Correction to: Expoloriting of graphene oxide for improving physical properties of TiO₂(NPs): toward photovoltaic devices and wastewater remediation approaches

Correction to: Eur. Phys. J. Plus (2022) 137:1160 https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-03289-z

In this article, the author name K. Althagafy was incorrectly written as K. Althagafi.

The wrong figures appeared as Figs. 2–13; the figures should have appeared as shown below. The original article has been corrected.

Fig. 2

Experimental setup of photocatalytic reactor for degradation of MO dye

Fig. 3

FTIR spectra of a TiO₂ (NPs), b (0.2 wt.%) GO-TiO₂, c (0.4 wt.%) GO-TiO₂, d (0.6 wt.%) GO-TiO₂ nanocomposites thin films

Fig. 4

SEM images and the grain size distribution of a TiO₂ (NPs), b (0.2 wt.%) GO-TiO₂, c (0.4 wt.%) GO-TiO₂, d (0.6 wt.%) GO-TiO₂ nanocomposites thin films

Fig. 5

EDX spectrum of a TiO₂ and of b–d GO-TiO₂ nanocomposite

Fig. 6

XRD analysis of a TiO₂ and of b–d GO-TiO₂ nanocomposite

Fig. 7

a UV–Visible Spectroscopy transmission and b absorption spectra

Fig. 8

Schematic representation of the charge transfer under UV–Vis irradiation and the variation of the optical band gap of a TiO₂ (NPs), b (0.2 wt.%), c (0.4 wt.%) and d (0.6 wt.%) GO-TiO₂ nanocomposites

Fig. 9

Thermal analysis data (TGA) and (DTA)

Fig. 10

a The Nyquist plot of (Z′ vs. − Z″) of TiO₂ nanocomposite in pellet form at different temperatures and b equivalent proposal circuit

Fig. 11

The absorption spectra of the degradation of MO under UV light irradiation at different time intervals using a TiO₂ (NPs) b (0.2 wt.%) c (0.4 wt.%) and d (0.6 wt.%) GO-TiO₂ nanocomposites

Fig. 12

The kinetic spectra of MO degradation using TiO₂ (NPs), (0.2 wt.%), (0.4 wt.%) and (0.6 wt.%) GO-TiO₂ nanocomposites

Fig. 13

The mechanism of photocatalytic degradation of MO with GO-TiO₂ nanocomposites under UV-light irradiation