Abstract
Recently, with numerical methods, Hod clarified the validity of Thorne hoop conjecture for spatially regular static charged fluid spheres, which were considered as counterexamples against the hoop conjecture. In this work, we provide an analytical proof on Thorne hoop conjecture in the spatially regular static charged fluid sphere spacetimes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
One famous conjecture in general relativity is the Thorne hoop conjecture, which states that horizons appear when and only when a mass \(\mathcal {M}\) gets compacted into a region whose circumference C in every direction is \(C\leqslant 4\pi \mathcal {M}\) [1, 2]. This upper bound can be saturated in the case of Schwarzschild black hole with the horizon radius \(r_{0}=2\mathcal {M}\). If generically true, such conjecture would signify that black holes form if matter/energy is enclosed in a small enough region. At present, there are a lot of works addressing the hoop conjecture, see [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29] and references therein.
Intriguingly, a few counterexamples against hoop conjecture were also presented [30, 31]. In particular, Ref. [30] constructed the horizonless charged fluid sphere configurations with uniform charge densities. For \(\frac{M}{r_{0}}=0.65\) and \(\frac{Q^2}{r_{0}^2}=0.39\), the horizonless charged sphere satisfies a relation \(\frac{C(r_{0})}{4\pi M}\backsimeq 0.769<1\), where M is the total mass of the spacetime, Q is the sphere charge and \(r_{0}\) is the sphere radius. According to the relation \(\frac{C(r_{0})}{4\pi M}<1\) in the horizonless spacetime, the author claimed that Thorne hoop conjecture can be violated in horizonless charged fluid sphere spacetimes [30].
However, as stated by Hod, it is physically more appropriate to interpreted the mass term \(\mathcal {M}\) in Thorne hoop conjecture as the gravitational mass \(M(r_{0})\) contained within the radius \(r_{0}\) and not as the total mass M of the entire curved spacetime [32]. In fact, there is electric energy outside the charged sphere. For the same parameters \(\frac{M}{r_{0}}=0.65\) and \(\frac{Q^2}{r_{0}^2}=0.39\) as [30], Hod reexamined the validity of hoop conjecture for charged fluid spheres and numerically obtained the relation \(\frac{C(r_{0})}{4\pi M(r_{0})}\backsimeq 1.099>1\), which is in fact in accordance with the hoop conjecture in charged spacetime [32]. Along this line, it is still meaningful to analytically examine Thorne hoop conjecture for spatial regular charged fluid spheres with generic parameters.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. We shall introduce the gravity model of spatial regular static charged fluid spheres. We provide an analytical proof on Thorne hoop conjecture for horizonless charged fluid spheres with generic parameters. Finally, we will briefly summarize our results.
2 Validity of the hoop conjecture for charged fluid spheres
It was widely believed that Thorne hoop conjecture is a fundamental property of classical general relativity. A lot of works indeed support the hoop conjecture [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. However, counterexamples against hoop conjecture were also presented in [30, 31]. In particular, Ref. [30] constructed a gravity model of horizonless static charged fluid spheres. And the charged fluid sphere reads [33,34,35,36]
The interior metric solution with uniform charge density was obtained in [30] as
We define \(\upsilon =\frac{r}{r_{0}}\leqslant 1\), \(\varepsilon =\frac{M}{r_{0}}\) and \(f_{0}=\sqrt{1-\frac{2M}{r_{0}}+\frac{Q^2}{r_{0}^2}}\), where M is the total mass of the spacetime, Q is the sphere charge and \(r_{0}\) is the sphere radius.
In the exterior region \(r\geqslant r_{0}\), the background is the Reissner–Nordsr\(\ddot{o}\)m solution given by [37,38,39,40,41,42]
At the radius \(r_{0}\), interior metric (2–3) and exterior metric (4) coincide with each other.
Thorne hoop conjecture states that horizons appear when and only when a mass \(\mathcal {M}\) gets compacted into a region whose circumference C in every direction is \(C\leqslant 4\pi \mathcal {M}\) [1, 2]. The author in [30] claimed that Thorne hoop conjecture was violated by a relation
with \(\frac{M}{r_{0}}=0.65\) and \(\frac{Q^2}{r_{0}^2}=0.39\). However, in the charged background, as stated in [32], it is physically more appropriate to interpreted the mass term \(\mathcal {M}\) in Thorne hoop conjecture as the gravitational mass \(M(r_{0})\) contained within the radius \(r_{0}\) and not as the total mass M of the entire curved spacetime. With the same parameters \(\frac{M}{r_{0}}=0.65\) and \(\frac{Q^2}{r_{0}^2}=0.39\), Hod reexamined the model and numerically obtained the relation for horizonless spheres as
which is in accordance with the hoop conjecture in charged spacetime [32].
In the following, we provide an analytical proof on Thorne hoop conjecture for generic parameters. According to the weak energy condition (WEC), the energy density is nonnegative [33, 34]. In this work, we can take a more general condition that the energy density is real (negative or nonnegative). The energy density of interior region is [30]
It can be transformed into
We put \(1-f_{0}\) in the general form
where a, b are real numbers.
Putting (9) into (8), we arrive at the relation
At the center \(\upsilon =\frac{r}{r_{0}}=0\), (10) yields
Since \(\rho _{m}(0)\) is real, there is
That is to say \(f_{0}=\sqrt{1-\frac{2M}{r_{0}}+\frac{Q^2}{r_{0}^2}}\) is real according to (9), which yields
In the case of \(\frac{2M}{r_{0}}-\frac{Q^2}{r_{0}^2}= 1\), there is \(1-\frac{2M}{r_{0}}+\frac{Q^2}{r_{0}^2}=0\) and \(r_{0}\) is horizon according to (4). Since we study horizonless sphere, the spacetime should satisfies
There is electric energy outside the charged sphere. In order to calculate \(M(r_{0})\), we should subtract the exterior electric energy \(E(r>r_{0})\) from the total energy M. Outside the sphere, one has the Maxwell field energy density \(\rho (r)=\frac{Q^2}{8\pi r^4}\). The mass \(E(r>r_{0})\) of the Maxwell field above the radius \(r_{0}\) is given by
So the mass \(M(r_{0})\) within the radius \(r_{0}\) is [32, 43, 44]
With (14) and (16), we arrive at the relation
It yields the inequality for the horizonless spacetime as
in accordance with Thorne hoop conjecture, which states that horizons appear when and only when the mass \(M(r_{0})\) and circumference \(C(r_{0})\) satisfy the relation \(C(r_{0})\leqslant 4\pi M(r_{0})\) [32]. We point out that relation (18) holds for generic parameters. Here we analytically prove Thorne hoop conjecture in spatial regular charged fluid sphere spacetimes.
3 Conclusions
We analytically examined the validity of Thorne hoop conjecture in spatial regular charged curve spacetimes. We took the natural assumption that the matter energy density is real. On this real energy density assumption, with generic parameters, we found that horizonless charged fluid sphere should satisfy the relation (18) in accordance with Thorne hoop conjecture. In summary, we provided an analytical proof on Thorne hoop conjecture in the spatially regular static charged fluid sphere spacetimes.
Data Availability Statement
This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: This work is based on analytical study. So there is no data.]
References
K.S. Thorne, in Magic Without Magic: John Archibald Wheeler, ed. by J. Klauder (Freeman, San Francisco, 1972)
C.W. Misner, K.S. Thorne, J.A. Wheeler, Gravitation (Freeman, San Francisco, 1973)
I.H. Redmount, Phys. Rev. D 27, 699 (1983)
A.M. Abrahams, K.R. Heiderich, S.L. Shapiro, S.A. Teukolsky, Phys. Rev. D 46, 2452 (1992)
S. Hod, Phys. Lett. B 751, 241 (2015)
P. Bizon, E. Malec, N.O. Murchadha, Trapped surfaces in spherical stars. Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1147 (1988)
P. Bizon, E. Malec, N.O. Murchadha, Class. Quantum Gravity 6, 961 (1989)
D. Eardley, Gravitational collapse of vacuum gravitational field configurations. J. Math. Phys. 36, 3004 (1995)
J. Guven, N.O. Murchadha, Sufficient conditions for apparent horizons in spherically symmetric initial data. Phys. Rev. D 56, 7658 (1997)
J. Guven, N.O. Murchadha, Necessary conditions for apparent horizons and singularities in spherically symmetric initial data. Phys. Rev. D 56, 7666 (1997)
E. Malec, Event horizons and apparent horizons in spherically symmetric geometries. Phys. Rev. D 49, 6475 (1994)
E. Malec, N.O. Murchadha, The Jang equation, apparent horizons, and the Penrose inequality. Class. Quantum Gravity 21, 5777 (2004)
T. Zannias, Phys. Rev. D 45, 2998 (1992)
T. Zannias, Phys. Rev. D 47, 1448 (1993)
E. Malec, Isoperimetric inequalities in the physics of black holes. Acta Phys. Pol. B 22, 829 (1991)
M. Khuri, The hoop conjecture in spherically symmetric spacetimes. Phys. Rev. D 80, 124025 (2009)
H. Bray, M. Khuri, Asian J. Math. 15, 557 (2011)
R. Schoen, S.-T. Yau, Commun. Math. Phys. 90, 575 (1983)
T. Chiba, T. Nakamura, K. Nakao, M. Sasaki, Hoop conjecture for apparent horizon formation. Class. Quantum Gravity 11, 431–441 (1994)
T. Chiba, Apparent horizon formation and hoop concept in nonaxisymmetric space. Phys. Rev. D 60, 044003 (1999)
K. Nakao, K. Nakamura, T. Mishima, Hoop conjecture and cosmic censorship in the brane world. Phys. Lett. B 564, 143–148 (2003)
G.W. Gibbons, Birkhoff’s invariant and Thorne’s hoop conjecture. arXiv:0903.1580 [gr-qc]
M. Cvetic, G.W. Gibbons, C.N. Pope, More about Birkhoff’s invariant and Thorne’s hoop conjecture for horizons. Class. Quantum Gravity 28, 195001 (2011)
J.D. Barrow, G.W. Gibbons, Maximum tension: with and without a cosmological constant. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 446, 3874–3877 (2014)
J.D. Barrow, G.W. Gibbons, A maximum magnetic moment to angular momentum conjecture. Phys. Rev. D 95, 064040 (2017)
E. Malec, N. Xie, Brown–York mass and the hoop conjecture in nonspherical massive systems. Phys. Rev. D 91(8), 081501 (2015)
F. Anzà, G. Chirco, Fate of the Hoop conjecture in quantum gravity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(23), 231301 (2017)
S. Hod, Bekenstein’s generalized second law of thermodynamics: the role of the hoop conjecture. Phys. Lett. B 751, 241–245 (2015)
S. Hod, The gravitational two-body system: the role of the Thorne hoop conjecture. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 134(3), 106 (2019)
J.P. de Len, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 19, 289 (1987)
W.B. Bonnor, Phys. Lett. A 99, 424 (1983)
S. Hod, On the status of the hoop conjecture in charged curved spacetimes. Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 1013 (2018)
D. Núñez, H. Quevedo, D. Sudarsky, Black Holes Have No Short Hair. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 571 (1996)
S. Hod, Hairy black holes and null circular geodesics. Phys. Rev. D 84, 124030 (2011)
Y. Peng, Scalar condensation behaviors around regular Neumann reflecting stars. Nucl. Phys. B 934, 459–465 (2018)
S. Chandrasekhar, The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes (Oxford University Press, New York, 1983)
S. Hod, The Reissner–Nordström black hole with the fastest relaxation rate. Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 935 (2018)
P. Basu, C. Krishnan, P.N. Bala Subramanian, Hairy black holes in a box. JHEP 11, 041 (2016)
N. Sanchis-Gual, J.C. Degollado, P.J. Montero, J.A. Font, C. Herdeiro, Explosion and final state of an unstable Reissner–Nordström black hole. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 141101 (2016)
S.R. Dolan, S. Ponglertsakul, E. Winstanley, Stability of black holes in Einstein-charged scalar field theory in a cavity. Phys. Rev. D 92, 124047 (2015)
Y. Peng, On instabilities of scalar hairy regular compact reflecting stars. JHEP 1810, 185 (2018)
Y. Peng, Scalar field configurations supported by charged compact reflecting stars in a curved spacetime. Phys. Lett. B 780, 144–148 (2018)
Y. Peng, Large regular reflecting stars have no scalar field hair. Eur. Phys. J. C 79(4), 309 (2019)
Y. Peng, Hair distributions in noncommutative Einstein–Born–Infeld black holes. Nucl. Phys. B 941, 1–10 (2019)
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. ZR2018QA008. This work was also supported by a grant from Qufu Normal University of China under Grant No. xkjjc201906.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Funded by SCOAP3
About this article
Cite this article
Peng, Y. Analytical studies on the hoop conjecture in charged curved spacetimes. Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 943 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7470-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7470-4