Skip to main content
Log in

An Endpoint for Worsening Asthma: Development of a Sensitive Measure and its Properties

  • Clinical and Non-Clinical Drug Development
  • Published:
Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The measurement of clinical efficacy in asthma lacks a validated endpoint for worsening asthma outcome. We propose a standard measure of worsening asthma and investigate its measurement characteristics. Data from two clinical trials were used to develop a composite endpoint that incorporated the following parameters on any study day: (1) decrease from baseline in peak expiratory flow (PEF) of >20%; (2) increase above baseline in β-agonist use of >70% (≥2 puffs/day); (3) increase above baseline in symptom score of >50%; (4) >2 nighttime awakenings; (5) PEF <180 L/min (adults); or (6) oral corticosteroid rescue or unanticipated visits to the physician, emergency room, or hospital. This novel endpoint demonstrated sufficient test/retest reliability (p = 0.67), prospectively exhibited a dose-response profile consistent with different dose levels of mon-telukast (a leukotriene antagonist), and was significantly correlated with forced expiratory volume in one second, quality of life, and global evaluations. The endpoint appears to be a valid and sensitive measure of day-to-day worsening of asthma and is appropriate for use in clinical trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shingo S, Zhang J, Reiss TF. Relationship between peripheral blood eosinophils and asthma efficacy endpoints: FEV1, PEF, and daytime symptom score. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;155:A889.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Taylor DR, Scars MR, Herbison GP, et al. Regular inhaled β-agonists in asthma: effects on exacerbations and lung function. Thorax. 1993;48:134–138.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pauwels RA, Lofdahl C, Postma DS, et al. Effect of inhaled formoterol and budesonide on exacerbations of asthma. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1405–1411.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Woolcock A, Lundback B, Ringdal N, Jacques LA. Comparison of addition of salmeterol to inhaled steroids with doubling of the dose of inhaled steroids. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;153:1481–1488.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. National Institutes of Health. Global Initiative for Asthma: Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 1995. Publication 95–3659.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang J, Reiss TF. Defining and analyzing asthma exacerbations. Control Clin Trials. 1995;16:52S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Altman LC, Munk Z, Seltzer J, et al. A placebo-controlled, dose-ranging stud; of montelukast, a cysteinyl leukotriene-receptor antagonist. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998;102:50–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Santanello NC, Barber BL, Friedman BS, Reiss TF, Juniper EF, Zhang J. Measurement characteristics of two asthma symptom diary scales for use in clinical trials. Eur Respir J. 1997;10:646–651.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Noonan MJ, Chervinsky P, Brandon M, et al. Montelukast, a potent leukotriene receptor antagonist, causes dose-related improvements in chronic asthma. Eur Respir J. 1998;11:1232–1239.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang J, Yu C and Reiss T, Predicting future response using patient baseline characteristics and early response to montelukast, a potent CYS LT-1 antagonist. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159:A640–A640.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Searle SR, Casella G, McCulloch CE. Variance Components. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1992.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Epstein RS, Ferrie PJ, Jaeschke R, Hiller TK. Evaluation of impairment of health-related quality of life in asthma: development of a questionnaire for use in clinical trials. Thorax. 1992;47:76–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rozas CJ, Goldman AL. Daily spirometric variability: normal subjects and subjects with chronic bronchitis with and without airflow obstruction. Arch Intern Med. 1982;142:1287–1291.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pennock RE, Rogers RM, McCaffree DR. Changes in measured spirometric indices: what is significant? Chest. 1981;80:97–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Greening AP, Ind PW, Northfield M, et al. Added salmeterol versus higher-dose corticosteroid in asthma patients with symptoms on existing inhaled corticosteroid. Lancet. 1994;344:219–224.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Reddel H, Ware S, Marks G, Salome C, Jenkins C, Woolcock A. Differences between asthma exacerbations and poor asthma control. Lancet. 1999;353:364–369.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Guyatt GH, Kirshner B, Jaeschke R. Measuring health status: what are the necessary measurement properties? J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:1341–1345.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hargreave FE, Dolovich J, Newhouse MT. The assessment and treatment of asthma: a conference report. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1990;85:1098–1112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Reiss TF, Chervinsky P, Dockhorn RJ, Shingo S, Seidenberg B, Edwards TB. Montelukast, a once-daily leukotriene receptor antagonist, in the treatment of chronic asthma: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial. Arch Int Med. 1998;158:1213–1220.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Malmstrom K, Rodriguez-Gomez G, Guerra J, et al. Oral montelukast, inhaled beclomethasone, and placebo for chronic asthma: a randomized, controlled trial. Am Int Med. 1999;130:487–495.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Best WR, Becktel JM, Singleton JW, Kern F. Development of a Crohn’s disease activity index: National Cooperative Crohn’s Disease Study. Gastroenterology. 1976;70:439–444.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Follmann D, Wittes J, Cutler JA. The use of subjective rankings in clinical trials with an application to cardiovascular disease. Stat Med. 1992;11:427–437.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Williford WO, Krol WF, Spechler SJ. Development for and results of the use of a gastroesophageal reflux disease activity index as an outcome variable in a clinical trial. Control Clin Trials. 1994;15:335–348.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gibson PG, Wlodarczyk J, Hensley MJ, Murree-Allen K, Olson LG, Saltos N. Using qualitycontrol analysis of peak expiratory flow recordings to guide therapy for asthma. Ann Int Med. 1995;123:488–492.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ji Zhang PhD.

Additional information

Supported by a grant from Merck Research Laboratories.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, J., Song, C. & Reiss, T.F. An Endpoint for Worsening Asthma: Development of a Sensitive Measure and its Properties. Ther Innov Regul Sci 38, 5–13 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150403800103

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150403800103

Key Words

Navigation