Abstract
Elastic and inelastic scattering angular distributions (ADs) for the 6Li + 144Sm system in the 21–45 MeV energy range are analyzed with a Woods-Saxon phenomenological and two microscopic optical potentials, with one derived from the São Paulo formulation and the other from cluster folding of realistic alpha and deuteron potentials. Energy-dependent real, JV, and imaginary, JW, potential volume integrals are extracted from each potential system. It is shown that their variation in the region of the Coulomb barrier displays the normal threshold anomaly of strong coupling between the real and imaginary potentials. The reduced energy dependence on the extracted reduced reaction cross sections for the 6Li + 144Sm system is presented and compared to the calculated one using Wong’s formula. The strength and energy dependence of the inelastic ADs are reasonably described using the adopted potentials within the framework of the coupled channels method.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepja%2Fs10050-023-01191-5/MediaObjects/10050_2023_1191_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepja%2Fs10050-023-01191-5/MediaObjects/10050_2023_1191_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepja%2Fs10050-023-01191-5/MediaObjects/10050_2023_1191_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepja%2Fs10050-023-01191-5/MediaObjects/10050_2023_1191_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepja%2Fs10050-023-01191-5/MediaObjects/10050_2023_1191_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepja%2Fs10050-023-01191-5/MediaObjects/10050_2023_1191_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepja%2Fs10050-023-01191-5/MediaObjects/10050_2023_1191_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepja%2Fs10050-023-01191-5/MediaObjects/10050_2023_1191_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepja%2Fs10050-023-01191-5/MediaObjects/10050_2023_1191_Fig9_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepja%2Fs10050-023-01191-5/MediaObjects/10050_2023_1191_Fig10_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepja%2Fs10050-023-01191-5/MediaObjects/10050_2023_1191_Fig11_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepja%2Fs10050-023-01191-5/MediaObjects/10050_2023_1191_Fig12_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepja%2Fs10050-023-01191-5/MediaObjects/10050_2023_1191_Fig13_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepja%2Fs10050-023-01191-5/MediaObjects/10050_2023_1191_Fig14_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R. L. Gluckstern and G. Breit, Proc. 2nd. Conf. on reactions between complex nuclei, Gatlinburg, 1960, ed. A. Zucker, E. C. Halbert and F. J. Howard (Wiley, NY, 1960).
K. Bethge, Ann Rev. Nucl. Sci. 20, 255 (1970)
J. Cook, Nucl. Phys. A 375, 238 (1982)
G.R. Satchler, W.G. Love, Phys. Rep. 55, 183 (1979)
N. Keeley et al., Nucl. Phys. A 571, 326 (1994). (and references therein)
M.A. Nagarajan, C.C. Mahaux, G.R. Satchler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1136 (1985)
G.R. Satchler, Phys. Rep. 199, 147 (1991)
A.M. Sanchez-Benitez et al., Nucl. Phys. A 803, 30 (2008)
D. Escrig et al., Nucl. Phys. A 792, 2 (2007)
J.P. Fernandez-Garcia et al., PRL 110, 142701 (2013)
M.A. Tiede, D.E. Trcka, K.W. Kemper, Phys. Rev. C 44, 1698 (1991)
A. Pakou et al., Phys. Lett. B 556, 21 (2003)
R. Navarro-Perez, J. Lei, Phys. Lett. B 795, 200 (2019)
J.M. Figueira et al., Phys. Rev. C 81, 024613 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.81.024613
P.D. Clark et al., Nucl. Phys. A 352, 267 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(81)90380-8
A.E. Woodard et al., Nucl. Phys. A 873, 17 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2011.10.003
L.C. Chamon et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 5218 (1997)
L.C. Chamon, D. Pereira, M.S. Hussein, Phys. Rev. C 58, 576 (1998)
L.C. Chamon, Nucl. Phys. A 787, 198c (2007)
L.C. Chamon, B.V. Carlson, L.R. Gasques, Comp. Phys. Comm. 267, 108061 (2021)
B.V. Carlson, D. Hirata, Phys. Rev. C 62, 054310 (2000)
P.R. Christensen, A. Berinde, I. Neamu, N. Scintei, Nucl. Phys. A 129, 337 (1969)
J.H. Barker, J.C. Hiebert, Phys. Rev. C 4, 2256 (1971)
P. Schwandt et al., Phys. Rev. C 24, 1522 (1981)
I.J. Thompson, Comput. Phys. Rep. 7, 167 (1988)
M.A.G. Alvarez et al., Nucl. Phys. A 723, 93 (2003)
M.A.G. Alvarez, N. Alamanos, L.C. Chamon, M.S. Hussein, Nucl. Phys. A 753, 83 (2005)
J.P. Fernández-García, M. Rodríguez-Gallardo, M.A.G. Alvarez, A.M. Moro, Nucl. Phys. A 840, 19 (2010)
J.P. Fernández-García, M.A.G. Alvarez, L.C. Chamon, Phys. Rev. C 92, 014604 (2015)
J.P. Fernández-García, M.A.G. Alvarez, A.M. Moroa, M. Rodríguez-Gallardo, Phys. Lett. B 693, 310 (2010)
M.A.G. Alvarez et al., Phys. Rev. C 100, 064602 (2019)
M.A.G. Alvarez et al., Phys. Rev. C 103, 054614 (2021)
J. Cook, K.W. Kemper, M.F. Vineyard, Phys. Rev. C 26, 486 (1982)
Y. Sakuragi, Phys. Rev. C 35, 2161 (1987)
D. Abriola et al., Phys. Rev. C 39, 546 (1989)
D. Abriola et al., Phys. Rev. C 46, 244 (1992)
L. Fimiani et al., Phys. Rev. C 86, 044607 (2012)
H. Kumawat et al., Phys. Rev. C 78, 044617 (2008)
N.N. Deshmukh et al., Phys. Rev. C 83, 024607 (2011)
A.M.M. Maciel et al., Phys. Rev. C 59, 2103 (1999)
S. Santra et al., Phys. Rev. C 83, 034616 (2011)
S. Dubey et al., Phys. Rev. C 89, 014610 (2014)
C. Mahaux, H. Ngô, G.R. Satchler, Nucl. Phys. A 449, 354 (1986)
G.R. Kelly et al., Phys. Rev. C 63, 024601 (2000)
J.J. Kolata, E.F. Aguilera, Phys. Rev. C 79, 027603 (2009)
E.F. Aguilera et al., Phys. Rev. C 83, 021601 (2011)
C.Y. Wong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 766 (1973)
A. Barioni et al., Phys. Rev. C 84, 014603 (2011). (see references therein)
K. Kundalia, D. Gupta, Sk.M. Ali et al., Phys. Lett. B 833, 137294 (2022)
S. Raman, C.W. Nestor Jr., P. Tikkanen, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 78, 1 (2001)
T. Kibedi, R.H. Spear, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 80, 35 (2002)
Acknowledgements
This research has been funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Grant No. AP19175991). A.A.Ibraheem express his appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia, for funding this work through research groups program under grant of number R.G.P.2/4/44. Sh. H. would like to thank Prof. K. Rusek for fruitful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Alexis Diaz-Torres
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kurmanaliyev, Z., Mauyey, B., Ibraheem, A.A. et al. Behavior of 6Li + 144Sm elastic and inelastic angular distributions in the region of the Coulomb barrier. Eur. Phys. J. A 59, 282 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01191-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01191-5