Background

One of the major causes of new drug molecules failing to reach the market is poor bioavailability. Indeed, many of the newly discovered drug candidates suffer from low to extremely low water solubility and hence are prone to limited bioavailability [13]. To cope with these issues, drug formulation scientists are developing formulation strategies that enhance the dissolution and thus the bioavailability of these poorly water-soluble drugs [4]. The most important technologies are applied in the formulation development to enhance solubility and dissolution which include particle size reduction, salt formation, and amorphous systems, as well as co-solvents, complexants, surfactants, and lipid formulations. Among these techniques, particle size reduction is highly promising. Micronization of drug crystals by various mechanisms to the lower micron range improves drug dissolution [5]. According to the Noyes-Whitney equation, the dissolution rate increases by increasing the specific surface area. The saturation solubility increases with decreasing particle size according to the Ostwald-Freundlich equation [6, 7]. Therefore, reducing particle size to the nanorange has been investigated through several approaches. Current methods to prepare drug nanocrystals can be divided into top-down and bottom-up methods [8, 9]. At present, most industrially feasible methods are the top-down technologies; all the products on the market are made by size reduction. The major two processes are ball milling and high-pressure homogenization, either in water or in non-aqueous water-reduced media. Disadvantages of the ball milling process are the relatively long milling times in the case of hard drug material, the limited scaling up ability (the weight of the ball mill and the milling material limit maximum size), and potential contamination of the milling material by erosion from the milling pearls [10]. Nanocrystal production by high-pressure homogenization requires typically 10 to 20 homogenization cycles at pressures of, e. g., 1,000 to 1,500 bar. Metal contamination from the homogenizer is obviously not a problem. However, despite when using a high-capacity homogenizer with 1 ton product per hour, the acceleration of production by reduction of the homogenization cycle number would be desirable. Currently, the utilization of ultrasound for material synthesis has been extensively examined over many years, and it is now positioned as one of the most powerful tools in nanostructured material synthesis. Acoustic cavitation provides a unique interaction of energy and matter, and ultrasonic irradiation of liquids causes high-energy chemical reactions to occur, often accompanied by the emission of light [11]. Bubbles generated during sonication can effectively accumulate the diffuse energy of ultrasound, and upon collapse, an enormous concentration of energy is released to heat the contents of the bubble. These transient, localized hot spots with extremely high temperatures and pressures are primarily responsible for the chemical effects of ultrasound [12]. The usefulness of sonochemical synthesis as a synthetic tool resides in its versatility. With a simple modification in the reaction conditions, various forms of nanostructured materials can be synthesized, including metals [13, 14], carbides [15] and sulfides [16] which are nanostructured supported catalysts.

Carvedilol, (+)–1-(Carbazol-4-yloxy)-3-f[2-(o-methoxyphenoxy)ethyl]aminog-2-propanol, is a β-receptor blocker and antihypertensive drug with a multiple-action spectrum [17], and it also has vasodilating properties that are attributed mainly to its blocking activity at α1 receptors. The use of carvedilol has been shown to provide additional morbidity and mortality benefits in severe congestive heart failure [18]. Previously, Varshosaz et al. reported the preparation of carvedilol nanoparticles by emulsification method [19]. Kalimuthu et al. reported the formulation of carvedilol-loaded Eudragit e 100 nanoparticles [20]. In this paper, we have developed a simple ultrasonic method to prepare nanocarvedilol and studied some parameters, such as sonication time and ultrasonic device power in the size and morphology of the carvedilol nanoparticles. The result shows that different particle diameters of carvedilol were prepared, and infrared studies show that the bonds do not change.

Results and discussion

Various conditions for the preparation of carvedilol nanoparticles were summarized in Table 1. In series 1, the reactions were studied in 20 and 40 min. Results show that the particle size in sample 1 (Figure 1B) is smaller than that of 2 (Figure 1A). This point shows that an increase in the sonication time led to an increase in the particle size. In the same way, an increase in the sonication time led to the increase of the particle sizes in sample 4 (Figure 2B). Various ultrasound powers led to different morphologies. Samples 1 and 2 have amorphous structures, but the morphology of samples 3 and 4 changed to spherical structures, and their particle distribution is uniform. Particle size in sample 3 is smaller than that of 4. Therefore, the best morphology with smaller particles and good distribution was obtained from sample 4 with the sonication time of 40 min and the ultrasound device power of 80 W (Figure 2B).

Table 1 Experimental conditions for the preparation of carvedilol nanoparticles
Figure 1
figure 1

SEM images of carvedilol nanoparticles in (A) sample 1 and (B) sample 2.

Figure 2
figure 2

SEM images of carvedilol nanoparticles in (A) sample 3 and (B) sample 4.

Figure 3 shows the typical Fourier transform-infrared (FTIR) spectrum pattern of the nanocarvedilol in the range of 400 to 4,000 cm−1. The IR spectrum of pure carvedilol showed the peak at 3,344.88 cm–1 (N-H, str), which corresponds to N-H stretching. The hetero-aromatic structure shows the presence of the C-H stretching vibrations in the region 2995.87 cm–1 (C-H, Sp2), also in 2923.56 cm–1, which is the characteristic region for the ready identification of the C-H stretching vibrations. The bands corresponding to the in-plane C-H deformations are observed in the regions 1,000 to 1,300 cm−1. The bands are sharp but of weak to minimum intensity. The medium- and strong-intensity bands are in the regions 1,099.72, 1,119.95, 1,156.24, and 1,177.15 cm−1 in the FT-IR spectrum. A medium experimental peak around 1252 to 1,402 cm−1 in the FT-IR was assigned to the C-C stretching vibrations. The bands in the regions 1,502 to 1,607 cm−1 observed in both FT-IR were assigned to the C = C stretching vibrations. In the present case, the bands observed at 849.50 and 783.90 cm−1 in the FT-IR are assigned to the ring breathing mode. The identification of C-N vibrations is a very difficult task since mixing of several bands is possible in the region assigned for the C-N stretching vibrations which is in the regions 1,347.95 to 1,285.41 cm−1. In the present work, a weak band at 1,402.71 cm−1 and a strong band at 1,453.97 cm−1 were seen in the FT-IR. It is observed that the ultrasonic wave has no effect on nanoscale materials and the structure does not change.

Figure 3
figure 3

Room-temperature FT-IR spectra of carvedilol and nanocarvedilol (sample 4).

X-ray diffraction (XRD) technique was used to determine the ingredients of the sample. Figure 4 shows the XRD patterns of typical sample 4 prepared by the sonochemical process. The mean size of carvedilol nanoparticles was calculated to be about 96 nm using Scherrer's equation: D = /(β cos θ), where D is the mean crystalline size (nm), λ is the wavelength of Cu Kα (0.154 nm), β is the full width at half maximum intensity in radian, and θ is the Bragg angle (°) [21].

Figure 4
figure 4

X-ray diffraction spectrum of nanocarvedilol in (A) sample 4.

The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curve of carvedilol showed a sharp endothermic peak (Tpeak = 115°C) corresponding to its melting point, indicating its crystalline nature (Figure 5A). In DSC studies, the characteristic endothermic peaks, corresponding to drugs melting point, were shifted toward higher temperature. This could be attributed to the bigger particle sizes and uniform distribution of drugs (Figure 5B). Now, it is found that the melting temperature of carvedilol nanoparticles decreases with decreasing their particle size. The melting temperature increases as its size increases. In other words, their melting temperature is lower than the corresponding bulk materials.

Figure 5
figure 5

DSC spectra of (A) carvedilol and (B) carvedilol nanoparticles.

It is also noteworthy that one of the problems of carvedilol is its very low aqueous solubility. The importance of solubility enhancement is for the absorption of drug from the site of absorption. The size of the solid particle influences the solubility because as a particle becomes smaller, the surface area-to-volume ratio of the particle increases. The larger surface area allows a greater interaction with the solvent. Increase aqueous solubility with the nanoparticle size increases the efficiency and/or reduces the side effects for certain drugs.

Conclusions

The described method for preparing carvedilol nanoparticles can potentially be used at industrial scale because it does not need special conditions, such as high temperature, long times, or high-temperature and high-pressure controlling. The advantage of using ultrasound radiation is that it yields smaller particles. The same results have been shown for recent reports too. This approach can be used to improve the therapeutic efficacy of poorly soluble drugs.

Methods

Material and methods

Carvedilol was purchased from Alborz Darou Pharmaceutical Company in Tehran, Iran. A multiwave ultrasonic generator (Sonicator_3000, Misonix, Inc., Farmingdale, NY, USA), equipped with a converter/transducer and titanium oscillator (horn), 12.5 mm in diameter, operating at 20 kHz with a maximum power output of 600 W, was employed. The morphology of synthesized samples was studied using scanning electron microscopes (KYKY-EM3200, KYKY Technology Development Ltd., Beijing, China; Philips XL 30 and S-4160, Philips, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) and by a sputtering technique with gold as covering contrast material. The thermal analysis was carried out on DSC Q10 V9.4 Build 287 (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA). The XRD measurements of synthesized samples were carried out using a Philips X-pert PRO powder diffractometer (Philips, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54 Å) in the scan range of 0° to 100°. The IR spectra were recorded using a Bruker spectrometer (Bruker AXS, Inc., Madison, WI, USA) with KBr pellets in the range of 400 to 4,000 cm−1.

Synthesis of nanoparticles

Carvedilol and carbon tetrachloride were mixed to prepare nanoparticles by ultrasonic method. The sonochemical reactions were carried in the sonochemical probe, as shown in Figure 6. The ultrasonic device power and sonication time were the parameters which were changed to reach the optimum condition.

Figure 6
figure 6

Schematic of the experimental setup used for the sonochemical reactions. (a) Carvedilol and carbon tetrachloride, (b) sonochemical probe.

Then, the suspension was ultrasonically irradiated with a high-density ultrasonic probe immersed directly into the solution under various conditions (Table 1). The precipitate was separated from the mother liquor by a centrifuge at 4,000 rpm for 3 min. The final product was dried at 50°C in a vacuum system.