based on the GPL570 platform, were obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). Adjusted P-values <0.05 and log2 FC >1 were set as cut-off criteria for screening out the upregulated DEGs. The list of significantly upregulated S100 genes was exported separately.

KEGG pathway enrichment analysis and GSEA for S100A2

In this study, an ordered list of genes based on the correlation between all genes and S100A2 expression was generated using KEGG and GSEA. Data were collected and analyzed using R3.6.3 software [16]. KEGG is a collection of databases dealing with genomes, biological pathways, diseases, drugs, and chemical substances (www.kegg.jp/kegg/kegg1.html). Genes were determined to be differentially expressed based on an absolute fold change >1.5 and Padj <0.05.

GSEA is a computational method that allows the determination of classes of genes or proteins that are overrepresented in a large set of genes or proteins and may have a statistically significant association with disease phenotypes [17]. The predefined gene set is from the MSigDB database (https://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/msigdb/index.jsp). In this study, an ordered list of genes based on the correlation between all genes and S100A2 expression was generated using GSEA. The enriched pathways were determined based on the nominal P-value and the normalized enrichment score (NES).

Statistical analysis

The Pearson χ2 test was used to analyze the relationship between S100A2 expression and clinicopathological variables; Fisher’s exact test was used when needed. OS was defined as the time from random assignment until death due to any cause and DSS as the percentage of people in a study or treatment group who have not died from a specific disease in a defined period of time. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to evaluate the survival of patients, and the log-rank test was used to test the significance. Univariate Cox proportional hazards regression was applied to estimate the individual hazard ratio (HR) for OS and DSS.

Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify the independent prognostic factors that are significant for the prognosis of patients with endometrial carcinoma. SPSS 22.0 software was used for statistical analysis. The chi-square test was used to compare and analyze the clinical and pathological conditions of the high and low expression groups. The HR with 95% confidence interval (CI) was measured to estimate the hazard risk of individual factors. R language was used to draw the nomogram and build a prediction model. P < 0.05 indicates statistical significance, and P < 0.01 indicates highly statistical significance. All reported P-values were two-sided.

Results

Prognostic values of S100 family members in endometrial carcinoma

First, we evaluated the expression and prognostic role of each S100 family member in endometrial carcinoma. Among the 21 family members, 11 (S100A2, S100A7, S100A7A, S100A8, S100A9, S100A10, S100A11, S100A12, S100A14, S100G and S100P) were found to be significantly highly expressed in endometrial carcinoma tissue and 10 (S100A1, S100A2, S100A5, S100A6, S100A7A, S100A7, S100A8, S100A9, S10014 and S100Z) were significantly correlated with OS in all patients with endometrial carcinoma (Fig. 1a, b). Six genes (S100A2, S100A7, S100A7A, S100A8, S100A9, and S100A14) were not only significantly highly expressed in endometrial carcinoma, but also associated with OS of endometrial carcinoma patients. To further explore the association between these selected genes and endometrial carcinoma, we downloaded two endometrial carcinoma gene expression profiles (GSE17025 and GSE39099) from the GEO database. The expressions of these six genes were depicted on a heatmap in Fig. 1c.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The prognostic value of S100 mRNA expression in endometrial cancer patients. (a) The mRNA expression of individual S100 members in endometrial carcinoma tissues. (b) Prognostic hazard ratios for individual S100 members in endometrial cancer patients. (c) Heatmap depicting the expression levels of individual S100 members

Full size image

High S100A2 expression is correlated with clinicopathologic features in patients with endometrial carcinoma

S100A2 was found high expressed in the GSE17025 and GSE39099 profiles and screened out among the six genes. To examine the role of S100A2 in endometrial carcinoma progression, TCGA databases were used to predict the S100A2 mRNA expression patterns in 174 endometrial carcinoma tissue samples and 13 normal tissue samples (Fig. 2a). The results showed that S100A2 mRNA expression levels were significantly higher in endometrial carcinoma primary tumor samples than in normal tissue (P < 0.05). We further compared the expression of S100A2 in normal samples of GTEx combined adjacent UCEC tissues and UCEC samples, and found that S100A2 was overexpressed in UCEC (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2b). Additionally, S100A2 expression was significantly upregulated in 23 endometrial carcinoma samples when compared with that in matched adjacent samples (P = 3.3e−06) (Fig. 2c). We also plotted a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to evaluate the diagnostic value of S100A2 levels by comparing S100A2 expression in normal samples of GTEx combined adjacent UCEC tissues and UCEC samples. The area under the curve (AUC) value for S100A2 levels was found to be 0.965 (CI = 0.944–0.986), suggestive of a high diagnostic potential (Fig. 2d). The protein expression level of S100A2 was also upregulated in endometrial carcinoma tissues in comparison with normal tissues (Fig. 2e and f), indicating that the protein and mRNA expressions of S100A2 were similar in different database.

Fig. 2
figure 2

High S100A2 expression is correlated with clinicopathologic features in patients with endometrial carcinoma. (a) Differences in S100A2 expression in UCEC tissues and adjacent normal tissues. (b) Differences in S100A2 expression in normal samples from the GTEx combined adjacent UCEC tissues and UCEC samples. (c) Differences in S100A2 expression in UCEC samples and paired adjacent samples. (d) ROC curve for S100A2 in normal samples from the GTEx combined adjacent UCEC tissues and UCEC samples. (e) S100A2 protein levels were markedly upregulated in tumor tissues compared with that in non-paired normal tissues. (f) Representative images of S100A2 expression in endometrial carcinoma tissues and their normal controls

Full size image

The gene-gene and protein-protein interaction network, which was generated by using GeneMANIA and STRING showed that 20 potential target genes and 10 potential target proteins interacted with the S100A2 (Fig. S1).

Correlation between S100A2 expression and clinical characteristics

The characteristics of 552 patients with endometrial carcinoma, including clinical and gene expression data, were collected from TCGA database. The patients were divided into high and low S100A2 expression groups based on the mean value of S100A2 expression (Table 1), following which putative correlations between S100A2 expression and clinical characteristics were evaluated using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and logistic regression analysis. The results showed that S100A2 mRNA expression differed significantly between stage I and stage II-IV tumors (P = 8.1e−03) as well as between menopause status (pre-menopause vs. peri- and post-menopause, P = 0.04) (Fig. 3a and c). S100A2 expression was also upregulated in serous type of endometrial carcinoma compared with that in endometrioid type disease (P = 0.02) (Fig. 3b).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Box plot assessing S100A2 expression in patients with endometrial carcinoma according to different clinical characteristics. (a) Stage, (b) histological type, and (c) menopause status

Full size image
Table 1 The relationship between S100A2 mRNA expression and clinical characteristics in endometrial carcinoma
Full size table

Univariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that S100A2 expression was correlated with some clinical characteristics in patients with endometrial carcinoma (Table 2). A comparison of baseline data between the high and low expression groups revealed that S100A2 expression was significantly associated with clinical stage (odds ratio [OR] = 1.505, P = 0.031), histological type (mixed and serous vs. endometrioid: OR = 1.778, P = 0.004), and menopause status (OR = 2.078, P = 0.047).

Table 2 S100A2 expression associated with clinicopathologic characteristics (logistic regression)
Full size table

The independent diagnostic value of S100A2 expression in endometrial carcinoma

Survival analysis demonstrated that high S100A2 expression was correlated with poor OS (P = 1.4e−03) as well as poor DSS (P = 0.02) (Fig. 4a and b). Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that high S100A2 expression was significantly correlated with poor OS (HR = 1.616, 95% CI = 1.069-2.442). Moreover, multivariate regression analysis further confirmed that S100A2 expression was an independent prognostic factor for OS in patients with endometrial carcinoma (HR = 1.635, 95% CI = 1.005-2.659, P = 0.048) (Table 3; Fig. 5). Subsequently, a nomogram was constructed using age, clinical stage, histologic grade, tumor invasion, histological type and S100A2 levels as indicators to predict 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS in patients with endometrial carcinoma (Fig. 6a). The calibration curve presented desirable prediction of the nomograms for the 1-, 3-, and 5-year clinical outcomes (Fig. 6b). Combined, the above data indicated that S100A2 may serve as a useful biomarker for the prediction of OS among endometrial carcinoma patients.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The independent risk and diagnostic value of S100A2 expression in endometrial carcinoma. (a & b) Kaplan–Meier analysis of overall survival (OS) and disease specific survival (DSS) for patients

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Forest plot of the multivariate Cox regression analysis in endometrial carcinoma patients

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

Construction and validation of nomogram based on S100A2 expression. (a) A nomogram for predicting the probability of 1-, 3- and 5-year OS in endometrial carcinoma patients. (b) Calibration plots validating the efficiency of nomograms for OS

Full size image
Table 3 Correlations between overall survival and S100A2 mRNA expression using univariate and multivariate Cox regression
Full size table

S100A2-related signaling pathways based on GSEA

Next, we sought to identify the putative cellular mechanisms underlying the effects of S100A2 in endometrial carcinoma through KEGG pathway analysis and GSEA. As shown in Fig. 7a, enrichment analysis indicated that hsa05150 (Staphylococcus aureus infection) was the pathway most strongly associated with the high S100A2 expression group, while hsa04657 (IL-17 signaling pathway) and hsa04915 (estrogen signaling pathway) were also found to be associated with the role of S100A2 in endometrial carcinoma. Meanwhile, inflammatory response, estrogen response, JAK/STAT3, K-Ras, and TNFα/NF-κB were the most differentially enriched pathways in S100A2 high expression phenotype (Fig. 7b–h).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Functional enrichment analysis of S100A2 in endometrial carcinoma. (a) KEGG pathway analysis. (b) Enrichment plots of S100A2-relevant enrichment pathways in h.all.v7.2.symbols.gmt from GSEA. (c) c KRas-signaling-DN, (d) TNFα-signaling-via-NF-κB, (e) IL6-JAK-STAT3-signaling (f) Inflammatory response (g) estrogen-response-early and (h) estrogen-response-late

Full size image

Discussion

Some members of the S100 family have been identified as playing a tumorigenic role in endometrial carcinoma. For instance, S100A4/non-muscle myosin II signaling has been associated with epithelial–mesenchymal transition and stemness in uterine carcinosarcoma [18], while the inhibition of S100A8 expression is reported to promote apoptosis through the suppression of AKT phosphorylation [19]. Although there have been studies linking S100A8, S100A11 as biomarker candidates for endometrial cancer detection [20], whether any other S100 gene family member is involved in endometrial carcinoma remains unclear. Accordingly, in this study, we analyzed the expression and prognostic value of different S100 genes in this cancer. High S100A2 expression was previously reported to be an independent prognostic biomarker for poor prognosis in stage II and III colorectal cancer [21]. Here, we found that S100A2 also has prognostic significance for endometrial carcinoma.

Different from other S100 proteins, S100A2 is mainly localized to the nucleus and exerts its biological role in a tissue- and cell-specific manner [22]. The expression of several S100 family members is dysregulated in multiple types of tumors, including pancreatic, head and neck, bladder, and prostate cancers [23,24,25,26]. Until recently, S100A2 was thought to be the only protein in the S100 family that was negatively correlated with tumor initiation and progression; however, it was recently shown that high S100A2 expression is associated with FIGO stage as well as with histologic subgroups in gastric cancer [27]. High cytoplasmic S100A2 and/or total S100A2 expression levels were identified as predictors of recurrence risk in patients with oral cancer [28]. High expression of S100A2 is also significantly correlated with worse OS in patients with ovarian cancer [29]. Consistent with these observations, our results revealed that, compared with normal tissue, S100A2 expression was significantly upregulated in endometrial carcinoma tissues at both the mRNA and protein levels.

We further investigated the prognostic value of S100A2 in endometrial carcinoma using Kaplan–Meier plotter. The results showed that patients with high S100A2 mRNA expression levels had worse OS and DSS, while multivariate Cox analysis confirmed that high S100A2 expression was an independent risk factor for OS in individuals with endometrial carcinoma. ROC analysis also confirmed the diagnostic value of S100A2. According to the FIGO 2009 staging systems, the 5-year survival rate for patients with endometrial carcinoma was 89.6 ~ 77.6% for stage I and 57.0 ~ 49.4% for stage III disease [30]. A recent study further reported a predictive model for OS consisting of age, clinical stage, pathological tissue grade, tumor size, and ethnicity [31]. A predictive nomogram for endometrial carcinoma combining long noncoding RNA expression profiles and m6A regulator-related CpG sites was also shown recently [32, 33]. Here, we constructed a new prognostic nomogram using age, clinical stage, histologic grade, tumor invasion, histological type and S100A2 levels as indicators that can be used by physicians to improve the accuracy of identifying high-risk patients. We further investigated the relationship between clinical characteristics and S100A2 mRNA expression in endometrial carcinoma patients and found that high S100A2 expression was associated with clinical stage and menopause status. Furthermore, our results demonstrated that the associated mechanisms may involve the inflammatory response, K-Ras signaling, TNFα signaling via NF-kB, the IL6/JAK/STAT3 axis, and estrogen response. Although increased levels of estrogens in the blood are believed to encourage the development of endometrial cancer [34], the crosstalk between estrogen and S100A2 remains poorly understood. Collectively, these findings demonstrated that S100A2 may be a promising biomarker for the diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma.

High S100A2 expression has been associated with the regulation of tumor cell proliferation and invasion through the enhancement of PI3K/AKT activation and functional interaction with SMAD3 [35]; however, whether S100A2 expression has prognostic value in endometrial carcinoma has remained unknown. S100A2 is thought to act both as a tumor suppressor and as an oncogene depending on the tumor type, suggesting that S100A2 may exert its effects through different mechanisms. GSEA analysis revealed that S100A2 interacts with the IL-17 signaling pathway in endometrial carcinoma. The IL-17 signaling cascade is thought to promote cytokine and chemokine production. After binding to its receptor, IL-17 activates mitogen-activated protein kinases, leading to the production of inflammatory mediators such as IL-6, IL-1, and NF-κB. It is well known that IL-17 acts both directly and indirectly on tumor cells, leading to tumor microenvironment remodeling. Similar to low-grade glioma, in which the S100A family genes play vital roles in tumor progression mostly via the IL-17 signaling pathway [36], our data implied that S100A2 might play a critical role in endometrial carcinoma initiation and progression through similar mechanisms. Although the current study revealed a potential interaction between S100A2 and the IL-17 signaling pathway, how S100A2 precisely regulates endometrial carcinoma progression requires further investigation.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this analysis revealed that S100A2 was more highly expressed in endometrial carcinoma tissues than in normal tissues and was correlated with worse survival. S100A2 has potential as a prognostic factor for patients with endometrial carcinoma. Recently, an inhibitor of S100A9 was used in clinical trials as a therapy for prostate cancer and other solid tumors [37]. Our study provides new insights regarding the contribution of S100A2 to endometrial carcinoma progression and may be of empirical value for future investigations on inhibitors targeting S100A2 for the treatment of endometrial carcinoma.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article.

Abbreviations

CI:

Confidence Interval

DEGs:

Differentially Expressed Genes

EGA:

European Genome-phenome Archive

GEPIA:

Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis

GTEx:

Genotype-Tissue Expression

GEO:

Gene Expression Omnibus

GSEA:

Gene Set Enrichment Analysis

KEGG:

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

HR:

Hazard Ratio

NCBI:

National Center for Biotechnology Information

NES:

Normalized Enrichment Score

OR:

Odds Ratio

OS:

Overall Survival

DSS:

Disease Specific Survival

ROC:

Receiver Operating Characteristic

TCGA:

The Cancer Genome Atlas

UCEC:

Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F: Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021, 71(3):209–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sundar S, Balega J, Crosbie E, Drake A, Edmondson R, Fotopoulou C, Gallos I, Ganesan R, Gupta J, Johnson N et al: BGCS uterine cancer guidelines: Recommendations for practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2017, 213:71–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nakayama S, Kretsinger RH: Evolution of the EF-hand family of proteins. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 1994, 23:473–507.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Koch M, Bhattacharya S, Kehl T, Gimona M, Vasak M, Chazin W, Heizmann CW, Kroneck PM, Fritz G: Implications on zinc binding to S100A2. Biochim Biophys Acta 2007, 1773(3):457–470.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsvetkov FO, Devred F, Makarov AA: [Thermodynamics of zinc binding to human S100A2]. Mol Biol (Mosk) 2010, 44(5):938–942.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bresnick AR, Weber DJ, Zimmer DB: S100 proteins in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2015, 15(2):96–109.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McKiernan E, McDermott EW, Evoy D, Crown J, Duffy MJ: The role of S100 genes in breast cancer progression. Tumour Biol 2011, 32(3):441–450.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Maderka M, Pilka R, Neubert D, Hambalek J: New serum tumor markers S100, TFF3 and AIF-1 and their possible use in oncogynecology. Ceska Gynekol 2019, 84(4):303–308.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Leclerc E, Vetter SW: The role of S100 proteins and their receptor RAGE in pancreatic cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta 2015, 1852(12):2706–2711.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Allgower C, Kretz AL, von Karstedt S, Wittau M, Henne-Bruns D, Lemke J: Friend or Foe: S100 Proteins in Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2020, 12(8).

  11. Li C, Chen Q, Zhou Y, Niu Y, Wang X, Li X, Zheng H, Wei T, Zhao L, Gao H: S100A2 promotes glycolysis and proliferation via GLUT1 regulation in colorectal cancer. FASEB J 2020, 34(10):13333–13344.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chandrashekar DS, Bashel B, Balasubramanya SAH, Creighton CJ, Ponce-Rodriguez I, Chakravarthi B, Varambally S: UALCAN: A Portal for Facilitating Tumor Subgroup Gene Expression and Survival Analyses. Neoplasia 2017, 19(8):649–658.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tang Z, Li C, Kang B, Gao G, Li C, Zhang Z: GEPIA: a web server for cancer and normal gene expression profiling and interactive analyses. Nucleic acids research 2017, 45(W1):W98-W102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nagy A, Munkacsy G, Gyorffy B: Pancancer survival analysis of cancer hallmark genes. Sci Rep 2021, 11(1):6047.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Blum A, Wang P, Zenklusen JC: SnapShot: TCGA-Analyzed Tumors. Cell 2018, 173(2):530.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu G, Wang LG, Han Y, He QY: clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS 2012, 16(5):284–287.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, Paulovich A, Pomeroy SL, Golub TR, Lander ES et al: Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102(43):15545–15550.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tochimoto M, Oguri Y, Hashimura M, Konno R, Matsumoto T, Yokoi A, Kodera Y, Saegusa M: S100A4/non-muscle myosin II signaling regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition and stemness in uterine carcinosarcoma. Lab Invest 2020, 100(5):682–695.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu C, Xing G, Wu C, Zhu J, Wei M, Liu D, Ge Y, Chen Y, Lei T, Yang Y: Inhibition of Expression of the S100A8 Gene Encoding the S100 Calcium-Binding Protein A8 Promotes Apoptosis by Suppressing the Phosphorylation of Protein Kinase B (Akt) in Endometrial Carcinoma and HEC-1A Cells. Med Sci Monit 2018, 24:1836–1846.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Njoku K, Chiasserini D, Whetton AD, Crosbie EJ: Proteomic Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometrial Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2019, 11(10).

  21. Masuda T, Ishikawa T, Mogushi K, Okazaki S, Ishiguro M, Iida S, Mizushima H, Tanaka H, Uetake H, Sugihara K: Overexpression of the S100A2 protein as a prognostic marker for patients with stage II and III colorectal cancer. Int J Oncol 2016, 48(3):975–982.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Glenney JR, Jr., Kindy MS, Zokas L: Isolation of a new member of the S100 protein family: amino acid sequence, tissue, and subcellular distribution. J Cell Biol 1989, 108(2):569–578.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Biankin AV, Kench JG, Colvin EK, Segara D, Scarlett CJ, Nguyen NQ, Chang DK, Morey AL, Lee CS, Pinese M et al: Expression of S100A2 calcium-binding protein predicts response to pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology 2009, 137(2):558–568, 568 e551-511.

  24. Zhang X, Hunt JL, Shin DM, Chen ZG: Down-regulation of S100A2 in lymph node metastases of head and neck cancer. Head Neck 2007, 29(3):236–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Matsumoto K, Irie A, Satoh T, Ishii J, Iwabuchi K, Iwamura M, Egawa S, Baba S: Expression of S100A2 and S100A4 predicts for disease progression and patient survival in bladder cancer. Urology 2007, 70(3):602–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rehman I, Cross SS, Catto JW, Leiblich A, Mukherjee A, Azzouzi AR, Leung HY, Hamdy FC: Promoter hyper-methylation of calcium binding proteins S100A6 and S100A2 in human prostate cancer. Prostate 2005, 65(4):322–330.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu YF, Liu QQ, Wang X, Luo CH: Clinical significance of S100A2 expression in gastric cancer. Tumour Biol 2014, 35(4):3731–3741.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kumar M, Srivastava G, Kaur J, Assi J, Alyass A, Leong I, MacMillan C, Witterick I, Shukla NK, Thakar A et al: Prognostic significance of cytoplasmic S100A2 overexpression in oral cancer patients. J Transl Med 2015, 13:8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bai Y, Li LD, Li J, Lu X: Prognostic values of S100 family members in ovarian cancer patients. BMC Cancer 2018, 18(1):1256.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lewin SN, Herzog TJ, Barrena Medel NI, Deutsch I, Burke WM, Sun X, Wright JD: Comparative performance of the 2009 international Federation of gynecology and obstetrics’ staging system for uterine corpus cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2010, 116(5):1141–1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhu L, Sun X, Bai W: Nomograms for Predicting Cancer-Specific and Overall Survival Among Patients With Endometrial Carcinoma: A SEER Based Study. Front Oncol 2020, 10:269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ouyang D, Li R, Li Y, Zhu X: A 7-lncRNA signature predict prognosis of Uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma. J Cell Biochem 2019, 120(10):18465–18477.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang X, Pang X, Huang Y, Qian S: A seven-m6A regulator-related CpG site-based prognostic signature for endometrial carcinoma. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021, 100(29):e26648.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rodriguez AC, Blanchard Z, Maurer KA, Gertz J: Estrogen Signaling in Endometrial Cancer: a Key Oncogenic Pathway with Several Open Questions. Horm Cancer 2019, 10(2-3):51–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Naz S, Bashir M, Ranganathan P, Bodapati P, Santosh V, Kondaiah P: Protumorigenic actions of S100A2 involve regulation of PI3/Akt signaling and functional interaction with Smad3. Carcinogenesis 2014, 35(1):14–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang Y, Yang X, Zhu XL, Bai H, Wang ZZ, Zhang JJ, Hao CY, Duan HB: S100A gene family: immune-related prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets for low-grade glioma. Aging (Albany NY) 2021, 13(11):15459–15478.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mehta AR, Armstrong AJ: Tasquinimod in the treatment of castrate-resistant prostate cancer - current status and future prospects. Ther Adv Urol 2016, 8(1):9–18.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82073226, 81773107) to JD, the Jiangsu Provincial Maternal and Child Health Scientific Research Project (F202005) to CY. JD and CY designed the study and drafted the manuscript. JD supervised the experimental work.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Qinzhen Zhang and Tianxiang Xia contributed equally to this paper.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The First Clinical Medical College, Nanjing Medical University, 211166, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

    Qinzhen Zhang

  2. Department of Physiology, Nanjing Medical University, 101 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, 211166, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

    Tianxiang Xia, Chenxiang Qi & Jun Du

  3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Women’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 123 Mochou Road, 210004, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

    Chunping Ye

Authors
  1. Qinzhen Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tianxiang Xia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chenxiang Qi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jun Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chunping Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JD, CY designed the study. QZ, TX, CQ performed the statistical analysis. JD, CY drafted the manuscript. JD supervised the experimental work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jun Du or Chunping Ye.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All methods were carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. No ethics approval was required for this work. All utilized public data sets were generated by others who obtained ethical approval.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Q., Xia, T., Qi, C. et al. High expression of S100A2 predicts poor prognosis in patients with endometrial carcinoma. BMC Cancer 22, 77 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09180-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09180-5

Keywords

  • S100A2
  • Overall survival
  • Prognosis
  • Endometrial carcinoma
  • Bioinformatics