Abstract
The ratios of the differential and angle-integrated cross sections for the 10B(n, α)7Li reaction (including (n, α), (n, α0) and (n, α1)) to the 6Li(n, t)4He reaction are obtained by re-analyzing our previous measurement data to avoid the uncertainty of the neutron fluences. Present results, with much smaller uncertainties and covering a large neutron energy region from 1.0 eV to several MeV, will be useful in the improvement of the neutron cross section standards. The normalized ratios of the differential and angle-integrated cross sections are in good agreement with the ratios calculated from the evaluation data in the ENDF/B-VIII.0 and JEFF-3.3 libraries. In the neutron energy region from 1.0 to 1.0 keV, the relative uncertainties of the present ratios are significantly reduced compared with those of our previous results of both the 10B(n, α)7Li and the 6Li(n, t)4He reactions. New measurements for the 10B(n, α)7Li reaction with higher precision are demanded, especially in the neutron energy region higher than 0.5 MeV where the relative uncertainties of the present ratios are dominated by those of the previous 10B(n, α)7Li cross sections which are larger than those of the 6Li(n, t)4He cross sections.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability statement
This manuscript has associated data in a data repository [Authors’ comment: The final results are presented in Appendix A in this paper. The origin data contains binary data of the signal waveforms from the detectors and it is too big to upload or deliver.]
References
A.D. Carlson et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 148, 143 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2018.02.002
H. Jiang et al., Chin. Phys. C 43, 124002 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/43/12/124002
H. Bai et al., Chin. Phys. C 44, 014003 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/44/1/014003
B. He et al., Chin. Phys. C 41, 016104 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/41/1/016104
M.G. Sowerby et al., J. Nucl. Energy 24, 323 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3107(70)90051-1
S.J. Friesenhahn, in Conference on Nuclear Cross-Section and Technology, Washington, vol 1 (1975), p. 232
C. Bastian, IAEA technical report, Vienna, no. 335, p. 118 (1984). http://www-nds.iaea.org/publications/tecdocs/iaea-tecdoc-0335/. Accessed 10 Jan 2023
S. Amaducci et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 55, 120 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12802-7
D.A. Brown et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 148, 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2018.02.001
JEFF-3.3. https://www.oecd-nea.org/dbdata/jeff/jeff33/index.html. Accessed 10 Jan 2023
Acknowledgements
The authors are indebted to Dr. A. D. Carlson from National Institute of Standards and Technology of USA for his inspiration and helpful discussions. This work is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 12075008) and the Key Laboratory of Nuclear Data foundation (6142A08200103).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Aurora Tumino.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, J., Bai, H., Jiang, H. et al. Ratios of the cross sections for the 10B(n, α)7Li reaction to the 6Li(n, t)4He reaction. Eur. Phys. J. A 59, 106 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-00992-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-00992-y