Skip to main content
Download PDF

Annual incidence rates of herpes zoster among an immunocompetent population in the United States

BMC Infectious Diseases volume 15, Article number: 502 (2015) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Herpes zoster (HZ), also known as shingles, is a painful and commonly occurring condition in the United States. In spite of a universally recommended vaccine for use in immunocompetent adults aged 60 years and older, HZ continues to impact the American public, and a better understanding of its current incidence is needed. The objective of the current study is to estimate the overall and age- and gender-specific incidence rates (IRs) of HZ among an immunocompetent US population in 2011 following availability of a vaccine.

Methods

Claims data from the Truven Health MarketScan® Research databases between 01/01/2011 and 12/31/2011 were extracted. Immunocompetent adult patients, enrolled as of January 1, 2011 were analyzed. The denominator was defined as eligible subjects who were immunocompetent, had no evidence of zoster vaccination, and no diagnosis of HZ (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code 053.xx) in the 90 days prior to January 1, 2011. Subjects contributed person-days to the denominator until the occurrence of one of the following events: end of continuous enrollment in the database, a claim for zoster vaccination, diagnosis of HZ or end of the observation period (December 31, 2011). The numerator was defined as enrollees within the denominator file exhibiting evidence of HZ. Annual IRs were calculated for the entire population in the database as well as by gender and age group; standardized IRs were also produced using the 2010 US Census data.

Results

The overall annual IR of HZ across all ages was 4.47 per 1000 person-years (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 4.44–4.50) which monotonically increased with age from 0.86 (95 % CI: 0.84–0.88) for those aged ≤19 to 12.78 (95 % CI: 12.49–13.07) for patients ≥80 years. The IR was 8.46 (95 % CI: 8.39–8.52) among adults ≥50 years and 10.46 (95 % CI: 10.35–10.56) among those aged ≥60 years. Women compared to men had higher HZ incidence (5.25, 95 % CI: 5.21–5.29 vs. 3.66, 95 % CI: 3.62–3.69) and this was seen across all age groups. When adjusted for age and gender using 2010 US Census data, the annual IR was 4.63 per 1000 person-years (95 % CI: 4.61–4.66).

Conclusions

Despite the availability of a vaccine, HZ remains common among immunocompetent adults in the US with incidence rates of HZ observed to increase with age and be higher in women than men.

Peer Review reports

Background

Herpes zoster (HZ), or shingles, is caused by reactivation of the varicella zoster virus (VZV) and mainly affects the elderly population [1–3]. In the United States, over 99 % of adults have serological evidence of VZV infection and are susceptible to HZ [4], and the individual lifetime risk of HZ is approximately 30 % [5]. It is estimated that approximately 1 million new cases of HZ are diagnosed each year. While susceptibility to HZ increases with advancing age, the rate of incidence significantly increases among patients aged >50 years, with a drastic rise in the rate thereafter [2, 6]. The incidence rate of HZ ranged between three and five per 1,000 person-years from prior studies in the US and other countries, depending on the population studied and immunocompetency of subjects [5, 7–10]. However, estimates are prior to the introduction of a zoster vaccine in the United States.

Zostavax®, a live attenuated zoster vaccine approved in the US for the prevention of HZ in immunocompetent adults 50 years of age and older, is recommended by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for use among immunocompetent adults aged 60 years and older [11]. In a large randomized clinical trial, zoster vaccine was shown to reduce the incidence of HZ by 51.3 % and the incidence of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) by 66.5 %, in immunocompetent adults 60 years of age and older [6]. In addition, the Zostavax Efficacy and Safety Trial (ZEST) demonstrated that zoster vaccine reduced the risk of HZ in adults 50 to 59 [12]. The economic value of the zoster vaccine has been reviewed and synthesized elsewhere [13].

In spite of vaccine availability, HZ continues to pose a significant burden in the US. Despite ACIP recommendations, in 2011 only 15.8 % of adults aged ≥60 years reported ever receiving the zoster vaccine [14]. Previous studies found that the incidence rate of HZ has changed over time, and updated data on age-specific and sex-specific incidence rates using a nationwide database is important to understand the population at risk of HZ. The objective of the current study is to estimate the overall and age- and sex-specific incidence rates of HZ among immunocompetent US adults in 2011 following availability of a vaccine.

Methods

Data source

This retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted using administrative claims data from two Truven Health MarketScan® Research Databases – the Commercial Claims and Encounters and the Medicare Supplemental and Coordination of Benefits—for the period January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011. Both databases include complete longitudinal records of inpatient services, outpatient services, long-term care, and prescription drug claims covered under a variety of fee-for-service and managed care health plans, including exclusive provider organizations, preferred provider organizations, point of service plans, indemnity plans, and health maintenance organizations. The MarketScan Research database records are de-identified and compliant with US patient confidentiality requirements, including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act 1996. Permissions were not needed to utilize these data. Since this study used only de-identified patient records and did not involve the collection, use, or transmittal of individually identifiable data, Institutional Review Board approval was not necessary.

Patient selection

Patients with and without HZ (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] diagnosis code 053.xx), enrolled as of January 1, 2011, having no claims for HZ or evidence of receiving shingles vaccination in the 90 days prior to January 1, 2011, and meeting criteria for immunocompetent status were included. A series of selected ICD-9-CM diagnoses, procedures and treatment criteria, informed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [11] were used to determine the immunocompetent status of each patient. Patients were excluded if they had ICD-9-CM diagnosis or procedure codes for hematologic malignancy, solid tumor malignancy, human immunodeficiency virus, chronic renal failure, nephrotic syndrome, and other select immunocompromising conditions. Patients were also excluded if they had evidence of organ transplantation, procedures indicating injection or infusion of cancer chemotherapeutic substance, immunotherapy as antineoplastic agent, poisoning by antineoplastic and immunosuppressive drugs, or treatment with chemotherapy, radiation therapy, corticosteroids, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, protease inhibitors, reverse transcriptase inhibitors, azathioprine, cyclosporine, or tacrolimus.

Annual incidence rate

The annual incidence rates of HZ were calculated for the entire population observed in the database as well as by gender and age group (<19, 20–29, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, 70–79, 80+). Standardized incidence rates were also produced using the 2010 US Census data to produce overall and gender-specific rates by age group [15]. In addition, rates were reported for those aged ≥50 and ≥60 years.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive analyses were conducted to determine the demographic characteristics of the study cohort. Annual incidence rates of HZ in the immunocompetent were estimated by dividing the total unique number of incident HZ patients observed in the reporting year by the total number of person-years in the reporting year. The calculations for the denominator and numerator were performed as described previously [16]. The denominator was defined as eligible subjects who were immunocompetent, had no evidence of shingles vaccination, and no diagnosis of HZ in the 90 days prior to January 1, 2011. Subjects contributed person-days to the denominator until the occurrence of one of the following events: end of continuous enrollment in the database, a claim for zoster vaccine, diagnosis of HZ, or end of the observation period (December 31, 2011). Rates of HZ were presented per 1,000 person-years, and the direct standardized rate and 95 % confidence intervals were calculated by Chiang’s normal approximation to Poisson rate sums [17]. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 113,861 incident cases of HZ were observed in the database during the study period. Demographic characteristics of the study cohort are shown in Table 1. The mean population age was 52 (standard deviation: 17.8) years, with the majority aged ≥50 years (60 %), and females comprising 60 % of the study population. Over a third of patients resided in the south region of the United States (36 %) and the majority was covered by commercial insurance (79.1 %) (Table 1).

Table 1 Demographic Characteristics of Incident Herpes Zoster Population
Full size table

The overall annual incidence rate of HZ, across all ages of the study population, was 4.47 per 1,000 person-years (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 4.44–4.50) with higher rates observed among women than men (5.25, 95 % CI: 5.21–5.29 vs. 3.66, 95 % CI: 3.62–3.69), respectively) across all age groups. The rate of HZ increased monotonically with age, ranging from 0.86 (95 % CI: 0.84–0.88) for those aged ≤19 to 12.78 (95 % CI: 12.49–13.07) for immunocompetent HZ patients aged 80 and older (see Additional file 1). When the raw annual incidence rates of HZ across all ages were adjusted for age and sex using 2010 US Census data, the overall rate was 4.63 per 1,000 person-years (95 % CI: 4.61, 4.66), with higher rates observed among women than men (5.52, 95 % CI: 5.45–5.53 vs. 3.66, 95 % CI: 3.62–3.79, respectively).

When incidence rates of HZ were examined for combined cohorts across age groups (i.e. those aged 50 and older and those 60 and older), the incidence rate increased from 8.46 (95 % CI: 8.39–8.52) among adults 50 years and older to 10.46 (95 % CI: 10.35–10.56) among those aged 60 years and older. Similarly, rates for males and females followed a nearly identical trend, increasing from 6.71 (95 % CI: 6.63–6.80) to 8.73 (95 % CI: 8.60–8.87) in males and from 10.06 (95 % CI: 9.96–10.15) to 12.00 (95 % CI: 11.85–12.16) in females (see Additional file 1).

Discussion

The current study demonstrates that despite the availability of HZ vaccine, incidence of herpes zoster among an insured population has not decreased. A total of 113,871 immunocompetent patients with HZ were analyzed in this retrospective study. The overall annual HZ incidence rate for the year 2011 was 4.47 per 1,000 person-years in our dataset and 4.63 per 1,000 person-years when standardized for age and sex using 2010 US Census data.

Understanding the age-specific incidence rate of HZ is important as they represent the target population for zoster vaccine. Consistent with other studies, the risk of HZ increased with advancing age. The age-specific incidence ranged from 0.86 per 1000 person-years in individuals <19 years of age to 12.78 per 1000 person-years among those 80 years of age and older, and increased rapidly after 50 years of age. The age-related increase in the incidence may be closely linked to an age-dependent decline in VZV-specific cell-mediated immunity. However, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of the zoster vaccine for use in adults over 50 years of age contrasts recommendations from the ACIP which recommends vaccination of adults 60 years and older [11]. A substantial public health burden of HZ also occurs in adults 50 to 59 years of age, most of whom are working adults. In our study, over 25 % of HZ occurred in adults 50 to 59 years of age and another 34 % occurred in adults >60 years of age in the US.

Our age- and sex-standardized estimated rate of 4.6 cases per 1,000 person-years among immunocompetent patients is comparable to recent studies using administrative data in the US. Previously, reported rates were 4.8 per 1,000 person-years from the general population that includes immunocompromised individuals in 2005–09 [8] and 4.4 per 1,000 person-years in 2006 [9]. Similarly, Yawn and colleagues reported incidence rates of 3.6 per 1,000 person-years in a population-based study in Minnesota that incorporated medical record review from 1996 to 2001 [5]. Another study which utilized the MarketScan databases, reported an incidence rate of HZ of 3.2 per 1,000 person-years in years 2000–2001 [7]. Studies conducted more than 20 years ago in the US showed even lower rates: 2.2 in years 1990–1992 [18] and 1.3 per 1,000 person-years in years 1945–1959 [19]. This trend over time is consistent with most studies that examined temporal trends in the US and six other countries across the globe [2, 9, 20–23].

We observed a higher incidence rate of HZ in women than men (5.2 versus 3.7 per 1,000 person-years, respectively) across all age groups. Although some studies found no difference, the majority of prior studies from across countries also found that women have a greater risk of HZ than men [1, 5, 20–22, 24–27]. This difference may be partly due to differences in health seeking behavior; however, the difference may also be due to biological factors. In the Shingles Prevention Study clinical trial where participants were actively followed up and cases were laboratory-confirmed, women had higher incidence rates of HZ than men in the placebo group (11.79 versus 10.65 per 1,000 person-years, respectively) [6]. It is plausible that there may be immunological or hormonal differences between women and men in response to reactivation of latent virus infection.

As with all retrospective studies, the current investigation has potential limitations. First, the study was limited to only those individuals with commercial health coverage or private Medicare supplemental coverage in the US; therefore, results may not be generalizable to HZ patients with other insurance or without coverage or those living outside the US. Second, the potential for misclassification of HZ, covariates, or study outcomes was potentially present as patients were identified through administrative claims data which are subject to data coding limitations and data entry error as opposed to medical records. However, previous studies found that the positive predictive value of ICD-9-CM codes for HZ in administrative claims data is relatively high, ranging from 84 to 94 % [18, 28, 29]. Third, since the zoster vaccine was approved in 2008 and this study only looked back 90 days prior to January 1, 2011 for evidence of vaccination, it is possible that both vaccinated and unvaccinated patients are included in the calculation. Fourth, this study used only one year of data to calculate incidence and may not represent the actual incidence if by any chance there were more or less cases reported in 2011. This study offers advantages, including the most updated estimate based on a nationwide administrative database in the US In addition, this study is based on a substantial number of datasets evaluated from two large administrative databases which allowed us to estimate the age- and sex-specific incidence rates in the immunocompetent population.

Conclusions

Despite the availability of a vaccine, herpes zoster remains common among immunocompetent adults with incidence rates of HZ observed to increase with age and be higher in women than men. A significant focus on how to reduce the risk of HZ, e.g. improving vaccine access, should be adopted by health care providers.

References

  1. Thomas SL, Hall AJ. What does epidemiology tell us about risk factors for herpes zoster? Lancet Infect Dis. 2004;4(1):26–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brisson M, Edmunds WJ, Law B, Gay NJ, Walld R, Brownell M, et al. Epidemiology of varicella zoster virus infection in Canada and the United Kingdom. Epidemiol Infect. 2001;127:305–14.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Schmader K. Herpes zoster in older adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:1481–6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kilgore PE, Kruszon-Moran D, Seward JF, Jumaan A, Van Loon FP, Forghani B, et al. Varicella in Americans from NHANES III: implications for control through routine immunization. J Med Virol. 2003;70 Suppl 1:S111–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yawn BP, Saddier P, Wollan PC, St Sauver JL, Kurland MJ, Sy LS. A population-based study of the incidence and complication rates of herpes zoster before zoster vaccine introduction. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82:1341–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Oxman MN, Levin MJ, Johnson GR, Schmader KR, Straus SE, Gelb LD, et al. A vaccine to prevent herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia in older adults. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2271–84.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Insinga RP, Itzler RF, Pellissier JM, Saddier P, Nikas AA. The incidence of herpes zoster in a United States Administrative Database. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:748–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen SY, Suaya JA, Li Q, Galindo CM, Misurski D, Burstin S, et al. Incidence of herpes zoster in patients with altered immune function. Infection. 2014;42(2):325–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Leung J, Harpaz R, Molinari NA, Jumaan A, Zhou F. Herpes zoster incidence among insured persons in the United States, 1993–2006: evaluation of impact of varicella vaccination. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(3):332–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kawai K, Gebremeskel B, Acosta CJ. Incidence and complications of herpes zoster: towards a global perspective. BMJ Open. 2014;4(6):e004833.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevention of Herpes Zoster. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR. 2008;57(Early Release):1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schmader KE, Levin MJ, Gnann Jr JW, McNeil SA, Vesikari T, Betts RF, et al. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of herpes zoster vaccine in persons aged 50–59 years. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(7):922–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kawai K, Preaud E, Baron-Papillon F, Largeron N, Acosta CJ. Cost-effectiveness of vaccination against herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia: a critical review. Vaccine. 2014;32(15):1645–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Noninfluenza vaccination coverage among adults — United States, 2011. MMWR. 2013;62:66–72.

    Google Scholar 

  15. United States’ Census 2010. Available at: http://www.census.gov/2010census/. Last accessed on 6 Sep 2014.

  16. O’Malley CD, Johnston SS, Lenhart G, Cherkowski G, Palmer L, Morgan SL. Trends in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the United States, 2000–2009. J Clin Densitom. 2011;14(2):100–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chiang CL. Standard error of the age-adjusted death rate. US Department of Health, Education and Welfare. Vital Stat Spec Rep. 1961;47:271–85.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Donohue JG, Choo PW, Manson JE, Platt R. The incidence of herpes zoster. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:1605–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ragozzino MW, Melton 3rd LJ, Kurland LT, Chu CP, Perry HO. Population-based study of herpes zoster and its sequelae. Medicine (Baltimore). 1982;61(5):310–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hales CM, Harpaz R, Joesoef MR, Bialek SR. Examination of links between herpes zoster incidence and childhood varicella vaccination. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(11):739–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Esteban-Vasallo MD, Gil-Prieto R, Domínguez-Berjón MF, Astray-Mochales J, Gil de Miguel A. Temporal trends in incidence rates of herpes zoster among patients treated in primary care centers in Madrid (Spain), 2005–2012. J Infect. 2014;68(4):378–86.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Toyama N, Shiraki K, Dermatologists SotMP. Epidemiology of herpes zoster and its relationship to varicella in Japan: A 10-year survey of 48,388 herpes zoster cases in Miyazaki prefecture. J Med Virol. 2009;81(12):2053–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu PY, Wu HD, Chou TC, Sung FC. Varicella vaccination alters the chronological trends of herpes zoster and varicella. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e77709.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Chapman RS, Cross KR, Fleming DM. The incidence of shingles and its implications for vaccination policy. Vaccine. 2003;21:2541–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Morant-Talamante N, Diez-Domingo J, Martínez-Úbeda S, Puig-Barberá J, Alemán-Sánchez S, Pérez-Breva L. Herpes zoster surveillance using electronic databases in the Valencian Community (Spain). BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:463.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Gonzalez Chiappe S, Sarazin M, Turbelin C, Lasserre A, Pelat C, Bonmarin I, et al. Herpes zoster: Burden of disease in France. Vaccine. 2010;28(50):7933–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lin YH, Huang LM, Chang IS, Tsai FY, Lu CY, Shao PL, et al. Disease burden and epidemiology of herpes zoster in pre-vaccine Taiwan. Vaccine. 2010;28(5):1217–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yawn BP, Wollan P, St. Sauver J. Comparing shingles incidence and complication rates from medical record review and administrative database estimates: How close are they? Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174(9):1054–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Klompas M, Kulldorff M, Vilk Y, Bialek SR, Harpaz R. Herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia surveillance using structured electronic data. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011;86(12):1146–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the analytic contributions of Helen Varker and Diana Stetsovsky and Santosh Tiwari for his editorial contribution to this study.

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Outcomes Research, Truven Health Analytics, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

      Barbara H. Johnson, Liisa Palmer, Justin Gatwood & Gregory Lenhart

    2. Vaccines, Center for Observational and Real-World Evidence (CORE), Merck & Co., Inc., West Point, PA, USA

      Kosuke Kawai & Camilo J. Acosta

    Authors
    1. Barbara H. Johnson
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Liisa Palmer
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Justin Gatwood
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Gregory Lenhart
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Kosuke Kawai
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Camilo J. Acosta
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Barbara H. Johnson.

    Additional information

    Competing interests

    BHJ, LP and GL are employees of Truven Health Analytics, which was awarded a research contract by Merck & Co., Inc to conduct this study. JG was an employee of Truven Health Analytics at the time of the study and during manuscript preparation. KK was a consultant working for Merck & Co., Inc at the time of the study and during manuscript preparation. CJA is an employee and stock holder of Merck & Co., Inc.

    Authors’ contributions

    BHJ, LP, KK, and CJA were responsible for the concept and design of the study; BHJ, JG and KK were responsible for study coordination; GL performed the statistical analysis. All authors had full access to the study data and contributed substantially to the data analysis and interpretation of data, contributed to and critically reviewed the manuscript during its development, and approved the final version of the manuscript for submission.

    Barbara H. Johnson and Justin Gatwood contributed equally to this work.

    Additional file

    Additional file 1:

    Incidence of Herpes Zoster among Immunocompetent Adults by Age and Gender. This table contains the full set of incidence rates by age and by gender with confidence intervals. Please view this file as landscape. (DOC 45 kb)

    Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

    Reprints and Permissions

    About this article

    Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Johnson, B.H., Palmer, L., Gatwood, J. et al. Annual incidence rates of herpes zoster among an immunocompetent population in the United States. BMC Infect Dis 15, 502 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-1262-8

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-1262-8

    Keywords

    • Herpes zoster
    • Incidence rates
    • Immunocompetent
    • Vaccine