The proband is a girl now aged 12 years. Pregnancy was noticeable only on the basis of a placenta previa without complications. The mother was 22. Birth weight was 2950 g. The child was brought to medical attention at the age of 4 because of global developmental delay. Past medical history is positive for recurrent otitis media that caused moderate conductive hearing loss, which required tympanostomy. She started a stimulation program at the age of 4 because of developmental delay. Cognitive performance is in agreement with moderate mental retardation (IQ between 40 to 55) according to the Weschler intelligence scale for children, third edition (WISC-III). There is no difference between verbal and non-verbal functions.
Phenotypic manifestations are the following: weight is at the 50th centile, height at 3rd centile and head circumference at 50th centile. The face is rectangular, hair implantation is low, the ears are large and protruding, the mouth is large with a prominent philtrum and a high-arched palate (Figure 1A). Small hands and clinodactyly of the fifth fingers were noted. Neurological examination is normal.
Cerebral imaging revealed asymmetrical lateral ventricles without any associated lesion. Renal ultrasound was performed and revealed no abnormalities. Endocrine evaluation was also normal, including thyroid stimulating hormone and insulin-like growth factor 1. Immune function was adequate with immunoglobulin A in normal range.
The second daughter is now aged 9. Pregnancy was uneventful and birth weight was 3630 g. Early development was normal and she walked at 1 year of age. Psychological evaluation with a WISC-III test indicated that she has a non-verbal IQ in the mild mental retardation range (55 to 70) and a verbal IQ in the borderline range (70 to 85). However, this difference is not significant. Her global IQ is in the borderline range but close to mild mental retardation.
On examination, her weight is at the 25th percentile, height is at the 10th percentile and head circumference is at the 75th percentile. Phenotypical observation revealed the following features: low posterior hairline, large protruding ears, rectangular face, epicanthal folds, large mouth with prominent philtrum, high-arched palate and downturning corners of the mouth (Figure 1B). Small hands and clinodactyly of the fifth fingers were also present.
Like her sister, renal ultrasound, endocrine function and immune function were all normal.
The mother's history is noticeable for learning difficulties especially in mathematics. Her global IQ is 43 consistent with moderate mental retardation. There is a significant difference (p = 0,05) between verbal and non-verbal IQ, 52 and 42 respectively. She leads an active and independent life. Her pubertal development is described as normal with menarche at age 13. She had a miscarriage at 16 weeks of pregnancy before her two daughters. The mother does not complain of dystonia.
Her height is 157 cm, which is around the fifth percentile. She has a rectangular face, low posterior hairline, downturning corners of mouth with prominent philtrum and a high-arched palate (Figure 1C). Unilateral ptosis is present. She showed clinodactyly of her fifth fingers as well. Immune and endocrine functions were normal.
Chromosome analysis from peripheral blood lymphocytes was carried out using GTG banding procedure on the whole family. The proband analysis revealed a 46, XX, del(18)(p11.2) complement in all 14 cells analyzed (Figure 1D). Fragile X syndrome was ruled out by polymerase chain reaction amplification. Proband's sister and mother revealed the same deletion (Figure 1E and 1F). Father's chromosomal analysis showed a 46, XY karyotype. In the proband, further investigation using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with 18p/18q subtelomeric probes on 20 mitosis was in agreement with cytogenetic results and showed a terminal deletion of 18p (Figure 2) with no hybridization of 18p subtelomeric probe on any other chromosome. Maternal grandfather's karyotype was normal but the maternal grandmother was unavailable.
This paper presents the sixth family with transmission of an 18p deletion. Phenotypical features were quite similar throughout the family and in accordance with the usual phenotype of del(18p). Short stature, low hairline, rectangular face, high-arched palate, prominent philtrum and clinodactyly of the fifth fingers were present throughout the family. The girls shared also large protruding ears, large mouth and small hands.
Another feature consistent throughout the familial del(18p) cases is poor intellectual outcome. Uchida et al. , described a 88% mosaic mother for del(18p) with an IQ of 75. Her child also had a developmental delay, performing at 65–70% of normal. Velagaleti et al. , presented a mother having an 18p11.2 deletion with mild mental retardation. Her daughter's psychosocial evaluation revealed a verbal IQ of 63 and a full scale IQ of 69 consistent with mild mental retardation. Tsukahara et al. , showed a Japanese woman also bearing del(18p11.2) who finished her junior high school. Her son presents a slight developmental delay at 11 months and her daughter has a DQ of 74 with significant speech delay placing them on the borderline intellectual functioning level.
We would like to underscore the fact that among the families presented above, the intellectual outcome is relatively constant throughout the same family. The family we report here is in discrepancy with this statement. The mother and proband share moderate mental retardation while the youngest daughter has borderline to mild mental retardation. This represents a significant difference among members of the same family afflicted by an identical chromosomal deletion. Such variability has been observed in other cases of familial deletions [12–14]. Even greater variability among family members with del(18p) is exemplified by the two holoprosencephaly cases. Mental retardation would have been expected in such cases of extreme brain dysmorphogenesis.
Del(18p) cases were associated with poorer verbal performance than non-verbal [2, 4, 5]. Our family equally differs in this regard. The mother has better verbal abilities and the two daughters do not display differences between verbal and non-verbal abilities. Therefore, none of our family members with del(18p) present the previously described verbal difficulties.
The six families with del(18p) were maternally transmitted. No paternal transmission has been described to our knowledge although molecular characterization of 18p de novo deletions showed an equal distribution of maternal and paternal distributions . However, it has been observed that women transmit unbalanced chromosomes aberrations more frequently than men . Since no imprinting center is known on chromosome 18 , a deleterious paternal allele with del(18p) would be a surprising phenomenon. Whether this observation is simply a statistical bias because of the small numbers involved or has a real cytogenetic background that could affect male fertility is still unknown but demands consideration.
Rigola et al. , discussed the fact that none of the cases published had a history of spontaneous abortions. This report presents the first mother with del(18p) syndrome having a miscarriage. This event happened at the 16th week of her first pregnancy and no analysis was performed on the fetus. Among the 9 clinical pregnancies of these 6 women, one aborted spontaneously which is in agreement with the 10 to 15% rate of miscarriage in the general population. Fertility of women with del(18p) syndrome seems to be normal although gonadal failure has been previously reported among those patients .